Package: libghc6-plugins-dev
Version: 0.9.10-1
Followup-For: Bug #372840
In this version, by September the issue is still there.
m.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bi
Package: firefox-sage
Version: 1.3.6-1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
When building 'firefox-sage' in a clean 'unstable' chroot,
I get the following error:
touch configure-stamp
dh_testdir
mkdir -p temp
unzip -o -d temp *.xpi
/bin/sh: unzip: command not found
make: *** [build-stamp] Error 127
Ple
Package: libnet-lite-ftp-perl
Version: 0.47-1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
When building 'libnet-lite-ftp-perl' in a clean 'unstable' chroot,
I get the following error:
# Tried to use 'Net::Lite::FTP'.
# Error: Can't locate Net/SSLeay/Handle.pm in @INC (@INC contains:
/libnet-lite-ftp-
Package: libfile-copy-recursive-perl
Version: 0.27-1
Severity: serious
When building 'libfile-copy-recursive-perl' in a clean unstable chroot,
I get the following error:
make[1]: Entering directory `/libfile-copy-recursive-perl-0.27'
cp ._Recursive.pm blib/lib/File/Copy/._Recursive.pm
cp Recursiv
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> tags 385759 sid
Bug#385759: qgis: not installable in sid
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sid
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance
Your message dated Mon, 11 Sep 2006 21:57:12 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#387070: reportbug: reportbug crashes
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> forcemerge 386737 387070
Bug#386737: crashs on startup with syntax error in /usr/bin/reportbug
Bug#387070: reportbug: reportbug crashes
Bug#386644: reportbug 3.29.4 syntax error
Bug#386866: reportbug: syntax error line 483
Forcibly Merged 386644 386737
Package: tla-load-dirs
Version: 20040801-1.lord
Severity: grave
Hi,
tla_load_dirs fails upon any import, which makes this package
mostly useless.
manoj
__> tla_load_dirs ../fvwm-2.5.18
TLACMD: tla
close failed: [Errno 9] Bad file descriptor
close failed: [Errno 9] Bad file de
When I run kcmshell displayconfig I get a message that says (I wish it let me cut and past :) )
The module Display could not be loaded.
The diagnostics is:
Possible reasons:
* An error occurred during your last KDE upgrade leaving an orphaned control module
* You have old third party modul
Package: reportbug
Version: 3.29.4
Severity: Grave
__> reportbug
File "/usr/bin//reportbug", line 485
if email_addy != def_email:
^
SyntaxError: invalid syntax
This makes the package unuseable (even breaks debian-bug.el)
manoj
--
Home on the Range was originally writ
Package: libgalago
Version: 0.3.3-4
Severity: serious
Tags: sid
The current version of libgalago is failing to build on all architectures
for the libdbus ABI transition, because it uses functions which seem to no
longer be present in libdbus:
[...]
alpha-linux-gnu-gcc -Wall -g -O2 -Wall -o .libs/
Your message dated Mon, 11 Sep 2006 19:17:11 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#380014: fixed in tellico 1.2.2-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Josip Rodin wrote:
> Well, duh. What's the problem? Any error messages? The package does
> actually seem to build for me and a dozen build daemons...
Linking maildirkwtest
cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I. -g -Wall -O2 -Wall -I./.. -I.. -c maildirkw.c
Linking maildirkw
/usr/lib/libfam.a(fam.o): I
Your message dated Mon, 11 Sep 2006 18:47:09 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#384929: fixed in yakuake 2.7.5-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
On Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 03:27:59AM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > > > > cdbs runs dh_fixperms with the parameters you tell it. The
> > > > > problem is in your rules file.
> > > >
> > > > As you can see for yourself, maildrop rules file simply says:
> > > >
> > > > DEB_FIXPERMS_EXCLUDE := lock
Your message dated Mon, 11 Sep 2006 18:32:09 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#386164: fixed in wpasupplicant 0.5.5-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
On Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 03:52:13AM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > Well, duh. What's the problem? Any error messages? The package does
> > actually seem to build for me and a dozen build daemons...
>
> Linking maildirkwtest
> cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I. -g -Wall -O2 -Wall -I./.. -I.. -c
Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 01:21:38AM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > > > cdbs runs dh_fixperms with the parameters you tell it. The
> > > > problem is in your rules file.
> > >
> > > As you can see for yourself, maildrop rules file simply says:
> > >
> > > DEB_FIXPERMS_EXCLUD
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 386707 serious
Bug#386707: debmirror: Missing dependency on libdigest-sha1-perl
Severity set to `serious' from `normal'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(ad
Package: xchat
Version: 2.6.4-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
xchat depends on having an identical version of xchat-common, which is
fine for regular uploads but breaks on binary-only NMUs, such as the one
that just happened for the libdbus-1-3 transition. To correct thi
On Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 01:21:38AM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > > cdbs runs dh_fixperms with the parameters you tell it. The problem
> > > is in your rules file.
> >
> > As you can see for yourself, maildrop rules file simply says:
> >
> > DEB_FIXPERMS_EXCLUDE := lockmail.maildrop maildrop
>
Your message dated Mon, 11 Sep 2006 16:47:18 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#380006: fixed in gal0.x 0.24-8
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Hi,
On Mon, Sep 11, 2006 at 05:42:12PM +0300, Riku Voipio wrote:
> > we need to fix this in order to not break partial upgrades from sarge
> > (if a user just upgrades libwbxml2 but not libsyncml0, the opensync
> > syncml plugin would break on their system)
>
> This is not an issue since libsyncm
Josip Rodin wrote:
> > cdbs runs dh_fixperms with the parameters you tell it. The problem
> > is in your rules file.
>
> As you can see for yourself, maildrop rules file simply says:
>
> DEB_FIXPERMS_EXCLUDE := lockmail.maildrop maildrop
>
> How should this be reformatted to actually work properly
On Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 12:59:20AM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > > retitle 386952 cdbs debhelper rules runs dh_fixperms with -X for
> > > setuid/setgid binaries, wrongly thinking it is an exact match
>
> cdbs runs dh_fixperms with the parameters you tell it. The problem is
> in your rules f
Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> > retitle 386952 cdbs debhelper rules runs dh_fixperms with -X for
> > setuid/setgid binaries, wrongly thinking it is an exact match
cdbs runs dh_fixperms with the parameters you tell it. The problem is
in your rules file.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 327339 + fixed
Bug#327339: CAN-2005-2860: Arbitrary webcode injection through XSS
vulnerability via Server field of a HTTP response header
Tags were: security
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assist
Your message dated Tue, 12 Sep 2006 00:44:59 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed in NMU of nikto 1.35-1.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your res
Your message dated Mon, 11 Sep 2006 14:52:14 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#386971: fixed in swt-gtk 3.2-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Mon, 11 Sep 2006 14:52:14 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#386971: fixed in swt-gtk 3.2-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 376551 mysql-server-5.0
Bug#376551: Upgrade 4.1->5.0: INSERT DELAYED and varchar issue
Bug reassigned from package `mysql-server-4.1' to `mysql-server-5.0'.
> forcemerge 376551 386337
Bug#376551: Upgrade 4.1->5.0: INSERT DELAYED and varchar is
reassign 386952 cdbs
retitle 386952 cdbs debhelper rules runs dh_fixperms with -X for setuid/setgid
binaries, wrongly thinking it is an exact match
thanks
On Mon, Sep 11, 2006 at 03:34:06PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> > Well, first of all, I just took a wild guess that it could be fixperms
> > invo
severity 386958 grave
tags 386958 sarge
thanks
I don't think that a failure to fetch your mail constitutes "serious
data loss". You can still use your browser :-/
I'll see about preparing an upload for stable-proposed-updates, but I
understand the RMs don't much like putting new upstream versions
On Mon, Sep 11, 2006 at 08:45:06PM +0200, Bernd Schubert wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 19, 2006 at 04:23:50PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
> > > Maybe it's better to fix it via proposed-updates and let the SRM team
> > > decide.
> > This has happened now, and is r3. It's regrettable that we couldn't ge
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 386958 grave
Bug#386958: gotmail: Cannot get mail
Severity set to `grave' from `critical'
> tags 386958 sarge
Bug#386958: gotmail: Cannot get mail
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sarge
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me
Your message dated Mon, 11 Sep 2006 14:50:50 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#386981: fixed in libwww-indexparser-perl 0.4-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the cas
Hello:
I upgraded to 0.100-1 in unstable and got a lot of problems, mostly
described in the mail dated on Fri, 18 Aug 2006 19:38:34 +0200.
Returning to 0.98-2 solved the problem.
--
Raúl Sánchez Siles
->Proud Debian user<-
Linux registered user #416098
pgpC86ZW2zgRi.pgp
Des
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 386952 cdbs
Bug#386952: dh_install installs files not as root when sudo is involved
Bug reassigned from package `debhelper' to `cdbs'.
> retitle 386952 cdbs debhelper rules runs dh_fixperms with -X for
> setuid/setgid binaries, wrongly thinki
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21
> reopen 384506
Bug#384506: libopensync-plugin-evolution2: FTBFS: checking for EPACKAGE...
configure: error: No compatible evolution-data-server was found
'reopen' is deprecated when a
Your message dated Mon, 11 Sep 2006 14:05:04 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Investigations
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to r
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 385295 + patch
Bug#385295: siege segfaults
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
tags 385295 + patch
thanks
hi,
Christian Aichinger took some time to investigate the second segfault too, see
attached patch.
bye,
- michael
--- http.c.orig 2006-09-11 22:37:21.0 +0200
+++ http.c 2006-09-11 22:37:54.0 +0200
@@ -292,7 +292,7 @@
while(TRUE){
x
> security: policydb version 21 does not match my version range 15-20
> I've looked around a bit, and I think this is a kernel issue. The
> current kernels in unstable simply don't know about version 21 and
> cannot handle it.
Yes, 2.6.17 will not support a version 21 policy file - even 2.6.18rc6
Your message dated Mon, 11 Sep 2006 22:27:12 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#386987: kmail: Displays warning messages for cachedimap
since last update lose emails
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 386928 minor
Bug#386928: policydb version 21 does not match my version range 15-20
Severity set to `minor' from `grave'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(ad
Slaven wrote:
> Just to make this clear: are you saying that if you fetch sources from
> upstream and compile them on your machine you'll get working maxima
> and this bug won't appear?
Honestly I haven't tried to compile clean sources yet, as the
compilation itself is quite lengthy on my machine.
On Sat, Sep 09, 2006 at 12:57:13PM +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> I'm a bit stomped on the bug, though; the issue seems to be that
> qUncompress() returns QByteArray* instead of QByteArray, which g++ refuses to
> make a new QByteArray out of. The relevant snippet is this one:
>
> 11194
On 9/11/06, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
> The upload of swt-gtk (3.2-1+b1) by the Build Daemon is definitely a bug.
> swt-gtk (3.2-1+b1) unstable; urgency=low
> * Binary-only non-maintainer upload for i386; no source changes.
> * Rebuild against libgcj7-0
> -- Debian/i386 B
Just a "me too" report. I just updated my machine with the testing
distribution and got the following.
$ man gcc
man: warning: /usr/share/man/man1/gcc.1.gz is a dangling symlink
No manual entry for gcc
See 'man 7 undocumented' for help when manual pages are not available.
gcc-doc depends on gc
On Fri, Sep 08, 2006 at 03:32:25PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 08, 2006 at 03:20:58PM +0200, Hans Ekbrand wrote:
> > Hi!
>
> Hi, please make sure you CC debian-kernel too on issues like this.
Bug #366620 is against linux-image-2.6.16-2-powerpc, my post was a
follow up to [EMAIL PROTEC
Josip Rodin wrote:
> Well, first of all, I just took a wild guess that it could be fixperms
> involved, because of the background (there's no problem under fakeroot,
> only with sudo). Any idea about that? Why would dh_install under sudo
> put a file in the package tree that isn't owned by root?
B
Your message dated Mon, 11 Sep 2006 11:47:18 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#386917: fixed in classpath 2:0.92-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Mon, 11 Sep 2006 11:47:18 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#386940: fixed in classpath 2:0.92-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Mon, 11 Sep 2006 11:47:18 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#386919: fixed in classpath 2:0.92-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Mon, 11 Sep 2006 11:47:18 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#386919: fixed in classpath 2:0.92-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Mon, 11 Sep 2006 11:47:18 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#386917: fixed in classpath 2:0.92-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
On Mon, Sep 11, 2006 at 10:09:01AM -0600, Shaun Jackman wrote:
> Package: swt-gtk
> Version: 3.2-1+b1
> Severity: serious
> Tags: pending
> On 9/9/06, Amir Tabatabaei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >libswt-gtk-3.2-jni has been updated few days ago to (3.2-1+b1) but
> >libswt-gtk-3.2-java depends on
Package: eagle-usb
Followup-For: Bug #377326
eagle-usb 2.1.1.2 use some obsolete code.
A solution might be to use a newer version from the internet.
another solution might be to use module provied by kernel, since version
2.6.15/2.6.16.
kernel/drivers/usb/atm/ueagle-atm.ko
But, how does this mo
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 386971 swt-gtk
Bug#386971: libswt-gtk-3.2-java: Needs a rebuild since libswt-gtk-3.2-jni
3.2-1+b1 hit unstable
Bug reassigned from package `libswt-gtk-3.2-java' to `swt-gtk'.
> severity 386971 serious
Bug#386971: libswt-gtk-3.2-java: Needs a
> Version: 2.1.7-5
>
> On Sat, Aug 19, 2006 at 04:23:50PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
> > Maybe it's better to fix it via proposed-updates and let the SRM team
> > decide.
>
> This has happened now, and is r3. It's regrettable that we couldn't get it
> out in a DSA update, but it's at least don
On Mon, Sep 11, 2006 at 12:46:19PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> > Apparently something goes wrong with dh_install (and/or dh_fixperms) here.
> > The command that cdbs ran was simply "dh_install -pmaildrop".
>
> From a log of a build of your package (which is the minimum information
> you should suppl
# correcting myself
found 338638 3.0-20
thanks
Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I haven't had time to think about this and do any coding. But I believe
> it can only be solved by a upload *to*sarge*, because during etch
> upgrade there won't be a fallback maintainer script from a new ve
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # correcting myself
> found 338638 3.0-20
Bug#338638: tetex-base: dies when /usr/local/ read-only
Bug marked as found in version 3.0-20.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administr
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 386999 important
Bug#386999: initramfs-tools: update-initramfs fails in post-processing of
kernel update
Severity set to `important' from `critical'
> tags 386999 moreinfo
Bug#386999: initramfs-tools: update-initramfs fails in post-processing
severity 386999 important
tags 386999 moreinfo
stop user escalating severity
On Mon, Sep 11, 2006 at 11:04:00AM -0400, Peter D. St. Onge wrote:
> Package: initramfs-tools
> Version: 0.78
> Severity: critical
> Justification: breaks the whole system
works for most so i need more info.
> Kernel
n/sh: python2.3: command not found
> make: *** [python-build-stamp-2.3] Error 127
> **
> Build finished at 20060911-1204
> FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Apparently something goes wrong with dh_install (and/or dh_fixperms) here.
> The command that cdbs ran was simply "dh_install -pmaildrop".
From a log of a build of your package (which is the minimum information
you should supply when filing an RC bug on debhelper):
dh_fixperms -pmaildrop -X loc
Your message dated Mon, 11 Sep 2006 18:11:27 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Your message dated Mon, 11 Sep 2006 18:11:06 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Your message dated Mon, 11 Sep 2006 18:06:57 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Your message dated Mon, 11 Sep 2006 18:11:06 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Your message dated Mon, 11 Sep 2006 18:12:13 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Package: swt-gtk
Version: 3.2-1+b1
Severity: serious
Tags: pending
On 9/9/06, Amir Tabatabaei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
libswt-gtk-3.2-jni has been updated few days ago to (3.2-1+b1) but
libswt-gtk-3.2-java depends on (= 3.2-1) and so wants to remove this and
further packages like azureus.
Your message dated Mon, 11 Sep 2006 18:11:06 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Your message dated Mon, 11 Sep 2006 18:11:06 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Your message dated Mon, 11 Sep 2006 18:06:57 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Your message dated Mon, 11 Sep 2006 18:11:06 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Your message dated Mon, 11 Sep 2006 18:09:52 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Your message dated Mon, 11 Sep 2006 18:12:13 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Hi
This happens on my iBook G3 (ppc).
I couldn't get it to work even by disabling dh_strip altogether in
debian/rules. The compiled binary (before packaging) works in any case.
I'd say it's a reproducible bug.
Toby
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscrib
Your message dated Mon, 11 Sep 2006 08:17:27 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#386997: fixed in psycopg 1.1.21-10
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.78
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
Kernel updates give this result:
orca:/home/pete# apt-get -f install
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 1 not upgraded.
1 no
Hi,
So libwbxml2 changed the wbxml_conv_xml2wbxml symbol to
wbxml_conv_xml2wbxml_withlen without increasing the soname and now
the old wbxml_conv_xml2wbxml symbol is undefined in libsyncml0
I was delaying library rename until upstream changes ABI.. and
when it happened I didn't notice it :(
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
libsnmp-multi-perl not only misses a Build-Dependency on libsnmp-perl, but also
a Dependency.
Without libsnmp-perl installed, libsnmp-multi-perl won't work at all.
Thanks,
Jochen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
Co
Package: kmail
Version: 4:3.5.4-1
Severity: grave
Justification: make package nearly unusable with cachedimap and can
Since a recent update (I think it was from 3.5.3-something to
3.5.4-1), KMail now displays very annoying warning messages in the
style of
"Warning - Kontact:
Mails on the server
Your message dated Mon, 11 Sep 2006 16:20:44 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line [Pkg-xen-devel] Bug#385934: xen-hypervisor-3.0-i386:
Hypervisor reboots before starting Dom0
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
I've installed the build-deps needed for python-qt3 on
leisner.debian.org (arm developer box). Hopefully that will help get
to the bottom of the problem. Hassle me further if you need more stuff
on the machine.
Wookey
--
Aleph One Ltd, Bottisham, CAMBRIDGE, CB5 9BA, UK Tel +44 (0) 1223 811679
wo
Package: python-psycopg
Version: 1.1.21-9
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hey,
During import of psycopg, i have the following error:
>>> import psycopg
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "", line 1, in ?
ImportError: libpq.so.4: cannot open shared object file: No s
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 386299 + fixed-in-experimental
Bug#386299: Does not work at all in UTF locale
Tags were: fixed-in-experimental
Tags added: fixed-in-experimental
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system
clone 358342 -1
reassign -1 ftp.debian.org
severity -1 normal
retitle -1 RM -- RoM: obsolete kernel, FTBFS
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: libsnmp-multi-perl
Version: 2.1-2
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
When building 'libsnmp-multi-perl' in a clean 'unstable' chroot,
I get the following error:
/usr/bin/make test
make[1]: Entering directory `/libsnmp-multi-perl-2.1'
PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl "-Iblib/lib" "-Iblib/arch"
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 384306 grave
Bug#384306: libsyncml0: libsyncml needs to be rebuilt, depends on no longer
existing symbol
Severity set to `grave' from `important'
> reassign 384306 wbxml2
Bug#384306: libsyncml0: libsyncml needs to be rebuilt, depends on no lo
Package: prelink
Version: 0.0.20060712-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Prelink does indeed prelink, missing many binaries due to problems outside
its scope. However, it eventually fails with:
*** glibc detected *** free(): invalid pointer: 0xb7f9ac08 ***
Prelink failed w
Package: rdiff-backup
Version: 1.1.5-3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hello,
while trying to use rdiff-backup as :
rdiff-backup localdir otherdir
where:
-localdir is from the local filesystem
-otherdir is mounted as smbfs
I got this message and backtrace:
Making director
Your message dated Mon, 11 Sep 2006 14:28:31 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Fixed in upload of ekg2 20060911+1323-1 to
experimental]
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 386972 important
Bug#386972: Network failure on upgrade to 2.6.16
Severity set to `important' from `grave'
> tags 386972 moreinfo
Bug#386972: Network failure on upgrade to 2.6.16
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo
> stop
Stopping pr
Package: libwww-indexparser-perl
Version: 0.4-2
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
When building 'libwww-indexparser-perl' in a clean 'unstable' chroot,
I get the following error:
# Tried to use 'WWW::IndexParser'.
# Error: Can't locate LWP/UserAgent.pm in @INC (@INC contains: ../lib
/libwww
severity 386972 important
tags 386972 moreinfo
stop
On Mon, Sep 11, 2006 at 07:50:14AM -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> Package: linux-image-2.6.16-2-686-smp
> Version: 2.6.16-18
> Severity: grave
> Justification: causes debilitating loss of functionality
an DD should no not to escalate severity,
Your message dated Mon, 11 Sep 2006 06:32:56 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#347146: fixed in xlbiff 4.1-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
ion)
> gstcacasink.c:333: error: 'CACA_DITHERING_NONE' undeclared (first use in this
> function)
> gstcacasink.c: In function 'gst_cacasink_close':
> gstcacasink.c:345: warning: implicit declaration of function 'caca_end'
> make[4]: *** [libgstca
1 - 100 of 152 matches
Mail list logo
