Walter Landry schrieb: > 3) There are only two clarifications I know of. One is in the > non-binding DLJ FAQ, and the other is from Tom Marble [1]. Neither > of these clarifications limit the restrictions to Java > implementations. For example, in Tom's clarification he says [2] > > In a similar way please don't take bits from the Java platform > and use them as part of or to complete alternate technologies > (e.g. plugin.jar). > > So using Java's plugin mechanism to implement python plugins for > Jython is not allowed. And this makes sense. Sun would definitely > be unhappy if the JDK were used to implement J++ or C#, especially > because they are not Java.
talking with Sun in the past, that was always meant as not combining with other JVM implementations. I'll have to recheck. > > Cheers, > Walter Landry > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [1] It is unclear to me how binding Tom Marble's clarifications are on > Sun. I somehow doubt that he is clearing every email with Sun's > legal department, though I could be wrong. > > [2] http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2006/05/msg00165.html > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
