Package: gnunit
Version: 1.1.11-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi,
here is the problem:
# apt-get install gnunit
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible si
tags 356565 patch
thanks
On Sun, Mar 12, 2006 at 08:41:07PM +0100, christian mock wrote:
> Package: libg20-perl
> Version: 0.70-1.1
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> When calling any G2 functions from perl, an error like the following occurs:
>
> perl: symbol lookup
On Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 11:34:55AM +1000, Marcus Crafter wrote:
> Thanks for the patch, will update the package asap.
Why don't you just upgrade to the "new" upstream version (0.40 from
2003)?
Cheers,
gregor
--
.''`. http://info.comodo.priv.at/ | gpg key ID: 0x00F3CFE4
: :' : infos zur us
On 20/04/2006, at 4:25 PM, gregor herrmann wrote:
On Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 11:34:55AM +1000, Marcus Crafter wrote:
Thanks for the patch, will update the package asap.
Why don't you just upgrade to the "new" upstream version (0.40 from
2003)?
Yep - will do.
Cheers,
Marcus
--
To UNSUBSCR
Sorry it took so long for me to get back to you.
(gdb) bt
#0 0xa7bcf79b in _gtk_tree_view_queue_draw_node ()
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#1 0xa7bdb8a7 in gtk_tree_view_set_model ()
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#2 0xa7afef16 in _gtk_marshal_VOID__BOXED_BOXED_POINTER ()
from /usr
Please note that this does not solve the bug for me. I am on unstable,
apt-get update done just few seconds ago.
(Reading database ... 83407 files and directories currently installed.)
Unpacking manpages-dev (from .../manpages-dev_2.25-2_all.deb) ...
dpkg: error processing
/var/cache/apt/archives/
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> merge 363295 363296
Bug#363295: vnc4server: Xvnc4 can not found 'fixed' font with xorg 7.0.14
Bug#363296: vnc4server: missing font fixed
Merged 363295 363296.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug t
On Wed, Apr 19, 2006 at 08:49:03PM -0400, Peter S Galbraith wrote:
> Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Package: libforms-dev
> > Version: 1.0-6
> > Severity: serious
> > Please change the package to install files on standard places. As this
> > package does not contain o
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 300638 + patch fixed-upstream
Bug#300638: segfaults after a few messages on ppc+amd64
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch, fixed-upstream
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking syst
Hi All,
Thanks for the patch, will update the package asap.
Cheers,
Marcus
On 20/04/2006, at 7:27 AM, Niko Tyni wrote:
tags 318546 patch fixed-upstream
thanks
On Sun, Apr 09, 2006 at 10:15:49PM +0200, gregor herrmann wrote:
On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 10:58:22AM +0100, Roland Stigge wrote:
I
tags 300638 + patch fixed-upstream
thanks
This bug is caused by the way va_list is used in src/send.c which
seems to cause problems on (at least) amd64 and ppc.
Upstream has fixed this last December (see r286 and r288 in svn).
Backporting this changes to the version in unstable fixes the problem
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: libforms-dev
> Version: 1.0-6
> Severity: serious
>
> Please change the package to install files on standard places. As this
> package does not contain or use package-config or autoconf M4 macros,
> packages that use it for buildi
> "Henrique" == Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Henrique> This leaves our postinst will all stdout output
Henrique> redirected into confmodule, which seems to cause the
Henrique> mess.
I don't particularly like the debconf standard of using stdout for its
c
On Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 10:14:10AM +1000, Brian May wrote:
> > "Henrique" == Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Henrique> This leaves our postinst will all stdout output
> Henrique> redirected into confmodule, which seems to cause the
> Henrique> mess.
>
>
> "Justin" == Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Justin> I don't disagree, but you can fix it pretty easily by doing
Justin> exec 1>&2;
Justin> right?
Won't this break debconf commands?
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wit
On Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 10:23:47AM +1000, Brian May wrote:
> > "Justin" == Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Justin> I don't disagree, but you can fix it pretty easily by doing
>
> Justin> exec 1>&2;
>
> Justin> right?
>
> Won't this break debconf commands?
Meh, I do
Your message dated Wed, 19 Apr 2006 19:06:29 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line ruby testsuite now passes, with official debian packages
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not t
Re: Manuel Kiessling 2006-03-28 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Severity: critical
> Justification: breaks unrelated software
>
> The last line of my /etc/aliases normally looks like this:
>
> otrs-myhammer: |/usr/share/otrs/bin/PostMaster.pl
>
> No empty newline follows afterwards. The line in question i
On Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 12:56:57AM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
> >
> >I suggest using a BSD-style license. The attached license is such a
> >license. It is based on the FreeBSD documentation license [3] and
> >explicitely mentions translations. In our case (the website) the
> >'
On Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 01:03:19AM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
> I agree that the GNU GPL v2 would be a perfectly reasonable choice for
> the Debian website.
> Several other GPLv2-compatible licenses are good choices too, however.
I'd rather use a simpler license for text content it is more under
Hello,
I have updated the patch of Stefan Huehner for python2.4 and clean some
stuff. Everything seems fine with this patch (build and content of the
package).
Regards,
Arnaud Fontaine
diff -urN libapache-mod-python-2.7.10.old/debian/changelog libapache-mod-python-2.7.10/debian/changelog
---
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 357227 + unreproducible
Bug#357227: norwegian: FTBFS: error on text transformation
There were no tags set.
Tags added: unreproducible
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system adminis
Your message dated Thu, 20 Apr 2006 01:31:27 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line netapplet: FTBFS: configure problem with iwlib
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
On Wed, 19 Apr 2006 08:09:15 -0500 Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On 19 Apr 2006, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña uttered the following:
[...]
> >
> > a) a proper license should be decided for the website.
> >
> > I suggest using a BSD-style license. The attached license is such a
> > license. It is bas
On Wed, 19 Apr 2006 13:12:16 +0200 Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> I was reviewing the status of #238245 ("Debian web site is licensed
> under the OPL which is not considered DFSG-free") and see that there
> have been no actions since October last year and no discussio
tags 357227 + unreproducible
thanks
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-03-16 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Package: norwegian
> Version: 2.0-23
> Severity: serious
>
> Hi,
>
> building the package norwegian in a clean sid build environment
> (with pbuilder) on i386 results in:
Builds fine here, both on i386 an
Your message dated Wed, 19 Apr 2006 15:47:12 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#358879: fixed in enigmail 2:0.94-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 357772 + unreproducible
Bug#357772: netapplet: FTBFS: configure problem with iwlib
There were no tags set.
Tags added: unreproducible
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system adminis
Your message dated Wed, 19 Apr 2006 15:47:08 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#358944: fixed in dfsbuild 0.99.0
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am 19.04.2006 um 13:12 schrieb Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña:
e) from here on access to the CVS of the website should be given after
clearly stating (and getting and agreement) that any and all
contributions
to the CVS, unless specified ot
tags 357772 + unreproducible
thanks
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-03-19 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Package: netapplet
> Version: 1.0.8-1
> Severity: serious
>
> building the package netapplet in a clean sid build environment
> (with pbuilder) on i386 results in:
>
> [...]
> checking iwlib.h usability...
Hello,
Because jython doesn't support python (>= 2.3) as mentioned there [0],
this bug can't be fix yet.
Regards,
Arnaud Fontaine
[0] http://lists.debian.org/debian-python/2006/04/msg00026.html
pgpDP7rX0KHc1.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Wed, Apr 19, 2006 at 10:55:44PM +0200, Sune Vuorela wrote:
> On Wednesday 19 April 2006 22:41, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > The alternatives-symlink gets hijacked. I don't know how importaint it is
> > > or how it will affect cursors in testing and/or stable for partial
> > > upgrades.
> > Er,
Your message dated Wed, 19 Apr 2006 15:32:17 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#363577: bsmtpd: Package missing in unstable
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case i
Hi,
The new upstream version seems to fix this bug. Please see my bug
against the upstream package - http://bugs.debian.org/libnss-pgsql ).
Cheers,
--
Julien
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Mar 22, 2006 at 09:07:33PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
> The reason why the tests fail are following differences between the
> reference files and the output files (cdumps). It are all whitespace,
> print and warning changes...
>
> --- Ref_Data/eslect.cdump_ref 2003-05-12 02:51:55.
Your message dated Wed, 19 Apr 2006 14:32:36 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#355316: fixed in libapache-mod-filter 1.4-9
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case i
Your message dated Wed, 19 Apr 2006 14:32:38 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#355315: fixed in libapache-mod-index-rss 0.10-10
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the c
Your message dated Wed, 19 Apr 2006 14:32:44 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#299162: fixed in libapache-mod-mp3 0.39-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Wed, 19 Apr 2006 14:32:31 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#355314: fixed in libapache-mod-auth-useragent 1.0-8
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not th
Your message dated Wed, 19 Apr 2006 14:32:41 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#355313: fixed in libapache-mod-ldap 1.8-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Wed, 19 Apr 2006 14:32:31 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#244799: fixed in libapache-mod-auth-useragent 1.0-8
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not th
Your message dated Wed, 19 Apr 2006 14:32:51 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#244789: fixed in libapache-mod-repository 0.3-9
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the ca
Your message dated Wed, 19 Apr 2006 14:32:36 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#244795: fixed in libapache-mod-filter 1.4-9
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case i
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 318546 patch fixed-upstream
Bug#318546: libproc-process-perl: FTBFS: Test failure
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch, fixed-upstream
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system a
Your message dated Wed, 19 Apr 2006 14:32:54 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#355309: fixed in libapache-mod-text2html 1.0-8
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the cas
Your message dated Wed, 19 Apr 2006 14:33:20 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#363448: fixed in tightvnc 1.2.9-11
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Wed, 19 Apr 2006 14:32:46 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#244791: fixed in libapache-mod-random 1.4-9
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case i
Your message dated Wed, 19 Apr 2006 14:32:43 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#244792: fixed in libapache-mod-mp3 0.39-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Wed, 19 Apr 2006 14:32:44 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#353916: fixed in libapache-mod-mp3 0.39-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Wed, 19 Apr 2006 14:32:17 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#362952: fixed in amavisd-new 1:2.4.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Package: monodoc-browser
Version: 1.1.11-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Monodoc-browser crashes mono, spewing thusly:
*** glibc detected *** free(): invalid pointer: 0x08717c88 ***
I'm using up to date mono packages from unstable, and I've had this bug
for three or four
Your message dated Wed, 19 Apr 2006 14:32:48 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#244804: fixed in libapache-mod-relocate 1.0-10
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the cas
Your message dated Wed, 19 Apr 2006 14:32:33 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#359882: fixed in libapache-mod-cgi-debug 0.7-10
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the ca
Your message dated Wed, 19 Apr 2006 14:32:46 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#355311: fixed in libapache-mod-random 1.4-9
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case i
Your message dated Wed, 19 Apr 2006 14:32:33 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#244796: fixed in libapache-mod-cgi-debug 0.7-10
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the ca
Your message dated Wed, 19 Apr 2006 14:32:56 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#244790: fixed in libapache-mod-trigger 1.1-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Wed, 19 Apr 2006 14:32:41 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#244793: fixed in libapache-mod-ldap 1.8-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
tags 318546 patch fixed-upstream
thanks
On Sun, Apr 09, 2006 at 10:15:49PM +0200, gregor herrmann wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 10:58:22AM +0100, Roland Stigge wrote:
>
> > I can reproduce this both on my development machine's current sid
> > environment and in a current pbuilder i386 chroot.
Your message dated Wed, 19 Apr 2006 14:32:51 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#355310: fixed in libapache-mod-repository 0.3-9
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the ca
Your message dated Wed, 19 Apr 2006 14:32:48 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#355308: fixed in libapache-mod-relocate 1.0-10
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the cas
Your message dated Wed, 19 Apr 2006 14:32:53 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#244803: fixed in libapache-mod-text2html 1.0-8
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the cas
Your message dated Wed, 19 Apr 2006 14:32:38 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#244800: fixed in libapache-mod-index-rss 0.10-10
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the c
Your message dated Wed, 19 Apr 2006 14:32:56 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#355307: fixed in libapache-mod-trigger 1.1-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Wed, 19 Apr 2006 14:32:44 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#343772: fixed in libapache-mod-mp3 0.39-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Package: wordpress
Version: 2.0.2-1
Severity: serious
Tags: security
Just installed Wordpress and configured it with script from example
directory.
This script created database in mysql and config file for domain, where
account information for this database is stored. But it made this file's
permi
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> package haskell-http libghc6-http-dev
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: haskell-http libghc6-http-dev
> tags 336268 patch
Bug#336268: libghc6-http-dev: Does not install with current GHC version
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> tags 315333 patc
tags 355982 fixed-upstream
thanks
On Thu, Mar 09, 2006 at 05:34:06AM +, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> Package: libdatetime-perl
> Version: 1:0.2901-1
> Severity: serious
>
> Your packages fails to build in unstable because one test in the test
> suite fails. I see the same on an i386 box, so I d
On Wednesday 19 April 2006 22:41, Steve Langasek wrote:
> >
> > The alternatives-symlink gets hijacked. I don't know how importaint it is
> > or how it will affect cursors in testing and/or stable for partial
> > upgrades.
>
> Er, this is the expected and desired behavior.
Yes. It is desired behav
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 355982 fixed-upstream
Bug#355982: FTBFS: Failed 1/36 test scripts
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed-upstream
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administr
package haskell-http libghc6-http-dev
tags 336268 patch
tags 315333 patch
tags 337979 patch
tags 325427 patch
tags 324718 patch
tags 336396 patch
thanks
Hi,
I have prepared an patch/NMU for haskell-http, which fixes most bugs. I
will probably ask my application manager to upload the NMU this wee
Package: enigmail
Version: 2:0.94-3
Followup-For: Bug #358981
Just wanted to add a +1 here, I could build using the above
CC='ccache gcc-3.4' debian/rules clean binary
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture:
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.17
> severity 363513 wishlist
Bug#363513: DoS could be caused by ntpdate installation
Severity set to `wishlist'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you nee
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
> Hello,
> why do remove the testsuite? I think it would make more sense to
I removed the testsuite because the tests fail on most architectures,
and I've filed a bug with upstream with the results and intend to work
on resol
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 363265 serious
Bug#363265: crystalcursors: Should either depend on some xorg >> 7 or conflict
with xorg << 7
Severity set to `serious'.
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system ad
Hi
It looks like this is a bug in some other package (like bash) that
we just go around this way.
Regards,
// Ola
On Wed, Apr 19, 2006 at 07:14:20PM +0200, Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
> Hello,
> why do remove the testsuite? I think it would make more sense to
> investigate the error and either remo
Package: libforms-dev
Version: 1.0-6
Severity: serious
Please change the package to install files on standard places. As this
package does not contain or use package-config or autoconf M4 macros,
packages that use it for building now fail (e.g. xwatch).
-- System Information:
Debian Release: tes
Package: bsmtpd
Version: 2.3pl8b-16
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi,
the package is missing in debian unstable.
regards
Hadmut
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
She
Frank Küster wrote:
> Ralf Stubner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 14, 2006 at 15:14 +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
>>> ,
>>> | %%% Copyright (C) 1994 Aloysius G. Helminck. All rights reserved.
>>> | %%% Permission is granted to to customize the declarations in this
>>> | %%% file to se
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.16
> close 349354 0.085-1
Bug#349354: initramfs-tools - kernel -udev dependency loop
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug marked as fixed in version
Package: fglrx-driver
Version: 8.23.7-1
Followup-For: Bug #355485
Ciao Flavio,
I have compiled a 2.6.16 kernel using CONFIG_OBSOLETE_INTERMODULE=y,
which provides the inter_module functions. The fglrx kernel module loads
fine and gives me 3D accel, but I still have Luigi's problem.
Regards,
Mar
severity 363534 normal
tags 363534 + unreproducible
stop
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 19, 2006, Garrett McLean wrote:
> Package: libbonoboui2-0
> Version: 2.14.0-1
> Severity: grave
> Tags: sid
> Justification: renders package unusable
Please do not file "grave" bugs when you are not sure to underst
Package: yank
Version: 0.2.1-7.2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
When trying to save a new todo item in yank it crashes with the
following error message:
Gdk-ERROR **: BadMatch (invalid parameter attributes)
serial 7797 error_code 8 request_code 62 minor_code 0
I tried
Your message dated Wed, 19 Apr 2006 11:47:14 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#350183: fixed in udev 0.090-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 363534 normal
Bug#363534: libbonoboui2-0: Depends on libbonoboui2-common = 2.14.0-1, but
2.14.0-2 is available
Severity set to `normal'.
> tags 363534 + unreproducible
Bug#363534: libbonoboui2-0: Depends on libbonoboui2-common = 2.14.0-1, but
Your message dated Wed, 19 Apr 2006 11:32:10 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#351693: fixed in guile-1.6 1.6.7-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Package: yelp
Version: 2.12.2-4
Followup-For: Bug #362476
Same problem here, though I lack the embed_open_uri_cb and uri= lines
the foreposter got. I already upgraded to scrollkeeper 0.3.14-10.1
without any benefit on the issue.
0|[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ LANG=C yelp
I/O warning : failed to load ext
Le Wednesday 19 April 2006 à 09:29:21, Eric Lavarde a écrit:
> Hi,
Hello,
> first, I hope the severity is correct, but as data loss is involved and
> can only be restored through a backup, this seemed to be the correct
> choice.
>
> OK, here it is:
> - create an appointment with a text containin
Your message dated Wed, 19 Apr 2006 11:15:51 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#356372: fixed in supercollider 20060416-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> Severity 363265 normal
Bug#363265: crystalcursors: Should either depend on some xorg >> 7 or conflict
with xorg << 7
Severity set to `normal'.
> thank you
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 345723 important
Bug#345723: cramfsswap generates an invalid cramfs file
Severity set to `important'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrat
Severity 363265 normal
thank you
> According to the search path compiled into libxcursor1 1.1.3-1 in sarge, X
> apps *will* find themes located in /usr/share/icons/. Are you sure this
> isn't just a side effect of the other bug? Can you describe "will not
> work" more precisely, so that I could
On Wednesday 19 April 2006 18:47, Bastian Venthur wrote:
> Sune: if I fix this bug by providing this directory
Agree.
> and after Steve's
> hint in the other bugreport (Xorg << 7 searches /u/s/i/default too), I
> guess your other bugreport against crystalcursors is obsolete, do you
> agree?
Sorry for the delay in handling your error report. Would you please send me
the file in question so i can have a look whats the problem?
By the way: Your bug severity of 'grave' is _not_ justified, because the
program works for most users. I will regrade the bug as important.
Regards
Michael
Package: acidlab
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: user security hole
CVE-2006-1590:
Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the PrintFreshPage
function in (1) Basic Analysis and Security Engine (BASE) 1.2.4 and
(2) Analysis Console for Intrusion Databases (ACID) 0.9.6b23 allows
r
Package: acidbase
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: user security hole
CVE-2006-1590:
Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the PrintFreshPage
function in (1) Basic Analysis and Security Engine (BASE) 1.2.4 and
(2) Analysis Console for Intrusion Databases (ACID) 0.9.6b23 allows
Package: libbonoboui2-0
Version: 2.14.0-1
Severity: grave
Tags: sid
Justification: renders package unusable
Subject line says it all. I'm stuck at the old version of
libbonoboui2-0 because I can't get an OLDER version of
libbonoboui2-common. Shouldn't the dep. be on versions of
libbonoboui2-com
Hello,
why do remove the testsuite? I think it would make more sense to
investigate the error and either remove the package from s390 or fix
the underlying error. Right now users might experience that problem on
this architecture (and possibly others) without noticing. Testuits are
there for a reas
tag 361863 + confirmed
thanks
On Mon, Apr 10, 2006 at 10:12:29PM +0200, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
> "Unspecified vulnerability in mpg123 0.59r allows user-complicit
> attackers to trigger a segmentation fault and possibly have other
> impacts via a certain MP3 file, as demonstrated by mpg1DoS3. NOTE:
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 361863 + confirmed
Bug#361863: CVE-2006-1655: Unspecified vulnerability in mpg123
Tags were: security
Tags added: confirmed
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(adm
1 - 100 of 149 matches
Mail list logo
