severity 342305 important
tags 342305 unreproducible moreinfo
thanks
On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 11:38:31PM +0100, Encolpe DEGOUTE wrote:
> Package: eclipse
> Version: 3.1.1-6
> Severity: critical
> Justification: causes serious data loss
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ls -lh /usr/local/lib/
> total 4,0K
> d
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 342305 important
Bug#342305: eclipse: today installation erase all data in /usr/local/lib
Severity set to `important'.
> tags 342305 unreproducible moreinfo
Bug#342305: eclipse: today installation erase all data in /usr/local/lib
There were no
Package: mh-e
Version: 7.85-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Having just upgraded a lot of packages, I now get a
"Lisp error: (void-variable message-mark-insert-begin)"
error when trying to load mh-e from my .emacs file.
The full trace has lots of nasty binary data, but t
Your message dated Tue, 06 Dec 2005 22:17:10 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#341959: fixed in amarok 1.3.7-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
tags 290420 + patch
thanks
pgplHkWxdpP8B.pgp
Description: PGP signature
this patch made rxtx build in my Sid chroot. It might solve 301364 too. I
did not test the produced package.
diff -x Makefile.in -x configure -x config.log -x 'ac*' -ru rxtx-2.1.6/Makefile.am rxtx-2.1.6.new/Makefile.am
--- rxtx-2.1.6/Makefile.am 2002-09-07 22:15:07.0 +
+++ rxtx-2.1.6
Package: oops
Version: 1.5.23.cvs-2.2
Severity: grave
/etc/init.d/oops contains a check for the existence of
/usr/sbin/oopsctl, and does an exit 0 if it's not found.
$ dpkg -S oopsctl
oops: /usr/share/man/man8/oopsctl.8.gz
commenting out the test -f check seems to allow things to load, but I'm
n
Your message dated Tue, 06 Dec 2005 21:47:06 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#287170: fixed in vorbis-tools 1.1.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Package: icon
Version: 9.4.2-2.3
Severity: serious
Justification: violation of policy 4.8
Hi,
Invoking 'fakeroot debian/rules binary' fails to build the package:
bash$ fakeroot debian/rules binary
test -f src/icont/tmem.c -a -f debian/rules
test "`whoami`" = root
test -f src/icont/tmem.
Your message dated Tue, 06 Dec 2005 20:47:11 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#308755: fixed in webmagick 2.02-8
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Tue, 6 Dec 2005 19:52:01 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#342306: pcmanx-gtk2: i386 packages built against GTK+ in
experimental
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
Your message dated Tue, 06 Dec 2005 19:02:13 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#342214: fixed in usrp 0.8-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your re
I've build this package in a Sid chroot and it builds fine. Could the poster
retry the build?
pgpERXUUZKnIG.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Neil McGovern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm tagging this bug as security and upping the severity.
>
> Justification:
> A small script can be used to affect the availability of the parent
> xserver if xloadimage is installed. If the resource limits of the
> xserver are high enough, there is po
manderlbot is not compatible with xmerl 1.0.3, the version that is integrated
in the erlang package starting from version 10.b.0.
It is in need of a patch because there is curently not upgrade available and
the development seem slow or inexistant.
pgp0WmwoUtoX8.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Your message dated Wed, 7 Dec 2005 11:18:48 +1100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Bug#322462: marked as done (CAN-2005-2097:
DoS through PDFs with crafted loca tables)]
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 341082 normal
Bug#341082: ftp connect not possible when root directory size > 4096
Severity set to `normal'.
> severity 341083 grave
Bug#341083: libgphoto2 move scripts to /etc/udev/scripts/ ?
Severity set to `grave'.
> merge 341083 341151 34
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 339268 + fixed
Bug#339268: library package needs to be renamed (libstdc++ allocator change)
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(ad
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 339267 + fixed
Bug#339267: library package needs to be renamed (libstdc++ allocator change)
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(ad
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 339269 + fixed
Bug#339269: library package needs to be renamed (libstdc++ allocator change)
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(ad
Your message dated Tue, 06 Dec 2005 14:59:15 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#339256: fixed in rapidsvn 0.9.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Tue, 06 Dec 2005 14:59:25 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#339176: fixed in bakery2.3 2.3.11-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 335881 patch
Bug#335881: numerix: FTBFS: Segfaults in tests
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bug
tag 335881 patch
thanks
* Michel Quercia:
> Florian Weimer a écrit :
>
>>You must also byte-code the final movl instruction, I'm afraid:
>>
>>
> Sorry. Attached is the new diff file (with respect to the original 0.21
> source).
Thanks a lot. I can confirm that this patch applies to the Debia
Florian Weimer a écrit :
You must also byte-code the final movl instruction, I'm afraid:
Sorry. Attached is the new diff file (with respect to the original 0.21
source).
--
Michel Quercia
23 rue de Montchapet, 21000 Dijon
http://michel.quercia.free.fr (maths)
http://pauillac.inria.fr/~quer
Subject: pcmanx-gtk2: i386 packages built against GTK+ in experimental
Package: pcmanx-gtk2
Version: 0.3.3-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
The arch:i386 packages of pcmanx-gtk2 0.3.3-2 are built against
experimental version of GTK+ and Pango packages, therefore uninstalla
Package: eclipse
Version: 3.1.1-6
Severity: critical
Justification: causes serious data loss
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ls -lh /usr/local/lib/
total 4,0K
drwxrwsr-x 4 root staff 4,0K 2005-12-06 23:30 eclipse
Thanks for all my stuff.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefer
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 342282 libgphoto2-2
Bug#342282: camera access works only when root
Bug reassigned from package `digikam' to `libgphoto2-2'.
> severity 342282 grave
Bug#342282: camera access works only when root
Severity set to `grave'.
> severity 341151 grav
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # found in woody according to iDEFENSE
> found 342281 1.00-3.4
Bug#342281: xpdf-reader: security issues by iDefense
Bug marked as found in version 1.00-3.4.
> # also in unstable
> found 342281 3.01-2
Bug#342281: xpdf-reader: security issues by iDefense
Package: postgresql-common
Version: 24
Severity: serious
First, apologies if this was fixed in something after package version 24; I
didnt see a bug report it about it, and I didnt see anything in the
changelogs (quick glance only)
This would appear to have been introduced by fixing #316100.
You
Package: koffice
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: user security hole
Some heap overflows have been found in xpdf, of which koffice ships
a local copy. It is therefore vulnerable to a subset of the xpdf issues:
CVE-2005-3191:
http://www.idefense.com/application/poi/display?id=342
http
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 342288 security
Bug#342288: libpoppler0c2: source taken from xpdf may introduce heap-overflow
vulnerabilities
There were no tags set.
Tags added: security
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug t
tags 342288 security
thanks
Hi,
I can confirm that poppler is vulnerable to all the latest xpdf vulnerabilities,
please mention the CVE mappings from the iDefense advisories in the changelog
when fixing this.
Cheers,
Moritz
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject o
Package: tetex-bin
Version: 3.0-10.1
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: user security hole
Multiple exploitable security problems have been found in xpdf, which are
all present in tetex-bin's embedded xpdf copy as well:
Multiple Vendor xpdf DCTStream Baseline Heap Overflow Vulnerabilit
* Michel Quercia:
> I don't know how to make a patch. Is this ok ?
It is.
> --- 985,991
> #define BODY(x,y,z) \
> adcl x(%ebx,%ecx,4), %eax; \
> !/* movl y(%esi,%ecx,4), %edx */ .byte 0x8B, 0x54, 0x8E, y; \
> movl %eax, x(%edi,%ecx,4); \
> !/* ad
Package: ocaml-ssl
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source
Hello,
Well in fact, it is mostly a problem of findlib. The package needs to be
rebuild for mips, mipsel, m68k, arm against findlib >1.1-3.
Kind regard
Sylvain Le Gall
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 342287 security
Bug#342287: kpdf: source taken from xpdf may introduce heap-overflow
vulnerabilities
There were no tags set.
Tags added: security
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking sy
tag 342287 security
thanks
Hi,
I can confirm that kpdf is vulnerable to all the latest xpdf vulnerabilities,
please mention the CVE mappings from the iDefense advisories in the changelog
when fixing this.
Cheers,
Moritz
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "u
Package: pdftohtml
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: user security hole
Some security problems have been found in xpdf, of which pdftohtml ships
a local copy. It is therefore vulnerable to a subset of the xpdf issues
(not all of them, as it ships an older copy than current xpdf):
CVE-
tags 342276 security
thanks
Hi,
gpdf is in fact vulnerable to the latest xpdf issues from iDefense.
Cheers,
Moritz
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your message dated Tue, 6 Dec 2005 21:18:31 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line closed with the upload of digikamimageplugins to unstable
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not t
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 342281 security
Bug#342281: xpdf-reader: security issues by iDefense
There were no tags set.
Tags added: security
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(adm
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> clone 342281 -1 -2 -3
Bug#342281: xpdf-reader: security issues by iDefense
Bug 342281 cloned as bugs 342286-342288.
> reassign -1 gpdf
Bug#342286: xpdf-reader: security issues by iDefense
Bug reassigned from package `xpdf-reader' to `gpdf'.
> retitle
clone 342281 -1 -2 -3
reassign -1 gpdf
retitle -1 gpdf: source taken from xpdf may introduce heap-overflow
vulnerabilities
reassign -2 kpdf
retitle -2 kpdf: source taken from xpdf may introduce heap-overflow
vulnerabilities
reassign -3 libpoppler0c2
retitle -3 libpoppler0c2: source taken from xpd
Your message dated Tue, 06 Dec 2005 12:20:37 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#342269: libglibmm-2.4-1c2: cannot install: broken
dependency
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
Your message dated Tue, 06 Dec 2005 12:20:37 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#342269: libglibmm-2.4-1c2: cannot install: broken
dependency
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
Your message dated Tue, 6 Dec 2005 21:28:06 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed in vorbis-tools 1.0.1-1.5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your res
Your message dated Tue, 6 Dec 2005 21:28:06 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed in vorbis-tools 1.0.1-1.5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your res
Your message dated Tue, 6 Dec 2005 21:23:49 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed in vorbis-tools 1.0.1-1.2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your res
Your message dated Tue, 6 Dec 2005 21:23:49 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed in vorbis-tools 1.0.1-1.2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your res
Your message dated Tue, 06 Dec 2005 12:22:42 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line libgnomecanvasmm2.0: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): explicit
specialization of non-template 'Glib::'
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Your message dated Tue, 6 Dec 2005 21:23:49 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed in vorbis-tools 1.0.1-1.2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your res
Your message dated Tue, 6 Dec 2005 21:23:49 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed in vorbis-tools 1.0.1-1.2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your res
Your message dated Tue, 6 Dec 2005 21:23:49 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed in vorbis-tools 1.0.1-1.2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your res
Your message dated Tue, 6 Dec 2005 21:23:49 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed in vorbis-tools 1.0.1-1.2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your res
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 341392 important
Bug#341392: Please remove obsoleted socket-modules-2.6.14-2-386-di
Severity set to `important'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administr
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 341392 ftp.debian.org
Bug#341392: linux-2.6: kernel BUG at mm/slab.c:1807!
Bug reassigned from package `linux-kernel-di-i386-2.6' to `ftp.debian.org'.
> retitle 341392 Please remove obsoleted socket-modules-2.6.14-2-386-di
Bug#341392: linux-2.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 339176 +pending
Bug#339176: library package needs to be renamed (libstdc++ allocator change)
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking sy
On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 10:03:42AM -0800, Daniel Burrows wrote:
> Could you confirm that -5experimental2 fixes this?
It does, thanks for your quick answer and action!
filippo
--
Filippo Giunchedi
PGP key: 0x6B79D401
random quote follows:
At the source of every error which is blamed on the comp
hi steve, olaf,
On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 01:30:23AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Yeah, it simply won't work. You'd need to give this build a distinguishing
> version number that's < the version in unstable; perhaps 5.0.16-0+etch1.
>
> I'd advise against giving it a different upstream version nu
reassign 341392 ftp.debian.org
retitle 341392 Please remove obsoleted socket-modules-2.6.14-2-386-di
thanks
On Tuesday 06 December 2005 06:55, Frans Pop wrote:
> This looks to be a serious bug in kernel-wedge as it seems a module
> from a previous kernel version is included when that module is not
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.9
> severity 342281 grave
Bug#342281: xpdf-reader: security issues by iDefense
Severity set to `grave'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistan
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.9
> # not RC unless it causes a build failure
> severity 342257 important
Bug#342257: centericq - workarounds bugs in curl
Severity set to `important'.
>
End of message, stopping process
On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 07:54:09PM +0100, Frank K?ster wrote:
>
> You don't by chance have a typescript of the upgrade from woody's
> version of tetex (1.0something) to sarge's?
The host was upgraded from woody to sarge three weeks ago, but I have
not recorded the upgrade, sorry.
Greetings
--
Package: xpdf-reader
Version: 3.00-13
Severity: critical
Justification: causes serious data loss
Arbitrary code execution (with privileges as user of package) issues
reported by iDefense:
Multiple Vendor xpdf DCTStream Baseline Heap Overflow Vulnerability
Multiple Vendor xpdf DCTStream Prog
Package: libgphoto2-2
Version: 2.1.6-5.3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
I am using udev unstable, version 0.076-4.
libgphoto2 generates a set of rules for use with udev, namely
/etc/udev/libgphoto2.rules. These in turn call the executable
/etc/hotplug/usb/libgphoto2, wh
Hi there, Myon!
Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> the binNMUs are on their way, only arm and m68k are still missing.
Good! Thanks for your time!
--
.''`. Follow the white Rabbit - Ranty (and Lewis Carroll)
: :' :
`. `' Proudly running unstable Debian GNU/Linux
`-
Le Mardi 6 Décembre 2005 12:14, Romain Beauxis a écrit :
> > And a userspace program MUST NOT include this headers directly.
>
> Hum..
> So what is the correct way of doing things then?
Hi!
I have googled this and found out that it had to be re-implemented in
userland.
I search around f
"Robert Sander" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> snell:~# kpsewhich --expand-var '$WEB2C'
> {/root/texmf,/usr/local/share/texmf,/usr/local/lib/texmf,!!/usr/share/texmf}/web2c
> snell:~# grep WEB2C /etc/texmf/texmf.cnf
> % WEB2C is for Web2C specific files. The current directory may not be
> WEB2C = $
On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 06:38:07PM +0100, Filippo Giunchedi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
was heard to say:
> On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 08:13:27AM -0800, Daniel Burrows wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 11:53:44AM +0100, Filippo Giunchedi <[EMAIL
> > PROTECTED]> was heard to say:
> > > Package: aptitude
> >
Florian Weimer a écrit :
It's a release-critical bug which needs to be fixed. I would like to
use the patch you described above, applied to 0.21. Do you think this
is feasible?
I don't know how to make a patch. Is this ok ?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/src/caml/numerix/numerix-0.21$ diff -b -C 2 ker
On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 07:01:25PM +0100, Frank K?ster wrote:
> kpsewhich --expand-var '$WEB2C'
> grep WEB2C /etc/texmf/texmf.cnf
> grep '^TEXMF =' /etc/texmf/texmf.cnf
snell:~# kpsewhich --expand-var '$WEB2C'
{/root/texmf,/usr/local/share/texmf,/usr/local/lib/texmf,!!/usr/share/texmf}/web2c
snell
Your message dated Tue, 6 Dec 2005 09:52:04 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Fixed in upload of aptitude
0.4.0-5experimental2 to experimental]
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
"Robert Sander" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> snell:~# ls /var/lib/texmf/web2c/updmap*
> /var/lib/texmf/web2c/updmap.cfg
> snell:~# kpsewhich --format='web2c files' updmap.cfg
> snell:~#
This shows that the file exists, but is not found - probably due to some
misconfiguration. What's the output
On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 08:13:27AM -0800, Daniel Burrows wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 11:53:44AM +0100, Filippo Giunchedi <[EMAIL
> PROTECTED]> was heard to say:
> > Package: aptitude
> > Version: 0.4.0-3experimental2
>
> I assume you mean -5experimental1.
indeed, I failed to tell reportbu
Hi Matt,
According to my reading of the doc for mmap, this should work. It does
work on other platforms. It also seg faults instead of returning ((void*)-1).
Now, what? :-(
If you don't want to require that users use a kernel that doesn't
misbehave like this, shouldn't you add an autoconf
Your message dated Tue, 06 Dec 2005 18:29:23 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Closed with upload
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 342218 + fixed-in-experimental
Bug#342218: aptitude: fails to build, tests/Makefile.in is not up to date
Tags were: experimental
Tags added: fixed-in-experimental
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian b
hi -admin and -devel,
executive summary: mysterious and unreproducible ftbfs for
mysql, and perhaps other packages on the hppa architecture. a faulty
buildd (sarti) is suspected, but afaict all requests for information
remain unanswered.
i'm suspecting hardware problems, as for mysql this is n
* Michel Quercia:
> like this ?
>
> --
># corps de boucle à dérouler. taille du code = 24 octets
># entrer avec eax = edx = 1er chiffre de a, CF = 0
> #undef BODY
> #define BODY(x,y,z) \
> adcl
Florian Weimer a écrit :
It's at the end of the URL you quoted, but it's incomplete, and the
general approach is wrong. Now, I would byte-code the affected
instructions in the macro and use it in all macro expansions.
like this ?
On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 05:05:36PM +0100, Frank K?ster wrote:
>
> What was the package that was "not fully installed or removed"? I guess
> it was tetex-extra?
Yes.
> Please send us the output of
>
> ls /var/lib/texmf/web2c/updmap*
> kpsewhich --format='web2c files' updmap.cfg
snell:~# ls /va
On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 11:53:44AM +0100, Filippo Giunchedi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
was heard to say:
> Package: aptitude
> Version: 0.4.0-3experimental2
I assume you mean -5experimental1.
> Severity: serious
> Tags: experimental
> Justification: no longer builds from source
>
> experimental apti
Package: libgtkmm-2.4-1c2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
The libgtkmm-2.4-1c2 package is uninstallable because it needs
libsigc++-2.0-0c2 that has been replaced by libsigc++-2.0-0c2a.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
Package: libglibmm-2.4-1c2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
The libglibmm-2.4-1c2 package cannot be installed because it needs
libsigc++-2.0-0c2 that has been replaced by libsigc++-2.0-0c2a.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstabl
Aidas Kasparas wrote:
tags 341398 + moreinfo unreproducible
thanks
I see you're using non standard kernel. Can you reporoduce the same
problem with standard kernel? I was unable to reproduce with 2.6.14-2-686.
Can you state what kind of ipsec policies you have in place?
Are you using any other
Package: gcc-4.0
Version: n/a
Severity: important
hi,
gcc-4.0 makes boost 1.33.x FTBFS on hppa. this bug is probably the
same of #342245 for gcc-3.4, only that gcc-4.0 _never_ built 1.33.x on
that architecture.
/usr/bin/ld:
bin/boost/libs/serialization/build/libboost_serialization.so/gcc/debug/
"Robert Sander" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: tetex-extra
> Version: 2.0.2c-8
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> Hi!
>
> The latest update is not installable:
>
> snell:~# apt-get install tetex-extra
> Reading Package Lists... Done
> Building Dependency Tree...
sean finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> none of these should endlessly loop. if faulty hardware/disk is
> suspect, the find jobs might be taking an extraordinary amount of
> time as a result... i can see a way to optimise the cleanups on
> the .deps directory (passing -prune to find) but it seem
On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 03:33:52PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
> CRUFT BEGIN
> /usr/bin/fakeroot: line 152: 24322 Trace/breakpoint trap
> FAKEROOTKEY=$FAKEROOTKEY LD_LIBRARY_PATH="$PATHS" LD_PRELOAD="$LIB" "$@"
> Build killed with signal 15 after 150 minutes of inactivity
> **
Package: centericq
Version: 4.21.0-7
Severity: serious
The last upload of centericq works around a bug in curl.
Bastian
--
You're too beautiful to ignore. Too much woman.
-- Kirk to Yeoman Rand, "The Enemy Within", stardate unknown
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 260775 + fixed
Bug#260775: oops.cfg should not be readable worlwide
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed
> tag 307360 + fixed
Bug#307360: oops: Format string vulnerability in database auth handling
(CAN-2005-1121)
Tags were: patch security
Ta
Package: gcc-3.4
Version: 3.4.4-10
Severity: important
hi,
starting with version 3.4.4-10, gcc-3.4 makes boost 1.33.x FTBFS.
/usr/bin/ld:
bin/boost/libs/serialization/build/libboost_serialization.so/gcc/debug/shared-linkable-true/basic_iarchive.o(.gnu.linkonce.t._ZSt24__uninitialized_copy_auxIN
Package: cgoban
Version: 1.9.14-8
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source
cgoban failed to build on a sparc buildd, duplicated on my sparc pbuilder.
make[1]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/cgoban-1.9.14'
cd . && automake-1.9 --gnu
/bin/sh: automake-1.9: command not found
Package: tetex-extra
Version: 2.0.2c-8
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi!
The latest update is not installable:
snell:~# apt-get install tetex-extra
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
The following packages will be upgraded:
tetex-extra
1 up
Package: mysql-dfsg-5.0
Severity: serious
The package has been tried again; this time there was no problem
installing tetex-bin, and all build-deps installed fine. But the build
was stopped due to inactivity:
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=mysql-dfsg-5.0&ver=5.0.16-1&arch=hppa&stamp=113
Your message dated Tue, 6 Dec 2005 15:24:12 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line 0.9.2-1 has been uploaded, closing the bug.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Tue, 6 Dec 2005 14:03:26 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Not installable
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to r
I realize that the subject of this bug report says ia64; but it really hits
all architectures. I appreciate that all those C++ transitions are making
life hard on maintainers - but today kmail came out and that allowed me to do
a major dist-upgrade to my "sid".
The only conflict left was lyx,
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 341398 + moreinfo unreproducible
Bug#341398: racoon stopped working when upgrading from 0.6.2-2 to 0.6.3-1
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo, unreproducible
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
1 - 100 of 136 matches
Mail list logo
