Your message dated Fri, 9 Dec 2005 09:55:44 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line testing, we're coming
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Nov 2005 10:37:50 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Nov 25 02:37:50 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from zbasel.fortytwo.ch ([193.138.215.60])
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1Efaxi-0006UN-Gv
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 25 Nov 2005 02:37:50 -0800
Received: from papillon.fortytwo.ch (unknown [10.48.13.2])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(Client CN "gluggsi.fortytwo.ch", Issuer "fortytwo.ch - MAIL CA"
(verified OK))
by zbasel.fortytwo.ch (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E4B78F9
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 25 Nov 2005 11:37:47 +0100 (CET)
Received: from kmail-papillion.fortytwo.ch (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by papillon.fortytwo.ch (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB1CA488EF
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 25 Nov 2005 11:37:43 +0100 (CET)
From: Adrian von Bidder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Don't let rapple into testing
Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2005 11:37:24 +0100
User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2
X-Face: j~5v(Bp|w-}v<lu`qRSq`vW>-^x(PbHz\0k(_hhT~N>n|%e\0cGUJMbW^V}}1H&D0"19u8
XGq=[NV[8]$jwG)[EMAIL PROTECTED])Geu})D+lw_C$"#$M^MNTIIRUZ!m
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
boundary="nextPart1602045.4Ynx5ad4bN";
protocol="application/pgp-signature";
micalg=pgp-sha1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
--nextPart1602045.4Ynx5ad4bN
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
Package: rapple
Version: 0.99cvs20051120-1
Severity: grave
Justification: hold-rapple-in-unstable marker bug
This package is based off a cvs snapshot, testing migration should wait=20
until an official release is out.
=2D- vbi
=2D-=20
He's dead, Jim.
--nextPart1602045.4Ynx5ad4bN
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: get my key from http://fortytwo.ch/gpg/92082481
iKcEABECAGcFAkOG6XNgGmh0dHA6Ly9mb3J0eXR3by5jaC9sZWdhbC9ncGcvZW1h
aWwuMjAwMjA4MjI/dmVyc2lvbj0xLjUmbWQ1c3VtPTVkZmY4NjhkMTE4NDMyNzYw
NzFiMjVlYjcwMDZkYTNlAAoJECqqZti935l6PvMAoJbJ8Pp5A+H5FpZ/ZHa641g5
bqLZAJ0TpyX8yi3mqhjUh5Ox0d6M1+XRIw==
=1pyf
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--nextPart1602045.4Ynx5ad4bN--
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 340709-done) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Dec 2005 08:55:46 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Dec 09 00:55:46 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from zbasel.fortytwo.ch ([193.138.215.60])
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1Eke2c-0007fp-Jk
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 09 Dec 2005 00:55:46 -0800
Received: from gluggsi.fortytwo.ch (zux221-140-086.adsl.green.ch
[81.221.140.86])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(Client CN "gluggsi.fortytwo.ch", Issuer "fortytwo.ch - MAIL CA"
(verified OK))
by zbasel.fortytwo.ch (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89017198
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 9 Dec 2005 09:55:45 +0100 (CET)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (unknown [192.168.1.17])
by gluggsi.fortytwo.ch (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A97848DB8A
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 9 Dec 2005 09:55:45 +0100 (CET)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by localhost.localdomain (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF21E5C0BA
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 9 Dec 2005 09:55:44 +0100 (CET)
From: Adrian von Bidder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: testing, we're coming
Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2005 09:55:44 +0100
User-Agent: KMail/1.8.3
X-Face:
j~5v(Bp|w-}v<lu`qRSq`vW>-^x(PbHz\0k(_hhT~N>n|%e\0cGUJMbW^V}}1H&D0"=?utf-8?q?19u8=0A=09XGq=3D=5BNV=5B8=5D=24jwG?=)[EMAIL
PROTECTED])Geu})D+lw_C$"#$M^MNTIIRUZ!m
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
boundary="nextPart2970892.T5XA8d1cQh";
protocol="application/pgp-signature";
micalg=pgp-sha1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
--nextPart2970892.T5XA8d1cQh
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
Yo!
After discussions with Alan (upstream), we've agreed that rapple *can* be=20
let into testing in its current state.
cheers
=2D- vbi
=2D-=20
pub 1024D/92082481 2002-02-22 Adrian von Bidder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Key fingerprint =3D EFE3 96F4 18F5 8D65 8494 28FC 1438 5168 9208 2481
--nextPart2970892.T5XA8d1cQh
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: get my key from http://fortytwo.ch/gpg/92082481
iKcEABECAGcFAkOZRpBgGmh0dHA6Ly9mb3J0eXR3by5jaC9sZWdhbC9ncGcvZW1h
aWwuMjAwMjA4MjI/dmVyc2lvbj0xLjUmbWQ1c3VtPTVkZmY4NjhkMTE4NDMyNzYw
NzFiMjVlYjcwMDZkYTNlAAoJEIukMYvlp/fWMiMAoLmh676QkXanWC/LXeMhKqTD
bn1/AJ4i3Ryig57gtCOvxof+3HV5+wP1/Q==
=UXWR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--nextPart2970892.T5XA8d1cQh--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
