On Mon, Sep 11, 2006 at 10:09:01AM -0600, Shaun Jackman wrote: > Package: swt-gtk > Version: 3.2-1+b1 > Severity: serious > Tags: pending
> On 9/9/06, Amir Tabatabaei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >libswt-gtk-3.2-jni has been updated few days ago to (3.2-1+b1) but > >libswt-gtk-3.2-java depends on (= 3.2-1) and so wants to remove this and > >further packages like azureus. There is no update for this package, > >neither in incoming nor buildd. Should I file a bug? > The upload of swt-gtk (3.2-1+b1) by the Build Daemon is definitely a bug. > swt-gtk (3.2-1+b1) unstable; urgency=low > * Binary-only non-maintainer upload for i386; no source changes. > * Rebuild against libgcj7-0 > -- Debian/i386 Build Daemon <buildd_i386-ninsei> Sun, 3 Sep 2006 > 19:12:54 -0700 > It uploaded libswt-gtk-3.2-jni (3.2-1+b1) but neglected to upload > libswt-gtk-3.2-java, which depends on libswt-gtk-3.2-jni (= 3.2-1), as > you have noted. I'll prepare an upload to fix this. It did not "neglect" to upload libswt-gtk-3.2-java; this is an arch: all package, and arch: all packages are not uploaded as part of binNMUs. Your package is not binNMU-safe as it stands, which would be good if it could be fixed given that binNMUing is now a quite common method for handling library transitions. Cheers, -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
