Your message dated Wed, 28 Jun 2006 23:32:30 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#375894: fixed in kiax 0.8.51.dfsg-2-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
I could get the bug reproduced, and tryed to craft a patch (attached,
it's mainly Matej Vela's patch replacing some 'unsigned long' with
'Window') but it's still not it (even if skippy doesn't crash
anymore).
I do not have a amd64 at hand, so debuging this is quite hard, if you
have such machine
Package: stalin
Version: 0.9+0.10alpha2-2.1
Severity: serious
Justification: violates policy 12.5
Hi,
There are some serious problems with stalin's copyright file:
* It does not actually contain the names of authors and copyright holders.
* It does not include a verbatim license statement from
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> clone 375507 -1
Bug#375507: heartbeat: uses adduser when it may not be available
Bug 375507 cloned as bug 375941.
> reassign -1 heartbeat-2
Bug#375941: heartbeat: uses adduser when it may not be available
Bug reassigned from package `heartbeat' to `hea
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> severity 375675 normal
Bug#375675: getmail4: getmail can't find module
Severity set to `normal' from `serious'
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you n
It looks like this was a python-support bug, #375608. Upgrading
python-support to the latest version fixed this for me.
Daniel
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Package: amarok
Version: 1.4.0a-1+b1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Amaroks starts without problem, start playing music and usually in the 1st song
skips a "second" of music, that is worst if I still operate the computer, start
kmail and prepare a trace report, while st
On Wed, 2006-06-28 at 10:36 +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > Here, the only way seems to be putting an entry in NEWS.Debian (for
> > users script, ie things not under our control).
Good idea, Christian.
> In addition, I would suggest we reinstate the previous behaviour, but
> display a warning w
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 375675 serious
Bug#375675: getmail4: getmail can't find module
Severity set to `serious' from `normal'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debi
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> forcemerge 375923 375925
Bug#375923: preinst fails because /usr/doc/cpio does not exist
Bug#375925: cpio: pre-installation script crashes
Forcibly Merged 375923 375925.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistan
Package: num-utils
Severity: critical
Hi, thanks for introducing num-utils, it looks interesting.
The conflict with gromacs is disappointing. There's no good reason why the
two shouldn't be able to coexist if the name clash with average can be
resolved. Is there a more constructive way of dealin
Hamish's report beat mine by 25 minutes, and included
more detail as well. Please merge this one (#375925)
with #375923.
- Larry
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> package cpio
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: cpio
> merge 375923 375925
Bug#375923: preinst fails because /usr/doc/cpio does not exist
Bug#375925: cpio: pre-installation script crashes
Merged 375923 375925.
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please cont
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 368913 serious
Bug#368913: please depends upon xerces27 instead of xerces26
Severity set to `serious' from `normal'
> severity 368914 serious
Bug#368914: please depends upon xerces27 instead of xerces26
Severity set to `serious' from `normal'
Your message dated Thu, 29 Jun 2006 02:16:17 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line ACK
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Package: python2.3-nevow
Version: 0.7.0-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
The package depends on python2.3-twisted-web, yet that package
does not exist (anymore).
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Package: debian-installer
Severity: grave
I tried the latest dailly snapshot of the etch debian-install cd.
The installation went pretty smoothly, there was one major issue though:
I setup a software raid (RAID1) with the following layout:
md0 (sda1,sdb1) => swap
md1 (sda2,sdb2) => /
The hard disk
Your message dated Wed, 28 Jun 2006 16:47:13 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#375029: fixed in python-numeric 24.2-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> reassign 324912 gftp
Bug#324912: gftp-gtk: segfaults regularly
Bug#323874: gftp-gtk: Crashes on disconnect
Bug reassigned from package `gftp-gtk' to `gftp'.
> reassign 324912 gftp-gt
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> notfound 324912 2.0.18-10
Bug#324912: gftp-gtk: segfaults regularly
Bug#323874: gftp-gtk: Crashes on disconnect
Bug marked as not found in version 2.0.18-10.
>
End of message, stoppi
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> # unversioned close since this was not a sourceful bug
> reopen 347881
Bug#347881: gnome-applets not installable because gnome-panel is still at
2.10.2-1
'reopen' is deprecated when
Your message dated Wed, 28 Jun 2006 16:52:39 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line deskbar-applet needs python 2.4 but depends on python 2.3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
Package: auto-apt
Version: 0.3.20
Severity: serious
auto-apt update now fails with:
auto-apt update
Downloading http://ftp.jp.debian.org/debian//dists/unstable Contents-amd64.gz
...
Warning: "+number" syntax is deprecated, please use "-n +number"
put: 0 files, 0 entries done (0 sec)
regard
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 373233 slapd fails with 2.4 kernels
Bug#373233: slapd: Fails to restart after upgrade
Changed Bug title.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Deb
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> # unversioned close since this was not a sourceful bug
> reopen 333642
Bug#333642: beagle: depends on newer version of libevolution-cil than is
available (0.10.2 > 0.8-2)
'reopen' i
Package: cpio
Version: 2.6-14
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
cpio_2.6-14 fails to install with apt-get upgrade.
Preparing to replace cpio 2.6-13 (using .../archives/cpio_2.6-14_amd64.deb) ...
dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/cpio_2.6-14_amd64.deb (--unpack)
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> # explicitly mark as open for britney
> reopen 324803
Bug#324803: cdw Segmentation fault
'reopen' is deprecated when a bug has been closed with a version;
use 'found' or 'submitter'
retitle 373233 slapd fails with 2.4 kernels
thanks
On Tue, Jun 13, 2006 at 09:45:14PM +0200, Matthijs Mohlmann wrote:
> This is a known problem and is fixed in the current svn, when all
> architectures are updated to the new gcc-defaults and we've tested the
> current version in svn we'll upload o
Package: cpio
Version: 2.6-14
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
cpio 2.6-14's preinst fails here because /usr/doc/cpio does not exist.
(This system was new pre-sarge hence has no /usr/doc leftovers.)
The preinst does
test -L /usr/doc/cpio && rm -f /usr/doc/cpio
which r
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 374487 + fixed
Bug#374487: sqwebmail-de: FTBFS: Failed to satisfy Build-Depends-Indep
dependency for sqwebmail-de: automake1.6
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian b
Fabio Tranchitella wrote:
> Il giorno mer, 28/06/2006 alle 13.35 +0200, Maximilian Mehnert ha
> scritto:
>> Package: zope-kupu
>> Version: 1.3.7-1
>> Severity: grave
>> Justification: renders package unusable
> Hi Maximilian,
>
> I'm not able to reproduce this bug, especially considering that
>
Your message dated Wed, 28 Jun 2006 15:17:12 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#373437: fixed in gnome-python-extras 2.14.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Wed, 28 Jun 2006 15:17:12 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#375836: fixed in gnome-python-extras 2.14.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 374487 patch
Bug#374487: sqwebmail-de: FTBFS: Failed to satisfy Build-Depends-Indep
dependency for sqwebmail-de: automake1.6
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks dude
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistanc
Your message dated Wed, 28 Jun 2006 15:17:12 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#375847: fixed in gnome-python-extras 2.14.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Wed, 28 Jun 2006 15:17:12 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#373437: fixed in gnome-python-extras 2.14.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Wed, 28 Jun 2006 15:17:12 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#375836: fixed in gnome-python-extras 2.14.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Wed, 28 Jun 2006 15:17:12 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#375847: fixed in gnome-python-extras 2.14.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Wed, 28 Jun 2006 15:17:12 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#375836: fixed in gnome-python-extras 2.14.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
On Wed, Jun 28, 2006 at 12:58:59AM +0200, Alexander Schmehl wrote:
> [ Cc-ing the bug report, so we have it in the bts, too ]
>
> Hi!
>
> - Now the real problem: shc.c
>
> Lookit at it we have:
>
> /**
> * This software contains the 'Alleged RC4' source code.
> * The original source code was
Your message dated Wed, 28 Jun 2006 15:17:12 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#375847: fixed in gnome-python-extras 2.14.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Wed, 28 Jun 2006 15:17:12 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#373437: fixed in gnome-python-extras 2.14.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
On Wednesday 28 June 2006 21:53, George Danchev wrote:
> svn r1969-1972 are way too fast ;-) In the previous commit I just fixed the
> blatant and unintended repackaging sed mistake and that is enough to have
> kiax/lib with LGPL code only and EC enabled, please look at the headers of
> the files.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> package gnome-python-extras python-gnome2-extras python-gnome2-extras-dev
> python-gnome2-extras-doc
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: python-gnome2-extras-doc python-gnome2-extras
pyt
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 336993 initramfs done by yaird with XFS
Bug#336993: linux-image-2.6.14-1-powerpc64: does not boot, failed to mount root
fs
Changed Bug title.
> severity 336993 serious
Bug#336993: initramfs done by yaird with XFS
Severity set to `serious' from
severity 375904 wishlist
tags 375904 + help
stop
Hi,
On Wed, Jun 28, 2006, Matt Taggart wrote:
> Package: galeon, firefox
> Version: 2.0.1-3, 1.5.dfsg+1.5.0.4-1
> Severity: serious
Since you're a DD, I should trust your bug report more than average,
but frankly: filing a RELEASE CRITIC
Your message dated Wed, 28 Jun 2006 13:19:43 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#375854: libevolution-cil: uninstallable in sid
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the cas
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 375906 linux-2.6
Bug#375906: linux-headers-2.6.17-1-k7: Not installable on sid: depends on
linux-kbuild-2.6.17 which does not exist
Bug reassigned from package `linux-headers-2.6.17-1-k7' to `linux-2.6'.
> forcemerge 375432 375906
Bug#375432:
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> package kiax
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: kiax
> tags 375894 + pending
Bug#375894: kiax DFSGness not taken seriously
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
>
End of message,
On Wednesday 28 June 2006 22:58, Mark Purcell wrote:
--
> Agreed we should remove this EC patch until it is DFSG licenced.
Apart from the blatant sed'ish bug (which was not inteneded, and never met
before this special case arose) our EC patch is not the same as the Tipic
one. Everything in ours
Il giorno mer, 28/06/2006 alle 13.35 +0200, Maximilian Mehnert ha
scritto:
> Package: zope-kupu
> Version: 1.3.7-1
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
>
> Trying to install kupu in plone_2.1.3-1 I get the following error:
Hi Maximilian,
I'm not able to reproduce this
On Wednesday 28 June 2006 21:25, Santiago Garcia Mantinan wrote:
> Package: kiax
> Version: 0.8.51.dfsg-1-1
> Severity: serious
>
> Hi!
Hello,
> We had a package that we knew was dfsg compliant, I had removed the lib
> stuff which had several license problems because of that and then renamed
> it
reassign 375906 linux-2.6
forcemerge 375432 375906
thanks
On Wed, Jun 28, 2006 at 03:50:47PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> Kernel headers for 2.6.17-1-k7 are not installable because they depend
> on linux-kbuild-2.6.17, which does not appear to exist anywhere
> (packages.d.o yields no matches, sa
Your message dated Wed, 28 Jun 2006 13:32:57 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#375882: fixed in libdbd-odbc-perl 1.13-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 375904 wishlist
Bug#375904: flash video crashes browser
Severity set to `wishlist' from `serious'
> tags 375904 + help
Bug#375904: flash video crashes browser
There were no tags set.
Tags added: help
> stop
Stopping processing here.
Please c
On Wed, 2006-06-28 at 14:44 +0200, tech wrote:
> Package: dillo
> Version: 0.8.5-4
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> dillo only shows the pictures, not the text
>
> -- System Information:
> Debian Release: testing/unstable
> APT prefers proposed-updates
> APT pol
I will do it. I was just in the process of fixing it myself.
Carlo
On Wed, 28 Jun 2006, gregor herrmann wrote:
tags 375882 pending
thanks
On Wed, 28 Jun 2006 13:24:12 -0400, Scott Reese wrote:
The actual perl module (/usr/lib/perl5/DBD/ODBC.pm) and its supporting
pieces are missing from t
On Wed, Jun 28, 2006 at 03:13:09PM +0300, George Danchev wrote:
> cheops should not build-depend on a virtual package since that prevents
> succesful autobuilding.
There is nothing wrong *in principle* with build-depending on a virtual
package. Lots of build-deps are virtual packages and this w
Package: linux-headers-2.6.17-1-k7
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Kernel headers for 2.6.17-1-k7 are not installable because they depend
on linux-kbuild-2.6.17, which does not appear to exist anywhere
(packages.d.o yields no matches, save a kernel-kbuild-2.6.3 which only
e
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 371866
Bug#371866: pfmon_3.2-1(ia64/unstable): FTBFS: missing include files
'reopen' is deprecated when a bug has been closed with a version;
use 'found' or 'submitter' as appropriate instead.
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> tags 371866
On Wednesday 28 June 2006 19:25, Santiago Garcia Mantinan wrote:
> We had a package that we knew was dfsg compliant, I had removed the lib
> stuff which had several license problems because of that and then renamed
> it to dfsg as we had agreed that it was dfsg compliant, now...
Manty,
Sorry. Tha
Hello,
I cannot reproduce this on an amd64 up to date Etch. Can you provide a
test page? (I took this bug report as test).
Greetings
Helge
--
Dr. Helge Kreutzmann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php
Package: galeon, firefox
Version: 2.0.1-3, 1.5.dfsg+1.5.0.4-1
Severity: serious
If you have the flash plugin installed and go to
http://gamevideos.com/video/id/4282
and click on the buttons in the flash video viewer it causes both galeon and
firefox (and maybe more?) to crash. I suspect the pr
Your message dated Wed, 28 Jun 2006 21:18:44 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line bug no longer applies
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibili
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 375882 pending
Bug#375882: libdbd-odbc-perl: The perl module is missing from the package.
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system adminis
Package: pfmon
Version: 3.2.060621-1
Severity: serious
Hello,
There was a problem while autobuilding your package:
> Automatic build of pfmon_3.2.060621-1 on avidan by sbuild/i386 0.47
> Build started at 20060627-2244
>
Package: kiax
Version: 0.8.51.dfsg-1-1
Severity: serious
Hi!
We had a package that we knew was dfsg compliant, I had removed the lib
stuff which had several license problems because of that and then renamed it
to dfsg as we had agreed that it was dfsg compliant, now...
I found of a bad taste tha
tags 375882 pending
thanks
On Wed, 28 Jun 2006 13:24:12 -0400, Scott Reese wrote:
> The actual perl module (/usr/lib/perl5/DBD/ODBC.pm) and its supporting
> pieces are missing from the package. The package contains documentation
> and examples, but is missing the module.
I've fixed debian/rule
Your message dated Wed, 28 Jun 2006 19:41:53 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed in NMU of fvwm1 1.24r-50.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
Any news about this bug? Now that Linux 2.6.17 is in unstable, this
better be fixed.
Thanks,
Johannes
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, 28 Jun 2006, Roger Leigh wrote:
>> I just installed discover on my i386 test system, and it didn't load
>> lp. I rebooted it to see what happened at startup, and it didn't load
>> lp then, either.
>
> Please file a bug against disc
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 372903 + fixed
Bug#372903: fvwm1: ..upgrade fails on symlink typo? in post-install
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(admi
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 361396 fixed-upstream
Bug#361396: FTBFS with G++ 4.1: extra qualification & co
Tags were: fixed-upstream
Tags added: fixed-upstream
> Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2006 19:38:21 +0200
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PR
Package: tomcat5
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
tomcat5 fails to build from source on i386 in a clean chroot:
make[1]: Entering directory `/tmp/buildd/tomcat5-5.0.30'
make[1]: Nothing to be done for `update-config'.
make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/tomcat5-5.0.30'
cd . && /usr/lib/
Package: libdbd-odbc-perl
Version: 1.13-3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
The actual perl module (/usr/lib/perl5/DBD/ODBC.pm) and its supporting
pieces are missing from the package. The package contains documentation
and examples, but is missing the module.
-- System In
Your message dated Wed, 28 Jun 2006 09:47:24 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#323099: fixed in wget 1.10.2-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 374743 [NONFREE-DOC:GFDL1.2] automake1.8 contains non-free material
Bug#374743: automake1.8: automake1.8 contains non-free material
Changed Bug title.
> retitle 374570 [NONFREE-DOC:GFDL1.2] automake1.9 contains non-free material
Bug#374570: aut
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 375859 linux-2.6
Bug#375859: linux-headers-2.6.17-1: package uninstallable as it depends on the
package linux-kbuild-2.6.17
Bug reassigned from package `linux-headers-2.6.17-1' to `linux-2.6'.
> forcemerge 375432 375859
Bug#375432: One packag
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 373437 + fixed
Bug#373437: Python policy transition
Tags were: patch
Bug#375836: python2.4-gnome2-extras: versioned dependency on virtual package
python2.4-gtk2
Bug#375847: Python policy transition
Tags added: fixed
> tag 375836 + fixed
Bug#375836
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 374633 important
Bug#374633: partimage: FTBFS (amd64): conflicting declaration 'typedef long
unsigned int __u64'
Severity set to `important' from `serious'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian
severity 374633 important
thanks
I'm lowering the severity to important because partimage is currently
not built for the AMD64 platform, so it should not be a release critical
bug. Nonetheless as soon as I have some spare I'll take a look at it.
From what I've seen so far, the real problem I think
Your message dated Wed, 28 Jun 2006 09:17:14 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#375103: fixed in menu 2.1.29
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
reassign 375859
forcemerge 375432 375859
thanks
On Wed, Jun 28, 2006 at 03:13:45PM +0100, James Keasley wrote:
> This package is currently uninstallable as it depends on the
> linux-kbuild-2.6.17 package, which isn't available.
And the next one.
Bastian
--
You're too beautiful to ignore. Too
On Wed, 28 Jun 2006, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
> > I have seen the other messages (discover, ...) but I want to answer this
> > mail
> > anyway.
> >
> > How do I get the udev bootup output? What else (discover, ...) can I test
> > to
> > help fixing this bug?
>
> As pointed out by Henrique an
Your message dated Wed, 28 Jun 2006 08:47:15 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#346829: fixed in xmpi 2.2.3b8-10
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
George Danchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> asked debian-legal:
> Unfortunately John L Allen is unreachible to clarify the license terms of his
> piece of code [3].
>
> Now, the question is: how long we should wait for nobody claim a copyright
> for
> the code to have it in Public Domain ? [...]
70 yea
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 375847 gnome-python-extras
Bug#375847: Python policy transition
Bug reassigned from package `python-gnome2-extras' to `gnome-python-extras'.
> reassign 375836 gnome-python-extras
Bug#375836: python2.4-gnome2-extras: versioned dependency on vir
Your message dated Wed, 28 Jun 2006 08:17:11 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#375347: fixed in lighttpd 1.4.11-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Package: config-manager
Version: 0.3-2
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
When building 'config-manager' on unstable,
I get the following error:
depbase=`echo src/File.o | sed 's|[^/]*$|.deps/&|;s|\.o$||'`; \
if x86_64-linux-gnu-g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.
-I./libgetopt/include-g -O2
Package: linux-headers-2.6.17-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
This package is currently uninstallable as it depends on the
linux-kbuild-2.6.17 package, which isn't available.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (
Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> thank you for the hint about su -s,
You're welcome.
> Aaron, I would suggest you to keep a copy of this tree to try again with the
> fixed wims package once Georges can provide it. In the mean time, starting
I've backed it up into a tarball, though
On Wed, 28 Jun 2006, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
> We have too many hardware detection layers and none of them able to see
> the full picture. Even worse, as witnessed in this particular case, they
> all fail at detecting something as simple as the printer driver.
>
> Anyhow, udev and discover dupli
Package: libgksu2-0
Version: 1.9.3-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
When I try to run a program with gksu, nothing seems to happen. With
debug output I get:
% gksu -d id
xauth: -X
- -
display:
Christian Groeger wrote:
> Package: powersaved
> Version: 0.12.18-1
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
>
> I try to start the init-script /etc/init.d/powersaved start, but it just
> prompts "Failed!". There are no error messages in dmesg, /var/log/syslog
> or /var/log/
Il giorno mer, 28/06/2006 alle 14.04 +0200, Alexandre Fayolle ha
scritto:
> Package: python2.4-gnome2-extras
> Severity: serious
> Tags: patch
> Justification: makes package uninstalable on sid
>
> Hi,
>
> The python-gtk2 package has been updated to the new Python policy, and
> therefore the
>
Package: libevolution-cil
Version: 0.11.1-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
libecal1.2-3 is not in sid anymore, therefore libevolution-cil is
uninstallable.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Archi
retitle 374721 toshset: FTBFS with pciutils 2.2
tag 374721 patch
thanks
The build failure is caused by a change in pciutils 2.2.0:
* lib/types.h, lib/pci.h, lib/sysdep.h: `byte' and `word' are
no longer exported to the outside world.
The attached patch replaces `byte' with `u8' (
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: wmweather: modifies conffile
> From: Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine
> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
> (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
> X-Spam-Level:
> X
Package: festival-it
Severity: serious
Hello,
here's another problem, and it's likely to be what's killing the accessibility
software[1]:
$ echo "Evviva il Perú" | festival --tts --language english
$ echo "Evviva il Perú" | festival --tts --language finnish
SIOD ERROR: damaged env : #
$ echo "Ev
Christian Groeger schrieb:
> Package: powersaved
> Version: 0.12.18-1
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
>
> I try to start the init-script /etc/init.d/powersaved start, but it just
> prompts "Failed!". There are no error messages in dmesg, /var/log/syslog
> or /var/lo
1 - 100 of 164 matches
Mail list logo
