Processed: Re: Bug#207056: OpenAFS on XFS-patched Alpha kernel

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > submitter 142523 ! Bug#142523: perl-base: bogus env handling causes segfaults Changed Bug submitter from Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. > submitter 188120 ! Bug#188120: astrolog: newest version not available

Processed: Fixed in NMU of cjk-latex 4.5.1-4.0.1

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 285198 + fixed Bug#285198: Manual edit of texmf.cnf not recommended There were no tags set. Tags added: fixed > tag 322010 + fixed Bug#322010: cjk-latex: Doesn't work with its own example file Big5.tex Tags were: patch Tags added: fixed > quit Sto

Bug#285198: NMU fix for this bug to get back to testing

Hi, Here is diff between NMU and previous version. Osamu -- ~\^o^/~~~ ~\^.^/~~~ ~\^*^/~~~ ~\^_^/~~~ ~\^+^/~~~ ~\^:^/~~~ ~\^v^/~~~ + Osamu Aoki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Yokohama Japan, GPG-key: A8061F32 .''`. Debian Reference: post-installation user's guide for non-developers : :' : ht

Processed: severity of 342831 is wishlist

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.10 > severity 342831 wishlist Bug#342831: security.debian.org: missing ftp access to the security updates Severity set to `wishlist'. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please c

Bug#342819: Processed: block 342819 with 342740

On Sat, Dec 10, 2005 at 04:18:38PM -0800, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.9 > > block 342819 with 342740 > Bug#342819: postgresql-pljava: ftbfs [sparc] gcc-3.3: Command not found > W

Processed: Re: gpsd: FTBFS: undefined reference to `floor'

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > package gpsd Ignoring bugs not assigned to: gpsd > tags 340852 patch Bug#340852: gpsd: FTBFS: undefined reference to `floor' There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > thanks control ;) Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assista

Bug#340852: gpsd: FTBFS: undefined reference to `floor'

package gpsd tags 340852 patch thanks control ;) I've fixed this in my merge of gpsd for Ubuntu. Attached is the (rather trivial) fix, though I suspect that a better solution would be to notify upstream of this problem and modify ./Makefile.am and update the autotools infrastructure accordingly.

Bug#342749: marked as done (emacs-wiki: cgi.el contains construct that does not work with emacs22)

Your message dated Sun, 11 Dec 2005 14:06:42 +0900 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Checked emacs-wiki, and it was innocent. has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is no

Bug#342749: Bugs are mixed up

forwarded 342794 [EMAIL PROTECTED] notforwarded 342749 thanks Hi, 342749 is marked as forwarded, but I think you want 342794 (mutt bug) thanks, junichi -- [EMAIL PROTECTED],netfort.gr.jp} Debian Project -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe

Bug#341580: Pending

tag 341580 +pending thanks A temporary dependency on libsensors-dev has been added until the issue with libsnmp-dev can be resolved. The svn version of the package now builds cleanly in a pbuilder. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Processed: Pending

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 341580 +pending Bug#341580: cyrus22-imapd_2.2.12-1(sparc/experimental): FTBFS: cannot find -lsensors There were no tags set. Tags added: pending > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking sys

Bug#325449: Checked emacs-wiki, and it was innocent.

Hi, I've noticed after cloning that cgi.el is fixed. It was just elserv that was broken. Sorry for the noise. regards, junichi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#339211: Bug#328958: RFA: libmusicbrainz-2.1: Second generation incarnation of the CD Index -- optional

On Thu, 1 Dec 2005 20:25:15 +0100, Florian Ernst wrote: > With respect to this new situation I'd prefer to omit the python > bindings completely, despite the pending removal of the bindings as > shipped with libmusicbrainz-2.0. Any thoughts? Couldn't you email upstream and ask for clarification, r

Bug#342833: debian-installer: Installation on Firewire hard drives fails on PPC/PowerMac

Package: debian-installer Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable debian-installer offers to install a Debian system on an external Firewire drive in the partitioning menu. However, installation of yaboot fails if _any_ system partition is on a Firewire device, even if the boot pa

Bug#342755: glibc: ftbfs [sparc] Error: symbol `__bind' is already defined

> ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/bind.S: Assembler messages: > ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/bind.S:5: Error: symbol `__bind' is already defined I think this will solve that problem. #! /bin/sh -e # All lines beginning with `# DP:' are a description of the patch. # DP: Description: Fix __bind redefiniti

Bug#342831: security.debian.org: missing ftp access to the security updates

Package: security.debian.org Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable i'd like to ask you to provide the security updates on ftp as well as http, so that ftp only connected systems could benefit of them, as well as with general upgrades. willing to test alex -- System Informati

Bug#341542: perl: Still vulnerable...

On Sun, Dec 11, 2005 at 02:03:20AM +1100, Brendan O'Dea wrote: > On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 12:41:02PM -0800, Charles Stevenson wrote: > >[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ perl -e 'printf("%2918905856\$vs")' > >Segmentation fault > >I haven't had time yet but I imagine it might be possible to gain root > >through

Bug#285198: [cjk-latex] Let's drop problematic script editting texmf.conf

As I see Sarge TeTeX package, font path is correct and we do not need script causing this serious bug. I will NMU this package soon by removing this script part following instruction in the original script. By the way, there are much newer upstream. Maybe you should RFA this package. Osamu --

Bug#342780: usrp: FTBFS on ia64

On Sat, Dec 10, 2005 at 12:52:10PM +0100, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote: > On Sat, Dec 10, 2005 at 06:41:16AM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote: > > Long, involved failure at: > > http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=usrp&ver=0.8-5&arch=ia64&stamp=1133933801&file=log&as=raw > > Appears to be due to po

Processed: block 342819 with 342740

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.9 > block 342819 with 342740 Bug#342819: postgresql-pljava: ftbfs [sparc] gcc-3.3: Command not found Was not blocked by any bugs. Blocking bugs added: 342740 > End of message, stopping pr

Processed: tag

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 335981 upstream Bug#335981: scm: FTBFS on s390 (failure in gc) There were no tags set. Bug#336371: scm - fails to build Tags added: upstream > forwarded 335981 "agj @ alum.mit.edu" Bug#335981: scm: FTBFS on s390 (failure in gc) Bug#336371: scm - fa

Bug#336135: marked as done (FTBFS: Memory input 2 is not directly addressable)

Your message dated Sat, 10 Dec 2005 18:41:21 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line linux sampler removed, therefor closing bugs has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it i

Bug#323669: baycomusb: FTBFS: error: 'USBDEVFS_URB_ISO_ASAP' undeclared

On Sat, Dec 10, 2005 at 07:45:30PM +0100, Joop PG4I wrote: > Hello again Kurt, > > Baycomusb still seems to build just fine on my Debian/unstable box. Can you > please check if USBDEVFS_URB_ISO_ASAP is defined in > /usr/include/linux/usbdevice_fs.h on your system? You have this code: #ifdef HAVE_

Bug#328121: marked as done (linuxsampler: Inconsistent and non DFSG free license)

Your message dated Sat, 10 Dec 2005 18:41:21 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line linux sampler removed, therefor closing bugs has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it i

Processed: retitle 339056 to tktable: Library package nonconforming

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.9 > retitle 339056 tktable: Library package nonconforming Bug#339056: tktable-dev: Library package fails to include shlibs file Changed Bug title. > End of message, stopping processing he

Bug#339056: Is Lars Steinke MIA?

On 2005-11-14, I filed grave bug #339056: "Library package fails to include shlibs file" [0] on package tktable-dev [1] , on which my package saods9 build-depends. I'm concerned about this bug because 1) its RC; 2) I haven't heard back in a month, despite pinging the maintainer last week; 3) My pa

Processed: Re: xsetbg keeps opening X clients without closing the old

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 325689 important Bug#325689: xsetbg keeps opening X clients without closing the old Severity set to `important'. > tags 325689 - security Bug#325689: xsetbg keeps opening X clients without closing the old Tags were: security confirmed Tags rem

Bug#325689: xsetbg keeps opening X clients without closing the old

severity 325689 important tags 325689 - security thanks Neil McGovern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > It's essentially the same, with a minor difference: > Fork bombs traditionally happen very quickly, whereas with normal > operation, this DoS will take some time. Sorry, but a (by your own admissi

Processed: severity of 307627 is grave

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.10 > # given the information provided by Tim Freeman, unrelated information loss > does occur > severity 307627 grave Bug#307627: will remove existing group even if group was created bef

Bug#342826: fuse-utils: group should only be removed on package purge, not removal

Package: fuse-utils Version: 2.4.0-1 Severity: serious Per definition of the "purge" and "remove" actions, the group, which is handled as configuration information, should not be dropped on package removal. I guess that can even cause the group to be removed (and the information to be lost) on si

Bug#334880: marked as done (ethereal 0.10.13 fixes lots of vulnerabilities)

Your message dated Sat, 10 Dec 2005 23:26:21 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#334880: still open? has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibi

Bug#337259: debian-reference: FTBFS with new tetex-bin: Error trying to create pdflatex.fmt

After reviewing my package, IO realized cjk-latex has been removed from testing. Until some fix is done on postinst script, it will not enter testing due to #285198 (Manual edit of texmf.cnf not recommended). It seems we need to add some script to /etc/texmf/texmf.d insted of screwing around wit

Bug#341805: marked as done (clanbomber: not installable in sid)

Your message dated Sat, 10 Dec 2005 14:02:09 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#341805: fixed in clanbomber 1.05cdbs-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#328571: marked as done (gnomesword: missing build-conflicts with libgtkhtml3.2-dev)

Your message dated Sat, 10 Dec 2005 14:02:39 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#328571: fixed in gnomesword 2.1.2-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Processed: Fixed in NMU of gnopernicus 0.9.19-2.1

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 286872 + fixed Bug#286872: gnopernicus: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): invalid lvalue in assignment Tags were: fixed-upstream patch Tags added: fixed > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system ad

Processed: Fixed in NMU of mpatrol 1.4.8-9.1

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 287677 + fixed Bug#287677: mpatrol: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): cast from 'Pixel*' to 'Cardinal' loses precision Tags were: patch Tags added: fixed > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system

Processed: Fixed in NMU of ispell-fi 0.7-16.1

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 326025 + fixed Bug#326025: ispell-fi: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'aspell' Tags were: patch Tags added: fixed > tag 331868 + fixed Bug#331868: ispell-fi depends on debconf without | debconf-2.0 alternate; blocks cdebconf transition There were

Processed: severity of 226139 is grave

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.10 > severity 226139 grave Bug#226139: amanda-server: chg-manual makes insecure use of /tmp Severity set to `grave'. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you

Bug#341797: ghc6 on sparc

Hi all, These look like symptoms of bitrot in ghc6's registerised sparc support. I'll make it unregisterised for the next ghc6 upload, but this won't happen until I can install ghc6's build-deps again (#338327 / #340076). Thanks Ian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subje

Bug#334880: still open?

What's the status of this set of holes now that 0.10.13-1 is uploaded? -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#342757: haskell-cabal: ftbfs [sparc] make[1]: *** [setup] Bus error

Hi Ian. Look like a GHC bug? Blars Blarson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Package: haskell-cabal > Version: 1.1.3 > Severity: serious > Justification: no longer builds from source > > > haskell-cabal failed to build on a sparc buildd, duplicated on my > sparc pbuilder. > > > > ./Distribution/Simp

Bug#341398: Can not reproduce

Hi, Sorry for the late reply Ganesan Rajagopal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20051206 21:32:43 +0530]: > > Aidas Kasparas wrote: > >tags 341398 + moreinfo unreproducible > >thanks > > > >I see you're using non standard kernel. Can you reporoduce the same > >problem with standard kernel? I was unable t

Bug#342821: tellico: not installable, dependencies are not satisfied.

Package: tellico Version: 1.0-1 Severity: serious the binary package in unstable is no longer installable, because the libaries for kde in unstable are changed. apt-get install tellico The following packages have unmet dependencies: tellico: Depends: kdelibs4c2 (>= 4:3.4.2-1) but it is not g

Bug#342642: otrs: upgrade failed

On Sat, 10 Dec 2005, Torsten Werner wrote: did you upgrade the database schema? I did nothing but upgrading the package. There was no file NEWS.Debian or whatever (debconf information) that gave me the slightest hint to do something else. If I should do something else (perhaps something that

Bug#342819: postgresql-pljava: ftbfs [sparc] gcc-3.3: Command not found

Package: postgresql-pljava Version: 1.1.0-4 Severity: serious Justification: no longer builds from source postgresql-pljava failed to build on a sparc buildd. make[2]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/postgresql-pljava-1.1.0/build/objs' gcc-3.3 -c -Wno-long-long -g -Wall -O2 -fPIC -DGCJ -DPKG

Processed: found 323580 238-1.1

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > found 323580 238-1.1 Bug#323580: libnss-ldap: segfault in libc/getent when receiving groupinformation with 1021-1023 characters Bug marked as found in version 238-1.1. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debi

Bug#323580: found 323580 238-1.1

found 323580 238-1.1 thanks I can confirm this problem in 238-1.1 However, this bug seems to be fixed in 244 from upstream. At least I can't reproduce it with nss_ldap-244 (self made package with debian patches applied). Regards, Henry -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a s

Bug#341668: marked as done (libgfcui-2.0-0c2a-dbg: Broken upload.)

Your message dated Sat, 10 Dec 2005 11:02:09 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#341668: fixed in gfcui 2.3.1-7 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#342706: marked as done (Causes cdebconf build failures on alpha and ia64)

Your message dated Sat, 10 Dec 2005 11:02:12 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#342706: fixed in gtk+2.0-directfb 2.0.9.2-13 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case

Bug#342815: Xdialog: syntax error leads to infinite memory allocation loop

Package: Xdialog Version: 2.0.6-3 Severity: critical Justification: breaks the whole system Running Xdialog --menubox "rotation angle?" 0 0 0 \ "" "erase picture" \ 0 "don't rotate" \ 90 "clockwise" \ 180 "flip over" \ 270 "anticlock" makes the "eras

Processed: Re: Bug#342803: openoffice.org: needs Replaces against openoffice.org-debian-files

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 342803 grave Bug#342803: openoffice.org: needs Replaces against openoffice.org-debian-files Severity set to `grave'. > merge 342610 342803 Bug#342610: openoffice.org: update problems 1.1.4-7 -> 2.0.0-4 Bug#342803: openoffice.org: needs Replace

Bug#335105: perl FTBFS in t/op/fork

Andrew Suffield wrote: > This doesn't look like #223110 to me - that bug is specific to signal > handlers. After a closer look I agree. > I just tried the test on casals against 5.8.7-6 though, and > I can't get it to break (although it is still breaking on the buildd). > > What do you know abo

Bug#323669: baycomusb: FTBFS: error: 'USBDEVFS_URB_ISO_ASAP' undeclared

Hello again Kurt,Baycomusb still seems to build just fine on my Debian/unstable box. Can you please check if USBDEVFS_URB_ISO_ASAP is defined in /usr/include/linux/usbdevice_fs.h on your system? Thanks,Joop - pa3aba at debian dot org-- Linux for your hamradio desktop___ 

Bug#342796: gnome-terminal: login screen not functional: no texts displayed, no entry possible

Hello Josselin, thank, for that fast answer. gdm Version is 2.6.0.8. Sorry about the wrong categorization. Was'nt sure about it. Greetings Michael --- Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb: > reassign 342796 gdm > thanks > > Le mercredi 10 décembre 2003 à 16:58 +0100, > michaeljgd a éc

Processed: Bug #342750 not applicable to Muse

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > close 342750 Bug#342750: muse-el: cgi.el contains construct that does not work with emacs22 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug closed, send any further explanations to "Laurent Bonnaud" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > t

Processed: Re: Bug#342796: gnome-terminal: login screen not functional: no texts displayed, no entry possible

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 342796 gdm Bug#342796: gnome-terminal: login screen not functional: no texts displayed, no entry possible Bug reassigned from package `gnome-terminal' to `gdm'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. De

Bug#342796: gnome-terminal: login screen not functional: no texts displayed, no entry possible

reassign 342796 gdm thanks Le mercredi 10 décembre 2003 à 16:58 +0100, michaeljgd a écrit : > Package: gnome-terminal > Version: 2.10.0-3 > Severity: grave > Justification: renders package unusable > > > After installation with netinst cdrom the system restarted and showed the > usual login scr

Bug#339061: bug in binutils

Mike Furr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > After some more investigation described in 338148, we found out that it > was actually OCaml which was at fault. A new version of OCaml was > uploaded yesterday which has a work-around for this bug and appears to > produce working binaries on alpha. Thanks

Bug#339061: bug in binutils

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Falk Hueffner wrote: > On Wed, Dec 07, 2005 at 08:54:03PM -0500, Mike Furr wrote: >>This is actually a bug in binutils (338148). I'll leave this bug >>here just so it doesn't get reported again. > AFAICT, 338148 is about ocaml not setting .prologue co

Bug#339061: bug in binutils

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Falk Hueffner wrote: > On Wed, Dec 07, 2005 at 08:54:03PM -0500, Mike Furr wrote: >>This is actually a bug in binutils (338148). I'll leave this bug >>here just so it doesn't get reported again. > AFAICT, 338148 is about ocaml not setting .prologue co

Bug#104394: melissa groeber Decrease your Monthly Payment

melissa groeber, We are proud to offer you 517K at a fixed 2.12 http://jukenyte.com N.o. - j u k e n y t e . c o m / melissagroeber Thank You, Bernardo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#335126: NMU diff for this bug

> to speed up the kdelibs4c2a transition, I've uploaded a NMU to fix > this bug. Patch attached. I accidentally built on a chroot with autoconf installed, and did not detect a FTBFS when autoconf is not installed. Sorry for that, second NMU coming, patch attached. -- Adeodato Simó

Bug#341542: marked as done (Integer overflow in perl's format string code)

Your message dated Sat, 10 Dec 2005 08:02:14 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#341542: fixed in perl 5.8.7-9 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#341849: marked as done (Debian Reference (zh_CN PS file) FTBFS)

Your message dated Sat, 10 Dec 2005 08:02:06 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#341849: fixed in debiandoc-sgml 1.1.93 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Processed: Re: Bug#342794: break-thread is not persistent when changing folders/restarting mutt-ng

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > forwarded 342749 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug#342749: emacs-wiki: cgi.el contains construct that does not work with emacs22 Forwarded-to-address changed from [EMAIL PROTECTED] to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you

Bug#342642: otrs: upgrade failed

Andreas Tille schrieb: > DBD::Pg::st execute failed: FEHLER: Relation »process_id« existiert nicht Hello Andreas, did you upgrade the database schema? Regards, Torsten -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#342759: marked as done (missingh: ftbfs [sparc] setup: waitForProcess: interrupted)

Your message dated Sat, 10 Dec 2005 08:59:01 -0600 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#342759: missingh: ftbfs [sparc] setup: waitForProcess: interrupted has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. I

Processed: Re: Bug#342794: break-thread is not persistent when changing folders/restarting mutt-ng

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > forwarded 342749 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug#342749: emacs-wiki: cgi.el contains construct that does not work with emacs22 Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you ne

Bug#342796: fontconfig.log

In case, that this issue is related to fonts I add the following from fontconfig.log: ... fc-cache: "/root/.fonts": skipping, no such directory ___ Telefonate ohne weitere Kosten vom PC zum PC: http://

Bug#342704: ocaml: FTBFS on hppa: "Error: Field out of range [-262144..262143] (-267528)."

* Julien Cristau: > ocaml FTBFS on hppa with the following error (from the build log): > ../../ocamlcompopt.sh -warn-error Ay -I ../camlp4 -I ../boot -c -impl > pa_o_fast.ppo > [...] > /tmp/camlasm6f9a2e.s: Assembler messages: > /tmp/camlasm6f9a2e.s:97621: Error: Field out of range [-262144..2621

Bug#341542: perl: Still vulnerable...

On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 12:41:02PM -0800, Charles Stevenson wrote: >[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ perl -e 'printf("%2918905856\$vs")' >Segmentation fault > >I haven't had time yet but I imagine it might be possible to gain root >through perl-suid. This is not a buffer overflow. You're causing a SEGV by at

Bug#331483: marked as done (xmms-oggre_0.3-1(mipsel/unstable): configure built with outdatad libtool.m4)

Your message dated Sat, 10 Dec 2005 06:32:13 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#331483: fixed in xmms-oggre 0.3-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#342247: marked as done (updating tetex-extra fails)

On 08.12.05 Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Hilmar Preusse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 07.12.05 Debian Bug Tracking System ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Hi, > >> According to our analysis, the bug occurred because you kept > >> woody's configuration files and refused the update to th

Bug#339061: bug in binutils

On Wed, Dec 07, 2005 at 08:54:03PM -0500, Mike Furr wrote: > This is actually a bug in binutils (338148). I'll leave this bug > here just so it doesn't get reported again. AFAICT, 338148 is about ocaml not setting .prologue correctly, and not about a binutils bug. Can you give more details? --

Bug#342695: eclipse: debian/copyright file doesn't seem to be accurate anymore

On 12/9/05, Francesco Poli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > According to the package debian/copyright file, Eclipse seems to be released > under the CPL. > But eclipse.org website states that, from version 3.1 on, Eclipse has > completed the migration[1] from the CPL to the EPL[2]. > > [1] http://www.e

Bug#321666: Bug still exists. Is not fixed.

found 321666 0.91-9 stop This bug still exists in 0.91-9. Again, reverting to 0.91-4 allows the printer to work. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#334030: FTBFS in rand()

On Sat, Dec 10, 2005 at 12:06:58PM +, Stephen Gran wrote: > > I have a copy of fork.t, hacked to run outside the perl source tree, > > which I've tried running a whole load of times on mips and anything > > else to hand... it hasn't failed yet. My best guess is that > > /dev/urandom on the buil

Bug#342734: debtags: Confirmed on i386 too, looks like duplicate of #342734

Package: debtags Version: 1.5.2+b1 Followup-For: Bug #342734 Confirmed on i386. Look slike duplicate of bug #342734 -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /

Bug#334030: FTBFS in rand()

This one time, at band camp, Andrew Suffield said: > On Sat, Dec 10, 2005 at 01:25:22AM +, Stephen Gran wrote: > > > > This is because the parent and the child get the same value for rand() > > almost every time (although oddly, the first time almost always succeeds > > in getting different va

Bug#342780: usrp: FTBFS on ia64

On Sat, Dec 10, 2005 at 06:41:16AM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote: > Long, involved failure at: > http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=usrp&ver=0.8-5&arch=ia64&stamp=1133933801&file=log&as=raw > > Appears to be due to poor use of Linux kernel headers, > since errors are spewing from /usr/incude/

Bug#342780: usrp: FTBFS on ia64

Package: usrp Version: 0.8-6 Severity: serious Justification: no longer builds from source Long, involved failure at: http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=usrp&ver=0.8-5&arch=ia64&stamp=1133933801&file=log&as=raw Appears to be due to poor use of Linux kernel headers, since errors are spewing f

Bug#342778: dar FTBFS on mips, mipsel

Package: dar Version: 2.2.4-2 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source See the logs at http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=dar&ver=2.2.4-2&arch=mips&stamp=1133597852&file=log&as=raw and http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=dar&ver=2.2.4-2&arch=mipsel&stamp=1133613457&fil

Bug#341668: Ping on gfcui

You appear to have uploaded since I filed this grave -- but trivial to fix -- bug, without fixing it. So I wondered what was going on. The fix is to change the debian/control entry for libgfcui-2.0-0c2a-dbg, so it depends on libgfcui-2.0-0c2a rather than on libgfcui-2.0-0c2. -- Nathanael Nero

Bug#341945: Investigation of the bug

Hello, Sorry to have been lingering on this bug: on Igloo's buildd report I saw that some of the packages were still rebuilding and I thought it was just a matter of waiting. Today I investigated a bit more. The problem is indeed connected to the C++ allocator thing, and the recompile was incomp

Bug#104394: melissa Shrink your Monthly Payment

melissa groeber, We are proud to offer you 559K at a fixed 2.49 http://jukenyte.com N.o. - j u k e n y t e . c o m / melissagroeber Regards, Ariel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#334030: FTBFS in rand()

On Sat, Dec 10, 2005 at 01:25:22AM +, Stephen Gran wrote: > So, with this test: > > #!/usr/bin/perl > > use POSIX ":sys_wait_h"; > > my $count = 0; > for (0.. 99) { > &do_test(1); > } > > print "Test (rand) passed $count % of the time\n"; > > $count = 0; > for (0.. 99) { > &do_test