On 24.07.06 19:32:06, Simon Huggins wrote: > Chris apparently has new code but it's not in unstable yet.
I really hope he can put it into unstable before it's too late for Etch, in this state apt-proxy shouldn't be delivered with Etch. > Given apt-proxy is entirely broken it's perhaps worth mentioning that > apt-cacher does a similar job but it works in today's unstable. Well, it only does part of the job. It doesn't cache "older" files, so it's not usable as "backup" in case of broken unstable packages. Of course there are alternatives, but I already had one or two occassions where snapshot.debian.net didn't have a working old version. Anyway I'm also happily using apt-cacher now, as I'm absolutely unable to debug/fix the current problems in apt-proxy.. Andreas -- You will engage in a profitable business activity. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
