Bug#342763: bayonne: ftbfs [sparc] error: expected ';' before '*' token

Package: bayonne Version: 1.2.15-1 Severity: serious Justification: no longer builds from source bayonne failed to build on a sparc buildd, duplicated on my sparc pbuilder. make[3]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/bayonne-1.2.15/drivers/phonedev' sparc-linux-gnu-g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I

Bug#342760: haskell-src-exts: setup: waitForProcess: interrupted

Package: haskell-src-exts Version: 0.2-2 Severity: serious Justification: no longer builds from source haskell-src-exts failed to build on a sparc buildd, duplicated on my sparc pbuilder. Running: ./setup build shift/reduce conflicts: 5 Chasing modules from: Language.Haskell.Hsx,Language.Hask

Bug#342759: missingh: ftbfs [sparc] setup: waitForProcess: interrupted

Package: missingh Version: 0.12.1 Severity: serious Justification: no longer builds from source missingh failed to build on a sparc buildd, duplicated on my sparc pbuilder. Running: ./setup build Chasing modules from: MissingH.Str,MissingH.IO,MissingH.IO.Binary,MissingH.List,MissingH.Daemon,Mi

Bug#342758: haskell-hsql: ftbfs [sparc] haddock.bin: Database/HSQL/SQLite.hs: openFile: does not exist

Package: haskell-hsql Version: 1.6-5 Severity: serious Justification: no longer builds from source haskell-hsql failed to build on a sparc buildd, duplicated on my sparc pbuilder. cd doctmp && haddock -h -o ../doc -t HSQL \ Database/HSQL.hs Database/HSQL/Types.hs \ Database/HSQ

Bug#342757: haskell-cabal: ftbfs [sparc] make[1]: *** [setup] Bus error

Package: haskell-cabal Version: 1.1.3 Severity: serious Justification: no longer builds from source haskell-cabal failed to build on a sparc buildd, duplicated on my sparc pbuilder. ./Distribution/Simple/Utils.hs:217:4: Warning: This binding for `paths' shadows an existing binding

Bug#325449: marked as done (elserv: support emacs-snapshot)

Your message dated Fri, 09 Dec 2005 21:17:05 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#325449: fixed in elserv 0.4.0+0.20011203cvs-10 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the cas

Bug#342755: glibc: ftbfs [sparc] Error: symbol `__bind' is already defined

Package: glibc Version: 2.3.5-8.1 Severity: serious Justification: no longer builds from source glibc failed to build on a sparc buildd, duplicated on my sparc pbuilder. gcc-4.0 ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/bind.S -c -I../include -I. -I/tmp/buildd/glibc-2.3.5/build-tree/sparc-libc/socket -I.. -

Bug#342704: ocaml: FTBFS on hppa: "Error: Field out of range [-262144..262143] (-267528)."

On Fri, Dec 09, 2005 at 05:27:46PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > Package: ocaml > Version: 3.09.0-3 > Severity: serious > Justification: no longer builds from source > > ocaml FTBFS on hppa with the following error (from the build log): > ../../ocamlcompopt.sh -warn-error Ay -I ../camlp4 -I ../bo

Processed: Re: Bug#325449: update info

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > clone 325449 -1 Bug#325449: elserv: support emacs-snapshot Bug 325449 cloned as bug 342749. > clone 325449 -2 Bug#325449: elserv: support emacs-snapshot Bug 325449 cloned as bug 342750. > reassign -1 emacs-wiki Bug#342749: elserv: support emacs-snapsh

Bug#325449: update info

clone 325449 -1 clone 325449 -2 reassign -1 emacs-wiki reassign -2 muse-el retitle -1 emacs-wiki: cgi.el contains construct that does not work with emacs22 retitle -2 muse-el: cgi.el contains construct that does not work with emacs22 thanks I'm cloning the bugreport to the respective packages, sin

Bug#325449: #325449: emacs-snapshot parses '?\ ' differently from emacs21?

Hi, > > elserv.el > > elserv-url-decode-string() > > (push ?\ decoded) > > > > is breaking in emacs-snapshot. > > > > emacs-snapshot probably wants > > (push ?\\ decoded) > > In emacs21, the following S expressions return the value of `(32)'. > But in emacs-snapshot (of

Bug#333708: acknowledged by developer (Bug#333708: fixed in mldonkey 2.7.0-1)

* Bastian Blank [Fri, 09 Dec 2005 20:32:53 +0100]: > reopen 333708 > thanks > > Changes: > > mldonkey (2.7.0-1) unstable; urgency=low > > . > >* New upstream release (Closes: #333708, #337856, #328131, #337313) > This is no new release bug. Sylvain, in case it's not clear enough, waldi

Bug#325449: update info

> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Junichi Uekawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > elserv.el > elserv-url-decode-string() > (push ?\ decoded) > > is breaking in emacs-snapshot. > > emacs-snapshot probably wants > (push ?\\ decoded) In emacs21, the following S expressions

Bug#342728: mysql-admin: not installable in sid

On Fri, Dec 09, 2005 at 06:43:35PM -0600, Adam Majer wrote: > On Fri, Dec 09, 2005 at 10:03:18PM +0100, Laurent Bonnaud wrote: > > The following packages have unmet dependencies: > > mysql-admin: Depends: mysql-admin-common (= 1.1.4-2+b1) but 1.1.4-2 is to > > be installed > That's because some

Bug#334030: FTBFS in rand()

Hello all, I strongly suspect that these two failures are linked. The failure in the fork test is most likely caused by a failure in the rand calls in that test (why use rand, anyway?) We only want to test fork, and rand has a non-zero chance of collision, which makes it a false positive failure

Bug#342583: postgresql-server-dev-8.0 depends upon libpq-dev which is 8.1 specific.

I think the postgresql-server-dev packages should not need libpq-dev at all, at least for the header files. (I think the reason for the dependency might be something to do with pg_config.) At least if you compile a server-side module, you should be able to compile that using only -I$(pg_confi

Bug#342583: postgresql-server-dev-8.0 depends upon libpq-dev which is 8.1 specific.

Am Samstag, den 10.12.2005, 01:19 +0100 schrieb Peter Eisentraut: > I think the postgresql-server-dev packages should not need libpq-dev at > all, at least for the header files. (I think the reason for the > dependency might be something to do with pg_config.) At least if you > compile a serve

Processed: Re: Not reproducible, but still can be fixed

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > package doc++ Ignoring bugs not assigned to: doc++ > tags 339921 - unreproducible Bug#339921: doc++: FTBFS: docify.ll:318: error: unknown escape sequence '\]' Tags were: patch unreproducible Tags removed: unreproducible > severity 339921 minor Bug#339

Bug#339921: Not reproducible, but still can be fixed

package doc++ tags 339921 - unreproducible severity 339921 minor retitle 339921 docify.ll:318: warning: unknown escape sequence '\]' thanks bts On Sun, 2005-12-04 at 18:19 -0500, Jeremy Nimmer wrote: > I am not able to reproduce this on sid now: > [...] > It's a warning now, not an error. Does DA

Bug#342728: mysql-admin: not installable in sid

On Fri, Dec 09, 2005 at 10:03:18PM +0100, Laurent Bonnaud wrote: > The following packages have unmet dependencies: > mysql-admin: Depends: mysql-admin-common (= 1.1.4-2+b1) but 1.1.4-2 is to > be installed That's because someone did a binary only upload so that the package does not depend on th

Bug#342741: superkaramba is uninstallable in sid

Package: superkaramba Version: 0.37-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Hi, due to the current C++ allocator transition superkaramba needs to be rebuilt against kdelibs4c2a. Andreas -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy

Bug#342217: marked as done (libopenh323-1.15.6: File conflict)

Your message dated Fri, 09 Dec 2005 14:32:16 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#342217: fixed in openh323 1.15.6-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Processed: severity of 341945 is grave, merging 341945 342734

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.10 > severity 341945 grave Bug#341945: debtags: segfault in postinst Severity set to `grave'. > merge 341945 342734 Bug#341945: debtags: segfault in postinst Bug#342734: debtags: glibc in

Bug#337257: marked as done (apt-build: apt-build segfaults)

Your message dated Fri, 9 Dec 2005 14:30:30 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#337257: unstable ok has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibil

Bug#332835: marked as done (xdb: Please undergo the C++ 'c2' transition)

Your message dated Fri, 09 Dec 2005 14:21:12 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#332835: fixed in xdb 1.2.0-6 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your r

Bug#337257: unstable ok

Hello, I upgraded apt to unstable: apt-get upgrade -t unstable apt and apt-build no more segfault -- Ashar Voultoiz pgp keyid: 0x63B820D1 IM: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ICQ: 15325080 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#342734: debtags: glibc invalid pointer

Package: debtags Version: 1.5.2+b1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Hello, I am running testing and recently upgraded apt to unstable (to test a bug fix for apt-build). When running apt-get upgrade everything got upgraded but debtag. The output actually is: # apt-get upg

Bug#342291: marked as done (ocaml-ssl: Need to be rebuild with findlib > 1.1-3)

Your message dated Fri, 09 Dec 2005 13:47:14 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#342291: fixed in ocaml-ssl 0.3.1-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#342731: wvdial uninstallable due dependancies

Package: wvdial Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable wvdial: Depends: libwvstreams4.0-base which is a virtual package. Depends: libwvstreams4.0-extras which is a virtual package. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT poli

Bug#342728: mysql-admin: not installable in sid

Package: mysql-admin Version: 1.1.4-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Hi, here is the problem: # apt-get install mysql-admin Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impo

Bug#342292: tetex-bin: Multiple exploitable heap overflows in embedded xpdf copy

Frank Küster wrote: > Hi Joey, > > Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > The original patch was not sufficient. I'm attaching the entire and the > > incremental patch. Please apply the incremental patch to the version in > > sid as well. > > Did you see Martin Pitt's "enhanced" patch

Bug#337346: Bug update status

Matt Keenan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Can we get a bug status update on this? Are the relevant packages going > to be modified to have the right files in them? Is there an interim > workaround? What projections do we have a fix being uploaded? > > Matt (still waiting for gnucash to be workin

Bug#337346: Bug update status

Can we get a bug status update on this? Are the relevant packages going to be modified to have the right files in them? Is there an interim workaround? What projections do we have a fix being uploaded? Matt (still waiting for gnucash to be working again) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PR

Bug#236243: adns: last problem hcommon.c.m4

On Fri, Dec 09, 2005 at 11:07:10AM +, Ian Jackson wrote: > arrangements are supposed to make sure that the timestamps are correct > and I will have to check this since obviously the shipped hcommon.c > was out of date. well... this might be related to the fact that i had patched both in the de

Bug#333708: acknowledged by developer (Bug#333708: fixed in mldonkey 2.7.0-1)

reopen 333708 thanks > Changes: > mldonkey (2.7.0-1) unstable; urgency=low > . >* New upstream release (Closes: #333708, #337856, #328131, #337313) This is no new release bug. Bastian -- Live long and prosper. -- Spock, "Amok Time", stardate 3372.7

Processed: Re: Bug#333708 acknowledged by developer (Bug#333708: fixed in mldonkey 2.7.0-1)

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reopen 333708 Bug#333708: mldonkey - fails to build Bug reopened, originator not changed. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) --

Bug#341756: revelation: Not startable after upgrade

"mkdir /etc/gconf/schemas/" and "cd /etc/gconf/schemas/ && ln -s /usr/share/gconf/schemas/revelation.schemas" solved my problem. Joh On Monday 05 December 2005 10:11, Stefan Völkel wrote: > Hello, > > please try to locate the file: revelation.schemas > > seems like your installation tries to,

Bug#342657: marked as done (xpuyopuyo - FTBFS: missing build dependency)

Your message dated Fri, 09 Dec 2005 09:47:13 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#342657: fixed in xpuyopuyo 0.9.8-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#342292: Fwd: Re: [vendor-sec] xpdf update - patch wrong?

Martin Pitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > After discovering that the same flawed multiplication is also present > in upstream's other two patches, I decided to completely rework the > patch. > > I attach the debdiff with separated out changelog. Florian, maybe you > can peer-review the patch? Mart

Bug#342292: tetex-bin: Multiple exploitable heap overflows in embedded xpdf copy

Hi Joey, Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The original patch was not sufficient. I'm attaching the entire and the > incremental patch. Please apply the incremental patch to the version in > sid as well. Did you see Martin Pitt's "enhanced" patch - do both address the same problems?

Processed: Re: Bug#342706: D-I - Minor buildd problems

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 342706 Causes cdebconf build failures on alpha and ia64 Bug#342706: D-I - Minor buildd problems Changed Bug title. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administ

Bug#342706: D-I - Minor buildd problems

Package: libgtk+2.0-directfb0 Version: 2.0.9.2-12 Severity: serious This from a thread on d-release. Alastair, could you please look into this? As it is keeping cdebconf from building on 2 arches, it's pretty important. On Friday 09 December 2005 17:03, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Fri, Dec 09, 20

Bug#342647: mh-e: does not configure with emacs-snapshot

Romain Francoise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Peter, didn't we agree that mh-e should skip byte-compilation for > emacs-snapshot anyway? Yes we did. Sorry, I was in Montreal for the Climate Change Conference and I've been very busy. The next mh-e upload will correct this. Peter -- To UNSUBS

Bug#342292: Fwd: Re: [vendor-sec] xpdf update - patch wrong?

Hi Frank, hi Florian! Frank Küster [2005-12-08 13:17 +0100]: > Martin Pitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi! > > > > I'm currently preparing Ubuntu security updates for these issues, and > > I noticed that the upstream provided patch is wrong. I sent the mail > > below to upstream (and some ot

Bug#325449: update info

Hi, elserv.el elserv-url-decode-string() (push ?\ decoded) is breaking in emacs-snapshot. emacs-snapshot probably wants (push ?\\ decoded) regards, junichi -- [EMAIL PROTECTED],netfort.gr.jp} Debian Project -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] w

Bug#342704: ocaml: FTBFS on hppa: "Error: Field out of range [-262144..262143] (-267528)."

Package: ocaml Version: 3.09.0-3 Severity: serious Justification: no longer builds from source ocaml FTBFS on hppa with the following error (from the build log): ../../ocamlcompopt.sh -warn-error Ay -I ../camlp4 -I ../boot -c -impl pa_o_fast.ppo [...] /tmp/camlasm6f9a2e.s: Assembler messages: /tm

Processed: setting package to clisp clisp-dev clisp-doc, tagging 342552, tagging 342640

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.10 > package clisp clisp-dev clisp-doc Ignoring bugs not assigned to: clisp clisp-dev clisp-doc > tags 342552 + pending Bug#342552: clisp: FTBFS without xmkmf Tags were: patch Tags added:

Processed: Please support emacs-snapshot

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 325449 elserv: support emacs-snapshot Bug#325449: wysihtml-el: postinst failure with emacs-snapshot-gtk Changed Bug title. > severity 325449 grave Bug#325449: elserv: support emacs-snapshot Severity set to `grave'. > thanks Stopping processing

Bug#340078: marked as done (junior-games-gl: fails to install: depends on no longer existing package "tuxracer")

Your message dated Fri, 09 Dec 2005 07:17:06 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#340078: fixed in junior-games-gl 1.7 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is no

Processed: Re: Bug#332682: vnc4 with gcc-4.0

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 332682 + patch Bug#332682: vnc4 - don't build with gcc 4.0 There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bug

Processed: tagging 342610, tagging 341271

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 342610 + pending Bug#342610: openoffice.org: update problems 1.1.4-7 -> 2.0.0-4 There were no tags set. Tags added: pending > tags 341271 + pending Bug#341271: openoffice.org-dev: possible unexpanded @FOO@ substitutions There were no tags set. Tag

Bug#332682: vnc4 with gcc-4.0

tags 332682 + patch thanks Thanks a lot! Regards, // Ola On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 04:29:34PM -0500, Aleksey Kliger wrote: > As far as I can tell, the build problems in vnc4 happen because > rfb/Rect.h provides its > own definitions of min() and max() as macros which interact badly with > the g

Bug#342699: does not depend on procps

Package: zaptel Version: 1:1.0.7-4.1 Severity: serious -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, zaptel's postinst uses the "ps" command from the non-essential "procps" package, but the zaptel package does not declare a dependency. Simon - -- System Information: Debian Release: test

Bug#342695: eclipse: debian/copyright file doesn't seem to be accurate anymore

Package: eclipse Version: 3.1.1-6 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 2.3 Hi! According to the package debian/copyright file, Eclipse seems to be released under the CPL. But eclipse.org website states that, from version 3.1 on, Eclipse has completed the migration[1] from the CPL to the EPL[2]

Bug#76918: Hey, meritorious publication

67841158 59 8367645733232 26 98668 314793 2381 98 79 24 29 22 22 64 68 759 272 72 34 2268 98 16 89 62 35 19 16 18 35 78 3239 3479 79 92 17 6617 25695728 558811163 23 74 42177111 39 644 86 98 95 71

Bug#342292: tetex-bin: Multiple exploitable heap overflows in embedded xpdf copy

Frank Küster wrote: > The upstream patch applies cleanly to xpdf/Stream.{cc,h} in sarge, but > JPXStream.cc does not exist. But the functions might still be defined > elsewhere. > > The patch does not apply cleanly, except for Stream.h, in woody, but at > least one affected line in Stream.cc *doe

Bug#341444: quagga (0.98-3-7) ospfd segfault on interface with vlans

0.99.2 does indeed fix the segfault, i have not tested an earlier version. there are some caveats. at first nothing was enabled, i had to remove the config and restart quagga. some ospf commands (redistribute static) didn't take effect immediatly and required a restart as well. i am only using th

Processed: Fixed in NMU of kile 1:1.8.1-3.2

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 342229 + fixed Bug#342229: kile-i18n: cannot install: broken dependency There were no tags set. Tags added: fixed > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator,

Bug#342642: otrs: upgrade failed

On Fri, 9 Dec 2005, Thomas Wouters wrote: Are the owner ship promissions set right on all otrs file? use ~otrs/bin/SetPermissions.sh i used otrs:www-data (that should work on debian as default) but it didn't work until i used www-data:www-data ; Well, I think I used www-data:www-data befor

Bug#342657: xpuyopuyo - FTBFS: missing build dependency

Package: xpuyopuyo Version: 0.9.8-2 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: > Automatic build of xpuyopuyo_0.9.8-2 on debian-31 by sbuild/s390 79 [...] > ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: > Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 5), libgtk1.2-dev, libmikm

Bug#342292: Fwd: Re: [vendor-sec] xpdf update - patch wrong?

* Martin Pitt: > Hi Florian! > > Florian Weimer [2005-12-09 11:53 +0100]: >> * Martin Pitt: >> >> > - For invalid (big) positive values of nObjs which, when multiplied with >> > nObjs >> > overflow an int, we have two cases: >> >> But neither ISO C nor GNU C make any promises regarding this c

Bug#335105: perl FTBFS in t/op/fork

This doesn't look like #223110 to me - that bug is specific to signal handlers. I just tried the test on casals against 5.8.7-6 though, and I can't get it to break (although it is still breaking on the buildd). What do you know about it? I need to duplicate the pesky thing somehow... -- .''`.

Bug#342292: Fwd: Re: [vendor-sec] xpdf update - patch wrong?

Hi Florian! Florian Weimer [2005-12-09 11:53 +0100]: > * Martin Pitt: > > > - For invalid (big) positive values of nObjs which, when multiplied with > > nObjs > > overflow an int, we have two cases: > > But neither ISO C nor GNU C make any promises regarding this case. > Overflow is undefined

Bug#236243: adns: last problem hcommon.c.m4

Bernd Eckenfels writes ("adns: last problem hcommon.c.m4"): > Hello Ian, me again :) Thanks for all your work :-). > there is a last problem, hcommon.c.m4 is missing ENOTSOCK, which will cause > a false regression failure. However since it is shipping hcommon.c, it > depends on the file timestamp

Bug#332835: Ping! for xdb/ C++ transition

On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 04:08:43PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote: > Do you need help? Is there some problem with the build? I uploaded on 2.12.2005 and the package is in NEW and waits for processing (because the package name changed). Cheers, Michael -- Linux is not The Answer. Yes is the ans

Bug#342292: Fwd: Re: [vendor-sec] xpdf update - patch wrong?

* Martin Pitt: > - For invalid (big) positive values of nObjs which, when multiplied with nObjs > overflow an int, we have two cases: But neither ISO C nor GNU C make any promises regarding this case. Overflow is undefined, period. You can pass -fwrapv to gcc if you want modulo arithmetic for

Bug#339269: marked as done (library package needs to be renamed (libstdc++ allocator change))

Your message dated Fri, 09 Dec 2005 02:32:08 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#339269: fixed in sword 1.5.8-7 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Processed: Reassigning to Gnus

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > unblock 342326 with 342521 Bug#342326: mh-e fails to load, "void-variable message-mark-insert-begin" Was blocked by: 342521 Blocking bugs removed: 342521 > severity 342647 grave Bug#342647: mh-e: does not configure with emacs-snapshot Severity set to `

Bug#342292: Fwd: Re: [vendor-sec] xpdf update - patch wrong?

Hi! Frank Küster [2005-12-09 11:09 +0100]: > Martin Pitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi Florian, hi Frank! > > > > Frank Küster [2005-12-08 22:55 +0100]: > >> Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > By the way, the gmallocn function suffers from undefined integer > >> > overflow, to

Processed: "reopen"

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 339120 - fixed-in-experimental Bug#339120: cupsys_1.1.99.b1.r4748-4(sparc/experimental): FTBFS: ld failed Tags were: fixed-in-experimental experimental Tags removed: fixed-in-experimental > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if yo

Bug#342292: Fwd: Re: [vendor-sec] xpdf update - patch wrong?

Martin Pitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Florian, hi Frank! > > Frank Küster [2005-12-08 22:55 +0100]: >> Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > By the way, the gmallocn function suffers from undefined integer >> > overflow, too: >> > >> > void *gmallocn(int nObjs, int objSize) { >> >

Bug#339120: "reopen"

tags 339120 - fixed-in-experimental thanks Reappeared in 1.1.99.b1.r4876-1 Gruesse, -- Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> www: http://www.djpig.de/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#342292: Fwd: Re: [vendor-sec] xpdf update - patch wrong?

Hi Florian, hi Frank! Frank Küster [2005-12-08 22:55 +0100]: > Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > By the way, the gmallocn function suffers from undefined integer > > overflow, too: > > > > void *gmallocn(int nObjs, int objSize) { > > int n; > > > > n = nObjs * objSize; > > if (ob

Bug#342550: firefox: Javascript, history.dat & DoS

* Mike Hommey: >> Even if the browser cannot be restarted after the attack has been >> carried out? The impact of this bug is slightly different from other >> crash bugs. > > Are you sure the firefox process was not still running ? That would > explain the browser not being able to restart... Ac

Bug#342292: Fwd: Re: [vendor-sec] xpdf update - patch wrong?

Hi Frank! Frank Küster [2005-12-08 13:17 +0100]: > Martin Pitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi! > > > > I'm currently preparing Ubuntu security updates for these issues, and > > I noticed that the upstream provided patch is wrong. I sent the mail > > below to upstream (and some others). > > >

Bug#342292: Fwd: Re: [vendor-sec] xpdf update - patch wrong?

Hi! Frank Küster [2005-12-08 15:54 +0100]: > Martin Pitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > - img.tiles = (JPXTile *)gmalloc(img.nXTiles * img.nYTiles * > > -sizeof(JPXTile)); > > + nTiles = img.nXTiles * img.nYTiles; > > + // check for overflow before

Bug#340709: marked as done (Don't let rapple into testing)

Your message dated Fri, 9 Dec 2005 09:55:44 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line testing, we're coming has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibilit

Bug#338437: marked as done ([alpha] ocamlopt is broken due to broken binutils on alpha, fixed in binNMU, but should be rebuilt)

Your message dated Fri, 09 Dec 2005 00:32:10 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#338437: fixed in ocaml 3.09.0-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

Bug#342578: checkinstall leaves system in unusable state

Am Donnerstag, den 08.12.2005, 22:31 -0600 schrieb Felipe Sanchez: > Well, the first thing that would be useful to know is exactly what > options did you use the last time you ran checkinstall. It would be really > useful for trying to figure out what actually happened to your system. > Please s

Bug#342247: marked as done (updating tetex-extra fails)

On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 10:15:21PM +0100, Frank K?ster wrote: > Robert, can you send us your /etc/texmf/texmf.cnf and > /etc/texmf/texmf.d/05TeXMF.cnf, ideally the versions before you fixed > it? Hi! No, I am sorry, I already purged the tetex packages and reinstalled. It's now working for me. Th

Bug#342642: otrs: upgrade failed

hi, Are the owner ship promissions set right on all otrs file? use ~otrs/bin/SetPermissions.sh i used otrs:www-data (that should work on debian as default) but it didn't work until i used www-data:www-data ; Good luck! Thomas Wouters Andreas Tille wrote: Package: otrs Version: 2.0.4p01

Bug#342642: otrs: upgrade failed

Package: otrs Version: 2.0.4p01-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Hello, after latest upgrade in testing OTRS became unusable: http://localhost/cgi-bin/otrs/customer.pl Forbidden You don't have permission to access /cgi-bin/otrs/customer.pl on this server.