Your message dated Tue, 6 Dec 2005 19:52:01 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#342306: pcmanx-gtk2: i386 packages built against GTK+ in
experimental
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Dec 2005 22:57:15 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 06 14:57:15 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from handler8.mail.rice.edu ([128.42.58.208])
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1EjlkJ-00062t-4H
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 06 Dec 2005 14:57:15 -0800
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by handler8.mail.rice.edu (Postfix) with SMTP id 2BD3D1DB04
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 6 Dec 2005 16:57:14 -0600 (CST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by handler8.mail.rice.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2C841DB03
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 6 Dec 2005 16:57:13 -0600 (CST)
Received: from handler8.mail.rice.edu ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (handler8.mail.rice.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 00786-10 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Tue, 6 Dec 2005 16:57:11 -0600 (CST)
Received: from danube.mems.rice.edu (danube.mems.rice.edu [128.42.57.44])
(using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by handler8.mail.rice.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 885E41DB02
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 6 Dec 2005 16:57:11 -0600 (CST)
Received: from minghua by danube.mems.rice.edu with local (Exim 4.54)
id 1EjlkC-0003tJ-17
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 06 Dec 2005 16:57:08 -0600
Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2005 16:57:07 -0600
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: pcmanx-gtk2: i386 packages built against GTK+ in experimental
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
From: Ming Hua <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavis-20030616-p6 at mail.rice.edu
X-DCC--Metrics: handler8.mail.rice.edu 1066; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Subject: pcmanx-gtk2: i386 packages built against GTK+ in experimental
Package: pcmanx-gtk2
Version: 0.3.3-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
The arch:i386 packages of pcmanx-gtk2 0.3.3-2 are built against
experimental version of GTK+ and Pango packages, therefore uninstallable
in an unstable environment.
Just FYI: Asking on debian-release mailing list for a binary-NMU may be
a better solution than just uploading a new source package.
Thanks,
Ming
2005.12.06
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 342306-done) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Dec 2005 03:52:03 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 06 19:52:03 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from dsl093-039-086.pdx1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([66.93.39.86]
helo=tennyson.dodds.net)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1EjqLb-00037S-2d
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 06 Dec 2005 19:52:03 -0800
Received: by tennyson.dodds.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 745157002; Tue, 6 Dec 2005 19:52:01 -0800 (PST)
Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2005 19:52:01 -0800
From: Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Ming Hua <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#342306: pcmanx-gtk2: i386 packages built against GTK+ in
experimental
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="yrj/dFKFPuw6o+aM"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
--yrj/dFKFPuw6o+aM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 04:57:07PM -0600, Ming Hua wrote:
> Subject: pcmanx-gtk2: i386 packages built against GTK+ in experimental
> Package: pcmanx-gtk2
> Version: 0.3.3-2
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
> The arch:i386 packages of pcmanx-gtk2 0.3.3-2 are built against
> experimental version of GTK+ and Pango packages, therefore uninstallable
> in an unstable environment.
> Just FYI: Asking on debian-release mailing list for a binary-NMU may be
> a better solution than just uploading a new source package.
Queued for binNMU.
Thanks,
--=20
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
--yrj/dFKFPuw6o+aM
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDllxhKN6ufymYLloRAv2BAKCGzD1RoONoc69l8QFvHQNh9odDbgCeKc1U
kpppOaziPsnkrOeVzi0tnzE=
=uixQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--yrj/dFKFPuw6o+aM--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
