Your message dated Sat, 10 Dec 2005 11:02:09 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#341668: fixed in gfcui 2.3.1-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Dec 2005 04:22:01 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Dec 01 20:22:01 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from ms-smtp-02.nyroc.rr.com ([24.24.2.56])
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
        id 1Ei2Qr-0002hk-3n
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 01 Dec 2005 20:22:01 -0800
Received: from doctormoo (cpe-24-59-106-110.twcny.res.rr.com [24.59.106.110])
        by ms-smtp-02.nyroc.rr.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id 
jB24LwDK005671;
        Thu, 1 Dec 2005 23:21:58 -0500 (EST)
Received: from neroden by doctormoo with local (Exim 4.54)
        id 1Ei2Qo-0004py-A3; Thu, 01 Dec 2005 23:21:58 -0500
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: libgfcui-2.0-0c2a-dbg: Broken upload.
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17
Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2005 23:21:58 -0500
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: libgfcui-2.0-0c2a-dbg
Version: 2.3.1-5
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

libgfcui-2.0-0c2a-dbg depends on libgfcui-2.0-0c2.

Should depend on libgfcui-2.0-0c2a, of course.  Oops.

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 341668-close) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Dec 2005 19:11:01 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Dec 10 11:11:01 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50)
        id 1El9yz-00066f-F9; Sat, 10 Dec 2005 11:02:09 -0800
From: Goedson Teixeira Paixao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.60 $
Subject: Bug#341668: fixed in gfcui 2.3.1-7
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2005 11:02:09 -0800
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Source: gfcui
Source-Version: 2.3.1-7

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
gfcui, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

gfc-examples_2.3.1-7_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/gfcui/gfc-examples_2.3.1-7_i386.deb
gfcui_2.3.1-7.diff.gz
  to pool/main/g/gfcui/gfcui_2.3.1-7.diff.gz
gfcui_2.3.1-7.dsc
  to pool/main/g/gfcui/gfcui_2.3.1-7.dsc
libgfcui-2.0-0c2a-dbg_2.3.1-7_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/gfcui/libgfcui-2.0-0c2a-dbg_2.3.1-7_i386.deb
libgfcui-2.0-0c2a_2.3.1-7_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/gfcui/libgfcui-2.0-0c2a_2.3.1-7_i386.deb
libgfcui-dev_2.3.1-7_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/gfcui/libgfcui-dev_2.3.1-7_i386.deb
libgfcui-doc_2.3.1-7_all.deb
  to pool/main/g/gfcui/libgfcui-doc_2.3.1-7_all.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Goedson Teixeira Paixao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated gfcui package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2005 15:31:42 -0200
Source: gfcui
Binary: libgfcui-2.0-0c2a-dbg libgfcui-2.0-0c2a gfc-examples libgfcui-doc 
libgfcui-dev
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 2.3.1-7
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Goedson Teixeira Paixao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Goedson Teixeira Paixao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 gfc-examples - GTK+ Foundation Classes Examples
 libgfcui-2.0-0c2a - GTK+ Foundation Classes UI - shared libraries
 libgfcui-2.0-0c2a-dbg - GTK+ Foundation Classes UI - debug symbols
 libgfcui-dev - GTK+ Foundation Classes UI - development files
 libgfcui-doc - GTK+ Foundation Classes UI - API reference documentation
Closes: 341668
Changes: 
 gfcui (2.3.1-7) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Fixed libgfcui-2.0-0c2a-dbg dependency, thanks to Nathanael
     Nerode (Closes: #341668).
Files: 
 fb70074649efbdcec0b483d12e00309f 739 libs optional gfcui_2.3.1-7.dsc
 efcc7d1060f53eb43e02a681b02aa6c7 158161 libs optional gfcui_2.3.1-7.diff.gz
 a27f9ab58e908bfaf8312633e99a7080 3751510 doc optional 
libgfcui-doc_2.3.1-7_all.deb
 f80ca6e640a3ae6607bc219fca1d5a6f 1629350 libdevel optional 
libgfcui-dev_2.3.1-7_i386.deb
 cd1b34421a1b44384c5ad2231e4f267a 6268854 libdevel optional 
libgfcui-2.0-0c2a-dbg_2.3.1-7_i386.deb
 8e7260cbc524bad743aa67f0ec2ab260 644078 libs optional 
libgfcui-2.0-0c2a_2.3.1-7_i386.deb
 895eb30bf24499390a27a14ce84f56ed 344124 devel optional 
gfc-examples_2.3.1-7_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDmyAC7tjUzB3rjq4RAjVfAJ9CWdr6R1wjNNEc0f0SO3+v0+bluQCfZXo0
KbcR/dilO+/7CIBxNl4Ct7A=
=gp/S
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to