Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 343687 help
Bug#343687: firefox_1.5.dfsg-1(m68k/unstable): lots of 'asm specifier' errors
There were no tags set.
Tags added: help
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administra
tags 343687 help
thanks
I'm going to need help with this one Wouter, my m68k assembly was a
long time ago, in a galaxy far, far away
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Package: firefox
> Version: 1.5.dfsg-1
> Severity: serious
>
> There was an error while trying to autobuild yo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
As subject says (but some BTS interfaces don't show subject so I
repeat here), this bug has been fixed in later releases packaged for
Etch and Sid.
So I have marked this bug as sarge, fixed-upstream and closed in
3.1.0a-1.
- Jonas
- --
* Jonas Sm
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.10
> close 339526 3.1.0a-1
Bug#339526: spamassassin: CVE-2005-3351: Bus Error Spam Detection Bypass
Vulnerability
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.10
> tags 339526 fixed-upstream sarge
Bug#339526: spamassassin: CVE-2005-3351: Bus Error Spam Detection Bypass
Vulnerability
Tags were: security
Tags added: fixed-upstream, sarge
>
End o
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.10
> notfound 339526 3.1.0a-2
Bug#339526: spamassassin: CVE-2005-3351: Bus Error Spam Detection Bypass
Vulnerability
Bug marked as not found in version 3.1.0a-2.
>
End of message, stoppi
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.10
> notfound 339526 3.1.0a-1
Bug#339526: spamassassin: CVE-2005-3351: Bus Error Spam Detection Bypass
Vulnerability
Bug marked as not found in version 3.1.0a-1.
>
End of message, stoppi
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 344519 unreproducible moreinfo
Bug#344519: Reload cacti graph page generates mysql zombie process for every
graph
There were no tags set.
Tags added: unreproducible, moreinfo
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assis
tags 344519 unreproducible moreinfo
thanks
hi epco,
i'll need some more information if you would like to have help with
resolving this. here are a few questions off the top of my head:
- what version of mysql?
- remote mysql server or local?
- what's in my.cnf?
- how many devices (and what kind
On Friday 23 December 2005 14:34, maximilian attems wrote:
> please try the attached patch,
> should load ide-generic even if udev didn't yet bring it up:
Although my initial report was for Sparc (which I will test tomorrow, I've
also tested it on my laptop.
ide-generic is loaded, but ide-disk is
Package: missinglib
Version: 0.4.10.debian-2
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source
missinglib failed to build on a sparc buildd, duplicated on my sparc
pbuilder. Please note that some buggy code that casts structures used
to work no longer works due to changes in gcc.
.
Package: ocamlodbc
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source
ocamlodbc failed to build on a sparc buildd, duplicated on my sparc
pbuilder. This seems to be the same error as 344463, so is probably
in a dependant package.
Some other architectures are still failing to build due
Your message dated Fri, 23 Dec 2005 18:47:13 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#340850: fixed in units 1.85-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Package: openswan
Version: 1:2.4.4-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
the pluto binary will not run, due to a shared library depenency that is
not met:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ldd /usr/lib/ipsec/pluto
libldap_r.so.2 => /usr/lib/libldap_r.so.2 (0x0ffa2000)
libp
Your message dated Sat, 24 Dec 2005 03:15:00 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line gcc-snapshot: ftbfs [sparc] cannot compute sizeof (int)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not t
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 321449 + sid
Bug#321449: gcc-snapshot should stay in unstable
Tags were: wontfix
Tags added: sid
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs da
Your message dated Fri, 23 Dec 2005 17:32:10 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#343990: fixed in tix 8.4.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
Package: firefox
Version: 1.5.dfsg-2
Followup-For: Bug #344401
I can't reproduce the problems you experience. I've successfully printed to a
CUPS printer, but unfortunately haven't tried any other printer.
Printing to file with CUPS-driver or Postscript/Default works fine, however,
both with Le
I have just made an upload to the 7-day DELAY queue to fix both of
these bugs.
This NMU can be overridden by a maintainer upload before 7 days have
passed, ideally one which fixes the RC bug (#326371).
Interdiff for the NMU is attached.
Don Armstrong
--
Of course, there are ceases where only
Re: Dominic Hargreaves in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> -Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 4.0.0), linux-source-2.6.12 | linux-source-2.6,
> libsnmp9-dev
> +Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 4.0.0), linux-source-2.6.12 | linux-source-2.6,
> libsnmp9-dev, autoconf
> Standards-Version: 3.6.2
Hi Matt,
I've uploade
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 326922 upstream
Bug#326922: raidutils: ftbfs [sparc] struct _I2O_MESSAGE_FRAME' has no member
named 'InitiatorAddress'
There were no tags set.
Tags added: upstream
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Deb
tags 326922 upstream
thanks
Hi,
I've tried to investigate the build failure on sparc [0] and came to the
conclusion that it is a genuine upstream bug (probably some misplaced
sparc #ifdef's). It would be too hard for me to understand what needs to
be done, so I'm CC'ing this message to the up
Your message dated Fri, 23 Dec 2005 15:17:08 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#343691: fixed in dbconfig-common 1.8.10
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> package flashplugin-nonfree
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: flashplugin-nonfree
> tags 304072 patch
Bug#304072: flashplugin-nonfree: [INTL:pt_BR] Please consider adding the
attached debconf template translation
Tags were: l10n
Tags added: patch
> reas
Fixing this bug appears to be a rather trivial change to
debian/control... Apparently, the xlibmesa-dev dependency that has gone
missing is now split into two packages, xlibmesa-gl-dev and
xlibmesa-glu-dev. Applying the attached patch makes it build again for me.
ciao,
--
[*Thomas Themel*] Sin
Package: libubit1c2
Version: 3.6.4-4
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
In the last C++ migration, it looks like the package name was changed in
debian/control without changing the corresponding install file, and as a
result the library package is actually empty.
I recommend
Your message dated Fri, 23 Dec 2005 14:17:06 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line This was fixed in 1.3+cvs20030317-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Wouter van Heyst wrote:
> I only understand the basics of heap-based overflows, I do not yet see
> how to use this one. Someone explaining it would be very welcome.
The two most common ways to exploit integer problems are
a) Integers, which control a memory allocation: By letting this integer
Max Alekseyev wrote:
Hi,
>
> No. It reports:
>
> upx: util.h:71: int ptr_diff(const T*, const T*) [with T = unsigned
> char]: Assertion `(int)d == d' failed.
> Aborted
Thanks.
I tried the command on pergolesi.debian.org (an amd64 machine accessible
for Debian developers), but can't reproduce
Package: hula
Version: 0.1.0+svn379-2.1
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source
When building the debian package (apt-get source -b -t unstable hula),
the following error is fixed by installing the zlib1g-dev package. It
should be added to Build-Depends.
gcc -shared .libs/
Package: cheops-ng
Version: 0.2.3-1
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of cheops-ng_0.2.3-1 on caballero by sbuild/ia64 79
> Build started at 20051218-2304
[...]
> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
> Build-Depends: libgt
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> package flashplugin-nonfree
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: flashplugin-nonfree
> reassign 321194 flashplugin-nonfree 7.0.25-5
Bug#321194: flashplugin-nonfree: does not install, not matter if tar.gz package
location is entered or not
Bug reassigned fro
On Fri, Dec 23, 2005 at 09:25:28PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Dec 23, Filippo Giunchedi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > it does not create devices, at least on powerpc with makedev 3.3.8.2-0:
> You are supposed to use the real MAKEDEV, not the one in experimental.
reportedly, unstable (2.3.
Steve Kemp wrote:
> > Please tell whether you deem those patches sufficient for a potential
> > future security advisory, and if not, please provide pointers at what
> > might be missing.
>
> It looks good to me.
I can confirm the patch for CVE-2005-3302 is correct, I've sent a similar
patch a
The attached patch should fix the bug in version 7.0.61-1.
Only in flashplugin-nonfree-7.0.61: build-stamp
Only in flashplugin-nonfree-7.0.61: configure-stamp
diff -ru flashplugin-nonfree-7.0.61.orig/debian/changelog flashplugin-nonfree-7.0.61/debian/changelog
--- flashplugin-nonfree-7.0.61.orig/d
On Dec 23, Filippo Giunchedi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> it does not create devices, at least on powerpc with makedev 3.3.8.2-0:
You are supposed to use the real MAKEDEV, not the one in experimental.
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Fri, Dec 23, 2005 at 07:21:30PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Dec 23, Edd Dumbill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Can you verify the MAKEDEV constructs the appropriate devices exactly as
> > the mknod from the postinst does? This was the reason I didn't use
> > MAKEDEV in the first instance
Package: sysutils
Version: 2.0.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 10.1
dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/sysutils_2.0.0-1_i386.deb
(--unpack):
trying to overwrite `/usr/bin/memtest', which is also in package memtester
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstabl
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> package tktable
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: tktable
> tag 320551 = patch
Bug#320551: 'man tktable' typos: "occuring" and "postion"
Tags were: pending patch
Tags set to: patch
> tag 343138 = patch
Bug#343138: tktable: FTBFS/unknown cause
Tags were:
Your message dated Fri, 23 Dec 2005 14:42:50 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed in 5.1-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to r
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 343138 - pending
Bug#343138: tktable: FTBFS/unknown cause
Tags were: pending patch
Tags removed: pending
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 339056 patch
Bug#339056: tktable: Library package nonconforming
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 343109 important
Bug#343109: boa-constructor: Fails to start
Severity set to `important'.
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs databas
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 344333 normal
Bug#344333: libextractor-python: fails unit test
Severity set to `normal'.
> --
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
severity 343109 important
quit
I downgrade this bug to important, because AMD64 was an unofficial
architecture for Sarge.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
No surprise if you use parts of libextractor-python 0.5.4 on 0.5.2. Wait
until we upgraded to the newever version.
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/
--
To
* Alexis Sukrieh [Thu, 22 Dec 2005 16:14:11 +0100]:
Hi,
> * Christoph Martin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) disait :
> > > But I must be wrong, sorry for the noise.
> > No. Thanks for your work. If you think a real NMU would make the case
> > clearer and speed up the inclusion in testing, go ahead. The mai
Alexis Sukrieh wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm the maintainer of the backup manager package.
> There are currently one security issue in our sarge package (0.5.7-7sarge1).
>
> I made a package with the patch submitted against the bug #329387 which
> closes the issue.
Umh... I don't have a CVE name to shar
On Dec 23, Edd Dumbill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can you verify the MAKEDEV constructs the appropriate devices exactly as
> the mknod from the postinst does? This was the reason I didn't use
> MAKEDEV in the first instance, albeit some time ago.
If it does not then it would be a MAKEDEV bug, a
Can you verify the MAKEDEV constructs the appropriate devices exactly as
the mknod from the postinst does? This was the reason I didn't use
MAKEDEV in the first instance, albeit some time ago.
On Fri, 2005-12-23 at 09:41 +0100, Alexis Sukrieh wrote:
> tags 338743 + patch
> thanks
>
> * Marco d'I
On Friday 23 December 2005 13:56, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
Actually upstream seems to have problems supporting the m68k architecture and
unless they find a solution soonish I will remove it from the architectures
list. :-(
Groetjes,
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> package isdnutils
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: isdnutils
> severity 335124 grave
Bug#335124: removal of automake1.6
Severity set to `grave'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system ad
"David C. Weichert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Frank,
>
> a friend forwarded your Email concerning a bug in db2latex-xsl. I'm not
> familiar with the package and what it does, but I've been working with
> SGML/XML and XSLT for a couple of years now. Please give me more
> information. If possi
package isdnutils
severity 335124 grave
thanks
automake1.6 is removed from the archive therefore isdnutils FTBFS.
Because of this, I'm setting the severity to grave.
An NMU is needed/pending for this package (see #344200). I'm
coordinating with Marco d'Itri to prepare those fixes.
Regards,
Faidon
Your message dated Fri, 23 Dec 2005 09:32:07 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#344482: fixed in klibc 1.1.1-8
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
On Fri, Dec 23, 2005 at 05:56:59PM +0100, Wouter van Heyst wrote:
> > It looks good to me. I've built a package and if nobody has any
> > objections I'll upload later today.
>
> No objections from me.
Great I already uploaded the package ;)
Steve
--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
On Fri, Dec 23, 2005 at 09:55:07AM +, Steve Kemp wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 23, 2005 at 12:10:00AM +0100, Florian Ernst wrote:
>
> > Steve, btw, any news on CVE-2005-3302 aka bug#330895 (arbitrary code
> > execution when importing a .bvh file)? Last I heard you were going to
> > prepare an update un
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 344538 important
Bug#344538: tetex-base: tex-common to Pre-Depends, otherwise installation fails
Severity set to `important'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrat
severity 344538 important
thanks
Hi Lamont, hi Debian admins,
during the last weeks there were a couple of FTBFS cases on sarti, the
hppa buildd, which point to severe problems on that machine. The things
that happened did only happen on this single buildd, but did in no way
look as if they were
I lied earlier, we do need the patch Ben submitted (the chroot I was
using wasn't updated and didn't show the bug). The problem is there is
no "good" way to patch it at the debian level, because the gdb
included in crash is shipped as a gzip tarball that gets unpacked at
build time. It's much easie
Your message dated Fri, 23 Dec 2005 17:03:22 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#344535: vim-runtime tries to overwrite /usr/bin/vimtutor
from vim-common
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt w
severity 344524 normal
thanks
On Fri, Dec 23, 2005 at 01:44:28PM +0100, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> xfce4-terminal depends on libexo-0.3-0, which is the wrong package name
> for libexo in Debian. The package is named libexo0.3-0 (without the 2nd
> dash). Thus xfce4-terminal is uninstallable.
The new
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 344524 normal
Bug#344524: xfce4-terminal: Depends on libexo-0.3-0 which is not in Debian
Severity set to `normal'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(adminis
On Dec 20, Paul Slootman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Please rebuild pppdcapiplugin for ppp 2.4.4b1.
> > Expect a NMU if this will not be fixed soon, because it's blocking ppp
> > from entering testing.
> Go ahead, I'm a bit out of the ISDN stuff at the moment due to
> circumstances :-(
OK, in t
On Fri, 2005-12-23 at 14:34 +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
> please try the attached patch,
> should load ide-generic even if udev didn't yet bring it up:
> patch -p1 /usr/share/initramfs-tools/scripts/init-premount/udev <
> ide-generic.udev.patch
>
> for this trial please remove any ide-generi
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 344523 normal
Bug#344523: xfmedia: Depends on libexo-0.3-0 which is not in Debian
Severity set to `normal'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator,
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.10
> tags 343720 + patch
Bug#343720: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> retitle 343720 libdjvulibre-dev: missing dependencies
Bug#343720: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Chan
Hi,
since this bug has been open for quite a while, I'm currently preparing
an NMU for this bug, using the attached patch. I'm going to upload it
without a delay.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer
diff -Nur poppler-0.4.2/debian/changelog poppl
severity 344523 normal
thanks
On Fri, Dec 23, 2005 at 01:42:27PM +0100, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> xfmedia depends (and build-depends) on libexo-0.3-0, but that package is
> not in Debian. The Debian package is called libex0.3-0. Thus xfmedia is
> uninstallable in unstable.
The new exo package is
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 344395 critical
Bug#344395: Root compromise bug if rssh_chroot_helper is installed suid
Severity set to `critical'.
> merge 344395 344424
Bug#344395: Root compromise bug if rssh_chroot_helper is installed suid
Bug#344424: rssh: local privilege
Package: tetex-base
Version: 3.0-11
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
texte-base installation fails because it needs to execute update-language
(from tex-common), which is not yet unpacked or configured during a fresh
install. T
Package: vim-runtime
Version: 1:6.4-004+1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi,
While trying to update vim, the installation failed on
Unpacking replacement vim-runtime ...
dpkg: error processing
/var/cache/apt/archives/vim-runtime_1%3a6.4-004+2_all.deb (--unpack):
trying
Your message dated Fri, 23 Dec 2005 06:32:21 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#344202: fixed in gclcvs 2.7.0-54
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Fri, 23 Dec 2005 06:32:21 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#340853: fixed in gclcvs 2.7.0-54
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
* Alexis Sukrieh ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) disait :
> I'm the maintainer of the backup manager package.
^^
Of course I was speaking about bugzilla, not backup-manager, sorry!
(Hopefully I'm on holydays this evening ;)
--
Alexis Sukrieh
* Andreas Jochens ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) disait :
> > Could you tell me if you can reproduce the bug with the package version
> > 0.91cvs2005082?
>
> I can not reproduce the bug with the latest version. So this seems
> indeed to be fixed, thanks!
Great!
Thanks, I'm closing the bug.
--
Alexis Suk
Your message dated Fri, 23 Dec 2005 14:52:33 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line [tecnoballz #318719] Bug still open?
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
unmerge 337497
severity 337497 important
tags 337497 moreinfo
stopped
On Fri, Dec 23, 2005 at 02:41:51PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
>
> Notice that there is no ide-generic module on powerpc, and never has been, so
> i fail to understand what i should test ?
>
indeed your bug report was falsly m
Hi,
I'm the maintainer of the backup manager package.
There are currently one security issue in our sarge package (0.5.7-7sarge1).
I made a package with the patch submitted against the bug #329387 which
closes the issue.
Can we plan to upload that package to security updates?
The package is av
On Fri, Dec 23, 2005 at 02:34:23PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
>
> please try the attached patch,
> should load ide-generic even if udev didn't yet bring it up:
> patch -p1 /usr/share/initramfs-tools/scripts/init-premount/udev <
> ide-generic.udev.patch
>
> for this trial please remove any
please try the attached patch,
should load ide-generic even if udev didn't yet bring it up:
patch -p1 /usr/share/initramfs-tools/scripts/init-premount/udev <
ide-generic.udev.patch
for this trial please remove any ide-generic or ide-disk
out of /etc/mkinitramfs/modules, then update-initramfs -
Your message dated Fri, 23 Dec 2005 04:47:06 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#344390: fixed in araneida 0.90.1-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Hello Frank, Ramon and other readers,
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
on Fri, Dec 23, 2005 at 12:16:12PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
> db2latex does not work properly with teTeX 3.0 (released in February
> this year and included in many operating system distributions now) and
> TeXLive 2005 (release
Package: clisp
Version: 1:2.36-2
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of clisp_1:2.36-2 on kiivi by sbuild/m68k 79
> Build started at 20051223-1039
[...]
> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
> Build-Depend
On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 08:15:12AM -0700, Matt Kraai wrote:
> I can still reproduce this problem using pbuilder and an i386 unstable
> chroot. I've attached the full build log. Please let me know if I
> can provide further information.
Hi,
I can reproduce this with sbuild, but not pbuilder. W
Package: xfce4-terminal
Version: 0.2.4-3+b1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi,
xfce4-terminal depends on libexo-0.3-0, which is the wrong package name
for libexo in Debian. The package is named libexo0.3-0 (without the 2nd
dash). Thus xfce4-terminal is uninstallable.
And
Package: xfmedia
Version: 0.9.1-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi,
xfmedia depends (and build-depends) on libexo-0.3-0, but that package is
not in Debian. The Debian package is called libex0.3-0. Thus xfmedia is
uninstallable in unstable.
Andreas
-- System Informatio
On 05-Dec-23 12:46, Alexis Sukrieh wrote:
> tags 318719 + moreinfo
> thanks
>
> Hello, I'd like to know if the last package closed this bug. Indeed,
> there is a patch applied in the last version for AMD 64 support.
>
> Could you tell me if you can reproduce the bug with the package version
> 0.9
Hi Steve,
I wonder if you would be able to trigger a binNMU of the powerpc kernel, which
would then build with the kernel-package version Manoj uploaded yesterday, and
claims fixes this issue. I have no tested it, nor will i be able to do the
binNMU upload myself, but i understand the buildd netwo
Package: f-spot
Version: 0.1.5-1
Followup-For: Bug #337240
Starting new FSpot server
Unhandled Exception: System.NullReferenceException: Object reference not set to
an instance of an object
in <0x001d4> PhotoStore:Query (System.String query)
in <0x005b0> PhotoStore:Query (.Tag[] tags, .DateRange
Package: cacti
Version: 0.8.6c-7sarge2
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
When I do a reload of the cacti graph page, I see that there is a zombie mysql
daemon process created for every graph shown.
In the end this results in over 1000 zombie processes and mysql server can
Package: linux-image-2.6.14-2-amd64-k8
Version: 2.6.14-6
Severity: critical
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.14-2-amd6
tags 318719 + moreinfo
thanks
Hello, I'd like to know if the last package closed this bug. Indeed,
there is a patch applied in the last version for AMD 64 support.
Could you tell me if you can reproduce the bug with the package version
0.91cvs2005082?
Thanks.
--
Alexis Sukrieh <[EMAIL PROTECTE
Dear maintainers of db2latex,
db2latex does not work properly with teTeX 3.0 (released in February
this year and included in many operating system distributions now) and
TeXLive 2005 (released this fall): It always produces PDF instead of DVI
files.
The reason is that these TeX distributions use
mis-aimed email, ignore :)
--
Trent Lloyd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Bur.st Networking Inc.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
avahi-utils used to only contain python stuff, but now we re-wrote some
tools in C and are moving to replacing most of them but avahi-discover
so avahi-utils really needs to be arch: any now
--
Trent Lloyd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Bur.st Networking Inc.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
avahi-utils usd to only contain python stuff, but now we re-wrote some
tools in C and are moving to replacing most of them but avahi-discover
so avahi-utils really needs to be arch: any now
--
Trent Lloyd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Bur.st Networking Inc.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Dec 23, 2005 at 12:10:00AM +0100, Florian Ernst wrote:
> Steve, btw, any news on CVE-2005-3302 aka bug#330895 (arbitrary code
> execution when importing a .bvh file)? Last I heard you were going to
> prepare an update unless anybody had an issue with the changes made,
> yet I haven't heard
I can confirm the problem with the CUPS printer. The printer properties
are listed there, including my paper setting of iso-A4. But when I try
to "print to file" with it, firefox 1.5 complains, saying "There was a
problem printing because the paper size you specified is not supported
by your prin
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 338743 + patch
Bug#338743: must not use mknod in postinst
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs
1 - 100 of 102 matches
Mail list logo
