Your message dated Sat, 4 Feb 2006 20:52:16 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#300699: It's just a notice. has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message --->From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Sep 10 06:55:45 2005 Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Sep 2005 13:55:45 +0000 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from master.debian.org [146.82.138.7] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EE5pZ-0004cW-00; Sat, 10 Sep 2005 06:55:45 -0700 Received: from 62-14-176-71.inversas.jazztel.es (localhost.localdomain) [62.14.176.71] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1EE5pX-0004w1-00; Sat, 10 Sep 2005 08:55:43 -0500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Emilio Jesus Gallego Arias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Depends on unavailable library, libgmp X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17 Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2005 15:56:53 +0200 X-Debbugs-Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-9.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, OUR_MTA_MSGID,X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: alex Version: 2.0-3 Severity: serious Hi, this package should be uploaded to comply with the gcc ABI transition, as it currently depends on libgmp3, that is not longer on unstable. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-k7 Locale: LANG=es_ES.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=es_ES.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages alex depends on: ii libc6 2.3.5-6 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libgmp3 4.1.4-6 Multiprecision arithmetic library alex recommends no packages. -- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --->From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Feb 04 20:52:20 2006 Received: (at 327490-done) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Feb 2006 04:52:20 +0000 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from dsl093-039-086.pdx1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([66.93.39.86] helo=tennyson.dodds.net) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1F5bsq-00042H-NI; Sat, 04 Feb 2006 20:52:20 -0800 Received: by tennyson.dodds.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 1F6852C002; Sat, 4 Feb 2006 20:52:17 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2006 20:52:16 -0800 From: Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Emfox Zhou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bug#300699: It's just a notice. Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="EgVrEAR5UttbsTXg" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 --EgVrEAR5UttbsTXg Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Version: 2.0.1-1 On Sun, Feb 05, 2006 at 12:10:21PM +0800, Emfox Zhou wrote: > 2006/2/5, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > On Sun, Feb 05, 2006 at 12:23:44AM +0800, Emfox Zhou wrote: > > > I have gone through the bts and found this bug, and I think it should= be > > > closed. > > Why? > A new version of the package which fix this problem has been installed > into debian archive, or the package has been removed. Your mail would have been a lot more helpful if you had been able to specify which. Anyway, I can confirm that the bugs on alex should be closed; the current version of alex in unstable has been built with gcc-4.0 subsequent to the filing of 300699 and 315072, and it was built with the new libgmp which fixes 327490. --=20 Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ --EgVrEAR5UttbsTXg Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFD5YR/KN6ufymYLloRAv8tAKDUlT5+9N5f3nlGYOej1MuYOrMsKwCbBwpi fxuRIqbN1q215m6TXjdZd8A= =076A -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --EgVrEAR5UttbsTXg--
--- End Message ---
