Your message dated Sat, 17 Jun 2006 15:02:10 -0300
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line python-minimal: 2.4.3-7 minimal fails to install
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: python-minimal
Version: 2.3.5-9
Severity: important


Setting up python2.4-minimal (2.4.3-7) ...
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/bin/pycentral", line 1365, in ?
    main()
  File "/usr/bin/pycentral", line 1359, in main
    rv = action.run(global_options)
  File "/usr/bin/pycentral", line 892, in run
    pkg.set_default_runtime_from_version_info()
  File "/usr/bin/pycentral", line 575, in 
set_default_runtime_from_version_info
    self.default_runtime = get_runtime_for_version(versions[0])
TypeError: unindexable object
dpkg: error processing python2.4-minimal (--configure):
 subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1

I was able to get a working python2.4 by downgrading to the versions in 
testing (normally I run unstable).

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.16-2-686
Locale: LANG=en_AU.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_AU.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages python-minimal depends on:
ii  python2.3                     2.3.5-14   An interactive high-level object-o

python-minimal recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
python-central 0.4.17 entered the archive and fixed this bug.

Thanks, Gustavo Franco - <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to