Your message dated Sun, 11 Jun 2006 23:17:08 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#372700: fixed in euro-support 1.34
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Package: speex
Version: 1.1.12-1
Severity: grave
/usr/bin/speex{enc,dec} links against libogg.so.0 (and Build-Depends on
libogg-dev), however neither libspeex nor speex depends on libogg0. Thus
execution fails after an apt-get install speex:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ speexenc ; speexdec
speexenc: erro
Your message dated Sun, 11 Jun 2006 21:02:11 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#371874: fixed in xorg 1:7.0.22
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Package: libghc6-plugins-dev
Version: 0.9.10-2
Severity: serious
Configuration of libghc6-plugins-dev on my system dies as follows:
Setting up libghc6-plugins-dev (0.9.10-2) ...
Reading package info from stdin ... done.
ghc-pkg: package altdata-0.9.10 is already installed
Reading package info f
On Sun, Jun 11, 2006 at 10:30:21PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> David Nusinow wrote:
> > Ok, this is an extremely troubling bug. The previous x11-common's postinst
> > gets called when the new x11-common's postinst fails with the /usr/bin/X11
> > switch.
> No the problem is not that the new postinst
On Sun, Jun 11, 2006 at 10:30:21PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> David Nusinow wrote:
> > Ok, this is an extremely troubling bug. The previous x11-common's postinst
> > gets called when the new x11-common's postinst fails with the /usr/bin/X11
> > switch.
>
> No the problem is not that the new postins
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 267040 + fixed-in-experimental
Bug#267040: remote code execution hole due to lack of Java security manager
Tags were: pending security
Bug#301134: gcjwebplugin: no mention of non-active security manager
Tags added: fixed-in-experimental
> tag 27524
Your message dated Sun, 11 Jun 2006 22:53:03 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line glibc/experimental on sparc
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your respon
David Nusinow wrote:
> Ok, this is an extremely troubling bug. The previous x11-common's postinst
> gets called when the new x11-common's postinst fails with the /usr/bin/X11
> switch.
No the problem is not that the new postinst is failing (nor does dpkg do
any error-unwind involving the old posti
Hi,
Hmm. Well, can you edit the postinst in
/var/lib/dpkg/info/linux-image-2.6.16-2-amd64-k8_2.6.16-14.postinst,
set DEBUG=1, and run
# /var/lib/dpkg/info/linux-image-2.6.16-2-amd64-k8_2.6.16-14.postinst configure
as root?
I think I see a typo in the postinst, but I'd like to
On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 10:48:44PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Package: x11-common
> > Version: 1:7.0.20
> > Severity: grave
> > X-Debbugs-CC: "Henk Boom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> >
> > x11-common postinst error: trouble with /usr/include/X11
> >
> >
> > We get this
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 372079 important
Bug#372079: xserver-xorg-video-mga: strange frequency behavior with dvi
Severity set to `important' from `grave'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system adminis
Your message dated Sun, 11 Jun 2006 17:17:08 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#365219: fixed in python-defaults 2.3.5-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Your message dated Sun, 11 Jun 2006 16:32:37 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#359048: fixed in w3-el-e21 4.0pre.2001.10.27.nodocs-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
FYI Tiger threw up these warnings too:
NEW: --WARN-- [lin001w] File `/usr/X11R6/bin/dh_pycentral' does not belong to
any package.
NEW: --WARN-- [lin001w] File `/usr/X11R6/bin/py_compilefiles' does not belong
to any package.
NEW: --WARN-- [lin001w] File `/usr/X11R6/bin/pycentral' does not belong
On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 12:50:18AM +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> Anyhow, I pushed this through valgrind ("LD_LIBRARY_PATH=.libs valgrind
> .libs/gctest") on amd64
Sorry, the test was on i386. I don't think it would matter too much, though.
/* Steinar */
--
Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/
#include
* Manoj Srivastava [Sun, Jun 11 2006, 05:45:56PM]:
> tags 372783 +moreinfo
> thanks
>
> Hi,
>
> some weeks ago: install of linux-image-2.6.16-1-amd64
> Presumed states:
> initrd.img ->initrd.img-2.6.16-1-amd64
>
>
>
tags 372783 +moreinfo
thanks
Hi,
some weeks ago: install of linux-image-2.6.16-1-amd64
Presumed states:
initrd.img ->initrd.img-2.6.16-1-amd64
dist-upgrading
On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 12:16:29AM +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> Note that so far, hppa/mipsel/powerpc/alpha/sparc/arm has failed, but
> amd64/ia64/mips/s390 has done just fine; IOW this isn't alpha-specific. (I've
> tested on my own amd64 and i386 machines, and both do just fine.)
Scrap th
reassign 339835 ifupdown
retitle 339835 please do not build-depend on gawk, use awk instead
thanks
Brian M. Carlson writes:
> either nowebm must Conflict: original-awk or use awk and only
> those features that are available in an "old" awk.
No, that's not true.
Every awk in Debian, including or
reopen 372700
thanks
On Sun, Jun 11, 2006 at 03:04:12PM -0700, Javier Fernandez-Sanguino Pen~a wrote:
> Closes: 372700
> Changes:
> user-es (0.36) unstable; urgency=low
> .
>* Removed Recommends: on xfonts-base-transcoded packages as they
> have been removed from sid (Closes: #372700)
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 339835 ifupdown
Bug#339835: configuring alternatives to use original-awk loses nawk
Bug reassigned from package `original-awk' to `ifupdown'.
> retitle 339835 please do not build-depend on gawk, use awk instead
Bug#339835: configuring alternat
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 372700
Bug#372700: euro-support-x depends on removed xfonts-base-transcoded
'reopen' is deprecated when a bug has been closed with a version;
use 'found' or 'submitter' as appropriate instead.
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> thanks
Stopp
On Sun, Jun 11, 2006 at 11:47:28PM +0200, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 11, 2006 at 09:42:28AM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > this package depends on the removed xfonts-base-transcoded.
> BTW, this package did not depend: on it, xfonts-base-transcoded was in the
> Recommends
Your message dated Sun, 11 Jun 2006 15:47:12 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#372803: fixed in tidy-proxy 0.94-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 372783 +moreinfo
Bug#372783: linux-image-2.6.16-2-amd64-k8: initrd symlink management sucks
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system admi
Your message dated Sun, 11 Jun 2006 15:04:12 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#372700: fixed in user-es 0.36
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
On Sun, 11 Jun 2006, Daniel Kobras wrote:
> I'm still concerned about the change, though. You're removing the
> logo first, then add a different one. Are you certain that this is
> sufficiently distinct from modifying the logo, which is not
> permitted by the license?
The logo itself is totally re
tags 372525 + pending
thanks
On 06/10/06 18:42, Cl??ment Stenac wrote:
> The simplest fix is to simply drop the debian/libjudydebian1.shlibs
> package and to let dh_makeshlibs do its work
Yep, got it thanks, 1.0.3-2 uploaded. Since I'm an idiot and forgot to
mark Closes in the changelog, I'll clo
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> retitle 370251 FTBFS on multiple platforms: test crashes
Bug#370251: FTBFS (alpha): Tests fail
Changed Bug title.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if yo
On Sun, Jun 04, 2006 at 01:08:58PM +0200, Falk Hueffner wrote:
> libgc 6.7-1 fails to build on Alpha:
I can reproduce this on escher, at least:
> /bin/sh: line 4: 5246 Killed ${dir}$tst
> FAIL: gctest
When I test it, it simply sleeps forever in some odd sort of loop. I can't
fi
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 372525 + pending
Bug#372525: libjudydebian1 shlibs broken
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bu
On Sun, Jun 11, 2006 at 12:49:04PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > When was this package removed? It still shows up in
> > http://packages.debian.org/unstable/x11/xfonts-base-transcoded
> > and is available in both sid and testing (in xorg-x11 6.9.0.dfsg.1-6)
>
> It's been removed from unstable f
On Sat, Jun 10, 2006 at 10:42:17PM +1000, Drew Parsons wrote:
> > Yes, a new upstream version of the library was just released dealing with
> > this issue. I'll be uploading it to unstable within a day or two hopefully.
>
> Hate to be a nuisance, but I hope you don't mean 1.1.0.
>
> This thread u
On Sun, Jun 11, 2006 at 09:42:28AM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> this package depends on the removed xfonts-base-transcoded.
BTW, this package did not depend: on it, xfonts-base-transcoded was in the
Recommends: line so I don't see why this bug would qualify as serious.
In any case, a new package
On Sun, Jun 11, 2006 at 05:18:17PM +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> Not good, not good. (I might add that a build system signalling "can't build
> shared libraries" by "no .css files" might not be perceived as very robust,
> though! :-) )
Right - I, for sure, know the bigloo build system does
On Sunday 11 June 2006 14:30, you wrote:
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "/usr/share/eric/modules/eric3.py", line 30, in ?
> from UI.SplashScreen import SplashScreen, NoneSplashScreen
> File "/usr/share/eric/modules/UI/SplashScreen.py", line 14, in ?
> from eric3config impor
On Sun, Jun 11, 2006 at 11:13:00PM +0200, Yann Dirson wrote:
> Right - I, for sure, know the bigloo build system does not exactly
> meets the criteria to get labelled as robust, and stderr regularly
> getting thrown to /dev/null really does not help...
I particularily like the header about "please
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> package artsbuilder juk kaboodle kaudiocreator kdemultimedia
> kdemultimedia-dbg kdemultimedia-dev kdemultimedia-doc-html
> kdemultimedia-kappfinder-data kdemultimedia-kfile-plugins
On Sun, Jun 11, 2006 at 11:15:04PM +0200, Yann Dirson wrote:
> Just as a quick note, there is no missing build-dep on perl: lintian
> just does not see that the dep comes from dbs invocation, and that dbs
> already depends on perl.
Aha, a miss there. Sorry about that.
/* Steinar */
--
Homepage:
On Sun, Jun 11, 2006 at 06:20:13PM +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> + * Add missing build-dependency on perl.
Just as a quick note, there is no missing build-dep on perl: lintian
just does not see that the dep comes from dbs invocation, and that dbs
already depends on perl.
Best regards,
--
Il giorno dom, 11/06/2006 alle 22.20 +0200, Bill Allombert ha scritto:
> A sarge to sid upgrade with piuparts failed because
> libgnome-window-settings1 overwrite a file in capplets.
[...]
> libgnome-window-settings1 should probably Replaces: capplets
Hello and thanks for the bug report, I wasn't
On 11 Jun 2006, Matthew Vernon uttered the following:
>> The only thing that removes the high score file is purging the
>> package -- so is it a possibility that angband was somehow purged?
>> If not, I see no mechanism for the high scores file to have been
>> removed.
>
> Here's the relevant bits
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bob Tanner wrote:
> Package: eric
> Version: 3.9.0-1
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
>
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "/usr/share/eric/modules/eric3.py", line 30, in ?
> from UI.SplashScreen import Spl
This patch was not applied, so it does not matter. I've prepared another
patch that is independent on the version of dhcp3-client. It's
available in the svn repository of FAI.
--
regards Thomas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAI
Package: libgnome-window-settings1
Version: 1:2.14.2-1
Severity: serious
Hello Marco,
A sarge to sid upgrade with piuparts failed because
libgnome-window-settings1 overwrite a file in capplets.
The piuparts command used:
/usr/sbin/piuparts -a -d sarge -d sid gnupg gnome
Selecting previously d
reassign 372783 kernel-package
thanks
On Sun, Jun 11, 2006 at 07:12:15PM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> today my machine failed to boot. What was the real reason? Something is
> completely fscked up with initrd management. The chronics:
kernel-package provides this infrastructure currently.
Bastia
Your message dated Sun, 11 Jun 2006 13:16:37 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#372711: ifpgui: Could not communicate with iRiver device
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is n
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 372783 kernel-package
Bug#372783: linux-image-2.6.16-2-amd64-k8: initrd symlink management sucks
Bug reassigned from package `linux-image-2.6.16-2-amd64-k8' to `kernel-package'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need
Package: tidy-proxy
Version: 0.94-4
Severity: grave
Tags: patch
Justification: renders package unusable
At start of init.d script, tidy-proxy fails with
Can't locate HTTP/Daemon.pm in @INC (@INC contains: /etc/perl
/usr/local/lib/perl/5.8.8 /usr/local/share/perl/5.8.8 /usr/lib/perl5
/usr/shar
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> severity 372708 grave
Bug#372708: idle-python2.3, version 2.3.5-12, fails to install
Severity set to `grave' from `normal'
> merge 372542 372708
Bug#372542: idle-python2.3.postinst f
On Sun, Jun 11, 2006 at 11:36:26AM +0200, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 11, 2006 at 09:42:28AM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > Package: euro-support-x
> > Version: 1.33
> > Severity: serious
> > this package depends on the removed xfonts-base-transcoded.
> When was this pack
Le Dim 11 Juin 2006 20:37, Ben Pfaff a écrit :
> Pierre HABOUZIT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > it has been a month, and etch is coming. that would be nice to
> > keep up with the RM goals in term of RC bugs [1]. Would it be
> > possible that you upload a new version with the fixed license
> >
Package: eric
Version: 3.9.0-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/share/eric/modules/eric3.py", line 30, in ?
from UI.SplashScreen import SplashScreen, NoneSplashScreen
File "/usr/share/eric/modules/UI/SplashScreen.py", li
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> package linux-kernel-headers
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: linux-kernel-headers
> severity 372742 normal
Bug#372742: libgii: FTBFS: expected specifier-qualifier-list before
'kernel_ulong_t'
Bug#372747: /usr/include/linux/input.h:801: error: expected
Package: libarts1-akode
Version: 4:3.5.3-1
Severity: serious
Hello Debian Qt/KDE Maintainers,
When doing a sarge to sid upgrade with piuparts
/usr/sbin/piuparts -a -d sarge -d sid gnupg gnome kde
the upgrade fails with
Selecting previously deselected package libarts1-akode.
Unpacking libar
Bill Allombert wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 05, 2006 at 10:10:51AM +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> > Bill Allombert wrote:
> > > On Sun, Jun 04, 2006 at 04:38:23PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > > > > Hello Matthias,
> > > > >
> > > > > Daniel and Matt Krai provided a pat
Pierre HABOUZIT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 07:44:45AM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>> Dave Love <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> > Ben Pfaff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> >
>> >> Did you ever get a chance to look at this?
>> >
>> > Sorry, I changed it to GFDL with no invar
* Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060611 12:17]:
> On Sun, Jun 11, 2006 at 09:42:28AM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > Package: euro-support-x
> > Version: 1.33
> > Severity: serious
> When was this package removed? It still shows up in
With going to xorg 7.
> http://packages.
tags 372649 + unreproducible
thanks
Re: Julien Danjou 2006-06-10 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > make[2]: Leaving directory
> > `/build/buildd/ivtools-1.1.3/src/glyphs/examples3.1'
> > make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/ivtools-1.1.3/src/glyphs'
> > # don't include the scripts
> > # Documentation
On Mon, Apr 10, 2006 at 11:42:29PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> When debconf-copydb is run from pkgsel's postinst script, it deletes the
> existing /var/cache/debconf/templates.dat in /target; after it has run
> only copied templates are present.
>
> This results in the problem that has been report
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> tags 368310 + sid
Bug#368310: libgmpxx's SONAME must be bumped
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sid
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assi
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 372705 g++-4.1
Bug#372705: kdelibs: FTBFS: no suitable 'operator delete'
Bug reassigned from package `kdelibs' to `g++-4.1'.
> tag 372705 + pending
Bug#372705: kdelibs: FTBFS: no suitable 'operator delete'
There were no tags set.
Tags added: p
reassign 372705 g++-4.1
tag 372705 + pending
merge 372705 372152
thanks
On Sun, Jun 11, 2006 at 10:41:26AM +0200, Julien Danjou wrote:
> Package: kdelibs
> Version: 4:3.5.3-1
> Severity: serious
>
> Hello,
>
> There was a problem while autobuilding your package:
>
> May be related to #372152
On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 07:44:45AM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> Dave Love <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Ben Pfaff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> >> Did you ever get a chance to look at this?
> >
> > Sorry, I changed it to GFDL with no invariant sections but couldn't
> > check it in at the time
Hi,
Thomas Bushnell BSG ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote on 2006-06-10:
> It looks like the bug is caused by having a QIF file being imported
> which does not contain valid UTF8 data. Then when it's written out,
> what gets written out is invalid, and so when it's written in, it
> can't be parsed and the
On Sat, Jun 10, 2006 at 04:32:15AM -0700, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> tag 356169 + fixed
>
> quit
>
> This message was generated automatically in response to a
> non-maintainer upload. The .changes file follows.
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Format: 1.7
> Date: Sat, 10 J
On Sat, May 06, 2006 at 06:49:30PM +0200, Michael Schmitt wrote:
> First, I need to say I am not sure that this is the right package to
> report a bug to but I have no glue where else I should report. The
> subject said it all. I get no errors even if I start for example
> gscanbus in a xterm. As
On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 06:21:43PM +0200, Henning Sprang wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 6/8/06, Thomas Pöhnitzsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >[...].]
> >well the name of the bug actually describes exactly the problem I
> >had. I
> >never said that building the nfsroot failed, as it did not for me.
>
> Agr
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> severity 372734 serious
Bug#372734: Template #30 in /var/lib/dpkg/info/base-config.templates does not
contain a 'Template:' line
Severity set to `serious' from `normal'
>
End of mes
Le Dim 11 Juin 2006 17:30, Mohammed Adnène Trojette a écrit :
> On Sun, Jun 11, 2006, Julien Louis wrote:
> > After some investigations it seems, it is *not* a cdbs bug but a
> > file provided by the tarball (the config.status one). If this file
> > is removed from the tarball, gandalf build well.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> reassign 372773 cdebconf-gtk-udeb
Bug#372773: debian-installer: [daily-build] mouse recognized but the pointer
disappeares
Bug reassigned from package `debian-installer' to `cdebconf
On Sun, Jun 11, 2006 at 01:01:42PM -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
> >
> >
> >May be related to #372152
> >
> Well, which g++ version did you use?
gcc version 4.1.2 20060604 (prerelease) (Debian 4.1.1-2)
The default in Debian.
--
Julien Danjou
.''`. Debian Developer
: :' : http://julien.danjou.i
Package: linux-image-2.6.16-2-amd64-k8
Version: 2.6.16-14
Severity: grave
Hello,
today my machine failed to boot. What was the real reason? Something is
completely fscked up with initrd management. The chronics:
some weeks ago: install of linux-image-2.6.16-1-amd64
dist-upgrading
manual install
Package: gem
Severity: serious
Justification: contains arial.ttf, which is not distributable
The gem package contains /usr/lib/pd/doc/gem/05.text/arial.ttf, which
has this embedded copyright information:
Typeface © The Monotype Corporation plc. Data © The Monotype Corporation
plc/Type Solutions I
May be related to #372152
Well, which g++ version did you use?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: egroupware-core
Version: 1.2-2.dfsg-1
Severity: grave
Tags: experimental
Justification: renders package unusable
the dependancy on php-gd can not be resolved. Maybe "php4-gd | php5-gd"
would be better?
Anyway, when installed with 'dpkg -i --force-depends' it runs flawless as far
as I can
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 372770 serious
Bug#372770: linux-kernel-headers: kernel_ulong_t not defined
Severity set to `serious' from `important'
> merge 372770 372742
Bug#372742: libgii: FTBFS: expected specifier-qualifier-list before
'kernel_ulong_t'
Bug#372770: linu
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> tags 360149 + unreproducible
Bug#360149: scorched3d: Segmentation fault on AMD64
There were no tags set.
Tags added: unreproducible
> severity 360149 important
Bug#360149: scorched3d
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 339835
Bug#339835: nowebm: must Conflict: original-awk
Bug is already open, cannot reopen.
> reassign 339835 original-awk
Bug#339835: nowebm: must Conflict: original-awk
Bug reassigned from package `nowebm' to `original-awk'.
> retitle 339835 c
OK, no objections. :-)
I wrote a patch to add -fPIC regardless, and run the ldopt test with the
flags given; since the bugs are previously unreported, I'm adding the NMU
diff here.
diff -Nru /tmp/vKTrUfAakv/bigloo-2.7a/debian/changelog
/tmp/YIvpNOOAef/bigloo-2.7a/debian/changelog
--- /tmp/vKTrUfA
Your message dated Sun, 11 Jun 2006 09:05:07 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#370745: fixed in lirc 0.8.0-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
reopen 339835
reassign 339835 original-awk
retitle 339835 configuring alternatives to use original-awk loses nawk
thanks
Brian M. Carlson wrote:
> I believe the problem in question is the fact that nawk is a slave to
> awk (try update-alternatives --display awk). If this is a bug in
> update-alte
Hi
Someone reopened this bug without any explanation whatsoever...
You as maintainer claimed that the shipped fonts are all free now, can
you please close this bug if this still is the case?
The reason the person reopened the bugreport might be that some shipped
fonts are called the same as the
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> found 369829 0.5.2-1.1sarge1
Bug#369829: wzdftpd-mod-perl 0.5.2-1.1sarge1 can't be installed
Bug marked as found in version 0.5.2-1.1sarge1.
> notfound 369829 0.7.0-2
Bug#369829: wzd
Your message dated Sun, 11 Jun 2006 09:05:58 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#368812: fixed in rafkill 1.2.1-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 372304
Bug#372304: libgtk-java: FTBFS: build-dep on missing libglib-java
'reopen' is deprecated when a bug has been closed with a version;
use 'found' or 'submitter' as appropriate instead.
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> thanks
Stopping
Your message dated Sun, 11 Jun 2006 09:05:26 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#369987: fixed in openvrml 0.15.10-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Sun, 11 Jun 2006 09:05:26 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#369404: fixed in openvrml 0.15.10-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Sun, 11 Jun 2006 09:05:26 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#369983: fixed in openvrml 0.15.10-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 367645 + fixed
Bug#367645: regexxer: Segmentation Fault on amd64
Tags were: patch confirmed
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debi
Your message dated Sun, 11 Jun 2006 09:05:26 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#369404: fixed in openvrml 0.15.10-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Sun, 11 Jun 2006 09:05:26 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#368959: fixed in openvrml 0.15.10-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Hi all,
Does anyone here feel like helping out with a FTBFS in synfigstudio due
to a floating point exception in synfig on alpha? If someone could get a
backtrace, or a patch or other hint, that would be great.
Steps to reproduce:
sudo aptitude install synfig synfig-dbg
mkdir tmp ; cd tmp
wget
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 369981 + fixed
Bug#369981: package depends on old gcj-4.0/libgcj6-dev packages
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator,
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 363586 + fixed
Bug#363586: monodoc-browser: Monodoc-browser crashes mono
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator,
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 358713 + fixed
Bug#358713: gtkhtml3.6: causes monodoc crash
There were no tags set.
Bug#358779: /usr/bin/monodoc: glib crash
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system a
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 364262 + fixed
Bug#364262: debian-edu: FTBFS: Missing build dependency.
Tags were: pending
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debia
Hi Matej,
Il giorno mar, 06/06/2006 alle 23.02 +0200, Matej Vela ha scritto:
[...]
> Unfortunately, there is no way to tell whether db_get returned a
> user-specified/preseeded value (which we should leave alone) or the
> value of the Default field (which we might want to override base
Your message dated Sun, 11 Jun 2006 09:05:13 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#372304: fixed in multitail 4.0.5-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
1 - 100 of 162 matches
Mail list logo
