On Mon, 2006-06-05 at 12:09 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Mon, Jun 05, 2006 at 11:41:01AM -0700, Keith Packard wrote: > > That patch is horrific and won't be accepted upstream... > > Ok, but the freetype website also claims that fontconfig 2.3.93 doesn't need > patching -- is that a version suitable for inclusion in etch?
Not at this point. I'm hoping to have a few days to play with fontconfig 2.4 this month; the code is pretty much ready to ship, but I want to redo the cache file management piece to simplify it dramatically. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
