Your message dated Wed, 07 Dec 2005 17:29:12 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#332562: marked as done (TeTeX causes FTBFS on
debian-reference)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Oct 2005 18:23:55 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Oct 21 11:23:55 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.194]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1ET1YZ-00059s-00; Fri, 21 Oct 2005 11:23:55 -0700
Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id x3so430107nzd
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 21 Oct 2005 11:23:54 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
s=beta; d=gmail.com;
h=received:message-id:disposition-notification-to:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
b=K6Oj0+ov7BJDZWrR5HmtaUtGxW41cAXYscaJVZ/TGKiRThHKZwNpL+X3ZQ4z8PZOKzPuyJ/uHM1x1DZVPrTDRKHEdr2KX6NsirvT/Xrn3Z40LO8GbrnuVJHsp0oMNgM5wVuHvtbh/X+dLvdUfRw7MqTWgRabHRxhaSTS6/rE1iU=
Received: by 10.36.220.31 with SMTP id s31mr3104466nzg;
Fri, 21 Oct 2005 11:23:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?10.214.1.201? ( [218.108.31.122])
by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id 38sm6322787nzk.2005.10.21.11.23.51;
Fri, 21 Oct 2005 11:23:54 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Disposition-Notification-To: binghe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2005 02:25:38 +0800
From: binghe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Organization: Zhejiang University
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9a1) Gecko/20051019
SeaMonkey/1.1a
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Configure error when install it from clean
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=GB2312
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
RCVD_IN_SBLXBL,RCVD_IN_SBLXBL_CBL autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: tetex-bin
Version: 3.0-10
When I install tetex-bin_3.0-10 completely from a clean environment (no
/usr/share/texmf, /etc/texmf and /var/lib/texmf),
I met some error at configure script:
Setting up tetex-bin (3.0-10) ...
Creating config file /etc/texmf/fmt.d/01tetex.cnf with new version
rm: cannot remove `/var/lib/texmf/web2c/*fmt': No such file or directory
dpkg: error processing tetex-bin (--configure):
subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1
I think may be you should add a '-f' argument when rmmove sth like
'/var/lib/texmf/web2c/*fmt'.
Thanks.
--
(setq reply-to
(concatenate 'string "Binghe " "<tianchunbinghe" '(#\@) "gmail.com>"))
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 332562-done) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Dec 2005 16:28:44 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Dec 07 08:28:43 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from idmailgate2.unizh.ch ([130.60.127.101])
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1Ek29r-0004Rz-8j; Wed, 07 Dec 2005 08:28:43 -0800
Received: from localhost ([130.60.169.219])
by idmailgate2.unizh.ch (8.13.1/8.13.1/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id
jB7GSeI2006996;
Wed, 7 Dec 2005 17:28:41 +0100
Received: from localhost
([127.0.0.1] helo=localhost.localdomain ident=frank)
by localhost with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1Ek2AL-0000Vz-HL; Wed, 07 Dec 2005 17:29:13 +0100
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#332562: marked as done (TeTeX causes FTBFS on
debian-reference)
X-Attribution: fant
X-Ehrenamt: http://www.langau.de
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (
=?iso-8859-1?q?Frank_K=FCster's_message_of?= "Wed, 07 Dec 2005 16:37:34
+0100")
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: =?iso-8859-1?q?Frank_K=FCster?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2005 17:29:12 +0100
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Frank K=FCster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> reopen 332562
> stop
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Debian Bug Tracking System) wrote:
>
>> Your message dated Wed, 07 Dec 2005 06:32:11 -0800
>> with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> and subject line Bug#335055: fixed in tetex-bin 3.0-11
>> has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
>
> I have no idea why katie closes a bug in debian-reference when I upload
> a new version of tetex-bin, especially given that the bug number 332562
> does not appear in the changes file:
>
>> Closes: 207874 335055 335477 336092 337308 338986 339388 341940 342292
>
> Does anybody have a clue?
Of course - it was merged, and I mixed it up with the other
debian-reference bug.
Regards, Frank
--=20
Frank K=FCster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Z=FCrich
Debian Developer
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
