Package: usrp
Version: 0.12-4
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
When building 'usrp' in a clean 'unstable' chroot,
I get the following error:
dh_compress -a
dh_fixperms -a
dh_pycentral
make: dh_pycentral: Command not found
make: *** [binary-arch] Error 127
Please add the missing Build-Depends on 'py
acking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
Package: checkpolicy
Version: 1.30.10-1
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of checkpolicy_1.30.10-1 on caballero by sbuild/ia64 85
> Build started
The problem still exists for amd64. Please reopen.
Many thanx
Harri
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Package: texlive-base-bin
Version: 2005.dfsg.1-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
following is the log, /tmp/texlive.fmtutil.JAo16966 in attachment
Setting up texlive-base-bin (2005.dfsg.1-1) ...
Running mktexlsr. This may take some time... done.
Building format(s) --all .
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 375281 important
Bug#375281: CVE-2006-2452: Allows local users to access Configure Login Manager
function
Severity set to `important' from `grave'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug track
Your message dated Sat, 12 Aug 2006 19:47:14 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#364259: fixed in xawtv 3.95-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Sat, 12 Aug 2006 19:47:14 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#346757: fixed in xawtv 3.95-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Sat, 12 Aug 2006 19:47:14 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#325044: fixed in xawtv 3.95-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Sat, 12 Aug 2006 19:47:13 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#298171: fixed in xawtv 3.95-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Sat, 12 Aug 2006 19:47:10 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#378608: fixed in nss-mdns 0.8-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Your message dated Sat, 12 Aug 2006 19:47:13 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#300363: fixed in xawtv 3.95-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
You are right, sorry.
I saw old messages talking about a NMU, but it wasn't uploaded then, so
I ACKed a not fixed package.
Soon I'll upload new hasciicam, much better webcam support and no
problem with GFDL.
Thanks
Christian
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 381225 + fixed
Bug#381225: libxinerama doesn't have a copyright file
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Deb
Your message dated Sun, 13 Aug 2006 01:14:40 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#364800: no answer to dnsmasq broadcasts
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Hi,
Attached is the diff for my libxinerama 1:1.0.1-4.1 NMU.
--
·O· Pierre Habouzit
··O[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OOOhttp://www.madism.org
diff -u libxinerama-1.0.1/debian/changelog libxinerama-1.0.1/debian/c
Your message dated Sat, 12 Aug 2006 14:47:38 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#326275: fixed in scilab 4.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 292231 !
Bug#292231: [NONFREE-DOC:GFDL1.1] making the entire manpage invariant is not
consistent with the DFSG
'reopen' is deprecated when a bug has been closed with a version;
use 'found' or 'submitter' as appropriate instead.
Bug reopened, ori
Your message dated Sat, 12 Aug 2006 14:47:38 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#361592: fixed in scilab 4.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Sat, 12 Aug 2006 14:47:38 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#359886: fixed in scilab 4.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Sat, 12 Aug 2006 14:47:38 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#326275: fixed in scilab 4.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Sat, 12 Aug 2006 14:47:38 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#359886: fixed in scilab 4.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Daniel Baumann escribió:
> Ari Pollak wrote:
>> this has not been fixed in the latest version for amd64. The .a and .la
>> files for the output plugins are included, but not the .so files.
>
> I just saw it. It is very strange, I did a test build on pergolesi
> before I uploaded it, and there it w
On Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 10:19:59PM +0100, Barak A. Pearlmutter wrote:
> (a) It's still not serious because of the actual consequences of this,
> namely a few missing README files.
Should this not be considered a misbuilt package? It seems to me that it
should; which means that the build-dependenc
Your message dated Sat, 12 Aug 2006 14:32:27 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#355797: fixed in monopd 0.9.3-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> severity 381389 critical
Bug#381389: smart-notifier: compilation fails with SyntaxError on
@dbus.service.signal(UD_INTERFACE)
Severity set to `critical' from `grave'
>
End of messag
Package: buildbot
Version: 0.7.3-3
Severity: serious
I simply can not to purge buildbot. I have added set +x in postrm:
(Reading database ... 192074 files and directories currently installed.)
Removing buildbot ...
Purging configuration files for buildbot ...
+ set -e
+ case "$1" in
+ getent pass
tag 376501 patch
thanks
Attached is a patch to fix this bug, to the best of my ability. See the
included changelog for details.
I'm not going to be doing an NMU for this, at least not soon, I'd rather
have the maintainer evaluate the patch.
--
Never underestimate the power of a small tactical L
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 376501 patch
Bug#376501: pxe: Trips over stray pid file.
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs d
>Can you give the output of the following commands:
>
>$ grep -H "*NickName" /etc/cups/ppd/*.ppd
/etc/cups/ppd/stylusd88.ppd:*NickName: "Epson Stylus D88 - CUPS+Gutenprint
v5.0.0-rc3"
>$ lpstat -v
device for stylusd88: parallel:/dev/lp0
>$ ls -l /etc/cups/*.types /etc/cups/*.convs
-rw-r--r-
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 357439 libgl1-mesa-glx
Bug#357439: amaya does not start--The program 'amaya' received an X Window
System error.
Bug reassigned from package `amaya' to `libgl1-mesa-glx'.
> retitle 357439 amaya crashes with GDK error traced to this component
B
Ari Pollak wrote:
this has not been fixed in the latest version for amd64. The .a and .la
files for the output plugins are included, but not the .so files.
I just saw it. It is very strange, I did a test build on pergolesi
before I uploaded it, and there it worked. I think, something with the
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 349700 normal
Bug#349700: sbackup: incremental backups fail
Severity set to `normal' from `grave'
> severity 340115 normal
Bug#340115: Must not backup /proc and similar directories
Severity set to `normal' from `important'
> quit
Stopping pro
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 382082 + help
Bug#382082: CVE-2006-400[56]: Multiple Remote Vulnerabilities in Bomberclone
Tags were: security
Tags added: help
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
Package: xemacs21
Version: 21.4.19-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Today I tried xeamcs, but it there are some strange bugs.
I started xemacs21 by typing:
?> $ xemacs21
I got:
Fatal error (11).
Your files have been auto-saved.
Use `M-x recover-session' to recover them
tags 382082 + help
thanks
Could you give me some hints to find an appropriate solution? I am a bit
exhausted with my spare time in these days.
Eduard.
#include
* Stefan Fritsch [Tue, Aug 08 2006, 08:56:54PM]:
> package bomberclone
> retitle 382082 CVE-2006-400[56]: Multiple Remote Vulnerabiliti
Your message dated Sat, 12 Aug 2006 20:43:56 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line The problem is not reproducible.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
reopen 380321
found 380321 1:1.2.10+20060801-1
thanks
this has not been fixed in the latest version for amd64. The .a and .la
files for the output plugins are included, but not the .so files.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
Package: boo
Version: 0.7.6.2237-3
Severity: serious
I found that MonoDevelop FTBFS because of boo.
Here the output of the boo compiler:
mkdir -p ../../../build/AddIns/BackendBindings
/usr/bin/booc -r:../../../build/bin/MonoDevelop.Core.dll
-r:../../../build/AddIns/MonoDevelop.Core.Gui.dll
-r:/
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 380321
Bug#380321: XMMS loads no output plugins
'reopen' is deprecated when a bug has been closed with a version;
use 'found' or 'submitter' as appropriate instead.
Bug#380115: xmms shows file selection box, but doesn't say a beep
Bug#380318: xmm
Hi,
This copyright file looks fine ([EMAIL PROTECTED] is me, but I
don't use that address anymore). However, I should note that libxv1 was
packaged from scratch (being a part of the modular tree), so at least
the first paragraph should be removed. I don't think it's terribly
important information
Your message dated Sat, 12 Aug 2006 21:18:22 +0300
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line not an xorg issue
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility t
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> forwarded 267584
> http://sourcesup.cru.fr/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=928&group_id=23&atid=167
Bug#267584: Excessive PostgreSQL user privileges
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to
http://sourcesup.cru.fr/tracker/index.php?func=d
Your message dated Sat, 12 Aug 2006 20:15:57 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen
I'd be stunned if this was actually a server problem, and not a
client-side problem related to grabs. Which window manager do you use?
Does changing it fix anything?
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> close 381072 1.5-15.2
Bug#381072: FTBFS with sudo as gain-root-command
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug marked as fixed in version 1.5-15.2
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> tags 362641 + fixed-upstream
Bug#362641: xorg-server - FTBFS: Uses inline assembler unconditionaly
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed-upstream
>
End of message, stopping proce
Package: libnjb
Version: 2.2.5-4
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
Hi,
Your package fails to build from source when sudo is used as gain-root
command (instead of fakeroot), see for instance the build log on alpha
[1].
Attached is the diff for my libnjb 2.2.5-4.1 NMU which I'll upload to
DELAYED-10.
Hi,
same errors as already reported here:
apt-cache policy bluez-utils
bluez-utils:
Installed: 3.1-3.1
Candidate: 3.1-3.1
hcid[5413]: pin_code_request (sba=00:11:B1:07:A3:3F,
dba=00:80:37:B5:DC:28)
hcid[5413]: Calling PasskeyAgent.Request: name=:1.1,
path=/org/bluez/passkey_agent_5433
+ li
Hi,
I've committed this patch upstream (thanks). I'd suggest that ioport
just not be built for S390.
Cheers,
Daniel
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sat, Aug 12, 2006 at 10:18:27AM -0700, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
Of course the message's subject should have been: "reproduced here"
A new round gave me a "Test 28 failed"
--
Jesus Climent info:www.pumuki.org dj:triplestereo.com
Unix SysAdm|Linux User #66350|Debian D
Your message dated Sat, 12 Aug 2006 10:17:26 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#382653: fixed in tomboy 0.3.9-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
trator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
Package: uswsusp
Version: 0.2-2
Severity: serious
Hello,
There was a problem while autobuilding your package:
> Automatic build of uswsusp_0.2-2 on avidan by sbuild/i386 0.49
> Build started at 2
Your message dated Sat, 12 Aug 2006 10:17:03 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#378244: fixed in enemies-of-carlotta 1.2.2-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Sat, 12 Aug 2006 10:28:31 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#379921: fixed in libaws 2.2-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Sat, 12 Aug 2006 10:28:31 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#370560: fixed in libaws 2.2-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Sat, 12 Aug 2006 10:28:31 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#370560: fixed in libaws 2.2-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Sat, 12 Aug 2006 10:28:31 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#379921: fixed in libaws 2.2-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Hi Colin,
On Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 04:45:35PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> Proposals:
> I'm on holiday away from computers all next week, so I can't
> realistically do anything before the base freeze. I therefore have two
> proposals, either of which really ought to be signed off by the release
>
Hi.
tar (1.15.91-2) unstable; urgency=low
make checks run 5 times on ext3
1st run:
53 tests were successful.
8 tests were skipped.
2nd run:
29: changed file types in incrementals FAILED (chtype.at:69)
ERROR: 53 tests were run,
1 failed unexpectedly.
8 tests were ski
Your message dated Sat, 12 Aug 2006 09:50:24 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#382024: fixed in librpcsecgss 0.14-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> close 325536 1.5-1
Bug#325536: mozilla: FTBFS: change in behavior of __attribute__((unused))
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug marked as fixed in version 1.5-1, send any further explanations to Steve
Langasek
close 325536 1.5-1
thanks
Some time ago, I cloned your mozilla-thunderbird bug #325536 as bug #363869.
The new bug is the one to track your issue for the new thunderbird package.
Thus, I close your original mozilla-thunderbird bug for all versions of the 1.5
branch and later.
This mail is just
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> close 337999 1.5-1
Bug#337999: mozilla-thunderbird: enter does not respond when editing an email.
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug marked as fixed in version 1.5-1, send any further explanations to Omry
Yadan
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> close 318728 1.5-1
Bug#318728: mozilla-thunderbird: Multiple security problems (fixed in
sarge/sid, not-fixed in etch)
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug marked as fixed in version 1.5-1, send any further expla
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> close 332481 1.5-1
Bug#332481: mozilla-thunderbird: Segfault in [EMAIL PROTECTED]
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug marked as fixed in version 1.5-1, send any further explanations to Martin
Sarsale <[EMAIL PRO
close 318728 1.5-1
thanks
Some time ago, I cloned your mozilla-thunderbird bug #318728 as bug #363866.
The new bug is the one to track your issue for the new thunderbird package.
Thus, I close your original mozilla-thunderbird bug for all versions of the 1.5
branch and later.
This mail is just
close 332481 1.5-1
thanks
Some time ago, I cloned your mozilla-thunderbird bug #332481 as bug #363867.
The new bug is the one to track your issue for the new thunderbird package.
Thus, I close your original mozilla-thunderbird bug for all versions of the 1.5
branch and later.
This mail is just
close 337999 1.5-1
thanks
Some time ago, I cloned your mozilla-thunderbird bug #337999 as bug #363868.
The new bug is the one to track your issue for the new thunderbird package.
Thus, I close your original mozilla-thunderbird bug for all versions of the 1.5
branch and later.
This mail is just
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> #
> # bts-link upstream status pull for source package lyx
> # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
> #
> user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Setting user to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (was [EMAIL PROTECTED]).
> # remote status report for #
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 382640 + wontfix
Bug#382640: zabbix: Postgresql interface missing
There were no tags set.
Tags added: wontfix
> severity 382640 wishlist
Bug#382640: zabbix: Postgresql interface missing
Severity set to `wishlist' from `grave'
> thanks
Stopping pr
tags 382640 + wontfix
severity 382640 wishlist
thanks
hi Sven,
On Sat, Aug 12, 2006 at 03:26:38PM +0200, Sven Goldt wrote:
> This package forces the usage of mysql instead of postgresql even though
> postgresql is supported by the original software.
yes, postgresql is indeed supported, however,
reassign 381389 debhelper 5.0.37.3
thanks
I can reproduce this in my machine. It's due to the fact that
/usr/bin/python points to python2.3 in my box, and smart-notifier's python
version is "current". Changing this in /var/lib/dpkg/status, "fixes" this
bug.
Therefore, as discussed with Pierre Ha
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 381389 debhelper 5.0.37.3
Bug#381389: smart-notifier: compilation fails with SyntaxError on
@dbus.service.signal(UD_INTERFACE)
Bug reassigned from package `smart-notifier' to `debhelper'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> package quodlibet
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: quodlibet
> found 367221 0.22-1
Bug#367221: quodlibet: fails to find module pygst
Bug marked as found in version 0.22-1.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
De
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> tags 381490 moreinfo unreproducible
Bug#381490: don't install, an error: "invoke-rc.d: initscript ivman, action
"start" failed."
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo, unrepro
Package: gmime2.2
Version: 2.2.3-1
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of gmime2.2_2.2.3-1 on bld-3 by sbuild/hppa 85
> Build started at 20060811-1947
[...]
> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
> Build-Depends: debhelper (
Package: tomboy
Severity: serious
Version: 0.3.5-2
Hi
Your package fails to build from source on arm as it build depends on
libgmime2.1-cil which is not available on arm. You might want to update
the build dependency to libgmime2.2-cil as gmime2.1 is in process of
being removed from Debian...
Ch
Package: mypasswordsafe
Severity: serious
Version: 0.0.20050615-1
Hi
Your package fails to build from source with sudo as gain-root command
as can be seen in the build log on the alpha buildd [1].
Cheers
Luk
[1]
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=mypasswordsafe&ver=0.0.20050615-1&arch=alp
Package: vpopmail-bin
Severity: serious
Version: 5.4.4-1
vpopmail-bin Depends: libmysqlclient10, which is no longer in the
archive, making the package uninstallable.
lamont
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: zabbix
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
This package forces the usage of mysql instead of postgresql even though
postgresql is supported by the original software.
You can't even install only the zabbix-server without any database or
you can't create your own zabbix
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 337127 grave
Bug#337127: gaim-encryption: gaim segfaults receiving a special message from
ICQ Buddy
Severity set to `grave' from `normal'
> severity 375281 grave
Bug#375281: CVE-2006-2452: Allows local users to access Configure Login Manager
On Sat, Aug 12, 2006 at 01:39:58PM +0100, Mark Purcell wrote:
> Christoph,
>
> On Saturday 12 August 2006 12:48, Christoph Kaminski wrote:
> > 01:06.0 Network controller: Cologne Chip Designs GmbH ISDN network
> > controller [HFC-PCI] (rev 02)
>
> Thanks I think this is the nub of the problem.
>
Your message dated Sat, 12 Aug 2006 07:32:03 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#382364: fixed in missingpy 0.8.6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Package: checkpolicy
Version: 1.30.10-1
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of checkpolicy_1.30.10-1 on caballero by sbuild/ia64 85
> Build started at 20060812-1056
[...]
> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package
Package: pnet-assemblies
Version: 0.7.4-1
Severity: serious
pnet-assemblies depends on libgnutls12, even if it is built on a
current sid system where libgnutls-dev is the corresponding package to
libgnutls13.
However afaict pnet-assemblies does not use any file in either
libgnutls12 or libgnutls1
Christoph,
On Saturday 12 August 2006 12:48, Christoph Kaminski wrote:
> 01:06.0 Network controller: Cologne Chip Designs GmbH ISDN network
> controller [HFC-PCI] (rev 02)
Thanks I think this is the nub of the problem.
Unfortunately I don't have access to ISDN hardware so won't be able to debug
Your message dated Sat, 12 Aug 2006 14:25:26 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#382625: /etc/udev/permissions.rules needs system groups
not created
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
Your message dated Sat, 12 Aug 2006 14:18:46 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#350747: Just updated the server, the problem is not
present anymore.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
Your message dated Sat, 12 Aug 2006 05:02:51 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#382569: fixed in request-tracker3.4 3.4.4-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case i
Alexis Sukrieh wrote:
> Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> >The distribution should be stable-security instead of
> >testing-proposed-updates. Please also remove all the i18n updates:
>
> Ok, I'll make a new package with the correct distribution.
>
> The i18n updates are automatically made by the build
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> tags 378244 pending
Bug#378244: enemies-of-carlotta: Mail with UTF-8 headers produces data-loss
Tags were: unreproducible
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, stopping processing he
Mohammed Adnène Trojette wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 23, 2006, Xav wrote:
>
>>Package: gcfilms
>>Version: 6.1-2
>>Severity: grave
>>Justification: renders package unusable
>>
>>When I launch it, I get this :
>>
>>$ gcfilms
>>*** unhandled exception in callback:
>>*** Can't locate object method "signal
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 350747 moreinfo
Bug#350747: stunnel: fails to start
Tags were: pending moreinfo
Tags added: moreinfo
> Thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bug
Package: udev
Version: 0.093-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
I am using several machines with testing distribution, after udev upgrade all
of them stop booting properly.
They stop at "udev loading step", and you must press CTRL+C to continue.
After finishing booting and
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 350747 + pending
Bug#350747: stunnel: fails to start
Tags were: moreinfo
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs databa
Mark Purcell schrieb:
Thanks,
On Saturday 12 August 2006 12:09, you wrote:
What sort of zaptel hardware do you have installed in your system, and
when was the last time you built the zaptel-modules?
This could be an issue, what sort of zaptel hardware do you have?
01:06.0 Network controller:
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 381097 experimental
Bug#381097: maildrop_2.0.2-1(sparc/experimental): FTBFS: pcre.h not found
There were no tags set.
Tags added: experimental
> --
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system adm
Thanks,
On Saturday 12 August 2006 12:09, you wrote:
> > What sort of zaptel hardware do you have installed in your system, and
> > when was the last time you built the zaptel-modules?
This could be an issue, what sort of zaptel hardware do you have?
> dpkg -l | grep zaptel-modules
> ii zaptel-
Hi
Just got my server in shape, and installed stunnel4 from scratch, and not it
works.
Have not done anything, so i guess we can close this bug unless other people
continue having the problem.
Cheers,
--
Jesus Climent info:www.pumuki.org dj:triplestereo.com
Unix SysAdm|Linux U
Mark Purcell schrieb:
On Saturday 12 August 2006 07:56, Christoph Kaminski wrote:
Setting up zaptel (1.2.7.dfsg-3) ...
Zaptel cards initial configuration: ZT_SPANCONFIG failed on span 1: Invalid
Thanks Christoph,
This is probably due to a version incompatability bewteen the installed
zaptel-
1 - 100 of 120 matches
Mail list logo
