Package: udev
Version: 0.084-2
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
OK, this is maybe overflated...I actually hesitate abou tthe severity and
the "breaks the whole system" statement...but, after all, breaking the
normal install of the system with our installer is kinda breakin
Hey 264637,
Just wanted to see if you were still looking to get back into sh ape. If
so, you'll wanna check out www.bellsouth.www.snwo.cmvV.jndx.org/jam//n1/?id=
havoc and f ill out their 10 sec short- f orm and they'll help you get back
in s hape in no time.
I've been with them for months and so
Package: adduser
Version: 3.81
Severity: serious
I guess it's a adduser bug;
adduser --system --group --home /var/spool/exim4 --no-create-home \
--disabled-login --force-badname Debian-exim > /dev/null
is failing due to new adduser.
O: Adding system-user for exim (v4)
Hi,
I've stumbled around to this bugreport.
>
> I think this will fix the bug. However I haven't tested it because I
> looked at the surrounding code and decided never to let it run on my
> system.
>
> --- src/main.C~ 2005-12-15 05:23:14.0 +
> +++ src/main.C 2005-12-15 05:23
Your message dated Sat, 4 Feb 2006 21:08:32 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#300699: It's just a notice.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your res
Your message dated Sat, 4 Feb 2006 21:14:07 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#300699: It's just a notice.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your res
Your message dated Sat, 4 Feb 2006 20:52:16 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#300699: It's just a notice.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your res
Your message dated Sat, 4 Feb 2006 20:52:16 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#300699: It's just a notice.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your res
Your message dated Sat, 4 Feb 2006 20:52:16 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#300699: It's just a notice.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your res
Your message dated Sat, 04 Feb 2006 20:32:10 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#342174: fixed in gmailfs 0.7-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
On Sun, Feb 05, 2006 at 01:46:38AM +0100, Nicolas Chauvat wrote:
> Package: python-fuse
> Version: 2.4-1
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
>
> Importing fuse used to work but broke with my last upgrade. I suspect
> recompiling the package
> would be enough as I think
2006/2/5, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Sun, Feb 05, 2006 at 12:23:44AM +0800, Emfox Zhou wrote:
> > I have gone through the bts and found this bug, and I think it should be
> > closed.
>
> Why?
A new version of the package which fix this problem has been installed
into debian archive,
Hi,
I've sent to the wrong mail address, resending.
> > > You've broken some default font-maps which were provided by dvipdfmx. Put
> > > them back.
> >
> > dvipdfmx package does not contain any font file. Configurations for other
> > package must be contained to that package. Otherwise, dvipd
On Sat, Feb 04, 2006 at 08:54:08PM -0500, Igor Belyi wrote:
> Could you specified versions of SWIG, SSL, and gcc used?
No, I don't have that information anymore. I just tried to reproduce
the problem in a sid chroot on PowerPC and was unable to, so I'll
understand if you want to close this bug.
Could you specified versions of SWIG, SSL, and gcc used?
Thanks,
Igor
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
> On Sun, Feb 05, 2006 at 12:23:02AM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> > You've broken some default font-maps which were provided by dvipdfmx. Put
> > them back.
>
> dvipdfmx package does not contain any font file. Configurations for other
> package must be contained to that package. Otherwise,
On Sun, Feb 05, 2006 at 12:23:44AM +0800, Emfox Zhou wrote:
> I have gone through the bts and found this bug, and I think it should be
> closed.
Why?
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the
Your message dated Sun, 05 Feb 2006 01:54:21 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line packages removed, bug no longer valid
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Sun, 05 Feb 2006 01:54:21 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line packages removed, bug no longer valid
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Sun, 05 Feb 2006 01:54:21 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line packages removed, bug no longer valid
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Sun, 05 Feb 2006 01:54:21 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line packages removed, bug no longer valid
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Sun, 05 Feb 2006 01:54:21 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line packages removed, bug no longer valid
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Sun, 05 Feb 2006 01:54:21 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line packages removed, bug no longer valid
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Sun, 05 Feb 2006 01:54:21 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line packages removed, bug no longer valid
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Sun, 05 Feb 2006 01:54:21 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line packages removed, bug no longer valid
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Hi,
> > > Why it needs another config file?
> > > Is there any reason that ptex-jisfonts package can't use dvipdfmx.cfg
> > > file?
> >
> > It's a known interface provided by dvipdfmx Debian package. If you're
> > breaking it, take both parts.
>
> Is there any other package that uses the config
On Sat, Feb 04, 2006 at 02:39:57PM +0100, Daniel Kobras wrote:
> tag 351262 + pending
> thanks
> On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 04:15:48PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 05:49:06PM +0100, Braun Gabor wrote:
> > > > Trying to install the package failed:
> > > > dpkg: error pro
Package: racoon
Version: 1:0.6.2-2
Followup-For: Bug #341398
I've found that this configuration that works with 0.6.2-2, doesn't with
0.6.4-1. This is /etc/ipsec-tools.conf:
flush;
spdflush;
spdadd 192.168.1.250 192.168.1.248 any -P out ipsec esp/transport//require;
spdadd 192.168.1.248 192.168.
Package: python-fuse
Version: 2.4-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Importing fuse used to work but broke with my last upgrade. I suspect
recompiling the package
would be enough as I think I remember seeing something about a fuse
upgrade.
>>> import fuse
Traceback (most
Error 2
> make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/libpolyxmass-0.8.7'
> make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2
> **
> Build finished at 20060204-0430
> FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died]
Bastian
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message
Your message dated Sun, 5 Feb 2006 01:12:08 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line [EMAIL PROTECTED]: mmv_1.01b-14_i386.changes ACCEPTED]
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Your message dated Sun, 5 Feb 2006 01:12:08 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line [EMAIL PROTECTED]: mmv_1.01b-14_i386.changes ACCEPTED]
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Your message dated Sun, 5 Feb 2006 01:12:08 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line [EMAIL PROTECTED]: mmv_1.01b-14_i386.changes ACCEPTED]
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Your message dated Sun, 5 Feb 2006 01:12:08 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line [EMAIL PROTECTED]: mmv_1.01b-14_i386.changes ACCEPTED]
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Your message dated Sun, 5 Feb 2006 01:12:08 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line [EMAIL PROTECTED]: mmv_1.01b-14_i386.changes ACCEPTED]
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Package: bugs.debian.org
Followup-For: Bug #340173
This same problem occurs with #340381 where the bug was fixed
two uploads ago but is still being reported as outstanding.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testi
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 351406 + unreproducible moreinfo
Bug#351406: Rhythmbox: No volume slider, does not play radio stations or
library music
There were no tags set.
Tags added: unreproducible, moreinfo
> severity 351406 important
Bug#351406: Rhythmbox: No volume slid
tags 351406 + unreproducible moreinfo
severity 351406 important
thanks
Hi,
On sam, fév 04, 2006, Gary Koskenmaki wrote:
> I installed the latest Rhythbox package from unstable this morning
> (0.9.3). Since I did the volume slider in Rhythmbox is missing. Also, when
> double-clicking on
On Sun, Feb 05, 2006 at 12:23:02AM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> You've broken some default font-maps which were provided by dvipdfmx. Put
> them back.
dvipdfmx package does not contain any font file. Configurations for other
package must be contained to that package. Otherwise, dvipdfmx have to
On Sun, Feb 05, 2006 at 12:23:55AM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > Why it needs another config file?
> > Is there any reason that ptex-jisfonts package can't use dvipdfmx.cfg file?
>
> It's a known interface provided by dvipdfmx Debian package. If you're
> breaking it, take both parts.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 350501 etch sid
Bug#350501: nscd: [hppa] error while loading shared libraries: unexpected reloc
type 0x42
There were no tags set.
Tags added: etch, sid
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug trac
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> tags 337830 patch
Bug#337830: Security problem in kphone
Tags were: security
Tags added: patch
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
tags 350501 etch sid
thanks
On Wed, 01 Feb 2006 18:59:30 +0100, Thibaut VARENE wrote:
> Package: nscd
> Version: 2.3.5-8
> Followup-For: Bug #350501
>
> FYI, I successfully reproduced this bug on another machine running
> etch (and running a 32bit kernel):
Tagging this RC bug with "etch sid", I a
Sven Dreyer wrote:
> Hi Ludovic,
>
> Ludovic Drolez schrieb:
>
>>I cannot reproduce your bug. With my settings kphonerc is created with 664
>>rights, since my umask is set to 002.
>>
>>I think that you have your umask set to 000. Which value returns 'umask ?'
>
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ umask
Package: firefox
Version: 1.5.dfsg-4
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: user security hole
Please, package the new firefox's version, it fix these vulnerabilities
besides some other improvements:
MFSA 2006-08 "AnyName" entrainment and access control hazard
MFSA 2006-07 Read beyond bu
On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 07:48:45AM +0100, Bart Martens wrote:
>
> I just checked again. According to the upstream website, 1.2.2 is the
> latest stable, 1.3.3 is "close to stable", and 1.4.0 is not mentioned.
>
> You own ITA bug #249718 since 7 july (13 august) 2005. Do you want to
> keep it u
Your message dated Sat, 04 Feb 2006 13:32:52 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#351339: fixed in clisp 1:2.38-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 322541
Bug#322541: mmv is unusable bacause of constant hangs / segmentation fault
Bug#321837: [Fwd: Log for successful build of mmv_1.01b-12.1 (dist=unstable)]
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please cont
Ralf Stubner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 20:27 +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
> [GFDL, OpenPub, ...]
>> I think we should move these to tetex-doc-nonfree, and only try to
>> contact the maintainers whether they are willing to relicense them once
>> we know about a DFSG-free do
Your message dated Sat, 04 Feb 2006 15:28:36 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line (no subject)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reo
Your message dated Sat, 04 Feb 2006 15:28:36 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line (no subject)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reo
On Sat, 2006-02-04 at 19:14 +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
> Package: qgis
> Severity: serious
> Version: 0.7.4-2
>
> Hi
>
> qgis FTBFS because libgdal1-dev is not available anymore. You might want
> to update that build dependency to libgdal1-1.3.1-dev.
I'm waiting for libgdal-grass 1.3.1-1 to clear t
Version: 4.0.2-3
It seems this was actually fixed some time before November 20th, 2005,
without me noticing. I assume a different bug was related to this one.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi Steve,
I've been busy but I ahve now prepared new verison of the package.
If you find the time to check it, that would be welcomed.
>> > Severity: grave, because amd64 is a release architecture.
>
>> > Jari, if you have packages for 1.1 available, I
Your message dated Sat, 04 Feb 2006 10:02:10 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#350490: fixed in udev 0.084-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Package: waiho.app
Severity: serious
Version: 0.2-4
Hi
waiho.app FTBFS because libgnustep-gui0.9-dev is not available anymore.
You might want to update that build dependency to libgnustep-gui0.10-dev.
Cheers
Luk
--
Luk Claes - http://people.debian.org/~luk - GPG key 1024D/9B7C328D
Fingerprint
Package: qgis
Severity: serious
Version: 0.7.4-2
Hi
qgis FTBFS because libgdal1-dev is not available anymore. You might want
to update that build dependency to libgdal1-1.3.1-dev.
Cheers
Luk
--
Luk Claes - http://people.debian.org/~luk - GPG key 1024D/9B7C328D
Fingerprint: D5AF 25FB 316B 53
Package: pantomime-dev
Severity: serious
Version: 1.1.2-3
Hi
pantomime-dev in unstable is uninstallable because
libgnustep-base1.10-dev is not available anymore. You might want to
update that to libgnustep-base1.11-dev.
Cheers
Luk
--
Luk Claes - http://people.debian.org/~luk - GPG key 1024D/9
Package: plopfolio.app
Severity: serious
Version: 0.1.0-2
Hi
Your package FTBFS as libgnustep-gui0.9-dev is not available anymore.
You might want to buil depend on libgnustep-gui0.10-dev instead.
Cheers
Luk
--
Luk Claes - http://people.debian.org/~luk - GPG key 1024D/9B7C328D
Fingerprint: D
Your message dated Sat, 04 Feb 2006 09:17:14 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#350447: fixed in libroxen-randomfile 1.0-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Package: Rhythmbox
Version: 0.9.3-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
I installed the latest Rhythbox package from unstable this morning
(0.9.3). Since I did the volume slider in Rhythmbox is missing. Also, when
double-clicking on a song in the music library the "play" butt
Your message dated Sat, 04 Feb 2006 08:32:18 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#347436: fixed in libprelude 0.9.4-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Sat, 04 Feb 2006 08:32:12 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#344032: fixed in bbdb 2.35.cvs20060204-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
I have gone through the bts and found this bug, and I think it should be closed.
Please consider closing it.
--
Emfox Zhou
GnuPG Public Key: 0xF7142EC2
Your message dated Sat, 04 Feb 2006 08:32:12 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#345186: fixed in bbdb 2.35.cvs20060204-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Hello, due to the unproducable problem and clearly not applying to
most of the people, I suggest to downgrade this bug to not RC. Also,
should it be merged with #342578?
--
Emfox Zhou
GnuPG Public Key: 0xF7142EC2
Your message dated Sat, 04 Feb 2006 07:17:21 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#349015: fixed in libcompface 1:1.5.2-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Sat, 04 Feb 2006 07:02:12 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#345596: fixed in freeloader 0.3-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Hi,
>
> The current version of dvipdfmx supports separate map files.
> If you need to add some font to dvipdfmx, make the separate map file and
> then put the name of the fontmap file to /etc/texmf/dvipdfmx.cfg file.
>
You've broken some default font-maps which were provided by dvipdfmx. Put th
Hi,
> Why it needs another config file?
> Is there any reason that ptex-jisfonts package can't use dvipdfmx.cfg file?
It's a known interface provided by dvipdfmx Debian package. If you're
breaking it, take both parts.
Keep the feature or fix both parts, please. Do NMUs sensibly.
regards,
Package: dovecot
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
after upgrading dovecot today, the /usr/sbin/dovecot cannot be stopped
by KILL -HUP, and /etc/init.d/dovecot stop respectively.
Moreover, the process consumes loads of resources.
top reports:
PID USER PR NI VIRT
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 349472 minor
Bug#349472: kernel-package - generates broken versions
Severity set to `minor'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs da
Niko Tyni wrote:
> Hi security team,
>
> I'm very sorry that you have to hear from me again :(
>
> There's a regression in the patch for DSA-960-1, for both woody and sarge.
> When $HOME is not set, Mail::Audit is now creating logfiles in cwd and
> dying if it's not writable. This happens even i
Package: gdal
Version: 1.3.1-2
Severity: serious
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=gdal&ver=1.3.1-2&arch=mipsel&stamp=1138103949&file=log&as=raw
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=gdal&ver=1.3.1-3&arch=mipsel&stamp=1138807257&file=log&as=raw
make[3]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/g
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 351262 + pending
Bug#351262: graphicsmagick: Fails to install, common file with imagemagick
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system admini
tag 351262 + pending
thanks
On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 04:15:48PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 05:49:06PM +0100, Braun Gabor wrote:
> > > Trying to install the package failed:
>
> > > dpkg: error processing
> > > /var/cache/apt/archives/graphicsmagick_1.1.7-2_i386.deb (-
The current version of dvipdfmx supports separate map files.
If you need to add some font to dvipdfmx, make the separate map file and
then put the name of the fontmap file to /etc/texmf/dvipdfmx.cfg file.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Con
Why it needs another config file?
Is there any reason that ptex-jisfonts package can't use dvipdfmx.cfg file?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your message dated Sat, 04 Feb 2006 04:32:13 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#349939: fixed in came 1.9-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your re
On Sat, Feb 04, 2006 at 09:14:16AM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Christian Perrier wrote:
> > This week-end, I think we can think about uploading a new release of
> > the package as the former one will enter testing.
> Apparently it's stuck because it thinks there are RC bugs. Either it's
> n
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 348044 normal
Bug#348044: ca-certificates: apt-get install failure
Severity set to `normal'.
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs data
severity 348044 normal
quit
>Unable to install the process exits with sub-process error.
>apt-get remove --purge ca-certificates and later re-installation also fails.
On my System, I have tried all debconf questions the installation is fine.
So it was a error on your system, perhaps you have a br
#x27;
> make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
> make[2]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/libpolyxmass-0.8.7'
> make[1]: *** [all] Error 2
> make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/libpolyxmass-0.8.7'
> make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2
> ****
Subject: ffmpeg2theora: New version available
Followup-For: Bug #333636
Package: ffmpeg2theora
Version: 0.13+svn20050704-1
version 0.15 is compilable if you add -ldc1394_control and -lgsm
For example, add -ldc1394_control -lgsm in Makefile.in
-ffmpeg2theora_LDFLAGS = -L$(prefix)/lib @XIPH_LIBS@
Hi Ludovic,
Ludovic Drolez schrieb:
> I cannot reproduce your bug. With my settings kphonerc is created with 664
> rights, since my umask is set to 002.
>
> I think that you have your umask set to 000. Which value returns 'umask ?'
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ umask
0022
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ls -l .qt/k
Hi,
thanx for all the pacthes, I'll make a new release during this weekend...
On 2/3/06, Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> retitle 349015 compface: no longer reads XBM files
> tag 349015 patch
> thanks
>
> The Debian-specific patch that allowed compface(1) to read XBM images
> got lost betwe
Quoting Peter Eisentraut ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Christian Perrier wrote:
> > This week-end, I think we can think about uploading a new release of
> > the package as the former one will enter testing.
>
> Apparently it's stuck because it thinks there are RC bugs. Either it's
> not understanding B
Your message dated Sat, 04 Feb 2006 16:12:05 +0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line nsis: 350112: fixed in 2.14-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your resp
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 346676 + fixed
Bug#346676: audiooss: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed
> tag 349381 + fixed
Bug#349381: FTBFS: '__open' aliased to undefined symbol 'open'
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed
89 matches
Mail list logo
