Your message dated Fri, 23 Dec 2005 18:47:13 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#340850: fixed in units 1.85-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Nov 2005 11:45:57 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Nov 26 03:45:57 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from asia.telenet-ops.be ([195.130.137.74])
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
        id 1EfyVA-0001HL-Vs
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 26 Nov 2005 03:45:57 -0800
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
        by asia.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with SMTP id 492A7382A7
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 26 Nov 2005 12:45:56 +0100 (CET)
Received: from Q.roeckx.be (dD5775F4A.access.telenet.be [213.119.95.74])
        by asia.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 334D33826D
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 26 Nov 2005 12:45:56 +0100 (CET)
Received: by Q.roeckx.be (Postfix, from userid 501)
        id F36E626136; Sat, 26 Nov 2005 12:45:55 +0100 (CET)
Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2005 12:45:55 +0100
From: Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: units: FTBFS: makeinfo: Command not found
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.4 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
        RCVD_IN_SORBS,RCVD_IN_SORBS_MISC autolearn=no 
        version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: units
Version: 1.85-1
Severity: serious

Hi,

Your package is failing to build on a few arches with the
following error:
gcc  -o units units.o parse.tab.o getopt.o getopt1.o  -lm -lreadline -lncurses
./texi2man units.texinfo > units.man
sed [EMAIL PROTECTED]@!/usr/share/misc/units.dat! ./units.man > units.1
makeinfo ./units.texinfo
make[1]: makeinfo: Command not found
make[1]: *** [units.info] Error 127

I'm guessing this is a timestamp skew issues.  I suggest you look
at /usr/share/doc/autotools-dev/README.Debian.gz about it.

Note that since linux 2.6, it keeps sub-second timestamps for
files (as long as they're in memory) which triggers more of those
bugs.

Other buildd's show this instead:
gcc  -o units units.o parse.tab.o getopt.o getopt1.o  -lm -lreadline -lncurses
sed [EMAIL PROTECTED]@!/usr/share/misc/units.dat! ./units.man > units.1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/units-1.85'
texi2html -monolithic units.texinfo


Kurt


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 340850-close) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Dec 2005 02:50:52 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Dec 23 18:50:52 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50)
        id 1EpzRB-0004fX-RV; Fri, 23 Dec 2005 18:47:13 -0800
From: John Hasler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $
Subject: Bug#340850: fixed in units 1.85-3
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 18:47:13 -0800
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Source: units
Source-Version: 1.85-3

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
units, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

units_1.85-3.diff.gz
  to pool/main/u/units/units_1.85-3.diff.gz
units_1.85-3.dsc
  to pool/main/u/units/units_1.85-3.dsc
units_1.85-3_i386.deb
  to pool/main/u/units/units_1.85-3_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
John Hasler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated units package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 21:10:54 -0600
Source: units
Binary: units
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.85-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: John Hasler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: John Hasler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 units      - converts between different systems of units
Closes: 340850
Changes: 
 units (1.85-3) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Fixed typo in control file
 .
   * Added missing build-depends on texinfo
     Closes: #340850: FTBFS: makeinfo: Command not found
Files: 
 8e904ea44d1f5cac06955a2a8873d367 703 utils optional units_1.85-3.dsc
 c1b7bbcd81ba0555e7b01ba80c4b8810 5844 utils optional units_1.85-3.diff.gz
 e505c684f0dc813f5769a5d5816f4013 137510 utils optional units_1.85-3_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)

iQCVAwUBQ6oZrfc1CeQKxb5hAQL7UQP8DeagPigIpYK+CUksBuWe5lnt060nE1BP
hLq5ilsZi36to9V/YHlLCQqSOFQk3lmvpJc3nvtLtKIbjPtdv8Y/dTvbP3OmnwNR
CQEaDuzw5QLFRdhqpue4pudJ7Trgbt5pmNS9RckXEs1Qs9EqQt+uTwHgRJGU4wJx
xryD0kRvKAE=
=I1cO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to