Package: ntlmaps
Version: 0.9.9.0.1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
When building 'ntlmaps' in a clean 'unstable' chroot,
I get the following error:
chmod og-r debian/ntlmaps/etc/ntlmaps/server.cfg
dh_pysupport /usr/share/ntlmaps
make: dh_pysupport: Command not found
make: *** [binary] Error 127
On Tue, 2006-07-25 at 00:23 +0100, Stephen Gran wrote:
> Package: xfce4-mcs-plugins
> Version: 4.3.90.2-1
> Severity: serious
>
> Preparing to replace xfce4-mcs-plugins 4.3.90.1-1 (using
> .../xfce4-mcs-plugins_4.3.90.2-1_i386.deb) ...
> Unpacking replacement xfce4-mcs-plugins ...
> dpkg: error p
On Tue, 2006-07-25 at 00:23 +0100, Stephen Gran wrote:
> Package: xfce4-mcs-plugins
> Version: 4.3.90.2-1
> Severity: serious
>
> Preparing to replace xfce4-mcs-plugins 4.3.90.1-1
> (using .../xfce4-mcs-plugins_4.3.90.2-1_i386.deb) ...
> Unpacking replacement xfce4-mcs-plugins ...
> dpkg: error
>
Your message dated Tue, 25 Jul 2006 07:39:08 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line [Pkg-xfce-devel] Bug#379689: xfdesktop4 uninstallable on
unstable amd6, dependency problem
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem ha
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 378397 moreinfo
Bug#378397: FTBFS, while processing doc/dejagnu.xml
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator
tags 378397 moreinfo
thanks
This bug was reported against version 1.4.4.cvs20060709 which I don't
find a record of as being in debian.
I tried building both 1.4.4.cvs20060709-1 and 1.4.4.cvs20060709-2 in
pbuilder, they are missing the build-dep on expect that is documented in
#378393, but neither
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 377499 pending
Bug#377499: freetennis - FTBFS: ocamlopt: Command not found
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> stop
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
done, thanks a lot.
pc
Simon Huggins wrote:
> Chris apparently has new code but it's not in unstable yet.
>
> Given apt-proxy is entirely broken it's perhaps worth mentioning that
> apt-cacher does a similar job but it works in today's unstable.
>
>
Your message dated Mon, 24 Jul 2006 20:47:19 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#377892: fixed in glibc 2.3.6-16
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
On Mon, Jul 24, 2006 at 09:05:01PM -0300, Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I saw this problem in a local machine, but I thought it was a problem
> with me messing up with the python installation while testing, so I
> fixed it locally and forgot to take notes on what file was causing the
>
On Mon, Jul 24, 2006 at 05:44:22PM +0200, Sven Mueller wrote:
>Is there any chance to get this fixed within the next week or two? It's
>already blocking something like 60 packages from entering testing.
Not a whole lot that I can do about it.
Ryan believes that the problem with MIPS is a kernel i
Your message dated Mon, 24 Jul 2006 19:02:07 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#347004: fixed in mdk 1.2.1+0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Closing now since I did not receive any more feedback from submitter and
> the bug is not reproducible on my ppc box.
> close 368747
Bug#368747: libgtk-mozembed-ruby1.8: Does not work here on powerpc...
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.o
On Sun, Jul 23, 2006 at 09:57:56AM +0200, Sebastian Bremicker wrote:
> swapspace still does not start here, saying
>
> Starting dynamic swap manager: swapspaceError: Parse error in /proc/meminfo:
> ' HugePages_Total: 0
> '
>
> Did I forget to ena
Package: xfdesktop4
Version: 4.3.90.1-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
xfdesktop4 is uninstallable on unstable running on amd64. It depends
on libxfce4util2, which appeards to have been replaced by libxfce4util4.
It appeards that the rest of xfce4 is moving to using lib
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 365150 + fixed
Bug#365150: enigmail-locales: Uninstallable after mozilla-enigmail -> enigmail
renaimg
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system admini
Your message dated Mon, 24 Jul 2006 18:02:17 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#379547: fixed in turbokid 0.9.8-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Mon, 24 Jul 2006 17:32:28 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#346267: fixed in xmakemol 5.15-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Mon, 24 Jul 2006 17:32:28 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#379311: fixed in xmakemol 5.15-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Hello,
I saw this problem in a local machine, but I thought it was a problem
with me messing up with the python installation while testing, so I
fixed it locally and forgot to take notes on what file was causing the
problem...
I need some help to create a work-around in the preinst, then, since I
Your message dated Mon, 24 Jul 2006 17:32:28 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#337468: fixed in xmakemol 5.15-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
On Monday 24 July 2006 12:29, Baruch Even wrote:
> There are various "Language Desktop" but no Hebrew Desktop, what is
> done for them and how I can get Hebrew Desktop there?
There should be no localization tasks shown (they are selected
automagically). This was a bug in tasksel which was fixed t
Your message dated Mon, 24 Jul 2006 17:02:15 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#379583: fixed in glob2 0.8.19-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Package: cupsys
Version: 1.2.1-4
Followup-For: Bug #372782
I have exactly the same problem; I have a Brother HL-1435 that worked
perfectly until cups version 1.2.1-2 (inclusive); now it only prints this:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
@PJL JOB NAME="Ghost"
@PJL SET ECONOMODE=OFF
@PJL SET MEDIATYPE=REGULAR
@P
On Tuesday 25 July 2006 01:25, Yuval Fledel wrote:
> 20482843+ is different than 20481024. I know for sure that when I
> repartitioned my disk, and entered the same number, only that it
> showed with no +, Windows no longer agreed to boot. Returning the
> partition table to what it was saved the da
El lunes, 24 de julio de 2006 18:00, Frans Pop escribió:
> Package: ntfsprogs
> Version: 1.12.1-1
> Severity: critical
> Justification: causes serious data loss
> Tags: d-i
>
> After a resize using Debian Installer of an NTFS partition created with
> Windows Vista Beta 2, I found that the partition
Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> So IIUC, a new upstream release requires python 2.4 and fixes the
> gcc-4.1 build failure.
This is correct.
> Concerning the new upstream release, I suggest you follow the Python
> transition and package lilypond with python 2.4 as the PYTHON runtime
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> owner 350739 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#350739: cdrtools: GPL violation - makefiles distributed under
non-GPL-compatible license
Owner recorded as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> owner 353277 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#353277: should be in contrib
Bug#353278: should be in
Your message dated Mon, 24 Jul 2006 16:17:26 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#370111: fixed in xfce4-notes-plugin 1.2.3-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case i
the following patch fixes two bugs related to dccproc functioning when the
kernel doesn't support AF_INET6.
dcc_udp_bind is cloberring errno before using it... and is testing for the
wrong errno... it needs to test for EAFNOSUPPORT. i probably should have
dropped the EPFNOSUPPORT tests, but i'
Your message dated Tue, 25 Jul 2006 01:21:51 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#374844: klineakconfig: FTBFS: X11/extensions/XKBfile.h: No
such file or directory
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has bee
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 376301 patch
Bug#376301: dccifd does not work when IPv6 is not supported by the kernel
Tags were: ipv6
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(admini
Your message dated Mon, 24 Jul 2006 16:17:26 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#370111: fixed in xfce4-notes-plugin 1.2.3-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case i
On 7/24/06, Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks for your quick reaction Yuval.
On Monday 24 July 2006 19:42, Yuval Fledel wrote:
> > The two are completely similar, except that the first is successful
> > and the second leads to corruption.
>
> I noticed that the original partition was n
Package: xfce4-mcs-plugins
Version: 4.3.90.2-1
Severity: serious
Preparing to replace xfce4-mcs-plugins 4.3.90.1-1 (using
.../xfce4-mcs-plugins_4.3.90.2-1_i386.deb) ...
Unpacking replacement xfce4-mcs-plugins ...
dpkg: error processing
/var/cache/apt/archives/xfce4-mcs-plugins_4.3.90.2-1_i386.de
Regis,
If you've identified the problem as being in various mesa components I
see no reason to reassign the bugs to the appropriate package. By all
means give as much assistance as you can but if Amaya caused a kernel
opps no would expect you to debug it -- likewise, Amaya is causing an
OpenGL "o
Thanks for your quick reaction Yuval.
On Monday 24 July 2006 19:42, Yuval Fledel wrote:
> > The two are completely similar, except that the first is successful
> > and the second leads to corruption.
>
> I noticed that the original partition was not the same in both cases.
> example:
> Vista: /dev
Your message dated Mon, 24 Jul 2006 14:32:59 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#379502: fixed in localechooser 1.21
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Mon, 24 Jul 2006 14:34:38 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#379625: fixed in yaz 2.1.18-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Mon, 24 Jul 2006 14:33:13 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#379357: fixed in postfix 2.3.0-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Mon, 24 Jul 2006 14:33:43 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#379278: fixed in subversion 1.3.2-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Mon, 24 Jul 2006 14:32:18 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#379532: fixed in cl-asdf 1.99-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 379636 + upstream
Bug#379636: sim: FTBFS: does not like autoconf 2.60
There were no tags set.
Tags added: upstream
> tags 379636 + pending
Bug#379636: sim: FTBFS: does not like autoconf 2.60
Tags were: upstream
Tags added: pending
> forwarded 379
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 378759 important
Bug#378759: nepenthes: dpkg-buildpackage erases y.tab.c if run a second time
Severity set to `important' from `serious'
> tags 378759 pending fixed-upstream
Bug#378759: nepenthes: dpkg-buildpackage erases y.tab.c if run a seco
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 379561 normal
Bug#379561: wordpress requires mysql-server but don't depends on it
Severity set to `normal' from `serious'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(
severity 379561 normal
thanks
On Mon, Jul 24, 2006 at 11:58:54AM +0200, Bastian Venthur wrote:
> Wordpress needs a mysqls-server on the system but does not depend on it.
> On a system with no mysql-server pre-installed, a fresh wordpress
> installation will simply not work until you install mysq
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> package hylafax-client
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: hylafax-client
> severity 363464 normal
Bug#363464: hylafax-client: sendfax cannot determine file type of a text file
Severity set to `normal' from `serious'
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Pleas
Package: gajim
Version: 0.10.1-4
Severity: serious
Setting up gajim (0.10.1-4) ...
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/bin/pycentral", line 1375, in ?
main()
File "/usr/bin/pycentral", line 1369, in main
rv = action.run(global_options)
File "/usr/bin/pycentral", line 912, i
Pawel Wiecek wrote:
> Obviously what's blocking it is the fact that real life is interacting too
> often, and when it's not I usually start with other packages for various
> reasons.
Pawel, with all respect, your list of rather old RC bugs is quite
(un)impressive. Maybe you should reevaluate how m
On 24.07.06 19:32:06, Simon Huggins wrote:
> Chris apparently has new code but it's not in unstable yet.
I really hope he can put it into unstable before it's too late for Etch,
in this state apt-proxy shouldn't be delivered with Etch.
> Given apt-proxy is entirely broken it's perhaps worth menti
Package: tcpreplay
Version: 2.99+3.0.beta9-1
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of tcpreplay_2.99+3.0.beta9-1 on caballero by sbuild/ia64 85
> Build started at 20060724-0757
[...]
> ** Using build dependencies supplied b
Any news about those bugs?
--
.''`. Aurelien Jarno | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
: :' : Debian developer | Electrical Engineer
`. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
`-people.debian.org/~aurel32 | www.aurel32.net
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTE
Hello George,
Yate 1 is stable. However we've never said that we support all those
platforms. And a lot of problems seems to be from the debian package,
and "yes" we forgot to add autoconf as a build dependency.
Diana
George Danchev wrote:
On Monday 24 July 2006 13:13, Diana Cionoiu wrote:
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> Version: 4.0.14-1
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
> found 379174 4.0.3-31sarge5
Bug#379174: shadow: CVE-2006-3378
Bug marked as found in version 4.0.3-31sarge5.
> This security bug is fixed in shadow upstream 4.0.14. So, in Debian,
Package: csound
Version: 1:4.23f13-1
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.2.1
csound originally had a restrictive license allowing "educational and
research purposes only". Back on 2003 there was an effort to relicense
everything in csound as GNU LGPL:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2
wordpress does not depend on a locally installed mysql server since it also
runs using a remote one (after changing the configuration).
--
Peter Thomassen • Steigerwaldstr. 4 • 97076 Würzburg • Germany
http://www.peter-thomassen.de/ • [EMAIL PROTECTED]
fon +49-931-27
Your message dated Mon, 24 Jul 2006 10:47:18 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#379142: fixed in mldonkey 2.7.7-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Mon, 24 Jul 2006 11:25:57 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line debpartial-mirror: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'python-dev'
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this i
Your message dated Mon, 24 Jul 2006 20:25:29 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Closing with version control
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your respo
Chris apparently has new code but it's not in unstable yet.
Given apt-proxy is entirely broken it's perhaps worth mentioning that
apt-cacher does a similar job but it works in today's unstable.
I installed it today and once I added a sane path_map it worked fine and
in a similar way to apt-proxy.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 352084 kazehakase: Build-Dep on mozilla (library), should transition
> to xulrunner
Bug#352084: Build-Dep on mozilla (library), should transition to
Changed Bug title.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need
Your message dated Mon, 24 Jul 2006 10:32:27 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#379438: fixed in pypar2 0.07-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
On Tue, Jul 18, 2006 at 11:31:00PM +0200, Daniel Knabl wrote:
> Am Tue, 18 Jul 2006 17:26:15 -0400 schrieb Justin Pryzby
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > On Tue, Jul 18, 2006 at 10:58:14PM +0200, Daniel Knabl wrote:
> > > Am Tue, 18 Jul 2006 16:45:06 -0400 schrieb Justin Pryzby
> > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED
Just for the record, has anyone of you checked whether these bugs are
present in sarge?
TIA.
Cheers,
Stefan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi!
My USB printer does not print under linux for several weeks now. I tried
the latest package cupsys 1.2.4 today but still got nothing. As a side
effect, for some unknown configuration quirk I have two printers installed
now:
lpstat -a -v
hp_usb_hp_color_LaserJet_2550_series accepting
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 379566 + fixed
Bug#379566: Daily build install looking at Hebrew l10n issues
Tags were: d-i
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debi
After sending the report I noticed that I did not run ntfsfix as root.
Here is the correct output.
debian:~# ntfsfix /dev/sda1
Mounting volume... FAILED
Attempting to correct errors...
Processing $MFT and $MFTMirr...
Reading $MFT... OK
Reading $MFTMirr... OK
Comparing $MFTMirr to $MFT... FAILED
Co
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 379563 normal
Bug#379563: galternatives has no man page
Severity set to `normal' from `serious'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs
Package: sim
Version: 0.9.4-1
Severity: serious
Hello,
There was a problem while autobuilding your package:
> Automatic build of sim_0.9.4-1 on avidan by sbuild/i386 0.49
> Build started at 2006072
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 377330 grave
Bug#377330: tar: FTBFS: Failed tests on amd64.
Bug#379393: tar: restore of listed incremental archives no longer works
Severity set to `grave' from `serious'
> forcemerge 377330 379393
Bug#377330: tar: FTBFS: Failed tests on amd64
Package: openmash
Version: 5.2-4
Severity: serious
Hello,
There was a problem while autobuilding your package:
> Automatic build of openmash_5.2-4 on avidan by sbuild/i386 0.49
> Build started at 2006072
severity 379563 normal
thanks
Having an associated manual page is a "should" directive, not a "must".
Downgrading to the proper severity.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Jul 24, 8:04am, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
> as you can likely tell, this bug has attracted quite a bit of attention.
> What's going on with it? A two years old RC bug and there is nothing
There's not much to discuss, really.
Like I said -- this and several other vpopmail bugs are fixed in my repo
Your message dated Mon, 24 Jul 2006 18:46:00 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#379615: FTBFS: E: Couldn't find package liboping-dev
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not t
On Mon, Jul 24, 2006 at 04:28:06PM +0400, Andrey Kiselev wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 19, 2006 at 09:32:00AM -0400, James Vega wrote:
> > > In addition I have built vim package using libmotif from unstable
> > > (2.2.3-1.4) and it works just fine. So it is most likely a problem with
> > > lesstif, but it r
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 379393 serious
Bug#379393: tar: restore of listed incremental archives no longer works
Severity set to `serious' from `grave'
> merge 379393 377330
Bug#377330: tar: FTBFS: Failed tests on amd64.
Bug#379393: tar: restore of listed incremental a
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 379566 newt
Bug#379566: Daily build install looking at Hebrew l10n issues
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `newt'.
> severity 379566 grave
Bug#379566: Daily build install looking at Hebrew l10n issues
Severity set to `grav
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 370436 serious
Bug#370436: Please remove mozilla-dev package
Severity set to `serious' from `wishlist'
> severity 352084 serious
Bug#352084: kazehakase: Please build against xulrunner when it will reach
unstable
Severity set to `serious' from
Your message dated Mon, 24 Jul 2006 18:32:26 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#378640: libnet-server-perl: [CVE-2005-1127] format string
vulnerability in log() function
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Package: smarteiffel
Version: 1.1-9
Severity: serious
Hi,
smarteiffel_1.1-9 FTBFS on amd64 with the following error:
mv debian/smarteiffel/usr/lib/smarteiffel/bin/compile
debian/smarteiffel/usr/lib/smarteiffel/bin/se-compile
mv: cannot stat `debian/smarteiffel/usr/lib/smarteiffel/bin/compile':
Hi.
Is there any chance to get this fixed within the next week or two? It's
already blocking something like 60 packages from entering testing.
Regards,
Sven
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Package: ntfsprogs
Version: 1.12.1-1
Severity: critical
Justification: causes serious data loss
Tags: d-i
After a resize using Debian Installer of an NTFS partition created with
Windows Vista Beta 2, I found that the partition was no longer usable.
I have checked that this really is an issue by
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> severity 355047 normal
Bug#355047: install: segmentation faultsts
Severity set to `normal' from `serious'
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need a
Package: libyaz2
Version: 2.1.18-1
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 8.6
When you renamed libyaz to libyaz2, you neglected a couple of steps:
* Updating the shlibs file, which still specifies dependencies on
libyaz (with the result that yaz has an unsatisfiable dependency on
libyaz 2.1.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> reopen 355047
Bug#355047: install: segmentation faultsts
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Package: collectd
Severity: serious
Hi,
collectd_3.10.1-2 FTBFS with the following error:
Checking for source dependency conflicts...
/usr/bin/sudo /usr/bin/apt-get --purge $CHROOT_OPTIONS -q -y install
debhelper autotools-dev libcurl3-dev libmysqlclient15-dev librrd2-dev
libsensors-dev libo
tags 379438 + pending
thanks
new upstream version will be relased really soon, I will fix this bug with
new upload.
--
-=[ Piotr Ozarowski ]=-
-=[ http://www.ozarowski.pl ]=-
pgpeg4BMhoyoK.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Package: libnss-db
Version: 2.2.3pre1-2
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 10.4
Hi,
There was an error while trying to build your package :
> Automatic build of libnss-db_2.2.3pre1-2 on saturne by sbuild/amd64 85
...
> touch debian/build-stamp
> /usr/bin/fakeroot debian/rules binary-arch
>
Your message dated Mon, 24 Jul 2006 08:17:12 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#379281: fixed in pyxmpp 1.0.0-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Yes, no need for more reports, please. I know it works with the
W3C-provided package and not with the Debian-provided one.
The problem is :
The amaya package provided by the W3C uses a statically (built and) linked
libGL, unsing the full software rendering, equivalent to the
libgl1-mesa-swx11 pac
Package: bobcat
Version: 1.10.0-2
Severity: serious
Hi,
bobcat_1.10.0-2 FTBFS on amd64 and s390 with the following error:
unescape.cc: In function 'unsigned int::handleOctal(FBB::String*,
const FBB::String&, unsigned int)':
unescape.cc:13: error: no matching function for call to 'min(unsigned i
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 379438 + pending
Bug#379438: pypar2: Missing dependency on python-xml
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrato
Your message dated Mon, 24 Jul 2006 06:35:45 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#287397: fixed in libgii 1:1.0.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Mon, 24 Jul 2006 06:35:45 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#367832: fixed in libgii 1:1.0.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Mon, 24 Jul 2006 06:47:30 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#378953: fixed in klibc 1.4.11-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Your message dated Mon, 24 Jul 2006 06:32:13 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#379270: fixed in glame 2.0.1-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Hello Stephen,
I sent a suitable security-package with basically the same patch in it to the
team in November 2005, immediately got a "nice, will do this later today" and
nothing ever happened. Maybe it's because the patch potentially breaks logs
of some servers using the lib, or because it's i
Your message dated Mon, 24 Jul 2006 06:17:16 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#360392: fixed in smarteiffel 1.1-9
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
severity 377408 important
thanks
Hello.
I asked to the gtk2-engines maintainers to introduce a Provides:
gtk2-engines-clearlooks in order to get ltsp (which has an udeb) off the
gtk2-engines migration. Hence this bug is no longer RC.
I'm leaving it at severity important though, since I think ldm
Your message dated Mon, 24 Jul 2006 06:17:16 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#358268: fixed in smarteiffel 1.1-9
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
1 - 100 of 174 matches
Mail list logo
