Processed: Re: Bug#338148: camlstartup asm file

2005-12-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 338148 important Bug#338148: [alpha] regression: ocamlopt.opt segfaults Severity set to `important'. > tags 338437 patch Bug#338437: [alpha] ocamlopt is broken due to broken binutils on alpha, fixed in binNMU, but should be rebuilt There were

Bug#338148: camlstartup asm file

2005-12-07 Thread Steve Langasek
severity 338148 important tags 338437 patch thanks On Wed, Dec 07, 2005 at 10:51:48PM -0500, Mike Furr wrote: > Steve Langasek wrote: > > Rather, the segfault happens in camlPrintf__entry, which is called > > from caml_startup__code_begin. I can't find a definition for > > camlPrintf__entry anyw

Processed: inria bug number

2005-12-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > forwarded 338148 http://caml.inria.fr/mantis/view.php?id=3912 Bug#338148: [alpha] regression: ocamlopt.opt segfaults Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to http://caml.inria.fr/mantis/view.php?id=3912. > thanks. Stopping processing here.

Bug#337603: Washnogo fix?

2005-12-07 Thread François-Denis Gonthier
tags 337603 + patch thanks Been bug hunting for fun and managed to build this package with this patch. It was pretty simple once I figured out this Cabal thing. diff -ru washngo-2.3.1/WASH.cabal washngo-2.3.1.new/WASH.cabal --- washngo-2.3.1/WASH.cabal 2005-12-08 06:23:15.0 + +++ was

Bug#341124: marked as done (elilo: FTBFS)

2005-12-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 07 Dec 2005 21:47:11 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#341124: fixed in gnu-efi 3.0b-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

Bug#342287: marked as done (kpdf: source taken from xpdf may introduce heap-overflow vulnerabilities)

2005-12-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 07 Dec 2005 20:32:10 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#342287: fixed in kdegraphics 4:3.4.3-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Processed: (no subject)

2005-12-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > submitter 332902 debian-ocaml-maint@lists.debian.org Bug#332902: numerix: FTBFS on hppa: cannot reach 0040_caml_c_call+0, recompile with -ffunction-sections Changed Bug submitter from Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > thanks.

Bug#338148: camlstartup asm file

2005-12-07 Thread Mike Furr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Steve Langasek wrote: > Rather, the segfault happens in camlPrintf__entry, which is called > from caml_startup__code_begin. I can't find a definition for > camlPrintf__entry anywhere, and I do in fact see some > suspicious-looking differences when dis

Bug#341083: some changes needed to udev script (nee hotplug script)

2005-12-07 Thread Aleksey Kliger
I believe that when /etc/hotplug/usb/libgphoto2 script is run by udevd instead of hotplug (as with recent udev versions, and with hotplug purged), the environment is somewhat different from what the script expects. in particular if I add echo "=" >> /tmp/script-output printenv >> /tmp

Bug#339061: bug in binutils

2005-12-07 Thread Mike Furr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 This is actually a bug in binutils (338148). I'll leave this bug here just so it doesn't get reported again. - -Mike -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDl5I57ZPKKRJLJvMRArvPAJ9UoLsRKdF9H7rJ65TQGU+qbTBl1QCggDVU jMd

Bug#342499: wordtrans-kde: uninstallable in sid

2005-12-07 Thread Andreas Pakulat
Package: wordtrans-kde Version: 1.1pre14-1.1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Hi, the rebuild of wordtrans-kde and wordtrans-qt for the c++ allocator transition didn't rebuild wordtrans-data, but the packages got a versioned dependecy on wordtrans-data=1.1pre14-1.1+b1 makin

Processed: severity of 332902 is serious

2005-12-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.9 > # ok, yeah, this looks like it may be RC > severity 332902 serious Bug#332902: numerix: FTBFS on hppa: cannot reach 0040_caml_c_call+0, recompile with -ffunction-sections Bug#334

Processed: merging 332902 334497, severity of 332902 is important

2005-12-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.9 > merge 332902 334497 Bug#332902: numerix: FTBFS on hppa: cannot reach 0040_caml_c_call+0, recompile with -ffunction-sections Bug#334497: binutils: linking error in building boost M

Bug#333708: marked as done (mldonkey - fails to build)

2005-12-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 07 Dec 2005 16:47:10 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#333708: fixed in mldonkey 2.7.0-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Processed: proper merge

2005-12-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 332902 serious Bug#332902: numerix: FTBFS on hppa: cannot reach 0040_caml_c_call+0, recompile with -ffunction-sections Severity set to `serious'. > merge 332902 334497 Bug#332902: numerix: FTBFS on hppa: cannot reach 0040_caml_c_call+

Processed: Re: merge some bugs

2005-12-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 338469 serious Bug#338469: libatomic-ops_1.0-3(m68k/unstable/vault13): FTBFS on m68k Bug#322027: libatomic-ops: FTBFS on m68k: Cannot implement AO_compare_and_swap_full on this architecture. Severity set to `serious'. > thanks Stopping proces

Processed: this is RC

2005-12-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reopen 332902 Bug#332902: numerix: FTBFS on hppa: cannot reach 0040_caml_c_call+0, recompile with -ffunction-sections Bug reopened, originator not changed. > reassign 332902 binutils Bug#332902: numerix: FTBFS on hppa: cannot reach 0040_caml_c

Processed: Re: Bug#342380: ogre - FTBFS: error: 'static Ogre::String Ogre::StringConverter::toString(long unsigned int, short unsigned int, char, std::_Ios_Fmtflags)' cannot be overloaded

2005-12-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 342380 important Bug#342380: ogre - FTBFS: error: 'static Ogre::String Ogre::StringConverter::toString(long unsigned int, short unsigned int, char, std::_Ios_Fmtflags)' cannot be overloaded Severity set to `important'. > thanks Stopping proc

Bug#342380: ogre - FTBFS: error: 'static Ogre::String Ogre::StringConverter::toString(long unsigned int, short unsigned int, char, std::_Ios_Fmtflags)' cannot be overloaded

2005-12-07 Thread Steve Langasek
2]: Leaving directory > > `/build/buildd/ogre-1.0.5/build-tree/ogre-free/OgreMain' > > make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 > > make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/ogre-1.0.5/build-tree/ogre-free' > > make: *** [stampdir/build-stamp] Error 2 > > *

Bug#335881: marked as done (numerix: FTBFS: Segfaults in tests)

2005-12-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 07 Dec 2005 15:47:06 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#335881: fixed in numerix 0.21-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

Bug#332902: marked as done (numerix: FTBFS on hppa: cannot reach 00000040_caml_c_call+0, recompile with -ffunction-sections)

2005-12-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 07 Dec 2005 15:47:06 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#332902: fixed in numerix 0.21-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

Processed: Re: Bug#342381: qterm - FTBFS: error: unknown escape sequence '\='

2005-12-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > package qterm Ignoring bugs not assigned to: qterm > tags 342381 +pending Bug#342381: qterm - FTBFS: error: unknown escape sequence '\=' There were no tags set. Tags added: pending > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assi

Bug#342381: qterm - FTBFS: error: unknown escape sequence '\='

2005-12-07 Thread LI Daobing
package qterm tags 342381 +pending thanks On 12/8/05, Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Package: qterm > Version: 0.4.0pre3-2+b1 > Severity: serious > > There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: > I have prepared a version to fix this problem, but I need a sponsor[1], can

Bug#342488: Wrong Conflicts/Replaces makes upgrade fail

2005-12-07 Thread Matthias Klose
severity 342488 normal merge 342489 342488 tags 342488 + pending thanks pending, in the meantime, please remove the libsvncpp0c2 package by hand. Michael Biebl writes: > Package: libsvncpp0c2a > Version: 0.9.0-1 > Severity: grave > > The packages has a Conflicts/Replaces to libsvncpp0 and libsvn

Bug#342488: Wrong Conflicts/Replaces makes upgrade fail

2005-12-07 Thread Michael Biebl
Package: libsvncpp0c2a Version: 0.9.0-1 Severity: grave The packages has a Conflicts/Replaces to libsvncpp0 and libsvncpp0c2a whereas it should be libsvncpp0 and *libsvncpp0c2*. This makes an upgrade impossible as the old libsvncpp0c2 is not uninstalled automatically. Cheers, Michael -- System

Bug#342387: oops on find_get_block with reiserfs

2005-12-07 Thread Stephen Gran
This one time, at band camp, Maximilian Attems said: > tags 342387 important stop > > On Wed, Dec 07, 2005 at 05:54:40PM +0100, yoann wrote: > > Package: kernel-image-2.6.8-2-686 Version: 2.6.8-16 Severity: > > critical > > baah works for others downgrading. > > > I had an oops on my box : > >

Bug#341888: update

2005-12-07 Thread Joey Hess
My other mail was wrong, this is with 2.4.27. I've also experienced earlier problems with 2.6 kernels and grub-install on this hardware, but I had given up on seeing that working. Having it also break in 2.4.27 now is a suprise. Bug #341381 could be it. Here is the grub-install log file from /tmp:

Bug#342207: CVE assignment

2005-12-07 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
Hi, this has been assigned CVE-2005-4048, please mention it in the changelog when fixing it. Cheers, Moritz -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#305907: marked as done (Failure to build from source when running sarge i386 with provided amd64 kernel.)

2005-12-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 07 Dec 2005 13:12:52 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#305907: fixed in util-linux 2.12r-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Processed: Re: Bug#342474: konqueror: URL crashes Konqueror, KDE and computer

2005-12-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 342474 normal Bug#342474: konqueror: URL crashes Konqueror, KDE and computer Severity set to `normal'. > stop Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian

Bug#342474: konqueror: URL crashes Konqueror, KDE and computer

2005-12-07 Thread Christopher Martin
severity 342474 normal stop On Wednesday 07 December 2005 15:18, Yann Forget wrote: > Package: konqueror > Version: 4:3.4.2-4 > Severity: critical > Justification: breaks the whole system > > Hi, > > This URL crashes Konqueror, KDE and the computer. > > http://www.radiofrance.fr/listen.php?file=/c

Bug#342185: marked as done (vm: ftbfs [sparc] dpkg-genchanges: failure: cannot read files list file)

2005-12-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 7 Dec 2005 14:58:26 -0600 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Why is that a bug? has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility t

Bug#342326: further information on failed load

2005-12-07 Thread Christopher J Peikert
Hi, If I try to remove and re-install gnus and mh-e, this time mh-e will not byte-compile property (due to the same problem: a void variable message-mark-insert-begin). A workaround: If I remove the gnus package and just use the one that comes with emacs21, mh-e compiles fine and everything seems

Bug#342474: konqueror: URL crashes Konqueror, KDE and computer

2005-12-07 Thread Yann Forget
Package: konqueror Version: 4:3.4.2-4 Severity: critical Justification: breaks the whole system Hi, This URL crashes Konqueror, KDE and the computer. http://www.radiofrance.fr/listen.php?file=/chaines/france-culture/chroniques/rpmed/rpmed_20051207.ra Thanks, Yann -- System Information: Debian

Bug#326296: marked as done (please rebuild with libreadline5-dev as build dependency)

2005-12-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 07 Dec 2005 11:47:16 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#326296: fixed in socat 1.4.3.0-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#342470: bazaar package build failure in "make test"

2005-12-07 Thread Christoph Scheurer
Package: bazaar Version: 1.4.2-2 Severity: serious Justification: no longer builds from source This is exactly the same bug as [EMAIL PROTECTED] which prohibits bazaar as well as tla from successfully finishing the "undo" test. The same patch as for #342468 applies also to bazaar. -- System Infor

Bug#342468: tla package build failure in "make test" for "undo" test

2005-12-07 Thread Christoph Scheurer
Package: tla Version: 1.3.3-3 Severity: serious Justification: no longer builds from source Since the current development archive of tla can only be accessed with tla version >= 1.3.2 I tried to backport 1.3.3-2 to sarge. The build went fine but the tests failed with an apparent tar error: ==

Processed: reassigning

2005-12-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 341124 gnu-efi Bug#341124: elilo: FTBFS Bug reassigned from package `elilo' to `gnu-efi'. > stop Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs d

Bug#341124: reassigning

2005-12-07 Thread dann frazier
reassign 341124 gnu-efi stop brett: so this needs a new gnu-efi, is that right? brett: if so; who maintains that upstream and for debian? dannf: to compile on sid, yes. stephane maintains it upstream, bdale is debian maintainer. brett: has the fixed version been released? dannf: in order to

Bug#338185: fixed upstream

2005-12-07 Thread dann frazier
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-ia64&m=113391258521267&w=2 -- dann frazier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#333946: marked as done (Unsatisfiable build-dep xlibmesa-glu-dev)

2005-12-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 07 Dec 2005 10:32:08 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#333946: fixed in glob2 0.8.16-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

Bug#321879: marked as done (glob2: includes font with rather dubious copyright status)

2005-12-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 07 Dec 2005 10:32:08 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#321879: fixed in glob2 0.8.16-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

Processed: Re: Bug#342387: oops on find_get_block with reiserfs

2005-12-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 342387 important Unknown tag/s: important. Recognized are: patch wontfix moreinfo unreproducible fixed potato woody sid help security upstream pending sarge sarge-ignore experimental d-i confirmed ipv6 lfs fixed-in-experimental fixed-upstream l10

Bug#342387: oops on find_get_block with reiserfs

2005-12-07 Thread Maximilian Attems
tags 342387 important stop On Wed, Dec 07, 2005 at 05:54:40PM +0100, yoann wrote: > Package: kernel-image-2.6.8-2-686 > Version: 2.6.8-16 > Severity: critical baah works for others downgrading. > I had an oops on my box : looks like one of those reiserfs races, with some chances they are fixed

Bug#342332: marked as done (/usr/lib/stardata-common/spacechart: bashisms in script)

2005-12-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 07 Dec 2005 08:47:13 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#342332: fixed in spacechart 0.9.5-11 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is no

Bug#342331: marked as done (/usr/lib/stardata-common/starplot: bashisms in script)

2005-12-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 07 Dec 2005 08:47:15 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#342331: fixed in starplot 0.95.3-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Processed: Re: Bug#339189

2005-12-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reopen 339189 Bug#339189: library package needs to be renamed (libstdc++ allocator change) Bug reopened, originator not changed. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (ad

Processed: Re: Bug#342185: vm: ftbfs [sparc] dpkg-genchanges: failure: cannot read files list file

2005-12-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reopen 342185 Bug#342185: vm: ftbfs [sparc] dpkg-genchanges: failure: cannot read files list file Bug reopened, originator not changed. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administr

Bug#342185: vm: ftbfs [sparc] dpkg-genchanges: failure: cannot read files list file

2005-12-07 Thread Bastian Blank
reopen 342185 thanks The control file list an arch-any component, so this is a valid bug. Bastian -- Killing is wrong. -- Losira, "That Which Survives", stardate unknown

Bug#341705: more information?

2005-12-07 Thread sean finney
hi christian, On Wed, Dec 07, 2005 at 11:36:47AM +0100, Christian Hammers wrote: > Feel free to upload this to t-p-u. > I created an etch-5.0 branch for this based on the current 5.0 branch: > svn+ssh://svn.debian.org/svn/mysql-dfsg-41/branches/etch-5.0 ok, i've merged the changes (just lines in

Bug#339189:

2005-12-07 Thread Bastian Blank
reopen 339189 thanks And the dependencies needs to be fixed. Bastian -- You can't evaluate a man by logic alone. -- McCoy, "I, Mudd", stardate 4513.3 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#342387: oops on find_get_block with reiserfs

2005-12-07 Thread yoann
Package: kernel-image-2.6.8-2-686 Version: 2.6.8-16 Severity: critical I had an oops on my box : the system was responding to ssh, but it was impossible to get any information about process list ps, top, kill, pkill, killall, etc was unusable and it was impossible to get out from the command, CT

Bug#332562: marked as done (TeTeX causes FTBFS on debian-reference)

2005-12-07 Thread Frank Küster
Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > reopen 332562 > stop > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Debian Bug Tracking System) wrote: > >> Your message dated Wed, 07 Dec 2005 06:32:11 -0800 >> with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> and subject line Bug#335055: fixed in tetex-bin 3.0-11 >> has caused the attach

Processed: tagging 333103

2005-12-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.9 > tags 333103 - experimental Bug#333103: liferea: [gnome 2.12 transition] build-depend on dbus changes Tags were: fixed-in-experimental experimental Tags removed: experimental > End of

Bug#342372: missing dependency on debconf

2005-12-07 Thread Sven Luther
On Wed, Dec 07, 2005 at 05:48:21PM +0200, Eero Häkkinen wrote: > Package: mkvmlinuz > Version: 17 > Severity: serious > > mkvmlinuz requires debconf but does not has a corresponding dependency field > (and debconf is not Essential). Oh well, will need to upload a fixed version on friday. That s

Bug#342381: qterm - FTBFS: error: unknown escape sequence '\='

2005-12-07 Thread Bastian Blank
Package: qterm Version: 0.4.0pre3-2+b1 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: > Automatic build of qterm_0.4.0pre3-2+b1 on debian-31 by sbuild/s390 79 [...] > if g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I/usr/share/qt3/include > -I/usr/X11R6/include -I/usr/include/

Bug#342380: ogre - FTBFS: error: 'static Ogre::String Ogre::StringConverter::toString(long unsigned int, short unsigned int, char, std::_Ios_Fmtflags)' cannot be overloaded

2005-12-07 Thread Bastian Blank
r 1 > make[2]: Leaving directory > `/build/buildd/ogre-1.0.5/build-tree/ogre-free/OgreMain' > make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 > make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/ogre-1.0.5/build-tree/ogre-free' > make: *** [stampdir/build-stamp] Error 2 > *

Bug#335055: marked as done (tetex-bin: Uninstallable: rm: cannot remove `/var/lib/texmf/web2c/*fmt': No such file or directory)

2005-12-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 07 Dec 2005 17:29:12 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#332562: marked as done (TeTeX causes FTBFS on debian-reference) has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If t

Bug#335065: marked as done (Configure error when install it from clean)

2005-12-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 07 Dec 2005 17:29:12 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#332562: marked as done (TeTeX causes FTBFS on debian-reference) has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If t

Bug#332562: marked as done (TeTeX causes FTBFS on debian-reference)

2005-12-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 07 Dec 2005 17:29:12 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#332562: marked as done (TeTeX causes FTBFS on debian-reference) has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If t

Bug#332562: marked as done (TeTeX causes FTBFS on debian-reference)

2005-12-07 Thread Hilmar Preusse
On 07.12.05 Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > reopen 332562 > stop > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Debian Bug Tracking System) wrote: > > > Your message dated Wed, 07 Dec 2005 06:32:11 -0800 > > with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > and subject line Bug#335055: fixed in tetex-bin 3.0-11 > > has

Bug#341843: gkrellmd: Problem with allow-host 127.0.0.1

2005-12-07 Thread Cai Qian
Hi, Can you just kill the previous gkrellmd and remove all the allow-host lines in config file. Then, start a new one with "gkrellmd --allow-host 127.0.0.1"? If the problem is still there, try "gkrellmd --allow-host :::127.0.0.1" instead. So I can check if this is a bug only affect version 2.

Bug#342372: missing dependency on debconf

2005-12-07 Thread Eero Häkkinen
Package: mkvmlinuz Version: 17 Severity: serious mkvmlinuz requires debconf but does not has a corresponding dependency field (and debconf is not Essential). -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Re: Bug#332562: marked as done (TeTeX causes FTBFS on debian-reference)

2005-12-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reopen 332562 Bug#332562: TeTeX causes FTBFS on debian-reference Bug#335055: tetex-bin: Uninstallable: rm: cannot remove `/var/lib/texmf/web2c/*fmt': No such file or directory Bug#335065: Configure error when install it from clean Bug reopened, origina

Bug#332562: marked as done (TeTeX causes FTBFS on debian-reference)

2005-12-07 Thread Frank Küster
reopen 332562 stop [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Debian Bug Tracking System) wrote: > Your message dated Wed, 07 Dec 2005 06:32:11 -0800 > with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > and subject line Bug#335055: fixed in tetex-bin 3.0-11 > has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. I have no idea w

Bug#342292: marked as done (tetex-bin: Multiple exploitable heap overflows in embedded xpdf copy)

2005-12-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 07 Dec 2005 06:32:11 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#342292: fixed in tetex-bin 3.0-11 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#332562: marked as done (TeTeX causes FTBFS on debian-reference)

2005-12-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 07 Dec 2005 06:32:11 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#335055: fixed in tetex-bin 3.0-11 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#335055: marked as done (tetex-bin: Uninstallable: rm: cannot remove `/var/lib/texmf/web2c/*fmt': No such file or directory)

2005-12-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 07 Dec 2005 06:32:11 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#335055: fixed in tetex-bin 3.0-11 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#335065: marked as done (Configure error when install it from clean)

2005-12-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 07 Dec 2005 06:32:11 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#335055: fixed in tetex-bin 3.0-11 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#342337: xpdf: Security hole CAN-2005-3193

2005-12-07 Thread Jan Niehusmann
On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 12:12:09AM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote: > On Wed, Dec 07, 2005 at 02:00:55PM +0100, Jan Niehusmann wrote: > > Ok, so you noticed that my analysis was not completely correct - while > > the woody version indeed doesn't contain JPXStream.cc (and consequently, > > the JPX strea

Bug#335148: [Fwd: Re: Bug#335148: removal of automake1.6]

2005-12-07 Thread rlewczuk
Hi Peter, I've sent a sponsoring request for xbsql some time ago (as I'm not a DD) but no one responded. Packages stripped of dpatch/autmake stuff (as it was redundant) and fixed are available as in a message below. Regards, rle --- Begin Message --- Hi, I've removed automake 1.6 dependency (

Bug#342363: git-core: Please change git conflict to (<< 4.3.20-8)

2005-12-07 Thread Ian Beckwith
Package: git-core Version: 0.99.9k-1 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 10.1 Hello. I had previously agreed with Sebastian Kuzminsky (the previous cogito maintainer) how to handle the conflicting /usr/bin/git binaries, and I've just discovered he has orphaned cogito, and git-core now conflic

Processed: Re: Bug#342292: tetex-bin: Multiple exploitable heap overflows in embedded xpdf copy

2005-12-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > found 342292 2.0.2-30 Bug#342292: tetex-bin: Multiple exploitable heap overflows in embedded xpdf copy Bug marked as found in version 2.0.2-30. > found 342292 2.0.2-31 Bug#342292: tetex-bin: Multiple exploitable heap overflows in embedded xpdf copy Bug

Bug#342292: tetex-bin: Multiple exploitable heap overflows in embedded xpdf copy

2005-12-07 Thread Frank Küster
found 342292 2.0.2-30 found 342292 2.0.2-31 found 342292 1.0.7+20011202-7.3 thanks The upstream patch applies cleanly to xpdf/Stream.{cc,h} in sarge, but JPXStream.cc does not exist. But the functions might still be defined elsewhere. The patch does not apply cleanly, except for Stream.h, in woo

Bug#342332: /usr/lib/stardata-common/spacechart: bashisms in script

2005-12-07 Thread Francisco García
Hi Michal Politowski, Thank you for file this bug. I will fix it in a few hours. Regards, Francisco García <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> El mié, 07-12-2005 a las 09:57 +0100, Michal Politowski escribió: > Package: spacechart > Version: 0.9.5-10 > Severity: serious > File: /usr/lib/stardata-common/spacec

Processed: Re: Processed: merge

2005-12-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > package xpdf-reader Ignoring bugs not assigned to: xpdf-reader > close 342337 3.01-3 Bug#342337: xpdf: Security hole CAN-2005-3193 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug marked as fixed in version 3.01-3, send any

Bug#342331: /usr/lib/stardata-common/starplot: bashisms in script

2005-12-07 Thread Francisco García
Hi Michal Politowski, Thank you for file this bug. I will fix it in a few hours. Regards, Francisco García <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> El mié, 07-12-2005 a las 09:56 +0100, Michal Politowski escribió: > Package: starplot > Version: 0.95.3-1 > Severity: serious > File: /usr/lib/stardata-common/starplot

Bug#337060: thy: tmp workaround - downgrading gnutls11 to 1.0.16-13.1 works

2005-12-07 Thread Vassilii Khachaturov
Package: thy Version: 0.9.4-1 Followup-For: Bug #337060 Had been bitten by this bug, too. Downgrading gnutls11 back and forbidding the buggy version in aptitude to prevent the same in the future did the trick: --\ libgnutls11 (>= 1.0.16) pF1.0.16-14 i 1.0.16-13.1

Bug#340279: marked as done (fmtutil-sys fails with aleph+omega (on hppa))

2005-12-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 07 Dec 2005 14:03:55 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#340279: Build problems on sarti has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

Bug#342337: xpdf: Security hole CAN-2005-3193

2005-12-07 Thread Hamish Moffatt
On Wed, Dec 07, 2005 at 02:00:55PM +0100, Jan Niehusmann wrote: > On Wed, Dec 07, 2005 at 11:42:08PM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote: > > merge 342281 342337 > Oops - I'm sorry, I missed that report. That's ok, thanks for helping. > > The fixed version is an update to 3.01, not 3.00. > I know, but th

Bug#342337: xpdf: Security hole CAN-2005-3193

2005-12-07 Thread Jan Niehusmann
On Wed, Dec 07, 2005 at 11:42:08PM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote: > merge 342281 342337 Oops - I'm sorry, I missed that report. > The fixed version is an update to 3.01, not 3.00. I know, but the patch applies to 3.00 without much trouble. > #342281 is already fixed in unstable. sarge and woody f

Bug#342337: xpdf: Security hole CAN-2005-3193

2005-12-07 Thread Hamish Moffatt
merge 342281 342337 thanks On Wed, Dec 07, 2005 at 10:30:15AM +0100, Jan Niehusmann wrote: > Package: xpdf-reader > Version: 3.00-13 > Severity: grave > Tags: security patch > Justification: user security hole > > CAN-2005-3193 lists a security hole of xpdf. A fix is available at > http://www.fo

Processed: Re: library package needs to be renamed (libstdc++ allocator change)

2005-12-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 339278 patch Bug#339278: library package needs to be renamed (libstdc++ allocator change) There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administr

Bug#339278: library package needs to be renamed (libstdc++ allocator change)

2005-12-07 Thread Steve Langasek
tags 339278 patch thanks Hi Michael, I've prepared an NMU to fix this bug in wftk. The patch for the NMU is attached, and I'll be uploading the package shortly to the NEW queue. If you disagree with any of the changes made, please make a maintainer upload in its place. Cheers, -- Steve Langas

Bug#325689: xsetbg keeps opening X clients without closing the old

2005-12-07 Thread Neil McGovern
On Wed, Dec 07, 2005 at 02:35:03AM +, James Troup wrote: > Neil McGovern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I'm tagging this bug as security and upping the severity. > > > > Justification: > > A small script can be used to affect the availability of the parent > > xserver if xloadimage is inst

Processed: Re: Bug#341444: quagga (0.98-3-7) ospfd segfault on interface with vlans

2005-12-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 341444 + upstream Bug#341444: quagga (0.98-3-7) ospfd segfault on interface with vlans There were no tags set. Tags added: upstream > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administr

Bug#341444: quagga (0.98-3-7) ospfd segfault on interface with vlans

2005-12-07 Thread Christian Hammers
tags 341444 + upstream thanks Hello I read your mail [quagga-users 6097]. Please write to this bug report if the bug has been fixed in 0.99 after testing the version for some days. Maybe I can put 0.99 into Stable at the next update then. Please also report if you are using BGPd or other daemons

Bug#342303: marked as done (postgresql-common 24: Causes complete logrotate failure)

2005-12-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 7 Dec 2005 11:35:55 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#342303: postgresql-common 24: Causes complete logrotate failure has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If th

Processed: tagging 335881, tagging 338233

2005-12-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.9 > tags 335881 pending Bug#335881: numerix: FTBFS: Segfaults in tests Tags were: patch Tags added: pending > tags 338233 pending Bug#338233: libnumerix-ocaml-dev: Missing libnumerix-ocam

Processed: IPv6 problem

2005-12-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > forwarded 334304 bug-cfengine@gnu.org Bug#334304: cfengine2: buffer overflow somewhere with rebuild against libssl0.9.8 Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you

Bug#341705: more information?

2005-12-07 Thread Christian Hammers
Hello Sean On 2005-12-06 sean finney wrote: > as steve suggested, i've given them a 5.0.16-0+etch1 version so they > will immediately upgrade to the versions currently in sid. they > are based off of what's in svn as 5.0.16-2 but not yet released (which > is just the initial upstream release + a

Processed: block 339177 with 339233

2005-12-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.9 > block 339177 with 339233 Bug#339177: library package needs to be renamed (libstdc++ allocator change) Was not blocked by any bugs. Blocking bugs added: 339233 > End of message, stoppi

Processed: Re: Bug#308755 acknowledged by developer (Bug#308755: fixed in webmagick 2.02-8)

2005-12-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reopen 308755 Bug#308755: Build-Depends on dropped perl-transitional package Bug reopened, originator not changed. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, D

Bug#308755: acknowledged by developer (Bug#308755: fixed in webmagick 2.02-8)

2005-12-07 Thread Jeroen van Wolffelaar
reopen 308755 thanks On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 09:03:05PM -0800, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: >* closes by maintainer. closes: #308755 Huh? This is from the changelog, which is supposed to list the changes in the package. Based on this entry, I have no idea what the resolution of the bug

Bug#340279: Build problems on sarti

2005-12-07 Thread Christian Hammers
On 2005-12-05 Frank Küster wrote: > it seems as if the problems that caused #340279 were either only > intermittent, or have been solved meanwhile: Both planner and > mysql-dfsg-5.0 have been built again in the last couple of days, and in > both cases tetex-bin could be installed fine (although my

Bug#342244: marked as done (mysql-dfsg-5.0: FTBFS on hppa)

2005-12-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 7 Dec 2005 11:01:31 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#342244: mysql-dfsg-5.0: FTBFS on hppa has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is no

Bug#322352: package not available on sarge (?)

2005-12-07 Thread Moritz Bunkus
Hey, I've just stumbled across this issue on my sarge system, and it seems that for me the pdns...sarge2 packages are not available (of course I've apt-get update'd before writing this): 0 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/var/lib/apt/lists$ apt-cache show pdns | grep Version Version: 2.9.17-13sarge1 Version: 2

Bug#338978: marked as done (python2.3-pylint: Depends on unavailable package python2.3-logilab-astng)

2005-12-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 7 Dec 2005 10:34:52 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line closing bug report has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility t

Processed: Re: Bug#342305: eclipse: today installation erase all data in /usr/local/lib

2005-12-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > clone 342305 -1 Bug#342305: eclipse: today installation erase all data in /usr/local/lib Bug 342305 cloned as bug 342338. > reassign -1 eclipse-rcp 3.1.1-6 Bug#342338: eclipse: today installation erase all data in /usr/local/lib Bug reassigned from pac

Bug#342337: xpdf: Security hole CAN-2005-3193

2005-12-07 Thread Jan Niehusmann
Package: xpdf-reader Version: 3.00-13 Severity: grave Tags: security patch Justification: user security hole CAN-2005-3193 lists a security hole of xpdf. A fix is available at http://www.foolabs.com/xpdf/download.html (the patch seems to be suitable for a security update - only overflow protectio

  1   2   >