Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Debian Bug Tracking System):
> Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>
> Bug#376442: phpqladmin: many cross site scripting problems
> Tags were: security
> Tags added: upstream
Since I'm both the upstream and Debian GNU/Linux maintainer, I'd
very much like to fix t
Your message dated Mon, 21 Aug 2006 22:47:18 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#362641: fixed in xorg-server 1:1.1.1-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
tags 383030 +patch
thanks
Hi,
I think this patch fixes the first vulnerability reported. I'm CCing
debian-security as it would be good if somebody more seasoned in this
matters could take a look at it (please CC me).
--
Martín Ferrari
--- lib/http.cpp 2006-06-27 20:06:08.0 -0300
+++ lib/
g directory `/build/buildd/source-highlight-2.4/src'
> make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
> make[2]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/source-highlight-2.4'
> make[1]: *** [all] Error 2
> make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/source-highlight-2.4'
> make: *** [build-
Package: duplicity
Version: 0.4.2-2+sftp+amazons3+compression.2
Severity: serious
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~>python -V
Python 2.3.5
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~>duplicity
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/bin/duplicity", line 29, in ?
from duplicity import collections, commandline, diffdir, dup_
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> severity 383939 serious
Bug#383939: duplicity: Can not be installed in sid, broken deps.
Severity set to `serious' from `important'
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Pleas
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 383030 +patch
Bug#383030: multiple buffer overflows in libmusicbrainz
Tags were: security
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Deb
Hello Margarita,
Margarita Manterola wrote:
There's been no activity in Bug#378253 for a month now. Do you have any
news regarding this?
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=378253
If you have a package ready, I could sponsor the upload.
Yes, I have a package ready, but my spons
Your message dated Tue, 22 Aug 2006 01:57:38 -0300
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug fixed after blocking bug was fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Mon, 21 Aug 2006 20:47:03 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#367935: fixed in checkinstall 1.6.0-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Your message dated Tue, 22 Aug 2006 00:03:32 -0300
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed since (0.4.9-1)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibili
Your message dated Mon, 21 Aug 2006 20:17:12 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#383304: fixed in ruledispatch 0.5adev-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Mon, 21 Aug 2006 20:17:10 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#383302: fixed in pyprotocols 1.0a0dev-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
There's been no activity in Bug#378253 for a month now. Do you have any
news regarding this?
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=378253
If you have a package ready, I could sponsor the upload.
--
Love,
Marga
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
Em Sun, 20 Aug 2006 01:20:39 -0700
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu:
> Oi Gustavo,
Oi vorlon!
> turbojson and turbogears are arch: all packages and cannot be
> binNMUed. It also doesn't look like they need to be -- they depend
> on python (>= 2.4) | python2.4, which is satisfied just
Hi!
Georg Baum reopened bug 327618, since apparently libqt4-dev
stopped having the needed dependency on libpq-dev.
I've been checking the packages on snapshot.debian.org, and found out that
the dependency was dropped on 4.1.0-2, the relevant changelog entry seems
to be:
* debian/control: adde
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> retitle 382153 (ia64) libstdc++6-4.1-dev: needed when including
>
Bug#382153: odyssey_0.4-1(ia64/unstable): FTBFS: compiler errors
Changed Bug title.
>
End of message, stopping pr
Hi all,
Could someone give me some clue as to what programs in xbase-config are
segfaulting in this case? I'm digging in to the libxkb* code now, but my
guess is that this is a server configuration issue, in which case I need
your xorg.conf. Thanks!
- David Nusinow
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> close 312406 2.3.5-3
Bug#312406: gnome-core: Does not install in SID
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug#313219: gnome-vfs2 crashes in read_entire_file with HAL and Linux 2.4
Bug marked as fixed in version 2.3.5-
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> close 378571 0.58-3.1
Bug#378571: courier-authdaemon: socket directory should have 750 permissions
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug marked as fixed in version 0.58-3.1, send any further explanations to
Charle
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> close 364283 5.9-2.1
Bug#364283: udev: /dev/null not writable
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug#364235: thinkpad-base: bad interaction with udev 0.090-2: *all* devices end
up group 'thinkpad' (?!)
Bug marked a
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 382988 xbase-clients
Bug#382988: No keyboard layout available under kcontrol!
Bug reassigned from package `kcontrol' to `xbase-clients'.
> # breaks unrelated software, sorry pal :|
> severity 382988 critical
Bug#382988: No keyboard layout avai
Your message dated Mon, 21 Aug 2006 19:56:22 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Security support for woody has ended
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Mon, 21 Aug 2006 20:01:43 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Support for 2.4 kernels is being dropped
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Your message dated Mon, 21 Aug 2006 19:59:13 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Security support for woody has ended
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Mon, 21 Aug 2006 19:54:51 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Security support for woody has ended
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Maximiliano Curia wrote:
> I could even reproduce this in an amd64, with an ATI 9250 video card. But it
> seems to be a random problem.
I put a ATI Fire X2 into the system, switched to xorgs ati driver and
I'm still having the very same problem which occurs for every launch of
xine; it's not usab
tags 384006 - unreproducible
thanks,
I couldn't get the same output you posted, but after doing severals
fullscreen, hide/show controls I got:
This is xine (X11 gui) - a free video player v0.99.5cvs.
(c) 2000-2004 The xine Team.
X Error of failed request: BadWindow (invalid Window parameter)
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> retitle 368972 libgl1-mesa-directfb-dev should not provide libgl-dev
Bug#368972: libgl1-mesa-directfb-dev: missing GL/glx.h
Changed Bug title.
>
End of message, stopping processing h
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> retitle 381389 dh_python doesn't fill Python-Version with the correct version
Bug#381389: smart-notifier: compilation fails with SyntaxError on
@dbus.service.signal(UD_INTERFACE)
Cha
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 383759 normal
Bug#383759: libmysqlclient15off needs at least pentium cpu
Severity set to `normal' from `serious'
> stop
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrat
On Monday 21 August 2006 21:10, you wrote:
> Yes. If it's repeatable then we could exclude that you have a hardware
> problem with random data corruptions (disk, cable, memory, etc).
> Similar happened before.
Looks like I made a mistake somehow while _creating_ the md5sum file.
It turns out the f
Your message dated Mon, 21 Aug 2006 18:57:02 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Package removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 384006 - unreproducible
Bug#384006: xine-ui: fails to start
Tags were: unreproducible
Tags removed: unreproducible
> thanks,
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administra
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 383759 libmysqlclient15off needs at least pentium cpu
Bug#383759: exim4-daemon-heavy: "illegal instruction" when executing on 100 MHz
Cyrix CPU
Changed Bug title.
> tags 383759 + confirmed wontfix upstream
Bug#383759: libmysqlclient15off needs
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
i just installed tha latest Version: 0.097-2 and everything works
fine in my debian sid sytem with kernel 2.6.15.2-686.it seems it is fixed.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http:/
retitle 383759 libmysqlclient15off needs at least pentium cpu
tags 383759 + confirmed wontfix upstream
forwarded 383759 http://bugs.mysql.com/bug.php?id=21765
stop
Hello Yavor
Thanks a lot for your work on the backtraces, I guess the last one cleared
the issue:
On 2006-08-21 Yavor Doganov wrote:
On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 12:42:03AM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le mercredi 16 ao�t 2006 � 11:34 +0200, Brian Sutherland a �crit :
> > smart-notifier has XS-Python-Version set to 2.4 but the binary
> > package gets Python-Version "current" if built with python2.4 as the
> > default python.
> >
Your message dated Mon, 21 Aug 2006 20:17:09 -0300
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug closed in version 6.0.2-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your resp
Package: etherconf
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
etherconf has issues and overwrite the settings from
udeb netcfg.
It does not set the default host name to 127.0.1.1,
fill /etc/resolv.conf with garbage,
overwrite netcfg /etc/hosts, fails to apply chanages
to /etc/network/
--
Martín Ferrari
Hi,
I think I could fix the alignment errors. I had to change various
things, as the code was totally unaware of alignment problems, and I
really doubt that this ever worked on archs where correct alignment is
mandatory.
Please, look at it, as it changes the SHA1 code (and downgrades
performance
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 380757 serious
Bug#380757: Python transition (#2): you are building a private python module !
Severity set to `serious' from `important'
> retitle 380757 uninstallable because of python transition
Bug#380757: Python transition (#2): you are bu
Le mercredi 16 août 2006 à 11:34 +0200, Brian Sutherland a écrit :
> smart-notifier has XS-Python-Version set to 2.4 but the binary
> package gets Python-Version "current" if built with python2.4 as the
> default python.
>
> In my tests with python2.3 as the default, Python-Version is set to 2.4.
Package: freeloader
Version: 0.3-5
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
# apt-get install freeloader
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
[snip]
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
freeloader: Depends: python (< 2.4) but 2.4.3
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> tags 384051 + moreinfo
Bug#384051: ekiga: Ekiga hangs up (process sleeping) when selecting the sound
manager
Tags were: unreproducible
Tags added: moreinfo
>
End of message, stoppin
Your message dated Mon, 21 Aug 2006 14:19:01 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#383746: fixed in qof 0.7.0-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
I forgot to mention that both Damián Viano and Maximiliano Curia played a
very significant role into finding out what the problem was.
Also, this was a very tricky problem to find. For the record, when weird
bugs turn up in a particular architecture, check that gcc is not
complaining about "impli
Package: kopete
Version: 4:3.5.4-2
Severity: critical
The latest version of kopete regulary hangs the whole system.
I don't know how to reproduce this bug, but it appears randomly every few
days.
If it happens, kde hangs completely, leaving the user unable to switch to a
different terminal or ev
[Holger Levsen]
> Good to hear / have this documented here. So do need,
> debian-edu-config in etch at the moment or can this package be
> removed (esp. from the radar of people working on releasing etch in
> time..)?
Well, I would like to have all the packages we have on the CD pulled
from etch,
Package: jikes-gij
Severity: serious
Version: 1:1.22-4
Hi
Your package is not installable as it depends on libgcj6-jar | libgcj6-common
(< 4.0.2-6) | libgcj5-common | libgcj4-common | libgcj4 (< 1:3.3.4-4) |
libgcj3 | libgcj2, none of which are available in unstable anymore. You might
want to add
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> close 382694 2.2.5-4.1
Bug#382694: libnjb: FTBFS with sudo as gain-root command
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug marked as fixed in version
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 382465
Bug#382465: FTBFS on arm, sparc, ia64, hppa
'reopen' is deprecated when a bug has been closed with a version;
use 'found' or 'submitter' as appropriate instead.
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> tags 382465 +patch
Bug#382465: FTBFS
reopen 382465
tags 382465 +patch
thanks
Hi, I could fix the FTBFS in ia64, which was caused by a segmentation
fault in the command line processing, because there was missing a
function prototype and gcc used a generic one which truncated a
pointer. I include the patch to fix it.
Still, I have fo
thanks! :)
pgpuPn7EfD13g.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hola Neil Williams!
> Please can you run this simple series (on all affected boxes):
> date -d"1995-03-26 06:00:00.0 +" +"%H %Z"
> date -u -d"1995-03-26 06:00:00.0 +" +"%H %Z"
> date -d"1995-03-26 06:00:00.0 +0500" +"%H %Z"
> date -u -d"1995-03-26 06:00:00.0
Hi,
Ok vtk 5 is not yet in sid so I have tested version 4.4.2-10.
IMHO you can close this bug.
BTW, I do hope vtk5 respects the python policy ;)
XAvier.
> OK,
> I have just successfully built vtk 5.0.1
> in a pbuilder environment.
>
> Perhaps you were trying vtk 4.4.2 and filed
> a duplicate of b
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 312406
Bug#312406: gnome-core: Does not install in SID
'reopen' is deprecated when a bug has been closed with a version;
use 'found' or 'submitter' as appropriate instead.
Bug#313219: gnome-vfs2 crashes in read_entire_file with HAL and Linux 2.4
Frank, thanks for the response!
| > Package: dvipsk-ja
| > Version: 5.95a+jp1.7a-1
| > Severity: grave
| > dvips: ! Couldn't find header file texnansi.enc
| > bash$
| [...]
| > ii tetex-base3.0-20 Basic library f
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> Tags 371865 + patch
Bug#371865: diacanvas2_0.14.4-1(ia64/unstable): FTBFS: gtk-doc failure
Tags were: help unreproducible
Tags added: patch
> Thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system admini
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 384051 +unreproducible +moreinfo
Unknown tag/s: +moreinfo.
Recognized are: patch wontfix moreinfo unreproducible fixed potato woody sid
help security upstream pending sarge sarge-ignore experimental d-i confirmed
ipv6 lfs fixed-in-experimental fi
On Mon, 21 Aug 2006, Szakacsits Szabolcs wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Aug 2006, Frans Pop wrote:
> > On Monday 21 August 2006 19:31, you wrote:
> > > Would it be possible to send the vista metadata image
> >
> > Available from: http://people.debian.org/~fjp/ntfsmeta.img.bz2
> >
> > > and tell us at what
tags 384051 +unreproducible +moreinfo
thanks,
Hello,
I can't reproduce the bug, this may be due to a bug already fixed in sid in a
particular dependency.
If the bug is still reproducible in your system, please attach the output of a
strace to the bug. Anyway as the bug is only present in your
Hi,
On Monday 21 August 2006 20:37, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> None from my point of view, at least. I care, and try to move as much
> configuration as possible into debconf preseeding. But I do not
> consider it release critical for debian-edu. We will release a new
> version independently o
Tags 371865 + patch
Thanks
Hi!
I've tracked down this problem. It was due to a lack of an include in
doc/ref/diacanvas2.types, which made gcc do an "implicit cast" from GType
to int, thus losing precision.
The patch is extremely simple, and makes this problem go away.
Please consider including
Package: python-wxglade
Version: 0.4.1-1
Severity: grave
Hello,
thanks for packaging wxglade.
After upgrading to the latest sid, wxglade fails looking for things in
/usr/lib/python2.3:
$ wxglade
python: can't open file '/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/wxglade/wxglade.py':
[Errno 2] No such fi
Robert Millan wrote:
>
> It seems that DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=nostrip didn't suffice. Perhaps
> debian/rules doesn't export a CFLAGS with "-g" ?
Of course you are right. Here's another attempt:
(gdb) r -C /dev/null -bV
Starting program: /usr/sbin/exim4 -C /dev/null -bV
[Thread debugging using libth
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 383759 libmysqlclient15off
Bug#383759: exim4-daemon-heavy: "illegal instruction" when executing on 100 MHz
Cyrix CPU
Bug reassigned from package `exim4-daemon-heavy' to `libmysqlclient15off'.
> stop
Stopping processing here.
Please contact m
On Mon, 21 Aug 2006, Holger Levsen wrote:
> Hi Santiago,
>
> On Saturday 19 August 2006 20:44, you wrote:
> > I know it is easy to fix, but there are several ways to fix it.
> > For example: Should perhaps /usr/local/etc be a symlink to /etc?
>
> Why should it (point somewhere outside /usr/local
On Mon, 21 Aug 2006, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Monday 21 August 2006 19:31, you wrote:
> > Would it be possible to send the vista metadata image
>
> Available from: http://people.debian.org/~fjp/ntfsmeta.img.bz2
>
> > and tell us at what size you resize? Thanks.
>
> Mostly at 9GB but 12GB also fail
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> tags 383746 + patch
Bug#383746: qof: FTBFS on hppa, sparc and m68k: date test failures
Tags were: upstream
Tags added: patch
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please conta
This patch tests OK using all the timezone specifiers that I can find (80).
http://www.timeanddate.com/library/abbreviations/timezones/
I'll prepare 0.7.0-2 and hopefully my sponsor can arrange an upload to
close this bug.
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.data-freedom.org/
http://www.
On Mon, 21 Aug 2006, Frans Pop wrote:
> > Are the files the same for which the checksums differ if you resize
> > again at the exact same size?
>
> Or do you mean for me to retry again starting from the situation _before_
> resizing?
Yes. If it's repeatable then we could exclude that you have a
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> tags 342246 + pending
Bug#342246: [ia64 headers] arch/ia64/modules.lds: No such file or directory
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> tags 383620 + pending
Bug#383620: fn k
On Mon, Aug 14, 2006 at 02:01:45AM -0400, Filipus Klutiero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Package: mozilla-cascades
> Severity: serious
>
> mozilla-cascades depends on mozilla-browser, which is scheduled to be
> removed from Etch. You should most likely request removal from
> ftp-master.
Actually,
On Monday 21 August 2006 19:31, you wrote:
> Would it be possible to send the vista metadata image
Available from: http://people.debian.org/~fjp/ntfsmeta.img.bz2
> and tell us at what size you resize? Thanks.
Mostly at 9GB but 12GB also fails.
> Just some quick questions: do you always used the
[Holger Levsen]
> Is it correct, that atm we "don't care" because (for the release) we
> can take debian-edu-config from our archive, not debians?!
None from my point of view, at least. I care, and try to move as much
configuration as possible into debconf preseeding. But I do not
consider it re
Hi Santiago,
On Saturday 19 August 2006 20:44, you wrote:
> I know it is easy to fix, but there are several ways to fix it.
> For example: Should perhaps /usr/local/etc be a symlink to /etc?
Why should it (point somewhere outside /usr/local)?
regards,
Holger
pgplv01PQGFpY.pgp
Descrip
Hi,
this bug has neither seen action nor traffic in the recent past. It's RC and
marked "sarge-ignore", but etch is coming... ;-)
Is it correct, that atm we "don't care" because (for the release) we can take
debian-edu-config from our archive, not debians?! And we're not integrated
into the ma
On Mon, 21 Aug 2006, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Monday 21 August 2006 16:40, Szakacsits Szabolcs wrote:
> > If a checksum doesn't match (except a few metadata files) then you've
> > found an ntfsresize problem.
>
> Attached is the result of the md5sum check straight after running
> ntfsresize (failur
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> reopen 361846
Bug#361846: non-free license for core.schema
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> reassign 361846 slapd
Bug#361846: non-free license for core.schema
Bug reassigned f
Thanks to the bug trace reports and the feedback on the date command, I
now have a simple way of testing for this bug on any system, independent
of the timezone setting. (Basically, export TZ when running test-date
manually.)
I hope to be able to fix this bug very soon.
Thanks for the help.
--
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> tags 383746 - help
Bug#383746: qof: FTBFS on hppa, sparc and m68k: date test failures
Tags were: upstream help
Tags removed: help
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please
Bram,
In the manual-copyright help toic, the text states that the user manual
and reference manual are licensed under the Open Publication License[0]
(which is also referred to in the subsequent frombook topic). The
URL[1] listed under manual-copyright points to the Open Content License
(which co
Your message dated Mon, 21 Aug 2006 19:36:54 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#384006: Can't reproduce this bug
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
On Mon, 21 Aug 2006, Szakacsits Szabolcs wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Aug 2006, Frans Pop wrote:
> > On Monday 21 August 2006 16:40, Szakacsits Szabolcs wrote:
> > > If a checksum doesn't match (except a few metadata files) then you've
> > > found an ntfsresize problem.
> >
> > Attached is the result of t
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> tags 383746 + upstream
Bug#383746: qof: FTBFS on hppa, sparc and m68k: date test failures
Tags were: help
Tags added: upstream
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please con
On Mon, 21 Aug 2006, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Monday 21 August 2006 16:40, Szakacsits Szabolcs wrote:
> > If a checksum doesn't match (except a few metadata files) then you've
> > found an ntfsresize problem.
>
> Attached is the result of the md5sum check straight after running
> ntfsresize (failur
Hi Margarita,
The diff is OK, please proceed.
Thanks,
Gregory
+++ Margarita Manterola [20/08/06 00:03 -0300]:
> tags 382260 pending
> thanks
>
> I submitted this bug 10 days ago, and sablevm has been failing in hppa for
> 193 days now. Therefore, I'm going to upload an NMU that includes the
>
Package: python-notify
Version: 0.1.0-1
Severity: grave
python-notify 0.1.0-1 depends on python (<< 2.4), a version which is no
longer available in Unstable.
debian/pyversions lists only "2.3", but simply rebuilding on a system
with python 2.4.3-11 created a package depending on python (>= 2.4).
On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 04:42:04PM +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-08-21 at 16:22 +0200, Eric Van Buggenhaut wrote:
> > I looked for the first for several hours but didn't find it, looks
> > like you're more apt at maintaining that package than I am. So, yes,
> > adopt it if you feel
> Thanks, but I do need the output from the sid machine too, please.
Here's the trace from sid.
Enter in test-date.c: main()
Info: run_qoftime_test(): base date for section =2006-07-13
23:20:27.000345634 +
Info: run_qoftime_test(): same time previous day = 2006-07-12
23:20:2
> Thanks, but I do need the output from the sid machine too, please.
I will rebuild it and send the trace.
> Please can you run this simple series (on all affected boxes):
> date -d"1995-03-26 06:00:00.0 +" +"%H %Z"
> date -u -d"1995-03-26 06:00:00.0 +" +"%H %Z"
> date -d"
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign #384058 exim4-config
Bug#384058: exim4: option "forbid_smtp_code" unknown error during postinstall
Bug reassigned from package `exim4' to `exim4-config'.
> severity #383420 serious
Bug#383420: exim4-config 4.63 should conflict with exim4 < 4.6
tags 384006 +unreproducible +moreinfo
thanks,
I can't reproduce the bug you report.
Could you please post provide some background of your environment?
Generally its a good idea to report your problems using the reportbug program,
since it provides some usefull background. To generate the backgr
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 384006 +unreproducible +moreinfo
Unknown tag/s: +moreinfo.
Recognized are: patch wontfix moreinfo unreproducible fixed potato woody sid
help security upstream pending sarge sarge-ignore experimental d-i confirmed
ipv6 lfs fixed-in-experimental fi
On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 12:06:12AM +0200, Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
> * Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-08-20 23:01]:
>
> > found 383777 1.9.0-1-5
> > thanks
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > We're still seeing this error in 1.9.0-1-5.
>
> Thanks, I have already noticed it. I reached a point now that
On Monday 21 August 2006 16:40, Szakacsits Szabolcs wrote:
> If a checksum doesn't match (except a few metadata files) then you've
> found an ntfsresize problem.
Attached is the result of the md5sum check straight after running
ntfsresize (failures only).
Let me know if you want the files for co
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> severity 383994 serious
Bug#383994: graveman: Isn't very active in upstream side and not suitable for
etch now
Severity set to `serious' from `critical'
>
End of message, stopping p
Hi,
May I suggest removing 'unreproducible' tag from this bug? It seems that it is
specific to powerpc architecture, but it has been reproduced on several
different systems.
Thanks,
Slaven
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
1 - 100 of 177 matches
Mail list logo
