Package: gal0.x
Version: 0.24-6
Severity: serious
Hello,
There was a problem while autobuilding your package:
> Automatic build of gal0.x_0.24-6 on avidan by sbuild/i386 0.46
> Build started at 20060606-0759
> **
[...]
>
Package: gch
Version: 19990519-8.3
Severity: serious
Hello,
There was a problem while autobuilding your package:
> Automatic build of gch_19990519-8.3 on avidan by sbuild/i386 0.46
> Build started at 20060606-0813
> **
>
Package: auctex
Version: 11.82-1
Severity: serious
This package doesn't install on a fresh testing system:
Setting up auctex (11.82-1) ...
install/auctex: Setting up for emacs21... emacs-package-install:
/usr/lib/emacsen-common/packages/install/auctex emacs21 emacs21 failed at
/usr/lib/emacsen-
Package: reportbug
Version: 3.20
Followup-For: Bug #370600
Errors were encountered while processing:
reportbug
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
A package failed to install. Trying to recover:
Setting up reportbug (3.21) ...
Compiling /usr/share/reportbug/reportbug_submit.
Your message dated Tue, 06 Jun 2006 07:50:09 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Your message dated Tue, 06 Jun 2006 07:54:17 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Your message dated Tue, 06 Jun 2006 07:54:17 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Your message dated Tue, 06 Jun 2006 07:50:09 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Your message dated Tue, 06 Jun 2006 07:50:09 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Your message dated Tue, 06 Jun 2006 08:00:08 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Your message dated Tue, 06 Jun 2006 08:00:08 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Your message dated Tue, 06 Jun 2006 07:34:26 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line gnome-control-center: Confirmation of bug
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
On Mon, Jun 05, 2006 at 01:46:29AM -0700, Walter Landry wrote:
> Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 04, 2006 at 08:16:24AM -0700, Walter Landry wrote:
> > > This can be fixed by making Jython conflict with sun-java, although I
> > > suspect that there may be other packages th
Package: graveman
Version: 0.3.12-4-2.1
Followup-For: Bug #364736
There is new upstream release fixing this bug, more information on graveman
site:
http://graveman.tuxfamily.org/changelog.php
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'uns
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 370595 important
Bug#370595: Multiple, serious event handling bugs in dispatch
Severity set to `important' from `grave'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(ad
Walter:
I have just posted a notice to debian-legal about the
availability of new DLJ FAQ [1] which further clarifies
our intent.
Please see the new FAQ#30 [2].
HTH,
--Tom
[1] https://jdk-distros.dev.java.net/developer.html
[2] http://download.java.net/dlj/DLJ-FAQ-v1.2.html#q30
signature.a
Walter:
I have just posted a notice to debian-legal about the
availability of new DLJ FAQ [1] which further clarifies
our intent. It is not the intent of the DLJ to
prevent running Jython.
Please see the new FAQ #13 #14 and #15 [2].
If Sun wanted to discourage innovations like Jython and
JRuby
Walter:
I have just posted a notice to debian-legal about the
availability of new DLJ FAQ [1] which further clarifies
our intent.
It is the intent of the DLJ that licensees such as Debian will
work towards compatibility with their Operating System [2].
The sun-java5 packages have been split for
Andreas Barth wrote:
> Ok, what is the best place to discuss this?
The GNU coreutils home page is here:
http://www.gnu.org/software/coreutils/
The best place to discuss upstream GNU coreutils issues is on the
bug-coreutils@gnu.org mailing list. You do not need to be subscribed
to post there b
severity 370595 important
thanks
On Mon, Jun 05, 2006 at 04:51:26PM -0700, Steven Brown wrote:
> There are multiple, serious event handling bugs in the dispatch code of
> libsigcx that are severe enough to make the library unusable for
> programs not using the GTK event loop
The "grave" severit
Here is a (rather noisy) patch that lets the file compile.
1) Replaced leading pairs of tabs with eight spaces to produce correct
indentation.
2) Appended ':' at line 371 to produce well-formed if statement.
--- reportbug/usr/share/reportbug/reportbug_submit.py 2006-06-05
22:59:23.0
No, it seems to be fixed. Thanks heaps :)
On 05/06/06 18:50:07, Marco Cabizza wrote:
Does this still happen with the current release in unstable?
~marco
--
Robert Marlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 364656 + fixed
Bug#364656: hoichess_0.4.0-1(amd64/unstable): arch: any package sets -march=i686
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system admini
Hello,
I'm doing an NMU of hoichess to fix #364656; diff attached.
Thanks,
Matej
diff -u hoichess-0.4.0/debian/changelog hoichess-0.4.0/debian/changelog
--- hoichess-0.4.0/debian/changelog
+++ hoichess-0.4.0/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,12 @@
+hoichess (0.4.0-1.1) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+ *
Your message dated Mon, 05 Jun 2006 19:17:19 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#361801: fixed in debpartial-mirror 0.2.91
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 312331 + fixed
Bug#312331: ntp-server: preinst is killall happytastic
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, De
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 370598 = d-i pending
Bug#370598: libnss-dns-udeb and libnss-files-udeb are empty
There were no tags set.
Tags set to: d-i, pending
> merge 370598 370523
Bug#370523: libnss-dns-udeb and libnss-files-udeb are empty, breaking d-i
Bug#370598: libnss-d
Your message dated Mon, 05 Jun 2006 18:17:32 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#368289: fixed in xosview 1.8.2-9
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Mon, 05 Jun 2006 18:17:32 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#364629: fixed in xosview 1.8.2-9
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
diff -u ntp-4.2.0a+stable/debian/ntp-server.preinst ntp-4.2.0a+stable/debian/ntp-server.preinst
--- ntp-4.2.0a+stable/debian/ntp-server.preinst
+++ ntp-4.2.0a+stable/debian/ntp-server.preinst
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@
# properly shutdown the server sometimes.
# Thus, we just kill all servers off her
Your message dated Mon, 05 Jun 2006 17:47:23 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#370593: fixed in reportbug 3.21.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> reassign 351182 ntp-server
Bug#351182: ntp: fails to restart after update
Bug reassigned from package `ntp' to `ntp-server'.
> merge 351182 370499
Bug#351182: ntp: fails to restart a
Joachim Reichel dijo [Sun, Jun 04, 2006 at 06:43:01PM +0200]:
> Hi,
>
> the attached patch fixes the problem.
Thanks! I tested it on a couple of Debian developer machines, and it
appears to work correctly - Uploading package now!
--
Gunnar Wolf - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - (+52-55)5623-0154 / 1451-224
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 240287 firebird2-server-common
Bug#240287: firebird-server-common: Should add system group instead of normal
group
'reopen' is deprecated when a bug has been closed with a version;
use 'found' or 'submitter' as appropriate instead.
Bug reopened,
Package: reportbug
Version: 3.21
Severity: grave
Upgrading reportbug to 3.21 fails with the following error:
Setting up reportbug (3.21) ...
Compiling /usr/share/reportbug/reportbug_submit.py ...
File "/usr/share/reportbug/reportbug_submit.py", line 354
while failed != True:
^
SyntaxEr
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> severity 348744 grave
Bug#348744: ntp-simple: sudo apt-get install fails need to be root
Severity set to `grave' from `normal'
> merge 348744 370499
Bug#348744: ntp-simple: sudo apt-
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 316195 O: cutter -- disconnect routed IP connections
Bug#316195: RFA: cutter -- disconnect routed IP connections
Changed Bug title.
> severity 232058 grave
Bug#232058: cutter doesn't recognize connections on 2.6 kernel
Severity set to `grave' f
Package: libnss-files-udeb
Version: 2.3.6-13
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi,
This version of glibc ships empty libnss-dns-udeb and libnss-files-udeb
packages, making the debian-installer unable to resolve names.
Regards,
Samuel
-- System Information:
Debian Release:
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> severity 353066 serious
Bug#353066: ntp-simple: cannot create "ntp" group on install
Severity set to `serious' from `important'
> merge 353066 329746
Bug#329746: User root does not e
IMHO, this is a fix for this bug. Not tested, just managed to
dpkg --configure -a
Matej
--- reportbug_submit.py.orig 2006-06-05 08:59:23.0 -0400
+++ reportbug_submit.py 2006-06-05 20:41:20.0 -0400
@@ -349,35 +349,32 @@
if smtphost:
toaddrs = [x[1] for x in alist]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> severity 370582 serious
Bug#370582: mdadm: postinst error if no raid support in kernel
Severity set to `serious' from `normal'
> tags 370582 confirmed pending
Bug#370582: mdadm: post
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> severity 351182 grave
Bug#351182: ntp: fails to restart after update
Severity set to `grave' from `important'
> merge 351182 370499
Bug#351182: ntp: fails to restart after update
Bug
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> severity 302127 grave
Bug#302127: Init script dies when stop fails, such as when daemon not running
Severity set to `grave' from `normal'
> merge 302127 370499
Bug#302127: Init scrip
Your message dated Tue, 6 Jun 2006 02:33:22 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#368298: trying to overwrite `/usr/X11R6/bin', which is
also in package ivtools-dev
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has bee
Your message dated Mon, 05 Jun 2006 17:32:15 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#368360: fixed in courier 0.53.2-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
tags 370576 + fixed-upstream pending
thanks
Fixed in upstream BASE 1.2.5 (sarah). Expect a new package in a few
days.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: reportbug
Version: 3.21
Severity: grave
I can't upgrade reportbug as follows:
Setting up reportbug (3.21) ...
Compiling /usr/share/reportbug/reportbug_submit.py ...
File "/usr/share/reportbug/reportbug_submit.py", line 354
while failed != True:
^
SyntaxError: invalid syntax
dp
On Sat, Jun 03, 2006 at 05:02:43PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
> On Fri, 2 Jun 2006 10:01:49 -0400 Andrew Moise wrote:
> > The image files don't include anything that
> > resembles source, but I'm choosing to assume that DFSG #2 doesn't
> > apply to images as long as they are being distributed leg
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 370502 + moreinfo
Bug#370502: gnucash: QIF import causes data loss
There were no tags set.
Bug#370500: (no subject)
Tags added: moreinfo
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system admi
Anders Ellenshøj Andersen wrote:
I am having this issue. How do I uninstall the package?
Try to install the new version, and then remove it.
Alternatively, you can start nscd before trying to remove it.
--
.''`. Aurelien Jarno | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
: :' : Debian developer
Your message dated Mon, 05 Jun 2006 16:02:23 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#355357: fixed in libapache2-mod-xmlrpc2 2.2.1-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the ca
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 370576 + fixed-upstream pending
Bug#370576: acidbase: Remote File Inclusion Vulnerabilities
Tags were: security
Tags added: fixed-upstream, pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking
Package: videogen
Version: 0.32-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
I noticed today while dist-upgrading my etch box that X 7.0 was going to
get installed, and 3 packages were getting removed:
videogen, xfree86-common, xserver-common. Found it weird given the
dependencies of
It's nice that guile-1.6 now builds on ia64, but a shame that it
doesn't work at all. The failures look just like the sort of things
that scm also does on ia64.
However, this is no big surprise to me. I said a while back, but it
may have gotten lost, that scm also does not work on ia64. Upstre
Package: libsigcx
Version: 0.6.5-2
Severity: grave
Tags: patch, upstream
There are multiple, serious event handling bugs in the dispatch code of
libsigcx that are severe enough to make the library unusable for
programs not using the GTK event loop. A patch to fix them was supplied
to the upst
acking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
Package: fontconfig
Version: 2.3.2-5.1
Severity: serious
Hello,
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of fontconfig_2.3.2-5.1 on avidan by sbuild/i386 85
> Build started
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 357552 + fixed
Bug#357552: FTBFS with G++ 4.1: extra qualification
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed
> tag 369090 + fixed
Bug#369090: FTBFS: error: freetype/internal/ftobjs.h: No such file or directory
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed
> quit
St
Package: acidbase
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: user security hole
http://www.frsirt.com/english/advisories/2006/1996
Advisory ID : FrSIRT/ADV-2006-1996
CVE ID : GENERIC-MAP-NOMATCH
Rated as : High Risk
Remotely Exploitable : Yes
Locally Exploitable : Yes
Release Date : 20
Your message dated Mon, 05 Jun 2006 15:32:41 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#370467: fixed in gnokii 0.6.12-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Mon, 05 Jun 2006 15:17:18 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#369923: fixed in cryptsetup 2:1.0.3-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> tags 370523 + pending
Bug#370523: libnss-dns-udeb and libnss-files-udeb are empty, breaking d-i
Tags were: d-i
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 368938 + fixed
Bug#368938: ktrack_0.3.0-alpha1-8 (unstable): FTBFS: renamed build-dependency
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administr
Your message dated Mon, 05 Jun 2006 15:17:51 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#365175: fixed in erlang-doc-html 1:10.b.9-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case i
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 368962 + fixed
Bug#368962: klic - produces over 1GiB log
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed
> tag 368964 + fixed
Bug#368964: klic: Configure script loops, consuming tons of memory and disk
space
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed
>
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 308268 + fixed
Bug#308268: mboxcheck-applet: Should depend on python-gnome2-extras
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(admi
Thomas Themel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I just noticed that the new gnucash version seems to corrupt imported
> data sets. I use the package with [EMAIL PROTECTED] set, and the
> following procedure reproducably loses a lot of transactions from my
> accounts:
Hi, thanks for your bug report.
Your message dated Mon, 05 Jun 2006 15:47:31 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#370304: fixed in bzflag 2.0.8.20060605
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 152392 important
Bug#152392: mpg321: lacking LFS
Severity set to `important' from `serious'
> --
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs databas
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 368360
Bug#368360: courier-authdaemon - fails to remove
'reopen' is deprecated when a bug has been closed with a version;
use 'found' or 'submitter' as appropriate instead.
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> reassign 368360 courier-base
Bug
On Thu, May 25, 2006 at 12:06:47AM -0400, Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
> Anyway, if you conditionalize my alignment code to only be on 64-bit
> platforms, I think you'll have a patch to fix this issue.
I minimalized your patch (removing the stuff to set -Wno-error, as it's
only relevant with noopt),
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 368546 sawfish
Bug#368546: general: remarkable slow-down of whole system after 4-6 hours
Bug reassigned from package `general' to `sawfish'.
> severity 368546 serious
Bug#368546: general: remarkable slow-down of whole system after 4-6 hours
Se
d `;' before 'else'
> make[2]: *** [display.o] Error 1
> make[2]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/gopchop-1.1.7/src'
> make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
> make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/gopchop-1.1.7'
> make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2
> **
> Build finished at 20060605-1242
> FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Leaving directory `/build/buildd/scribus-ng-1.3.3.1.dfsg/scribus'
> make[3]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
> make[3]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/scribus-ng-1.3.3.1.dfsg/scribus'
> make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
> make[2]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/scr
On Mon, Jun 05, 2006, Thomas Girard wrote:
> tags 369090 + patch
> thanks
I've uploaded a NMU concerning this issue. I don't know why my email
with the patch did not make it to the bug report, though.
--
adn
Mohammed Adnène Trojette
Hi,
From: "Carsten Otto" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Bug#341843: gkrellmd: Problem with allow-host 127.0.0.1
Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2006 19:52:15 +0200
> On Fri, Apr 14, 2006 at 08:17:43PM +0100, Cai Qian wrote:
> > OK. As far as I know, this bug will only affect 2.2.5. I'll have a
> > look, and t
tag 369090 patch
thanks dude
On Sat, May 27, 2006, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> Package: glob2
> Version: 0.8.16-2
> Severity: serious
>
> This package fails to build from source with:
>
> powerpc-linux-gnu-gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../..
> -I/usr/include/freetype2 -I/usr/include/SDL -D_REENTR
Package: libaws
Version: 2.0p-11
Severity: serious
Hello,
There was a problem while autobuilding your package:
> Automatic build of libaws_2.0p-11 on avidan by sbuild/i386 85
> Build started at 2006060
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> merge 370500 370502
Bug#370500: (no subject)
Bug#370502: gnucash: QIF import causes data loss
Merged 370500 370502.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 369090 patch
Bug#369090: FTBFS: error: freetype/internal/ftobjs.h: No such file or directory
Tags were: patch
Tags added: patch
> thanks dude
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administr
Walter Landry schrieb:
> 3) There are only two clarifications I know of. One is in the
>non-binding DLJ FAQ, and the other is from Tom Marble [1]. Neither
>of these clarifications limit the restrictions to Java
>implementations. For example, in Tom's clarification he says [2]
>
>
Le lundi 05 juin 2006 à 12:09 -0700, Steve Langasek a écrit :
> On Mon, Jun 05, 2006 at 11:41:01AM -0700, Keith Packard wrote:
> > That patch is horrific and won't be accepted upstream...
>
> Ok, but the freetype website also claims that fontconfig 2.3.93 doesn't need
> patching -- is that a versi
Package: inkscape
Version: 0.43-4
Followup-For: Bug #369828
With libgc1c2 6.7-1 installed, inkscape dies as in the original report.
Installing 6.6-2 makes it work again.
I haven't tested 0.43-5 since it requires the broken libfreetype6 2.2.1,
which I'm not about to allow on any box I control, but
Walter Landry schrieb:
> Package: sun-java5-jre
> Version: 1.5.0-06-1
> Severity: serious
>
> In the Distributor License for Java, there is the clause
>
> (c) you do not combine, configure or distribute the Software to
> run in conjunction with any additional software that implements
>
On Mon, Jun 05, 2006 at 09:26:55PM +0200, Yves Jean Marie Lambert wrote:
> Package: security.debian.org
> Severity: critical
> Tags: security
> Justification: root security hole
>
> "Enlarge your d1ck" spammers are using a security hole in debian :
Which security hole?
> all zombified system I
On Mon, 2006-06-05 at 12:09 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 05, 2006 at 11:41:01AM -0700, Keith Packard wrote:
> > That patch is horrific and won't be accepted upstream...
>
> Ok, but the freetype website also claims that fontconfig 2.3.93 doesn't need
> patching -- is that a version su
On Mon, 2006-06-05 at 12:09 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 05, 2006 at 11:41:01AM -0700, Keith Packard wrote:
> > That patch is horrific and won't be accepted upstream...
>
> Ok, but the freetype website also claims that fontconfig 2.3.93 doesn't need
> patching -- is that a version su
Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Stefan Hornburg (Racke) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-06-05 20:09]:
>
>>>I don't think this is gone.
>>
>>You are correct that this problems still persists, but now only the
>>removal fails. Therefore bug 368360 should be reopened and probably
>>reassigned to courier-base.
With regard to the last message:
1) Other async dns libraries:
http://daniel.haxx.se/projects/c-ares/
http://daniel.haxx.se/projects/c-ares/otherlibs.html
C-ares and udns look the most promising as replacements.
4) The ansi2knr is something that comes with autoconf, isn't it?
wt
--
War
severity 370296 normal
thanks
I think that is your interpretation. The paragraph cited never talks
about "the exact same file". It's an archive of some form, which is
unpacked and repacked in the deb format.
- no files in the archive is distributed modified.
- all files in the archive are complet
Your message dated Mon, 5 Jun 2006 22:31:05 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Querying for HOST-RESOURCES-MIB::hrStorageAllocationFailures.2
causes snmpd to use max CPU
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
* Stefan Hornburg (Racke) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-06-05 20:09]:
> > I don't think this is gone.
>
> You are correct that this problems still persists, but now only the
> removal fails. Therefore bug 368360 should be reopened and probably
> reassigned to courier-base.
Isn't it courier-authdaemo
Hello,
I'm doing an NMU of klic to fix #368962 and #368964; diff attached.
Thanks,
Matej
diff -u klic-3.003-gm1/debian/changelog klic-3.003-gm1/debian/changelog
--- klic-3.003-gm1/debian/changelog
+++ klic-3.003-gm1/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,16 @@
+klic (3.003-gm1-2.1) unstable; urgency=medium
Josh Triplett schrieb:
> As more direct examples than Jython:
>
> gjdoc implements javadoc. If a user installs a
> non-natively-gcj-compiled gjdoc and the Sun Java packages, and then runs
> gjdoc, it will run gjdoc with the Sun Java packages. That looks very
> much like a violation of DLJ clause
Hello,
I'm doing an NMU of ktrack to fix #368938; diff attached.
Thanks,
Matej
ktrack_0.3.0-alpha1-8.1.diff.gz
Description: Binary data
Your message dated Mon, 5 Jun 2006 21:18:12 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line java-gcj-compat_1.0.56-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibi
tags 369090 + patch
thanks
Hello,
A patch similar to [1] can be applied here.
Applying the attached patch fixes the FTBFS.
[1]
http://www.freetype.org/freetype2/patches/SDL_ttf-2.0.7-noftinternals.patch
--- libgag/src/SDL_ttf.c.orig 2006-06-05 21:48:31.829231750 +0200
+++ libgag/src/SDL_ttf.
Package: mboxcheck-applet
Version: 0.3-1
Tags: patch
Hi,
Attached is the diff for my mboxcheck-applet 0.3-1.1 NMU.
--
You will gain money by a speculation or lottery.
diff -u mboxcheck-applet-0.3/debian/changelog
mboxcheck-applet-0.3/debian/changelog
--- mboxcheck-applet-0.3/debian/changelog
+
Your message dated Mon, 5 Jun 2006 21:14:53 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#370518: placing jni.h in versioned subdirectory makes no
sense
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If thi
On Mon, Jun 05, 2006 at 07:06:11PM +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 05, 2006 at 02:01:02PM +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> > Compiling the file in question (mods.c) with -O0 makes the problem go away.
> > Likewise, compiling it with gcc-4.1 (with -O2) makes the problem go away.
On Mon, Jun 05, 2006 at 11:41:01AM -0700, Keith Packard wrote:
> That patch is horrific and won't be accepted upstream...
Ok, but the freetype website also claims that fontconfig 2.3.93 doesn't need
patching -- is that a version suitable for inclusion in etch?
--
Steve Langasek
1 - 100 of 239 matches
Mail list logo
