Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 374378 important
Unknown tag/s: important.
Recognized are: patch wontfix moreinfo unreproducible fixed potato woody sid
help security upstream pending sarge sarge-ignore experimental d-i confirmed
ipv6 lfs fixed-in-experimental fixed-upstream l10
Your message dated Sun, 18 Jun 2006 23:34:17 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line nant dependency on winforms done
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The fix_intltool.dpatch works fine, and already included in upstream.
Now this bug is pending for libchewing3 pass the NEW queue.
Thanks for everyone who helped on this.
- -Andrew
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)
Commen
tags 374378 important
stop
breakage happens not under usual circumstances thus severity important.
On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 04:35:21AM +0300, Viktor Pilpenok wrote:
> If pvmove was ran on the system and did not complete (eg due to a crash,
> power
> failure, etc), LVM2 requires the "mirror" dm
Package: knemo
Version: 0.4.1-1
Severity: grave
knemo crashes randomly (not 100% reproducable, but pretty frequent), when:
1) openning the status dialog
2) switching tabs in the status dialog
0.4.2 changelog seems to refer to this bug as fixed.
Version 0.4.2:
* fixed crash when opening sta
Dear friend,
I foubnd your picture on bonbe of the websites, can we taalk to
each other? I might be coaming to your plabce in few weeks.
This would be a greaat opportunity to meet each other.
Btw, I am a woman. I am 25. Drop me a line at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PR
Your message dated Sun, 18 Jun 2006 22:47:11 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#370502: fixed in gnucash 1.9.8-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Sun, 18 Jun 2006 22:47:11 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#370502: fixed in gnucash 1.9.8-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 372275 + fixed
Bug#372275: libannodex: FTBFS: build-dep on missing libcmml0-dev
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(adminis
Hello Justin, Tollef,
* Justin Erenkrantz wrote on Sun, Jun 18, 2006 at 11:40:12PM CEST:
> On 6/18/06, Tollef Fog Heen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Currently, if configure is passed --sbindir=, it just overrides
> >$sbindir without flagging that at all. If it, in addition to changing
> >$sbindir
Hello,
Sorry, forgot to update the libannodex0-dev dependency; here's the
diff I'm actually uploading.
Thanks,
Matej
diff -u libannodex-0.7.3/debian/changelog libannodex-0.7.3/debian/changelog
--- libannodex-0.7.3/debian/changelog
+++ libannodex-0.7.3/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,13 @@
+libannode
Hello,
I'm doing an NMU of libannodex to fix #372275; diff attached.
Thanks,
Matej
diff -u libannodex-0.7.3/debian/changelog libannodex-0.7.3/debian/changelog
--- libannodex-0.7.3/debian/changelog
+++ libannodex-0.7.3/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,13 @@
+libannodex (0.7.3-3.1) unstable; urgency=me
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 371866 + fixed
Bug#371866: pfmon_3.2-1(ia64/unstable): FTBFS: missing include files
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(adm
Filipus Klutiero wrote:
> Rene, what evidence is there that this bug affects Etch?
Because I somehow thought the sarge-security fixed libfreetype6 went
into etch, too thorough the propagation mechanism (or at least did so).
also got a report on etch after that upgrade with that version number.
An
Hello,
I'm doing an NMU of pfmon to fix #371866; diff attached.
Thanks,
Matej
diff -u pfmon-3.2/debian/changelog pfmon-3.2/debian/changelog
--- pfmon-3.2/debian/changelog
+++ pfmon-3.2/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+pfmon (3.2-1.1) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ *
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.19
> tags 372719 - etch sarge
Bug#372719: Freetype and OpenOffice
Tags were: etch sarge
Bug#373581: freetype security update causes divide by zero (w/FIX)
Bug#373980: openoffice.org: Openo
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.60
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
If pvmove was ran on the system and did not complete (eg due to a crash, power
failure, etc), LVM2 requires the "mirror" dm target to activate the VG
By default the initrd only contains dm-mod and dm
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.19
> notfound 372719 2.1.7-2.4
Bug#372719: Freetype and OpenOffice
Bug#373581: freetype security update causes divide by zero (w/FIX)
Bug#373980: openoffice.org: Openoffice crashes when sw
Rene, what evidence is there that this bug affects Etch?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ray Kohler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Package: openafs-modules-source
> Version: 1.4.1-3
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
> The module built from this version, at least on AMD64, does not load:
> # modprobe openafs
> FATAL: Error inserting openafs
> (/lib/modules/2
Your message dated Mon, 19 Jun 2006 01:49:34 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line been fixed in 0.1.19-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibil
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 374363 pending
Bug#374363: pngnq: FTBFS: undefined references
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debia
Hi,
Several weeks ago lithuanian Mozilla translators released updated
lt-LT.xpi for Mozilla 1.7.12 and newers, so I've updated mozilla-locale-lt
debian package and fixed this bug at last ;)
Updated mozilla-locale-lt deb packages and signed sources are available at
ftp.akl.lt/Internetas/Mozilla
Your message dated Mon, 19 Jun 2006 01:35:19 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed in upstream 2.0.17
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsib
Your message dated Sun, 18 Jun 2006 16:02:13 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#372716: fixed in libkexif 0.2.3-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Package: openafs-modules-source
Version: 1.4.1-3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
The module built from this version, at least on AMD64, does not load:
--
# modprobe openafs
FATAL: Error inserting
Package: pngnq
Version: 0.3-1
Severity: serious
Hello,
There was a problem while autobuilding your package:
> Automatic build of pngnq_0.3-1 on avidan by sbuild/i386 0.47
> Build started at 20060619-0013
...
> /usr/bin/fakeroot debian/rules clean
> test -x debian/rules
> test "`id -u`" = 0
> /u
> the attached patch makes configure look for X.h in /usr/include/X11
> instead of /usr/X11R6/include/X11. It also adds a build-dep on
> x11proto-core-dev.
> (I didn't include the patch to configure itself, so you need to run
> autoconf after applying this.)
I did that, and sponsored Julien's N
Your message dated Mon, 19 Jun 2006 00:37:49 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line [Pkg-texlive-maint] Bug#369763: texlive-base-bin: not
installable in sid and obsolete libxaw8-dev build-dep
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim th
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> found 374002 4:3.5.2-2
Bug#374002: kdm: [CVE-2006-2449] KDM symlink attack vulnerability
Bug marked as found in version 4:3.5.2-2.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please
Le mercredi 14 juin 2006 à 22:05 +0200, Peter Palfrader a écrit :
> Package: and
> Version: 1.2.2-1
> Severity: serious
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo /etc/init.d/and stop
> Stopping auto nice daemon: and.
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo dpkg --remove and
> (Reading database ... 229177 files and direct
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> notfound 374002 4:3.5.2-2
Bug#374002: kdm: [CVE-2006-2449] KDM symlink attack vulnerability
Bug marked as not found in version 4:3.5.2-2.
(By the way, this Bug is currently marked as
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> notfound 374002 4:3.5.3-2
Bug#374002: kdm: [CVE-2006-2449] KDM symlink attack vulnerability
Bug marked as not found in version 4:3.5.3-2.
(By the way, this Bug is currently marked as
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 372558 + fixed
Bug#372558: gai: FTBFS: missing build dependency
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs dat
Package: ogmtools
Version: 1:1.5-2
Severity: serious
Hello,
There was a problem while autobuilding your package:
> Automatic build of ogmtools_1:1.5-2 on avidan by sbuild/i386 0.47
> Build started at 2006061
On 6/18/06, Tollef Fog Heen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Currently, if configure is passed --sbindir=, it just overrides
$sbindir without flagging that at all. If it, in addition to changing
$sbindir, it'd set ac_param_sbindir either to 1 to show that sbindir
is derviced from a command line argume
Your message dated Sun, 18 Jun 2006 14:47:39 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#374344: fixed in gcalctool 5.8.16-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Sun, 18 Jun 2006 14:49:09 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#374211: fixed in monodevelop 0.10-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> package gcalctool
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: gcalctool
> tags 374344 + pending
Bug#374344: FTBFS: missing dependency on gnome-doc-utils
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pendin
As far as I can tell, this bug has not affected anyone else, nor has
it been reproducible. Do you have any information that could help track it
down?
If you don't provide more info, in one month, I will downgrade this bug to
normal, and close it two months from then.
Thank you.
--
Rodrigo Gall
Package: openldap2
Version: 2.1.30-13
Severity: serious
This package no loner builds in unstable:
> Automatic build of openldap2_2.1.30-13 on usurper by sbuild/amd64 0.46
...
> cc -Wall -g -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -O2 -o .libs/apitest apitest.o
> ./.libs/libldap.so ../../libraries/liblber/.libs/l
On Sun, Jun 18, 2006 at 12:35:45PM +0900, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Package: xsol
> Severity: normal
>
> Good day,
>
> Your package xsol has been detected as depending on the deprecated
> lesstif1.
>
> This bug is part of a mass bug filling and the remedy is usually
> quite simple. Build-depend
Package: dietlibc-dev
Version: 0.29-14
Severity: serious
bglibs fails to build, possibly due to the new dietlibc (given that
stackgap comes from there).
> Automatic build of bglibs_1.041-1 on usurper by sbuild/amd64 0.46
...
> ./load bg-installer cli/lib.a libbg.a libbg-sysdeps.a
> gcc -nostdl
I originally sent this just to Henrique; it looks like it didn't make
it into BTS. It looks like it's been fixed, though.
Jun 18 14:11:29 raych hpiod: 0.9.11 accepting connections at 51476...
-- Forwarded message --
From: Eric Christopherson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 11 Jun
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> forcemerge 372719 373980
Bug#372719: Freetype and OpenOffice
Bug#373980: openoffice.org: Openoffice crashes when switching anti-aliasing off
Bug#373581: freetype security update causes divide by zero (w/FIX)
Forcibly Merged 372719 373581 373980.
> than
On Sun, Jun 18, 2006 at 02:20:30PM +0200, Michael Koch wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 18, 2006 at 12:47:46AM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 07:58:06PM +0200, Michael Koch wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 02:41:40PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 11:
Package: sfio
Version: 2000-5
Severity: serious
This package no longer builds on amd64.
> Automatic build of sfio_2000-5 on usurper by sbuild/amd64 0.46
...
> gcc -c -I. -O3 -Dvt_threaded=0 -pipe -fPIC -D_REENTRANT sfclose.c
> In file included from sfio_t.h:29,
> from sfhdr.h:12,
Package: twclock
Version: 2.5-3
Severity: grave
Hi,
twclock_2.5-3 FTBFS on all architectures with the following error:
make[4]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/twclock-2.5'
echo Installing Twclock in /usr/lib/X11/app-defaults
Installing Twclock in /usr/lib/X11/app-defaults
/usr/bin/install -c -
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 355663 - fixed
Bug#355663: FTBFS with G++ 4.1: qtermhttp.cpp:94: error: unknown escape
sequence '\='
Tags were: pending fixed patch
Tags removed: fixed
> severity 355663 serious
Bug#355663: FTBFS with G++ 4.1: qtermhttp.cpp:94: error: unknown esc
Hi Peter,
Thanks for the upload.
On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 08:15:53AM +0200, Peter Van Eynde wrote:
> > [...]
> > echo '(setq *clhs-root-default* "http://www.lisp.org/HyperSpec/";)'
> > > config.lisp
> > ./lisp.run -B . -N locale -Efile UTF-8 -Eterminal UTF-8 -Emisc 1:1 -norc
> > -m 1400KW -x "(
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> #
> # bts-link upstream status pull for source package libkexif
> # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
> #
> user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Setting user to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (was [EMAIL PROTECTED]).
> # remote status report
Package: wpasupplicant
Version: 0.5.3+20060522-3
Severity: serious
This is a dummy bug to prevent propagation to 'testing'. We havn't
decided yet if we want the 0.5 branch in 'etch' yet, until we have
heard more feedback.
In the following discussion, please keep this bug in CC.
Gruesse,
Package: gcalctool
Version: 5.8.16-1
Severity: grave
Hi,
gcalctool_5.8.16-1 FTBFS with the following error:
[...]
checking for gconftool-2... /usr/bin/gconftool-2
Using config source xml:merged:/etc/gconf/gconf.xml.defaults for schema
installation
Using $(sysconfdir)/gconf/schemas as install dir
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> forwarded 373643 http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=345255
Bug#373643: Unsupported or non-substituted DATADIRNAME variable in
Makefile.in.in template
Noted your statement that
On Sun, Jun 18, 2006 at 02:20:37PM +0200, Christian Hammers wrote:
>
> Er, "subject says all" :) Just type "SELECT str_to_date(1, NULL);" and watch
> your connection
> go away. If you get "NULL" as result without any error message then your
> version is safe.
ahem, I didn't read your second mes
On Sun, Jun 18, 2006 at 07:06:53PM +0200, Loïc Minier wrote:
>
> *.la files are pure evil, and we should get rid of them. I wish I
> wouldn't have to resort to awful dependencies like I have to right now,
> but the removal process is long when done properly (ie not like
> Xcursor).
I agree t
Your message dated Sun, 18 Jun 2006 09:47:27 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#373696: fixed in vim 1:7.0-017+8
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Sun, 18 Jun 2006 09:47:27 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#373890: fixed in vim 1:7.0-017+8
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Sun, 18 Jun 2006 10:02:18 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#374289: fixed in libbonoboui 2.14.0-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Your message dated Sun, 18 Jun 2006 09:47:27 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#373696: fixed in vim 1:7.0-017+8
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Sun, 18 Jun 2006 09:47:27 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#373890: fixed in vim 1:7.0-017+8
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Sun, 18 Jun 2006 09:47:27 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#373762: fixed in vim 1:7.0-017+8
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Sun, 18 Jun 2006 09:47:27 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#373890: fixed in vim 1:7.0-017+8
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Sun, 18 Jun 2006 09:47:27 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#373762: fixed in vim 1:7.0-017+8
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
I'm on the austin-group mailing list, which is the discussion
list for the POSIX committee.
According to discussion on the austin-group mailing list,
the POSIX spec never intended to disallow the traditional
syntax. Very rarely is traditional syntax disallowed, and only
with some major justificat
Your message dated Sun, 18 Jun 2006 09:47:27 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#374060: fixed in vim 1:7.0-017+8
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Sun, 18 Jun 2006 09:47:27 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#374060: fixed in vim 1:7.0-017+8
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Hi,
On Sun, Jun 18, 2006, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > > > grep /usr/lib/libtasn1.la /usr/lib/libbonoboui-2.la
> > > If I rebuild it now, it's actually not there anymore. So you can
> > > just remove it.
> > I disagree, you've rebuilt it on your arch but the change you requested
> > impac
Your message dated Sun, 18 Jun 2006 09:47:27 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#373762: fixed in vim 1:7.0-017+8
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Sun, 18 Jun 2006 09:47:27 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#374060: fixed in vim 1:7.0-017+8
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Sun, 18 Jun 2006 09:47:18 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#373852: fixed in starfighter 1.1-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Sun, 18 Jun 2006 09:47:27 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#373696: fixed in vim 1:7.0-017+8
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Sun, 18 Jun 2006 09:47:27 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#374060: fixed in vim 1:7.0-017+8
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Sun, 18 Jun 2006 09:47:27 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#373762: fixed in vim 1:7.0-017+8
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Sun, 18 Jun 2006 09:47:27 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#373696: fixed in vim 1:7.0-017+8
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Sun, 18 Jun 2006 09:47:27 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#373890: fixed in vim 1:7.0-017+8
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Sun, 18 Jun 2006 09:47:15 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#369990: fixed in gtklookat 0.13.0-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
On Saturday 17 June 2006 10:17, Sune Vuorela wrote:
> Being friendly and poking a bit to people on irc made one come up with a
> partly patch. Now, creating new dIMAP-accounts in kmail is disabled thru
> the user interface.
Poking around people on irc sometimes helps.
The new plan is that we all
On Sun, Jun 18, 2006 at 06:18:01PM +0200, Loïc Minier wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jun 18, 2006, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > > grep /usr/lib/libtasn1.la /usr/lib/libbonoboui-2.la
> > If I rebuild it now, it's actually not there anymore. So you can
> > just remove it.
>
> I disagree, you've rebuilt it on y
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 374289 + pending confirmed
Bug#374289: libbonoboui2-dev: uninstallable: conflicting depends.
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending, confirmed
> stop
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking sy
On Sun, Jun 18, 2006 at 05:26:33PM +0200, Mario Iseli wrote:
> Package: msmtp
> Severity: serious
> Justification: Policy 2.3
Hi,
> msmtp is licensed under the GPL and in the COPYING file and also in
> debian/copyright I couldn't find an exception which allows the linking with
> OpenSSL, this vio
tags 374289 + pending confirmed
stop
On Sun, Jun 18, 2006, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > grep /usr/lib/libtasn1.la /usr/lib/libbonoboui-2.la
> If I rebuild it now, it's actually not there anymore. So you can
> just remove it.
I disagree, you've rebuilt it on your arch but the change you requested
On Sun, Jun 18, 2006 at 05:21:06PM +0200, Loïc Minier wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 18, 2006, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > You really should only add those -dev packages your packages
> > added to it. If your package wasn't using them, they should be
> > in other .la files, and those packages should already have
Hi!
Well, this package is available only on unstable now. It was removed
from testing because it was failing to build.
http://packages.qa.debian.org/k/kernel-patch-powerpc-2.4.27/news/20060608T210817Z.html
If it's not in testing, it won't be included on the next version of
Debian (when it is rel
On Sun, Jun 18, 2006, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> You really should only add those -dev packages your packages
> added to it. If your package wasn't using them, they should be
> in other .la files, and those packages should already have that
> dependency.
I don't understand what you mean:
grep /usr
On Sun, Jun 18, 2006, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> PS: Why do you depend on it when you don't have a build
> dependency for either of those?
Because of *.la files (the list of deps added for *.la files is huge,
see version 2.10.1-2 in changelog).
I suppose a libbonoboui2-dev rebuild might be necessar
On Sun, Jun 18, 2006 at 05:06:29PM +0200, Loïc Minier wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 18, 2006, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > PS: Why do you depend on it when you don't have a build
> > dependency for either of those?
>
> Because of *.la files (the list of deps added for *.la files is huge,
> see version 2.10.1-2
Your message dated Sun, 18 Jun 2006 07:32:30 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#302127: fixed in ntp 1:4.2.0a+stable-9
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Sun, 18 Jun 2006 07:32:30 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#302127: fixed in ntp 1:4.2.0a+stable-9
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Sun, 18 Jun 2006 07:32:30 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#302127: fixed in ntp 1:4.2.0a+stable-9
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Package: tar
Version: 1.15.1dfsg-3
Severity: critical
Justification: causes serious data loss
About a month ago, I tar-ed a 6GB sparse file (ntfsclone image) with "cjSf"
options
to get a nice 1.6GB tar.bz2 file.
I've no exact information which tar version I used for that, but it was
certainly
f
Simply recompiling the Nvidia (closed--from their site) driver fixed it!
Recommend others who have such problems: Try recompiling the driver/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your message dated Sun, 18 Jun 2006 06:47:12 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#374294: fixed in gphoto2 2.2.0-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Sun, 18 Jun 2006 07:32:30 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#365950: fixed in ntp 1:4.2.0a+stable-9
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Sun, 18 Jun 2006 07:32:30 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#312331: fixed in ntp 1:4.2.0a+stable-9
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
tags 374211 + confirmed
thanks
On Sun, 2006-06-18 at 00:44 +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> I tried to build monodevelop and it failed.
> To build, the build-dependencies need to be updated:
> Add libmono-sqlite1.0-cil
> Change libmono-cecil0.3-cil to libmono-cecil0.4-cil
>
> Sonce monodevelop is b
On Sat, Jun 17, 2006 at 05:25:25PM +0200, Stefan Hirschmann wrote:
> Package: apache2
> Version: 2.0.55-4
> Severity: serious
> Justification: no longer builds from source
>
> I ran apt-build --rebuild --reinstall install apache2
> and got this error:
> .
> dh_clean
> Error while building apa
On Sat, 17 Jun 2006 12:42:02 +0200
Filippo Giunchedi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 11:21:59AM +0200, Christian Hammers wrote:
> > A query like "select str_to_date( 1, NULL );" crashes mysqld.
> > This affects:
> > Woody: mysql-server 3.23.x
> > Sarge: mysql
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 374211 + confirmed
Bug#374211: monodevelop: FTBFS: unsatisfiable and missing build-depend.
There were no tags set.
Tags added: confirmed
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system admi
Your message dated Sun, 18 Jun 2006 07:32:30 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#365950: fixed in ntp 1:4.2.0a+stable-9
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
1 - 100 of 136 matches
Mail list logo
