Hi Christoph,
On Sat, May 13, 2006 at 09:40:11PM +0200, Bart Martens wrote:
> Hi Christian,
My apologies. Your firstname is Christoph, not Christian. Feel free to
call me Bert for a while. :)
Regards,
Bart Martens
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscrib
I just uploaded libmhash2 0.9.6-2, which contains a more complex
workaround that should fix the problem you're seeing. Please try it
and let me know.
It would be better if upstream did the promised release, but after two
months it seems best not to wait.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROT
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.19
> tags 294520 - patch
Bug#294520: qtparted: Incorrect handling of extended partitions
Tags were: patch
Tags removed: patch
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact m
I just uploaded libmhash2 0.9.6-2 to unstable. Please try this as I
think it will fix these bugs. (I'm pretty sure they are both the same
bug.)
I think what's happening is that there are two separate bugs. In
0.9.4a the function mutils_word32swap was broken and caused a segfault
on big-endian a
Your message dated Sat, 13 May 2006 21:32:11 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#365752: fixed in opencv 0.9.7-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Your message dated Sat, 13 May 2006 21:32:11 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#365752: fixed in opencv 0.9.7-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Your message dated Sat, 13 May 2006 21:32:11 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#366105: fixed in opencv 0.9.7-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Your message dated Sat, 13 May 2006 21:32:11 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#366105: fixed in opencv 0.9.7-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
I am sorry it took me so long to get back to this. I had a good read
over the code and this bug and I reached the conclusion that the
proposed fix is not 100% adequate.
The issue at stake is a postinst creation of /dev/md* devices by the
mdadm package. The original created the devices only when de
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 359996 + patch
Bug#359996: after upgrade, eyeD3 no longer works at all
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator
tags 359996 + patch
thanks
Alexander,
I have attached a patch that partially fixes this bug. The other half
of the fix can be had by using the patch that I submitted for dh_python
to bug #358392. If Joey chooses to accept the patch, then it will allow
dh_python to create a versioned dependency
Your message dated Sat, 13 May 2006 18:02:25 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#360732: fixed in vls 0.5.4+cvs20031028-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.19
> merge 365752 366105
Bug#365752: FTBFS on AMD64: missing SSE2 header
Bug#366105: opencv_0.9.7-1(amd64/unstable): build failure: error: '__m128d' was
not declared in this scope
Merged
Your message dated Sat, 13 May 2006 17:17:26 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#365597: fixed in emacs21 21.4a-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Sat, 13 May 2006 17:17:26 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#365597: fixed in emacs21 21.4a-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Sat, 13 May 2006 17:17:26 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#365597: fixed in emacs21 21.4a-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Sat, 13 May 2006 16:47:13 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#285086: fixed in allegro4 2:4.0.4-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
tag 361608 pending confirmed
thanks
Hello,
this was a bug in java-gcj-compat and got fixed in version
1.0.52-0ubuntu1. I will soon (on monday) upload 1.0.55 to unstable which
fixes this too.
Thanks for reporting this.
Cheers,
Michael
--
Escape the Java Trap with GNU Classpath!
http://www.gn
Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Can you please work on #351693? Perhaps simply following the
> suggestion in the bug report would solve the problem; I don't know.
> But regardless, it's silly that such a small thing should be causing
> problems for three months now.
At least wh
Your message dated Mon, 08 May 2006 10:47:10 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#365699: fixed in kdewebdev 4:3.5.2-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
tags 364264 + patch
thanks
I have attached a patch that fixes this bug.
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sanchez
http://familiasanchez.net/~roberto
diff -ur directvnc-0.7.5.old/debian/changelog directvnc-0.7.5/debian/changelog
--- directvnc-0.7.5.old/debian/changelog2006-05-13 17:54:25.251128443
On Sat, 2006-05-13 at 15:13 -0700, Arias Hung wrote:
> Attached as requested.
Thanks. Could you also add "-s 1000" so I can see what messages are sent
and received to/from hald-runner?
And it's fine to just mail it to me privately too, probably no sense in
spamming the bug system.
Thanks,
johan
Your message dated Sun, 07 May 2006 18:02:13 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#366362: fixed in spampd 2.30-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
* Daniel Schepler wrote:
> Since the package explicitly needs openjade to build, you need to
> include that in the Build-Depends.
Okay... the package build-depends on docbook-dsssl, which depends on
openjade, openjade1.3 or jade. I'm going to add an explicit build-dep
on openjade with the next upl
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 361608 pending confirmed
Bug#361608: ecj-bootstrap: takes over /usr/lib/jvm/java-gcj/bin/javac with
../../../../bin/ecj
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending, confirmed
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assist
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 364264 + patch
Bug#364264: directvnc: FTBFS: dfb.c:33: error: syntax error before 'caps'
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administra
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 364629 + patch
Bug#364629: FTBFS: error: previous declaration 'int snprintf...'
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(admi
Your message dated Sat, 13 May 2006 14:32:38 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#367075: fixed in bacula 1.38.9-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 365230
Bug#365230: mcvs - FTBFS: There is no package with name "FFI"
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> found 1.0.13-15
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need as
ith name "FFI"
>
> 0 errors, 0 warnings
> Bye.
> make[1]: *** [unix.c] Error 1
> make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/mcvs-1.0.13/code/unix-bindings'
> linking set failed to build.
> make: *** [common-install-arch] Error 1
> *
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> reassign 361608 java-gcj-compat
Bug#361608: ecj-bootstrap: takes over /usr/lib/jvm/java-gcj/bin/javac with
../../../../bin/ecj
Bug reassigned from package `ecj-bootstrap' to `java-gc
debian/tmp/usr/share/man/man1/python2.4.1
> mv: cannot stat `debian/tmp/usr/man/man1/python.1': No such file or directory
> make: *** [stamp-install] Error 1
> **
> Build finished at 20060513-2324
>
tags 364629 + patch
thanks
I have attached a patch that fixes this bug.
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sanchez
http://familiasanchez.net/~roberto
diff -ur xosview-1.8.2.old/config/configure.in xosview-1.8.2/config/configure.in
--- xosview-1.8.2.old/config/configure.in 2006-05-13 16:25:08.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 367083 normal
Bug#367083: "The partition with /var/lib/mysql is too full" when using a symlink
Severity set to `normal'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(a
severity 367083 normal
thanks
Hello Jeroen
On 2006-05-13 Jeroen Massar wrote:
> # LC_ALL=C df --portability /var/lib/mysql | tail -n 1 | awk '{ print ($4)
> }'
> 34536456K
> /var/lib/mysql is a symlink, maybe that causes the issue?
No, the script explicitly checks "/var/lib/mysql/." to avoid thi
Hi Christian,
I intend to upload an NMU for qiv with this in the changelog:
* NMU.
* debian/patches/02.improves_bgimage_setting.dpatch, debian/patches/00list:
Removed patch with regression. Closes: #320115.
* debian/copyright: Fixed old-fsf-address-in-copyright-file.
* debian/co
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 367060 + fixed-in-experimental
Bug#367060: gnucash_1.9.5-3(experimental/mips/signy): FTBFS: "./config.status:
No such file or directory"
Tags were: experimental
Tags added: fixed-in-experimental
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me
retitle 366907 Checking configuration files does not work properly
severity 366907 normal
thanks
On Sat, May 13, 2006 at 11:30 -0400, Liam M. Healy wrote:
> Thanks for the pointer to tex-common, the separate purge and
> reinstallation seems to have fixed the problem.
Welcome. I am downgrading in
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 366907 Checking configuration files does not work properly
Bug#366907: tetex-bin: Fails to configure, updmap failed
Changed Bug title.
> severity 366907 normal
Bug#366907: Checking configuration files does not work properly
Severity set to `nor
On 2006-05-13 Martin Schulze wrote:
> Christian Hammers wrote:
> > Attached you will find a diff that can be used to make a DSA for the
> > recent Quagga security bug.
>
> Thanks a lot for preparing the update.
>
> Please also mention CVE-2006-2223 CVE-2006-2224 in the unstable changelog
> when
Package: amarok
Version: 1.3.9-1
Followup-For: Bug #337754
This started with 1.3.8+b1, prior to that, amarok was mostly usable on this
testing platform. But as soon
as I started using 1.3.8+b1 (and this continues with the present version) I
cannot get amarok to progress
further than the openi
On Sat, Apr 01, 2006 at 08:55:30AM -0400, Bruno Barrera C. wrote:
> > I would seriously reconsider maintenance of this package..trivially
> > fixed valgrind warnings, saved files aren't correct, overwrites files
> > which wget wouldn't, and improper use of recv.
>
> Could you please explain me wha
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 367096 pending
Bug#367096: undeclared dependency on libnautilus-burn2
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator
tag 367096 pending
thanks
Le samedi 13 mai 2006 à 17:50 +0200, Robert Bihlmeyer a écrit :
> Package: nautilus-cd-burner
> Version: 2.12.3-2
> Severity: serious
>
> ~$ nautilus-cd-burner
> nautilus-cd-burner: error while loading shared libraries:
> libnautilus-burn.so.2: cannot open shared objec
On Fri, Nov 25, 2005 at 05:55:07PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
> Roland Stigge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > building the package abntex in a clean sid build environment
> > (with pbuilder) on i386 results in:
> [...]
> > pdfTeX error (ext1): \pdfinfo used while \pdfoutput is not set.
>
Seems like regression, cupsys 1.1.23-15 (AMD64) won't start; dpkg says:
...
Setting up cupsys (1.1.23-15) ...
Starting Common Unix Printing System: cupsdcupsd: Child exited with status 98!
invoke-rc.d: initscript cupsys, action "start" failed.
dpkg: error processing cupsys (--configure):
subproce
Your message dated Sat, 13 May 2006 09:02:14 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#357885: fixed in gnome-screensaver 2.14.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case i
Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> gnucash 1.9.5-3 fails to build on a mips buildd:
Thank you for your bug report. The actual failure was not the
"config.status" check, which as can be seen from the log was ignored
correctly by the makefile; rather, the problem appears later on
Your message dated Sat, 13 May 2006 18:25:02 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line nfs-kernel-server: Fails to upgrade and to start
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Package: nautilus-cd-burner
Version: 2.12.3-2
Severity: serious
~$ nautilus-cd-burner
nautilus-cd-burner: error while loading shared libraries:
libnautilus-burn.so.2: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
~$ ldd $(which nautilus-cd-burner)
linux-gate.so.1 => (0xe
Your message dated Sat, 13 May 2006 17:54:48 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug not needed anymore, package removed from archive
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the c
Quoting Richard Antony Burton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Log contains:
> 2006-05-13 13:39:42 1FetPI-0005GT-MT SA: Action: SA didn't successfully run
> against message
Which means SA-Exim did work, but SpamAssassin itself failed for some
reason. It would be great if you can search through your logs a
On Sat, May 13, 2006 at 05:08:09PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> >* bacula-sd-*: added conflict on bacula-sd < 1.38.9, since some
> > manpages have moved around since that version and conflicts
> > could exist on upgrade. Closes: #367075.
>
> A conflict is not enough, it have to rep
Your message dated Sat, 13 May 2006 07:47:04 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#367066: fixed in bacula 1.38.9-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Sat, 13 May 2006 16:59:04 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
On Sat, May 13, 2006 at 06:53:02AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> severity 367070 grave
> thanks
>
> Sorry, Bastian pointed out my error -- the problem is that the error message
> saying "postinst called with ..." is being generated by a *preinst* :)
Yes. Apparently I accidentally run "cp
bacula
Your message dated Sat, 13 May 2006 16:59:04 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Your message dated Sat, 13 May 2006 16:59:04 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Your message dated Sat, 13 May 2006 08:02:10 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#304476: fixed in devmapper 2:1.02.05-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Sat, 13 May 2006 07:47:04 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#367066: fixed in bacula 1.38.9-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Sat, 13 May 2006 07:47:04 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#367066: fixed in bacula 1.38.9-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Package: beagle
Followup-For: Bug #365371
This bug can be closed.
Although the upstream changelog doesn't mention it, the fix is in 0.2.6.
Red Hat's bugzilla has the patch [1] that was applied to Beagle's CVS
on April 13th; Beagle 0.2.6 was released on the 29th of that month. I
glanced over the
reopen 367075
found 367075 1.38.9-5
thanks
>* bacula-sd-*: added conflict on bacula-sd < 1.38.9, since some
> manpages have moved around since that version and conflicts
> could exist on upgrade. Closes: #367075.
A conflict is not enough, it have to replace it.
Bastian
--
Earth
I had a custom-made /etc/texmf/texmf.d/05TeXMF.cnf which was not
removed because I had not purged tex-common; this happened because I
grepped packages for "tetex" and I didn't see tex-common.
However, when I tried to purge tex-common together with all the tetex
packages, nothing happened. It was n
Your message dated Sat, 13 May 2006 16:59:04 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 367075
Bug#367075: Install fails for bacula-sd-sqlite.
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> found 367075 1.38.9-5
Bug#367075: Install fails for bacula-sd-sqlite.
Bug marked as found in version 1.38.9-5.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Pl
Your message dated Sat, 13 May 2006 07:47:05 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#367070: fixed in bacula 1.38.9-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Sat, 13 May 2006 07:47:05 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#367075: fixed in bacula 1.38.9-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Sat, 13 May 2006 09:20:33 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#367066: bacula-director-pgsql: postinst called with
unknown argument `upgrade'
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been d
Your message dated Sat, 13 May 2006 07:47:05 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#367069: fixed in bacula 1.38.9-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Sat, 13 May 2006 16:13:04 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Your message dated Sat, 13 May 2006 16:50:38 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Your message dated Sat, 13 May 2006 07:47:05 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#367070: fixed in bacula 1.38.9-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Sat, 13 May 2006 09:20:33 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#367066: bacula-director-pgsql: postinst called with
unknown argument `upgrade'
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been d
Your message dated Sat, 13 May 2006 07:47:05 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#367069: fixed in bacula 1.38.9-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Sat, 13 May 2006 07:47:05 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#367069: fixed in bacula 1.38.9-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
severity 367070 grave
thanks
Sorry, Bastian pointed out my error -- the problem is that the error message
saying "postinst called with ..." is being generated by a *preinst* :)
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set
Your message dated Sat, 13 May 2006 09:20:33 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#367066: bacula-director-pgsql: postinst called with
unknown argument `upgrade'
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been d
Package: nfs-kernel-server
Version: 1:1.0.7-15
Severity: grave
Upgrading from -13 to -14 and -15 fails with the following error:
Setting up nfs-kernel-server (1.0.7-15) ...
Stopping NFS kernel daemon: mountd nfsd.
Unexporting directories for NFS kernel daemon...done.
Exporting directories for NFS
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 365284 + fixed
Bug#365284: xclips: please update for X11R7
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database
Your message dated Sat, 13 May 2006 07:17:18 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#367009: fixed in nfs-utils 1:1.0.7-16
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Your message dated Sat, 13 May 2006 07:47:05 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#367070: fixed in bacula 1.38.9-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
On Sat, May 13, 2006 at 04:54:38PM +0300, Yavor Doganov wrote:
>> What about "ls -ld /var/lib/nfs/"? I'm unable to reproduce this, but
>> it might be a case of statd not being able to write to /var/lib/nfs.
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ls -ld /var/lib/nfs/
> drwxr-xr-x 5 root root 4096 2006-05-13 09:56 /
Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
>
> What about "ls -ld /var/lib/nfs/"? I'm unable to reproduce this, but
> it might be a case of statd not being able to write to /var/lib/nfs.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ls -ld /var/lib/nfs/
drwxr-xr-x 5 root root 4096 2006-05-13 09:56 /var/lib/nfs/
I have an issue with nf
Your message dated Sat, 13 May 2006 16:52:32 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Package: mysql-server-5.0
Version: 5.0.21-3
Severity: critical
# /etc/init.d/mysql start
/etc/init.d/mysql[13623]: ERROR: The partition with /var/lib/mysql is
too full!
After upgrade, while there is plenty (30G+) of diskspace left...
Trying to fake the script:
# /usr/sbin/mysqld --print-default
experienced same problem here. i'll pick up where craig left off (in the
email chain for bug 366776).
# dnsdomainname
# hostname
deuteronomy
# cat /etc/hosts
127.0.0.1 deuteronomy localhost localhost.localdomain
# echo '127.0.0.1 localhost' >/etc/hosts
# dnsdomainame
gigabit
# hostname -f
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 367066 grave
Bug#367066: bacula-director-pgsql: postinst called with unknown argument
`upgrade'
Severity set to `grave'.
> severity 367069 grave
Bug#367069: bacula-director-pgsql - fails to upgrade
Severity set to `grave'.
> severity 367070
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 367070 grave
Bug#367070: bacula-director-pgsql - postinst called with unknown argument
`upgrade'
Severity set to `grave'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
Package: sa-exim
Version: 4.2.1-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Since updating spamassassin package to 3.1.1 sa-exim no longer has incoming mail
scanned.
Log contains:
2006-05-13 13:39:42 1FetPI-0005GT-MT SA: Action: SA didn't successfully run agai
nst message, accepting
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.19
> tags 363978 + patch
Bug#363978: rssh: broken command line parsing
Tags were: sarge security
Tags added: patch
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you ne
On Sat, May 13, 2006 at 10:27:05AM +0300, Yavor Doganov wrote:
> I'm trying to upgrade from 1.0.7-13 and get the same error.
> `/etc/init.d/nfs-common restart' works. Here's the output you
> requested:
Thanks, that's useful. What about "ls -ld /var/lib/nfs/"? I'm unable to
reproduce this, but it
First of all, don't take it for granted that the disk has to be full or
almost full for this to happen.
Also, this isn't a data loss problem unless you make it so yourself. If
you think the only option is to delete your mailbox, try to delete only
the cache and metadata files. Look for your mailbo
Package: installwatch
Version: 0.6.3-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Whenever I run checkinstall, I get a segmentation fault when it invokes
installwatch. It used to work until around 2 - 4 weeks ago. This fault renders
checkinstall useless.
The output on the console i
Package: bacula-sd-sqlite
Severity: grave
Hi,
upon upgrading bacula I get this error in bacula-sd-sqlite:
Unpacking bacula-sd-sqlite3 (from .../bacula-sd-sqlite3_1.38.9-3_i386.deb) ...
dpkg: error processing
/var/cache/apt/archives/bacula-sd-sqlite3_1.38.9-3_i386.deb (--unpack):
trying to over
Ok, I see now. I read the errmsg, looked for arts with "aptitude search
"
and saw, that it is not installed.
===snip===
p arts- sound system from the official KDE release
===snip===
I didn't realize, that libarts1c2a provides "artsd".
> Could please you try to run arts by h
Christian Hammers wrote:
> Attached you will find a diff that can be used to make a DSA for the
> recent Quagga security bug.
Thanks a lot for preparing the update.
Please also mention CVE-2006-2223 CVE-2006-2224 in the unstable changelog
when you're doing the next upload anyway.
Regards,
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.19
> # bogus tag
> tags 367058 - security
Bug#367058: existing wrong ~/.gnupg/gpg-agent.conf prevents window manager from
starting, X still runs
Tags were: security
Tags removed: securit
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.19
> # this comes from gnupg-agent, not gnupg
> reassign 367058 gnupg-agent
Bug#367058: existing wrong ~/.gnupg/gpg-agent.conf prevents window manager from
starting, X still runs
Bug rea
On Sat, May 13, 2006 at 11:08:19AM +0900, akira yamada wrote:
> Aurélien GÉRÔME wrote:
> > Package: libopenssl-ruby1.8
> > Version: 1.8.2-7sarge2
> > Severity: serious
> >
> > The binary package libopenssl-ruby1.8 (pure GPL) depends on libssl0.9.7
> > (OpenSSL Licence). Those 2 licences conflict d
1 - 100 of 124 matches
Mail list logo
