Package: stars
Severity: serious
Version: 0.12+1-1
Hi
Your package is not installable in unstable as it depends on xlibs which
is not available anymore.
Cheers
Luk
--
Luk Claes - http://people.debian.org/~luk - GPG key 1024D/9B7C328D
Fingerprint: D5AF 25FB 316B 53BB 08E7 F999 E544 DE07 9B
On Thursday, 06 July 2006 18:35 Luk Claes wrote:
> Luk Claes wrote:
> > Norman Rasmussen wrote:
> >> Hey Luk,
> >
> > Hi Norman
> >
> >> I'm happy to fix this, but I'm not sure what needs to be done.
> >>
> >> Is it as simple as doing an apt-get source, uupdate, edit changlog,
> >> buildpackage, an
Your message dated Sun, 09 Jul 2006 23:52:02 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Invalid
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Your message dated Mon, 10 Jul 2006 05:22:01 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line DLJ prevents running jython with sun-java
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
On Mon, Jul 10, 2006 at 01:21:52AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> With the aid of snapshot.debian.net, I was able to reproduce this by running:
> apt-get install amule-utils=2.1.1-3 amule-common=2.1.1-3 amule=2.1.1-3
> amule-daemon=2.1.1-3
> apt-get install amule-utils=2.1.2-2 amule-common=2.1.2-2
With the aid of snapshot.debian.net, I was able to reproduce this by running:
apt-get install amule-utils=2.1.1-3 amule-common=2.1.1-3 amule=2.1.1-3
amule-daemon=2.1.1-3
apt-get install amule-utils=2.1.2-2 amule-common=2.1.2-2
apt-get install amule-utils=2.1.2-3 amule-common=2.1.2-3
Ben.
--
B
On Sun, Jul 09, 2006 at 09:52:52PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
>
> It seems that the created tar files are good, but during
> extraction it doesn't always react the same.
straces between 2 runs that are good only differ in some system
call, and they all have to do with either the pid changed or
the
clone 370295 -1
retitle -1 Can only be used to utilize software in an illegal manner
reassign -1 jikes-sun
thanks
On Sun, Jun 04, 2006 at 02:37:45PM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
> jikes-sun implements a javac compiler, and uses the Sun JDK.
This is indeed as far as I can see a violation of Sun's l
Your message dated Mon, 10 Jul 2006 01:24:58 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed in -3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reop
Your message dated Mon, 10 Jul 2006 01:25:11 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#370245: Export control problems in license
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Package: mirrors
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
i was using module-assistant to install nvidia-kernel-source when i realized
that this package and nvidia-glx aren't on this
(http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/) server. i have main contrib and non-free in
my sources.list an
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> clone 370295 -1
Bug#370295: DLJ prevents running jython with sun-java
Bug 370295 cloned as bug 377560.
> retitle -1 Can only be used to utilize software in an illegal manner
Bug#377560: DLJ prevents running jython with sun-java
Changed Bug title.
> re
tag 377420 patch
thanks
A fix for this bug is available and waiting for my sponsor to upload.
Julien,
Can you please upload mod-bt_0.0.18+p4.1178-2? It has been placed
online here:
http://www.crackerjack.net/mod_bt/debian/sid/
The .orig tarball is identical. The only cha
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 376581 important
Bug#376581: python-4suite: [m68k] build log is not written to stdout -> build
can time out
Severity set to `important' from `serious'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug t
please rebuild using g++-4.1.1-7.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Loïc Minier wrote:
> Package: libcairo2-dev
> Version: 1.2.0-2
> Severity: serious
>
> Hi,
>
> #377234 was just filed against gnome-keyring which uses libtool and
> pkg-config --libs gtk+-2.0 to build. libtool sees the -lcairo from
> this command and includes the dependency_libs of li
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 377420 patch
Bug#377420: mod-bt - FTBFS: Not resolvable build dependencies
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administra
severity 376581 important
thanks
I agree, but m68k is not a release architecture; lowering the
severity.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I wanted to have a first version in Debian on the only architecture I
could test Tremulous so that it wouldn't be slowed by other
architectures compilation errors.
Now, I've put "any" and will have it reuploaded soon.
About the data package, it has been rejected because I forgot the CC
license fi
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 377508 libwine
Bug#377508: libwine.so.1 not found
Bug reassigned from package `wine' to `libwine'.
> forcemerge 332580 377508
Bug#332580: libwine does not install libwine.so.1 on apt-get dist-upgrade
Bug#377508: libwine.so.1 not found
Forcibly
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 377499 freetennis
Bug#377499: freetennis - FTBFS: ocamlopt: Command not found
Warning: Unknown package 'freetennis'
Bug reassigned from package `ocaml-nox' to `freetennis'.
> notfound 377499 3.09.2-5
Bug#377499: freetennis - FTBFS: ocamlopt: C
reassign 377499 freetennis
notfound 377499 3.09.2-5
found 377499 0.4.8-1
thanks
Hi,
Bart Martens wrote:
> So it seems that this FTBFS bug for freetennis_0.4.8-1_s390 is caused by
> the missing /usr/bin/ocamlopt in ocaml_3.09.2-5_s390. Can someone in
> the debian-ocaml-maint@lists.debian.org team
Christian Hammers wrote:
Steven, can you please assign a CVE for the second DoS issue?
> On 2006-07-04 Christian Hammers wrote:
> > It's time for a new MySQL DSA :) On
> > http://www.lathspell.de/linux/debian/mysql/sarge-4.1
> > you find *sarge5.deb pacakges that fix the following two vulnerab
Your message dated Sun, 9 Jul 2006 23:40:18 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line odontolinux: Wrong postgresql dependency
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
reassign 377508 libwine
forcemerge 332580 377508
thanks
Mmm, this bug is a duplicate of #332580.
Merging then.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 377499 ocaml-nox
Bug#377499: freetennis - FTBFS: ocamlopt: Command not found
Warning: Unknown package 'freetennis'
Bug reassigned from package `freetennis' to `ocaml-nox'.
> found 377499 3.09.2-5
Bug#377499: freetennis - FTBFS: ocamlopt: Comma
On Sat, Jul 08, 2006 at 08:13:50AM -0400, Bruno Barrera C. wrote:
> On Sun, 2006-06-25 at 11:48 -0400, Andrew Moise wrote:
> > Bruno, would you object if I NMUed a new version of this package, with
> > the copyright file I attached earlier in this bug report?
>
> I would prefer if we can discuss
On Sat, Jul 08, 2006 at 10:32:52PM +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> When reporting an ICE in gcc, please include at least the version number of
> the gcc-4.1 package; I've tried to build llvm with both 4.1.1-5 and 4.1.1-7,
> and it builds fine with both for me.
FWIW, I've updated my pbuilder t
reassign 377499 ocaml-nox
found 377499 3.09.2-5
notfound 377499 0.4.8-1
stop
When I compare these:
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=freetennis&ver=0.4.8-1&arch=sparc&stamp=1152450391&file=log&as=raw
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=freetennis&ver=0.4.8-1&arch=s390&stamp=1152450558&
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> severity 377531 important
Bug#377531: openoffice.org-dev: unowinreg.dll should be included
Severity set to `important' from `grave'
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Pleas
Sam Morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Has there been any progress on getting a security update pushed out for
> this bug?
Not to my knowledge. I've pinged [EMAIL PROTECTED] a couple of times and
provided a patch, and after a few initial responses, I've not gotten any
further updates.
Copying
Package: namazu2
Version: 2.0.16-5
Severity: serious
Hi,
>From the buildd log:
cd tknamazu && /usr/bin/make install prefix=/build/buildd/namazu2-2.0.16/../deb
ian/namazu2/usr
make[1]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/namazu2-2.0.16/tknamazu'
make[2]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/namazu2-2.0
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 377414 important
Bug#377414: vzquota - FTBFS: comparison is always true due to limited range of
data type
Severity set to `important' from `serious'
> tags 377414 + upstream
Bug#377414: vzquota - FTBFS: comparison is always true due to limite
severity 377414 important
tags 377414 + upstream
forwarded 377414 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
thanks
Hi
On Sun, Jul 09, 2006 at 06:58:11PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> severity 377414 serious
> thanks
>
> On Sun, Jul 09, 2006 at 06:26:14PM +0200, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> > First of all as this package have
On Sun, Jul 09, 2006 at 08:08:23PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 09, 2006 at 11:55:38AM -0600, Bdale Garbee wrote:
> > tags 377330 +unreproducible +moreinfo
> > thanks
> >
> > On Sat, 2006-07-08 at 13:49 +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> >
> > > Tar failed a test on the amd64 buildd:
> > > 2
On Sun, Jul 09, 2006 at 08:12:08PM +0100, Sam Morris wrote:
> Has there been any progress on getting a security update pushed out for
> this bug?
A package is available from https://debian.pumuki.org/rssh/ and the needed
package has been pushed to debian proposed updates, since the security team
f
Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes, name it libapr-dev. If something really can use either one
> of the 2, I don't see why you should make a transition so hard
> and go and name it libapr0-dev.
>
> So I suggest you rename libapr0-dev to libapr-dev and make it
> provide libapr0-dev for n
Asheesh Laroia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >But if I have to remove the "apr1 | apr0" sutff, then a new version of
> >mod-bt (and every other apache2 module) will be neccessary when the switch
> >to 2.2 happens.
> In theory you could just switch the order of apr1 | apr0. But I agree
> that this
Package: openoffice.org-dev
Version: 2.0.3-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
The file "unowinreg.dll" from the openoffice.org sdk is missing
from the debian package. It is intentional, as one can learn from
the file /usr/share/doc/openoffice.org-dev/changelog.Debian.gz:
On Thu, Jun 15, 2006 at 05:27:02PM +0200, Frederic matray wrote:
> And there is no reference ton /dev/null in my configuration file so i
> don't know why it tries to use it.
I guess this is a matter of confusing file descriptors at some point;
syslog-ng opens /dev/null a number of places.
Anyhow,
Eduard Bloch wrote:
> I have another test subject, looks like the bug was not completely
> fixed. Uploaded to http://people.debian.org/~blade/linux-kernel.bz2 .
Problem message:
---
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jun 11 20:15:21
Has there been any progress on getting a security update pushed out for
this bug?
--
Sam Morris
http://robots.org.uk/
PGP key id 5EA01078
3412 EA18 1277 354B 991B C869 B219 7FDB 5EA0 1078
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
On Sun, Jul 09, 2006 at 11:37:58AM -0700, Tyler MacDonald wrote:
> Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 09, 2006 at 10:10:37AM -0700, Tyler MacDonald wrote:
> > > > apache2-prefork-dev depends on libapr0-dev which conflicts with
> > > > libapr1-dev.
> > > But that should be fi
On Sun, 9 Jul 2006, Tyler MacDonald wrote:
But if I have to remove the "apr1 | apr0" sutff, then a new version of
mod-bt (and every other apache2 module) will be neccessary when the switch
to 2.2 happens.
In theory you could just switch the order of apr1 | apr0. But I agree
that this is less
Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 09, 2006 at 10:10:37AM -0700, Tyler MacDonald wrote:
> > > apache2-prefork-dev depends on libapr0-dev which conflicts with
> > > libapr1-dev.
> > But that should be fine, since I depend on libapr1-dev *or*
> > libapr0-dev, shouldn't it? pbu
On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 01:20:34AM -0500, Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
> could you please try and send feedback if this is still an issue with
> the latest packge from here:
>
> http://people.debian.org/~nobse/temp/libapache2-mod-python/
This was over a month ago; the latest version in unstable is 3
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> found 367435 1:4.1.0-1+ia32.libs.1.12+b1
Bug#367435: lib32gcc1: Will not install: conflicts with libgcc1
Bug marked as found in version 1:4.1.0-1+ia32.libs.1.12+b1.
>
End of message,
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 373955 + fixed
Bug#373955: fai-server: fai doesn't remove apt.conf.d/*fai
Tags were: fixed
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debia
Your message dated Sun, 9 Jul 2006 19:57:49 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line libdnsres now available in Debian
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
tags 377330 +unreproducible +moreinfo
thanks
On Sat, 2006-07-08 at 13:49 +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> Tar failed a test on the amd64 buildd:
> 28: cyclic renames FAILED (rename03.at:122)
I see that. The bad news is I just tried this on my desktop amd64
system at ho
On Fri, May 05, 2006 at 01:13:39AM +0200, David Martínez Moreno wrote:
> tags 364012 + pending
> thanks for the fish
This was two months ago. Any progress? :-)
/* Steinar */
--
Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Troub
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 377330 +unreproducible +moreinfo
Unknown tag/s: +moreinfo.
Recognized are: patch wontfix moreinfo unreproducible fixed potato woody sid
help security upstream pending sarge sarge-ignore experimental d-i confirmed
ipv6 lfs fixed-in-experimental fi
Hello
On 2006-07-04 Christian Hammers wrote:
> It's time for a new MySQL DSA :) On
> http://www.lathspell.de/linux/debian/mysql/sarge-4.1
> you find *sarge5.deb pacakges that fix the following two vulnerabilities:
>
>* Fixed DoS bug where any user could crash the server with
> "SELECT
Package: libgcrypt11
Version: 1.2.2-2
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of libgcrypt11_1.2.2-2 on debian-31 by sbuild/s390 85
[...]
> /usr/bin/make check-TESTS
> make[3]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/libgcrypt11-1.2.2/tests'
> PAS
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> severity 343864 important
Bug#343864: Karm failes to save data
Severity set to `important' from `grave'
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need ass
On Sun, Jul 09, 2006 at 10:10:37AM -0700, Tyler MacDonald wrote:
> > apache2-prefork-dev depends on libapr0-dev which conflicts with
> > libapr1-dev.
> But that should be fine, since I depend on libapr1-dev *or*
> libapr0-dev, shouldn't it? pbuilder handles it without a problem...
No. The au
severity 377414 serious
thanks
On Sun, Jul 09, 2006 at 06:26:14PM +0200, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> First of all as this package have not been built on this architecture before
> this is not a serious bug, rather an important or normal bug.
Incorrect:
| Packages must autobuild without failure on all
Package: fgfs-atlas
Version: 0.3.0-3.1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
When I start Atlas, the following is written on the standard output and X quits:
X Error of failed request: BadWindow (invalid Window parameter)
Major opcode of failed request: 146 (NV-GLX)
Minor
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 377414 serious
Bug#377414: vzquota - FTBFS: comparison is always true due to limited range of
data type
Severity set to `serious' from `serious'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug trackin
Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: mod-bt
> Version: 0.0.18+p4.1178-1
> Severity: serious
>
> There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
>
> > Automatic build of mod-bt_0.0.18+p4.1178-1 on lxdebian.bfinv.de by
> > sbuild/s390 85
> [...]
> > ** Using build depende
Your message dated Sun, 09 Jul 2006 09:32:08 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#377016: fixed in gpsd 2.33-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
tags 370149 fixed-upstream
kthxbye
- Forwarded message from Adam Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
From: Adam Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 20:19:57 -0400
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [ANNOUNCE] libXfont 1.2.0
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
The bi
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 370149 fixed-upstream
Bug#370149: FTBFS: not compatible with FreeType 2.2
There were no tags set.
Bug#374905: libxfont: FTBFS: FreeType errors
Tags added: fixed-upstream
> kthxbye
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance
#include
* Volker Kuhlmann [Tue, Jun 20 2006, 11:57:29AM]:
> On Monday 22 May 2006 05:05, David Coppit wrote:
> > FYI,
> >
> > Today I have released Mail::Mbox::MessageParser version 1.4003, which
> > incorporates Eduard Bloch's patch for the "grepmail returning all emails"
> > bug.
>
> Thanks f
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> severity 377423 wishlist
Bug#377423: linux-image-2.6.16-2-em64t-p4-smp: Fails to find boot device (AHCI
ICH7 Family)
Severity set to `wishlist' from `serious'
>
End of message, stop
Your message dated Sun, 9 Jul 2006 18:03:28 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#366340: mozilla-thunderbird: Thunderbird crashes on
startup: 'BadMatch (invalid parameter attributes)'
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
severity 377414 normal
thanks
Hi
First of all as this package have not been built on this architecture before
this is not a serious bug, rather an important or normal bug.
Secondly I do not understand why warnings are treated as errors.
Regards,
// Ola
On Sat, Jul 08, 2006 at 09:11:46PM +0200
Christian Perrier wrote:
> As a consequence, I hereby ask the security team to DROP the processing
> of the 4.0.3-31sarge6 version you have.
As you wish, packages deleted.
Regards,
Joey
--
Testing? What's that? If it compiles, it is good, if it boots up, it is perfect.
Please always C
Mmm, this bug is a duplicate of #332580.
Executing "#dpkg -i libwine_0.9.15-1_i386.deb" solve the problem.
Sorry for the noise.
Chiacchiera con i tuoi amici in tempo reale!
http://it.yahoo.com/mail_it/foot/*http://it.messenger.yahoo.com
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
Package: wine
Version: 0.9.15-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
$ wine foo.exe
/usr/lib/wine/wine.bin: error while loading shared libraries: libwine.so.1:
cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
Wine failed with return code 127
-- System Information:
D
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 373955 + fixed
Bug#373955: fai-server: fai doesn't remove apt.conf.d/*fai
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> severity 377471 serious
Bug#377471: tremulous: please add amd64 to Architecture: in debian/rules
Severity set to `serious' from `wishlist'
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> merge 377419 377471
Bug#377419: FTBFS: architectures specified in debian/control too strict
Bug#377471: tremulous: please add amd64 to Architecture: in debian/rules
Merged 377419 3774
rectory `/build/buildd/freetennis-0.4.8'
> make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2
> **
> Build finished at 20060709-1508
> FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> This was about a month ago -- any progress?
You don't need to NMU.. *kidding*
Well, the "problem" is, that the kernel-team will prepare a modules
package to conglomerate all oot-modules. Unfortunately, they don't want
contrib modules, OTOH I was told that they will i
Your message dated Sun, 09 Jul 2006 13:13:39 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 377485 + fixed
Bug#377485: sablotron: Fails to upgrade: trying to overwrite
`/usr/share/man/man1/sablot-config.1.gz', which is also in package
libsablot0-dev
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please conta
On Sat, Jun 10, 2006 at 05:56:11PM +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> New upstream version of ipw does fix it, upload will follow soon, was
> redoing both ipw packages as oot.
This was about a month ago -- any progress?
/* Steinar */
--
Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Sun, Jul 09, 2006, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> Package: sablotron
> Version: 1.0.2-5.1
> Severity: serious
I introduced this erroneously in my NMU. Here are fixed packages
http://adn.diwi.org/debian-QA/sablotron/1.0.2-5.2/
Sorry for the trouble :(
The patch between -5.1 and -5.2 is as follows:
diff
Your message dated Sun, 09 Jul 2006 05:02:15 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#377473: fixed in squid 2.6.1-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Agreed. I have to upload a new version of gnade anyway due to the new
ABI, so I'll fix this bug.
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
People who cut off ompirtant people from the list of mail recipients cannot be
taken for serious.
You are obvuiously not interested in a solution but in lighting a fire :-(
Steve Langasek wrote:
>To my knowledge, Eben Moglen's *beliefs* on how the GPLv2 should be
>interpreted are not a binding
You again make the wrong conclusions and I get the impression that
you need to read the GPL more thoroughly in order to understand the way
I interpret it.
The main missunderstanding seems to be caused by reading GOL §2 b) too
quickly. this is why I try to explain it to you in detail below.
Your message dated Sun, 9 Jul 2006 13:25:57 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line rosegarden-data: missing replaces on rosegarden4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case i
On Sun, Jul 09, 2006 at 07:00:03PM +0800, LI Daobing wrote:
> this diff does not contain escape.h and escape.cpp
Oops; try this one instead.
/* Steinar */
--
Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/
diff -Nur xdrawchem-1.9.9/xdrawchem/application.cpp
../xdrawchem-1.9.9/xdrawchem/application.cpp
--- xdra
Package: sablotron
Version: 1.0.2-5.1
Severity: serious
Hi,
When trying to upgrade sablotron from 1.0.2-5 to 1.0.2-5.1 I get
the following error:
Preparing to replace sablotron 1.0.2-5 (using
.../sablotron_1.0.2-5.1_amd64.deb) ...
Unpacking replacement sablotron ...
dpkg: error processing /var/c
On Sat, May 27, 2006 at 08:02:07PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi Yann,
>
> we expect the 2.0.5 will be released in about 2 weeks.
What is the progress on this bug? 2.0.5 has been out for a while...
/* Steinar */
--
Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PRO
On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 11:51:37PM +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> Oh, and it's also incomplete; there are other system() calls there that need
> to be addressed. Some of them are harder, though, like the ones using ">" so
> they obviously need to go through a shell.
The included patch is com
Your message dated Sun, 9 Jul 2006 12:26:40 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed in NMU of python-orbit 0.3.1-12.4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
On 7/9/06, Steinar H. Gunderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 11:51:37PM +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> Oh, and it's also incomplete; there are other system() calls there that need
> to be addressed. Some of them are harder, though, like the ones using ">" so
> they obv
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 377401 serious
Bug#377401: libdnsres: FTBFS: incomplete build-depends
Severity set to `serious' from `serious'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrat
severity 377401 serious
thanks
Missing build dependencies are RC bugs.
Kurt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: sooperlooper
Version: 1.0.8c-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
Your package is failing to build on all 64 bit arches with the
following error:
midi_bind_panel.cpp: In member function 'void SooperLooperGui::MidiBindPanel::r
efresh_state()':
midi_bind_panel.cpp:457: error: cast from 'wxListCtrl*' to
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 358301 serious
Bug#358301: FTBFS with GCC 4.1 (GNAT): cannot inline "To_Ada"
Severity set to `serious' from `normal'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(admin
Package: mozilla-traybiff
Version: 1.2.2-3
Severity: serious
Hi,
Your package is failing to build with the following error:
make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/mozilla-traybiff-1.2.2'
unzip -d debian/temp/tb/ mozTrayBiff-1.2.2-tb1.5.0.4-Linux_x86_64-gcc3.xpi
make: unzip: Command not found
m
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> severity 376108 important
Bug#376108: pymol: fail to start with freeglut error
Severity set to `important' from `grave'
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 377419 FTBFS: architectures specified in debian/control too strict
Bug#377419: tremulous - FTBFS: error: current build architecture s390 does not
appear in package's list (i386)
Changed Bug title.
> stop
Stopping processing here.
Please conta
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
this dummy package makes no sense:
a) openoffice.org-soikko already has a RC bug so openoffioce.org2-soikko
won't get in anyway (testing does testing migration per source
packages). So with this bug, openoffice.org-soikko also never will
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 374136 + fixed
Bug#374136: python-orbit - Provides CORBA and PortableServer module
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(admi
retitle 377419 FTBFS: architectures specified in debian/control too strict
stop
The same applies for amd64. I was able to compile and play tremulous
when adding amd64 to debian/control. Please add amd64!
Gruesse,
Reinhard
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
1 - 100 of 119 matches
Mail list logo
