Bug#374131: (no subject)

> Thanks for the examples. However I can't reproduce your results. > With the standard gerbv from etch, my result looks identical to your > GTK+ 2.0 result. My screenshot with GTK+ 2.0 version of gerbv (from etch tree) shows *incorrect* result of GERBER interpretation! Maybe you mean that "my res

Bug#374190: marked as done (Impossible to ugrade python2.4 neither to install other packages now)

Your message dated Sat, 17 Jun 2006 19:32:07 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#374190: fixed in python-central 0.4.18 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#373922: marked as done (python2.4-minimal fails to install)

Your message dated Sat, 17 Jun 2006 19:32:07 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#373922: fixed in python-central 0.4.18 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#374225: marked as done (Upgrade fails by missing conflicts with python2.3-gadfly)

Your message dated Sat, 17 Jun 2006 19:17:07 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#374225: fixed in gadfly 1.0.0-10 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#373884: marked as done (python2.4-minimal: Upgrading package fails)

Your message dated Sat, 17 Jun 2006 19:32:07 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#373922: fixed in python-central 0.4.18 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#373857: marked as done (Unable to update python2.4-minimal v2.4.3-7 and python2.4 with today's apt-get updates (6/15/2006).)

Your message dated Sat, 17 Jun 2006 19:32:07 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#373922: fixed in python-central 0.4.18 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#373856: marked as done (python2.4-minimal: Install/Upgrade fails: "TypeError: unindexable object")

Your message dated Sat, 17 Jun 2006 19:32:07 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#373922: fixed in python-central 0.4.18 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Processed: tagging 368857

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20 > # 0.2.4+svn20060414-4 is in NEW atm > tags 368857 pending Bug#368857: linux-wlan-ng-firmware: Should be in contrib Tags were: patch Tags added: pending > End of message, stopping pr

Bug#374222: Upgrade fails by missing conflicts with python2.3-reportlab

Package: python-reportlab Version: 1.20debian-6 Severity: grave -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 pycentral: pycentral pkginstall: already exists: /usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/reportlab/extensions/__init__.py It seems, that package just misses a conflicts entry for python2.3-repo

Bug#374225: Upgrade fails by missing conflicts with python2.3-gadfly

Package: python-gadfly Version: 1.0.0-9 Severity: grave -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 pycentral: pycentral pkginstall: already exists: /usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/reportlab/extensions/__init__.py pycentral pkginstall: already exists: /usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/reportlab

Bug#374131: (no subject)

On Sat, Jun 17, 2006 at 07:58:44PM +0400, Evgeny M. Zubok wrote: > For example, take GERBER from Ronja project. > http://www.artelektronika.ru/bug/twister.pcb.output_front.gbr > > gerbv 1.0.1 (GTK+ 1.2): > http://www.artelektronika.ru/bug/gerbv_1.0.1_with_gtk1.png > > gerbv 1.0.1 (GTK+ 2.0) from

Bug#374190: marked as done (Impossible to ugrade python2.4 neither to install other packages now)

Your message dated Sat, 17 Jun 2006 21:17:16 -0300 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Impossible to ugrade python2.4 neither to install other packages now has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If

Bug#346771: marked as done (xjump: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev)

Your message dated Sat, 17 Jun 2006 15:32:21 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#346771: fixed in xjump 2.7.5-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#374211: monodevelop: FTBFS: unsatisfiable and missing build-depend.

Package: monodevelop Version: 0.10-1 Severity: serious Hello Mirko, I tried to build monodevelop and it failed. To build, the build-dependencies need to be updated: Add libmono-sqlite1.0-cil Change libmono-cecil0.3-cil to libmono-cecil0.4-cil Sonce monodevelop is blocking the transition of a who

Bug#374181: leaks potentialy sensitive information (e.g. passwords) to www.google.com

On Sat, Jun 17, 2006 at 10:30:40PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote: > Thanks, it seems disabling "middlemouse.contentLoadURL" gets rid of the > problem. Could you make this the default? I think that is up to either a) Firefox upstream b) The Debian firefox maintainers It certainly isn

Bug#374200: marked as done (libarchive: [FTBFS] yacc: command not found)

Your message dated Sat, 17 Jun 2006 15:47:11 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#374200: fixed in libarchive 1.2.53-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is no

Bug#374090: Precisions on installation problems

Ciao, Sat, Jun 17, 2006 at 05:32:05PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Please reply to the bug report in addition to the person requesting > more information when you send a followup. I hope I'm doing the right way now... > I reproduced this issue when installing nagios-mysql without > mys

Processed: Re: Bug#374181: leaks potentialy sensitive information (e.g. passwords) to www.google.com

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 374181 wishlist Bug#374181: leaks potentialy sensitive information (e.g. passwords) to www.google.com Severity set to `wishlist' from `grave' > tags 374181 wontfix Bug#374181: leaks potentialy sensitive information (e.g. passwords) to www.go

Bug#374181: leaks potentialy sensitive information (e.g. passwords) to www.google.com

severity 374181 wishlist tags 374181 wontfix tags 374181 - security merge 352480 374181 thanks * Robert Millan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > On Sat, Jun 17, 2006 at 07:18:58PM +0100, Steve Kemp wrote: > > > When pasting using X11 clipboard to a firefox window, unless the focus is > > > in a > > >

Bug#374201: marked as done (libarchive_1.2.53-1(amd64/unstable): FTBFS: missing build dependency on bison)

Your message dated Sat, 17 Jun 2006 18:03:03 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Fixed in 1.2.53-2 ( libarchive_1.2.53-2_i386.changes ACCEPTED) has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is

Bug#369877: kaffe FTBFS on ia64

On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 07:58:06PM +0200, Michael Koch wrote: > On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 02:41:40PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 11:50:56AM +0200, Michael Koch wrote: > > > > Well this seems like a gcc-4.1 (not gcj) issue: kaffe build fine > > with gcc-4.0 on ia64. > >

Bug#374209: python-parted: FTBFS: build-dep on non-existent libparted1.6-dev

Package: python-parted Version: 0.11.2 Severity: serious Hello, There was a problem while autobuilding your package: > Automatic build of python-parted_0.11.2 on avidan by sbuild/i386 0.46 > Build started at 20060618-0029 >

Bug#374204: sim: crashes immediately after start

Package: sim Version: 0.9.3.99+0.9.4rc2-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable sim crashes with 18/06/2006 00:06:17 [ERR] EventInit failed - aborting! SIM-IM: 18/06/2006 00:06:17 [ERR] EventInit failed - aborting! ERROR: Communication problem with sim, it probably crashed.

Bug#374208: qm: FTBFS: python2.4: command not found

Package: qm Version: 2.3-2 Severity: serious Hi, Your package is failing to build with the following error: for v in 2.3 2.4; do \ python$v setup.py clean; \ done running clean /bin/sh: line 1: python2.4: command not found make: *** [clean] Error 127 Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE

Bug#374090: Precisions on installation problems

Cherubini Enrico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit : Good day (damn spam, I deleted your email by mistake so I'm replying 'cause I looked at the bug repository on the main site), When I installed the package there wasn't mysql-server neither mysql-client so the installation complaint about this mi

Bug#372279: amule-utils: Happens the same with a different file.

Package: amule-utils Version: 2.1.2-2 Followup-For: Bug #372279 I get the same error but with a different file: S'està preparant per a reemplaçar amule-utils 2.1.2-2 (fent servir .../amule-utils_2.1.2-3_powerpc.deb) ... Removing `diversion of /usr/bin/ed2k to /usr/bin/ed2k.xmule by amule' dpkg-d

Bug#372791: marked as done (libarts1-akode: overwrite `/usr/lib/libarts_akode.la', which is also in akode)

Your message dated Sat, 17 Jun 2006 14:47:17 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#372791: fixed in kdemultimedia 4:3.5.3-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it i

Bug#367056: marked as done (libgnutls13-dbg: Package is empty apart from documentation)

Your message dated Sat, 17 Jun 2006 14:17:20 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#367056: fixed in gnutls13 1.4.0-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#374200: libarchive: [FTBFS] yacc: command not found

Package: libarchive Version: 1.2.53-1 Severity: serious Justification: no longer builds from source Your package fails to build on all arches, probably due to a missing build dependency on bison/yacc: Automatic build of libarchive_1.2.53-1 on tanda by sbuild/m68k 85 [...] ** Using build dependenc

Bug#363294: marked as done (gnutls13 - rebuild looses dep against libtasn1)

Your message dated Sat, 17 Jun 2006 14:17:20 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#363294: fixed in gnutls13 1.4.0-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#374201: libarchive_1.2.53-1(amd64/unstable): FTBFS: missing build dependency on bison

Package: libarchive Version: 1.2.53-1 Severity: serious Hello, There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: > ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: > Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 4.0.0), autotools-dev, libbz2-dev, zlib1g-dev, > libacl1-dev, e2fslibs-dev, libattr1-dev, l

Bug#373761: marked as done (mpfr_2.2.0.dfsg.1-6: FTBFS on hppa with new gmp-4.2: 37 of 117 tests failed)

Your message dated Sat, 17 Jun 2006 14:17:29 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#373761: fixed in mpfr 2.2.0.dfsg.1-7 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is no

Bug#373922: python2.4-minimal fails to install

Hello Matthias, I well read some br like this one and your related advise. Unfortunately my 'apt-get dist-upgrade' (today 2006-06-17) still failled: [snip] (Reading database ... 87452 files and directories currently installed.) Preparing to replace python-central 0.4.7 (using .../python-central

Bug#374181: leaks potentialy sensitive information (e.g. passwords) to www.google.com

On Sat, Jun 17, 2006 at 07:18:58PM +0100, Steve Kemp wrote: > > When pasting using X11 clipboard to a firefox window, unless the focus is > > in a > > specific place like the navigation bar or an edit box, it'll assume you > > want to > > go to "keyword:$clipboard", which happens to be an alias f

Bug#374190: Impossible to ugrade python2.4 neither to install other packages now

> please could you check, that your mirror has current versions? > > python2.4-X should be at 2.4.3-7 (not -5) python2.4_2.4.3-7_i386.deb > python should be at 2.3.5-10 (not -5) python_2.3.5-9_all.deb http://packages.debian.org/cgi-bin/search_packages.pl?keywords=python&searchon=names&subword

Bug#374190: Impossible to ugrade python2.4 neither to install other packages now

> Le samedi 17 juin 2006 =E0 21:28 +0200, Matthias Klose a =E9crit : > > > so does apt-get -f install help? > > As I said it at the beginning here's the output : [...] please could you check, that your mirror has current versions? python2.4-X should be at 2.4.3-7 (not -5) python should be at 2.

Bug#374190: Impossible to ugrade python2.4 neither to install other packages now

Le samedi 17 juin 2006 à 21:28 +0200, Matthias Klose a écrit : > so does apt-get -f install help? As I said it at the beginning here's the output : pegase:~# apt-get -f install Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done Correcting dependencies... Done The following extra pa

Bug#357439: amaya does not start

The ovbious next data point would be - do the upstream packages work with Composite enabled? Or have you already done that? -- A true pessimist won't be discouraged by a little success. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PRO

Bug#312331: ntp-server: preinst is killall happytastic

On Sat, Jun 17, 2006 at 08:32:41PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Kurt Roeckx wrote: > > The rest of the preinst seems to be for a pre-sarge version too > > (and is there since 1:4.2.0a-2), so maybe we can just get rid > > that whole part of the preinst? > > So it seems. In fact, there is quite

Bug#374190: Impossible to ugrade python2.4 neither to install other packages now

> I just try to do an upgrade > Here's what a dpkg -l gives : [...] so does apt-get -f install help? or apt-get --reinstall install python2.4 (that was the package that dpkg complained about). -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMA

Bug#374185: mkvmlinuz: syntax errors in script

severity 374185 important tags 374185 moreinfo On Sat, Jun 17, 2006 at 08:15:29PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > mkvmlinuz currently fails to work at all. There are a number of syntax > errors in the script, which would need to be fixed before it can ever > hope to run successfully. Did whoever u

Processed: Re: Bug#374190: Impossible to ugrade python2.4 neither to install other packages now

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 374190 + needsinfo Unknown tag/s: needsinfo. Recognized are: patch wontfix moreinfo unreproducible fixed potato woody sid help security upstream pending sarge sarge-ignore experimental d-i confirmed ipv6 lfs fixed-in-experimental fixed-upstream l

Bug#374190: Impossible to ugrade python2.4 neither to install other packages now

I just try to do an upgrade Here's what a dpkg -l gives : pegase:~# dpkg -l python-central Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold | Status=Not/Installed/Config-files/Unpacked/Failed-config/Half-installed |/ Err?=(none)/Hold/Reinst-required/X=both-problems (Status,Err: uppercase=bad) ||/ Name

Bug#374190: Impossible to ugrade python2.4 neither to install other packages now

tags 374190 + needsinfo thanks what are the versions you try to install from? and which are the current versions? If python-central_0.4.16 is installed, please get 0.4.17 directly from the archives before you continue. nb writes: > Package: python2.4 > Version: 2.4.3-5 > Severity: grave > Justifi

Bug#373923: FTBFS: Can't find X includes

Amaya Rodrigo Sastre wrote: > Building kaptain fails at configure stage: > > checking for X... configure: error: Can't find X includes. Please check > your installation and add the correct paths! So I added a build dependency on libxt-dev, run autoreconf -I admin and it seemed to help, but it sti

Processed: Re: Bug#374185: mkvmlinuz: syntax errors in script

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 374185 important Bug#374185: mkvmlinuz: syntax errors in script Severity set to `important' from `grave' > tags 374185 moreinfo Bug#374185: mkvmlinuz: syntax errors in script There were no tags set. Tags added: moreinfo > On Sat, Jun 17, 2006

Bug#374190: Impossible to ugrade python2.4 neither to install other packages now

Package: python2.4 Version: 2.4.3-5 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable When I try to upgrade my packages or to install new ones I have he following error message : pegase:~# apt-get -f install Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done Correcting dependenc

Bug#374090: Precisions on installation problems

When I installed the package there wasn't mysql-server neither mysql-client so the installation complaint about this missing packages. Could you please paste that complaint? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#373951: tetex-base: FTBFS: rerunning quilt push -a fails

Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 0 2006-06-16 16:50:06.0 + build-stamp >> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 0 2006-06-16 16:50:05.0 + patch-stamp >> frobnitz:/tmp/buildd/tetex-base-3.0# ls -ld --time-style=full-iso stampdir/ >> drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4

Bug#374185: mkvmlinuz: syntax errors in script

Package: mkvmlinuz Version: 22 Severity: grave Justification: make package in question unusable Hi, mkvmlinuz currently fails to work at all. There are a number of syntax errors in the script, which would need to be fixed before it can ever hope to run successfully. Did whoever uploaded this actu

Bug#312331: ntp-server: preinst is killall happytastic

Kurt Roeckx wrote: > The rest of the preinst seems to be for a pre-sarge version too > (and is there since 1:4.2.0a-2), so maybe we can just get rid > that whole part of the preinst? So it seems. In fact, there is quite a bunch of stuff that can probably be removed on similar grounds: ntpdate.p

Bug#374181: leaks potentialy sensitive information (e.g. passwords) to www.google.com

On Sat, Jun 17, 2006 at 08:01:22PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote: > Package: firefox > Severity: grave > Tags: security Not a security bug. > When pasting using X11 clipboard to a firefox window, unless the focus is in a > specific place like the navigation bar or an edit box, it'll assume you wan

Bug#373887: marked as done (python-minimal: 2.4.3-7 minimal fails to install)

Your message dated Sat, 17 Jun 2006 15:02:10 -0300 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line python-minimal: 2.4.3-7 minimal fails to install has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case

Bug#374181: leaks potentialy sensitive information (e.g. passwords) to www.google.com

Package: firefox Severity: grave Tags: security When pasting using X11 clipboard to a firefox window, unless the focus is in a specific place like the navigation bar or an edit box, it'll assume you want to go to "keyword:$clipboard", which happens to be an alias for google "I'm feeling lucky" sea

Bug#373933: marked as done (lineak-defaultplugin: FTBFS: /usr/include/lineak/xmgr.h:38:36: error: X11/extensions/XKBfile.h: No such file)

Your message dated Sat, 17 Jun 2006 10:17:11 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#373933: fixed in lineak-defaultplugin 1:0.8.4-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the ca

Bug#374177: pytables: FTBFS: should build-dep on python-numarray

Package: pytables Version: 1.3-1 Severity: serious Hello, There was a problem while autobuilding your package: > Automatic build of pytables_1.3-1 on avidan by sbuild/i386 0.46 > Build started at 2006061

Processed: Upgrade

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 362319 serious Bug#362319: RM: kernel-patch-powerpc-2.4.27 -- RoM; obsolete Severity set to `serious' from `normal' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (admini

Bug#365192: marked as done ([NONFREE-DOC] Package contains IETF RFC/I-D)

Your message dated Sat, 17 Jun 2006 09:47:06 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#365192: fixed in freeradius 1.1.2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Processed: your mail

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 374173 serious Bug#374173: zinc-compiler: Problems running cyi, the interactive interpreter for Zinc. Severity set to `serious' from `normal' > stop Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking sys

Bug#374131: (no subject)

Hi, For example, take GERBER from Ronja project. http://www.artelektronika.ru/bug/twister.pcb.output_front.gbr gerbv 1.0.1 (GTK+ 1.2): http://www.artelektronika.ru/bug/gerbv_1.0.1_with_gtk1.png gerbv 1.0.1 (GTK+ 2.0) from official Debian Repository: http://www.artelektronika.ru/bug/gerbv_1.0.1_w

Processed: Re: Bug#374162: emacs-snapshot-gtk: Problem with instalation

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 374162 grave Bug#374162: emacs-snapshot-gtk: Problem with instalation Severity set to `grave' from `important' > reassign 374162 python-mode Bug#374162: emacs-snapshot-gtk: Problem with instalation Bug reassigned from package `emacs-snapshot-g

Processed: severity of 374137 is important

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20 > #apparently this is not rc > severity 374137 important Bug#374137: typo3-src-3.7: copyright file does not list copyright/licence info of the fonts Severity set to `important' from `

Bug#360728: marked as done (tipa: FTBFS: Cannot find dh_installtexfonts)

Your message dated Sat, 17 Jun 2006 08:17:17 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#360728: fixed in tipa 2:1.3-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#374160: apache2 does not build with apt-build

Package: apache2 Version: 2.0.55-4 Severity: serious Justification: no longer builds from source I ran apt-build --rebuild --reinstall install apache2 and got this error: . dh_clean Error while building apache2! Sorry, no package to install. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/un

Processed: tagging 367790

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 367790 +moreinfo Bug#367790: linux-wlan-ng-source: Setting USB adapter to monitor mode triggers memory leak in kernel There were no tags set. Tags added: moreinfo > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debia

Bug#373124: cupsys: Cupsys hangs when trying to creates the certs

Hi, It doesn't hang, it's just dogfuckingslow. Took something like 10 minutes here to generate the damn certs. JB. -- Julien BLACHE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Debian, because code matters more Debian & GNU/Linux Developer| Public key available on

Bug#374131: gerbv: gerbv 1.0.1 works incorrectly with GTK+ 2

On Sat, Jun 17, 2006 at 04:45:50PM +0400, Evgeny M. Zubok wrote: > Package: gerbv > Version: 1.0.1-2 > Severity: grave > > gervbv from Debian/Etch incorrectly shows the GERBER files with GTK+ 2. It > works well only with GTK+ 1.2 and gdk-pixbuf2. Hi, Can you please provide an example file and t

Bug#349442: dpkg dependtry assertion is due to broken cycle breaking

On Fri, Jun 02, 2006 at 07:08:26PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: > The patch provided by Frank Lichtenfeld in #349442 is also wrong and > might lead to infinite recursion. findbreakcyclerecursive is not > allowed to recurse except via foundcyclebroken because > foundcyclebroken is the thing which dete

Bug#374153: gopchop: FTBFS on ARM: error: X11/extensions/Xvlib.h: No such file or directory

Package: gopchop Version: 1.1.7-4 Severity: serious gopchop FTBFS on ARM with the following error: if arm-linux-gnu-gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../include -I../include -Wall -g -O2 -MT video_out_x11.o -MD -MP -MF ".deps/video_out_x11.Tpo" \ -c -o video_out_x11.o `test -f 'video_out_x

Bug#370573: marked as done (gopchop - FTBFS: error: expected primary-expression before 'else')

Your message dated Sat, 17 Jun 2006 07:32:33 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line gopchop - FTBFS: error: expected primary-expression before 'else' has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If thi

Bug#280485: Licence question for DocBook: The Definitive Guide

Hi, The Debian package of DocBook: The Definitive Guide is currently orphaned and unmaintained. I'm considering maintaining it as I need to consult it from time-to-time. While investigating the package I noticed this release-critical bug against it: http://bugs.debian.org/280485 This relates to

Bug#328378: marked as done (xine-ui: crash with right click)

Your message dated Sat, 17 Jun 2006 06:47:18 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#328129: fixed in xine-ui 0.99.4-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#288702: marked as done (xine-ui: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): invalid lvalue in assignment)

Your message dated Sat, 17 Jun 2006 06:47:18 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#288702: fixed in xine-ui 0.99.4-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#328129: marked as done (xine: The player crash when mouse event occures)

Your message dated Sat, 17 Jun 2006 06:47:18 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#328129: fixed in xine-ui 0.99.4-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#325144: marked as done (xine-ui: FTBFS: Please change the Build-Depends from 'aalib1-dev' to 'libaa1-dev')

Your message dated Sat, 17 Jun 2006 06:47:18 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#325144: fixed in xine-ui 0.99.4-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#372172: marked as done (CVE-2006-2230: Denial of service in xine-ui)

Your message dated Sat, 17 Jun 2006 06:47:18 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#372172: fixed in xine-ui 0.99.4-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#329023: marked as done (xine-ui: xine-ui segfaults after glibc upgrade)

Your message dated Sat, 17 Jun 2006 06:47:18 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#328129: fixed in xine-ui 0.99.4-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#328114: marked as done (xine-ui: crashes on right-click - free(): invalid pointer)

Your message dated Sat, 17 Jun 2006 06:47:18 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#328129: fixed in xine-ui 0.99.4-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#321552: marked as done (xine-ui: uninstallable due to dependency on slang1)

Your message dated Sat, 17 Jun 2006 06:47:18 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#321552: fixed in xine-ui 0.99.4-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#346817: marked as done (xine-ui: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev)

Your message dated Sat, 17 Jun 2006 06:47:18 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#346817: fixed in xine-ui 0.99.4-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#374136: python-orbit - Provides CORBA and PortableServer module

Package: python-orbit Version: 0.3.1-12.1 Severity: grave python-orbit provides the CORBA and PortableServer module which implements the CORBA python interface specified by OMG, but don't conflict which the other implementations omniorb and pyorbit. Bastian -- Vulcans believe peace should not d

Bug#374137: typo3-src-3.7: copyright file does not list copyright/licence info of the fonts

Package: typo3-src-3.7 Version: 3.7.0-8 Severity: serious Justification: policy 2.3 and 12.5 Please document the copyright and licence for the fonts included in this package in the copyright file. Actually, the whole copyright file could use a rewrite, please see this message for how: http://list

Bug#358542: marked as done (FTBFS with G++ 4.1: assigning NULL to iterator won't work)

Your message dated Sat, 17 Jun 2006 06:02:08 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#358542: fixed in knoda 0.8.1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#374131: gerbv: gerbv 1.0.1 works incorrectly with GTK+ 2

Package: gerbv Version: 1.0.1-2 Severity: grave gervbv from Debian/Etch incorrectly shows the GERBER files with GTK+ 2. It works well only with GTK+ 1.2 and gdk-pixbuf2. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#312331: ntp-server: preinst is killall happytastic

On Sat, Jun 17, 2006 at 02:22:14PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > > I think we only want to cover case 3, because case 2 is that the old > package is removed but not purged, so there should be no binaries left > to kill anyway. > > But actually, the checked version 1:4.2.0a-10 is older than t

Processed: does this still happen with 0.99.4-1?

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 347572 important Bug#347572: xine-ui: xine crashes KDE artsd Severity set to `important' from `grave' > tags 347572 moreinfo Bug#347572: xine-ui: xine crashes KDE artsd There were no tags set. Tags added: moreinfo > stop Stopping processing h

Bug#312331: ntp-server: preinst is killall happytastic

Kurt Roeckx wrote: > It's still doing that in 1:4.2.0a+stable-8.2. > > I think we want an && instead of an || in the ntp-server.preinst? > > preinst can be called in the following ways: > * `install' > * `install' > * `upgrade' > * `abort-upgrade' > > And we o

Bug#312331: ntp-server: preinst is killall happytastic

found 312331 1:4.2.0a+stable-8.2 thanks It's still doing that in 1:4.2.0a+stable-8.2. I think we want an && instead of an || in the ntp-server.preinst? preinst can be called in the following ways: * `install' * `install' * `upgrade' * `abort-upgrade' And w

Processed: Re: ntp-server: preinst is killall happytastic

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > found 312331 1:4.2.0a+stable-8.2 Bug#312331: ntp-server: preinst is killall happytastic Bug marked as found in version 1:4.2.0a+stable-8.2. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system admini

Bug#374050: marked as done (plucker - FTBFS: cp: cannot stat `debian/tmp//usr/bin/plucker': No such file or directory)

Your message dated Sat, 17 Jun 2006 04:17:14 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#374050: fixed in plucker 1.8-15 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

Processed: Re: Bug#374093: bind9: bind does not serve locally defined zone files

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 374093 normal Bug#374093: bind9: bind does not serve locally defined zone files Severity set to `normal' from `grave' > kthxbye Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (adm

Bug#374093: bind9: bind does not serve locally defined zone files

severity 374093 normal kthxbye This one time, at band camp, alex bodnaru said: > the bind9 server failed to serve all zones i have defined, but does work > as a dns forwarder. > i have fixed this situation by removing the view "original" { }; from > named.conf, but keeping it's contents, of cours

Bug#373913: SECURITY: CAN-2006-XXXX: str_to_date(1, NULL) crashs the server

On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 11:21:59AM +0200, Christian Hammers wrote: > A query like "select str_to_date( 1, NULL );" crashes mysqld. > This affects: > Woody: mysql-server 3.23.x > Sarge: mysql-server 4.0.x > Sarge: mysql-server-4.1 4.1.x > Unstable/Testing is

Processed: re: sa-exim: not working with latest spamassassin package

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 367081 sa-exim: better messages on sa problems Bug#367081: sa-exim: not working with latest spamassassin package Changed Bug title. > severity 367081 wishlist Bug#367081: sa-exim: better messages on sa problems Severity set to `wishlist' from `

Bug#374093: bind9: bind does not serve locally defined zone files

Package: bind9 Version: 1:9.3.2-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable the bind9 server failed to serve all zones i have defined, but does work as a dns forwarder. i have fixed this situation by removing the view "original" { }; from named.conf, but keeping it's contents, of c

Bug#373761: mpfr_2.2.0.dfsg.1-6: FTBFS on hppa with new gmp-4.2: 37 of 117 tests failed

Laurent Fousse wrote: Hello, * Joel Soete [Thu, Jun 15, 2006 at 03:00:54PM +0200]: Package: libmpfr-dev Version: 2.2.0.dfsg.1-4 Severity: serious Justification: no longer builds from source Hello Laurent, As you may be already read in buildd report:

Bug#340842: marked as done (unalz: buffer overflow when extracting archives)

Your message dated Sat, 17 Jun 2006 11:43:39 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#340842 acknowledged by developer (Re: unalz: buffer overflow when extracting archives) has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem ha

Processed: Fixed in NMU of gle 3.1.0-5.3

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 322046 + fixed Bug#322046: libgle-dev: Dummy package still needed? There were no tags set. Tags added: fixed > tag 374000 + fixed Bug#374000: gle: build-depends on xlibmesa-glu-dev There were no tags set. Tags added: fixed > quit Stopping processi

Bug#373857: marked as done (Unable to update python2.4-minimal v2.4.3-7 and python2.4 with today's apt-get updates (6/15/2006).)

Your message dated Sat, 17 Jun 2006 11:17:26 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line python2.x/python-central postinst error fixed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#373867: marked as done (python-central: Crash in postinst of python2.4, pyversions returning a Set, not list)

Your message dated Sat, 17 Jun 2006 11:17:26 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line python2.x/python-central postinst error fixed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

  1   2   >