Bug#339048: marked as done (tkdesk: directory listing is incorrect)

Your message dated Mon, 14 Nov 2005 23:17:10 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#339048: fixed in tkdesk 2.0-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Processed: libreadline4-dev removed, raising severity

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 326282 serious Bug#326282: please rebuild with libreadline5-dev as build dependency Severity set to `serious'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrat

Bug#339287: binutils: c++filt hangs with gcj

Package: binutils Version: 2.16.1cvs20050902-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Starting with binutils 2.16.1cvs20050902-1 the program c++filt hangs when starting up eclipse when using gcj as Java runtme. Gcj calls c++filt internally when exceptions are thrown to be able to

Processed: tix8.1 proposed for removal, raising the severity of the report

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 335356 serious Bug#335356: please build-depend on tix-dev instead of tix8.1-dev Severity set to `serious'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator,

Bug#339124: FTBFS: Unsatisfiable build-dependency on ocaml-nox-3.08.3

Hello, On Mon, Nov 14, 2005 at 12:59:27PM -0800, Matt Kraai wrote: > Package: ounit > Version: 1.0.2-1 > Severity: serious > Tags: patch > > pbuilder fails to build ounit in an unstable chroot on i386: > > > -> Considering ocaml-nox-3.08.3 > >-> Trying ocaml-nox-3.08.3 > >-> Cannot

Bug#339123: breaks d-i etch beta 1

Quoting Joey Hess ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > Package: base-installer > Version: 2.74 > Severity: serious > > This version of base-config, which drops apt-setup, breaks d-i etch beta Didn't you mean to assign this to base-config ? I didn't reassign as I don't want to break some intent I would not ha

Bug#339136: Changes in stat package output break apt-move

Package: coreutils Version: 5.93-2 Severity: critical Justification: renders apt-move unusable Hello, in the past 'stat -L -c "%s" / /' produced 4096 4096 while now (since 5.93 update) it produces 40964096 without any explanation why this happened. This breaks at least apt-move and some p

Bug#339128: marked as done (nmap: Fails to install)

Your message dated Mon, 14 Nov 2005 20:44:57 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#339128: nmap: Fails to install has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#339085: marked as done (coreutils: tail and sort does not recognize the option +n)

Your message dated Mon, 14 Nov 2005 19:02:06 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#339085: fixed in coreutils 5.93-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#298709: chrony: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): array type has incomplete element type

The patch did not apply cleanly but I was able to fix it up. Chrony 1.21 is running now on this box. I'll upload in a few days after I test it and fix a few things. -- John Hasler [EMAIL PROTECTED] Elmwood, WI USA -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe".

Bug#339128: nmap: Fails to install

Package: nmap Version: nmap_3.93-1.0.1_i386.deb Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Here is what I get: apt-get install nmap Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done The following NEW packages will be installed: nmap 0 upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to rem

Bug#339056: tktable-dev: Library package fails to include shlibs file

severity 339056 serious reassign 339056 tktable thanks On Mon, Nov 14, 2005 at 02:27:44PM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote: > Package: tktable-dev > Version: 2.9-1 > Severity: grave > Justification: 8.6: when a package is built which contains any shared > libraries, it must provide a `shlibs' file for

Processed: Re: Bug#339056: tktable-dev: Library package fails to include shlibs file

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 339056 serious Bug#339056: tktable-dev: Library package fails to include shlibs file Severity set to `serious'. > reassign 339056 tktable Bug#339056: tktable-dev: Library package fails to include shlibs file Bug reassigned from package `tktabl

Bug#315539: marked as done (crashing on startup on amd64 (x86_64))

Your message dated Mon, 14 Nov 2005 17:47:05 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#315539: fixed in gphpedit 0.9.80-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#339125: FTBFS: Unsatisfiable build-dependency on ocaml-nox-3.08.3

Package: pagodacf Version: 0.7-1 Severity: serious pbuilder fails to build pagodacf in an unstable chroot on i386: > -> Considering ocaml-nox-3.08.3 >-> Trying ocaml-nox-3.08.3 >-> Cannot install ocaml-nox-3.08.3; apt errors follow: > Reading package lists... > Building dependency t

Bug#339124: FTBFS: Unsatisfiable build-dependency on ocaml-nox-3.08.3

Package: ounit Version: 1.0.2-1 Severity: serious Tags: patch pbuilder fails to build ounit in an unstable chroot on i386: > -> Considering ocaml-nox-3.08.3 >-> Trying ocaml-nox-3.08.3 >-> Cannot install ocaml-nox-3.08.3; apt errors follow: > Reading package lists... > Building depe

Bug#339123: breaks d-i etch beta 1

Package: base-installer Version: 2.74 Severity: serious This version of base-config, which drops apt-setup, breaks d-i etch beta 1 netboot, floppy+net, and businesscard installs, by not finishing the install with a configured apt. It should be kept out of testing until the benefit of adding it to

Processed: tagging 339120

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.7 > tags 339120 + experimental Bug#339120: cupsys_1.1.99.b1.r4748-4(sparc/experimental): FTBFS: ld failed There were no tags set. Tags added: experimental > End of message, stopping proce

Bug#338934: parrot - FTBFS on s390: Segmentation fault

Hello, I'm aware of the unportability of parrot and working on it. Unfortunately I don't have a s390 machine where I can log into currently. Could you please provide a backtrace of this segfault? TIA, Flo -- BOFH excuse #394: Jupiter is aligned with Mars. signature.asc Description: Digital s

Bug#332607: Date and the PHP License

On Wed, 9 Nov 2005 12:34:18 -0500 Charles Fry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Are you able to bring this issue before the Pear group, or would > > > it make sense for me to send another mass mailing list email? > > > > Mass mailing does not help :=) > > But it was my best attempt to get the is

Bug#339120: cupsys_1.1.99.b1.r4748-4(sparc/experimental): FTBFS: ld failed

Package: cupsys Version: 1.1.99.b1.r4748-4 Severity: serious Hi, your package failed to build in the sparc buildd for experimental. | Automatic build of cupsys_1.1.99.b1.r4748-4 on odin by sbuild/sparc 69 | Build started at 20051114-0727

Bug#339119: iproute_20051007-1(sparc/experimental): FTBFS

Package: iproute Version: 20051007-1 Severity: serious Hi, You seem to miss a build-dependency on flex. | Automatic build of iproute_20051007-1 on odin by sbuild/sparc 69 | Build started at 20051114-0819 | ** | Checking

Bug#339116: slcfitsio: FTBFS: slsh: command not found

Package: slcfitsio Version: 0.3.2b-2 Severity: serious Justification: Fails to build from source >From my build log: On Tue, Nov 15, 2005 at 12:54:34AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Automatic build of slcfitsio_0.3.2b-2 on hertz by sbuild/kfreebsd-i386 1.170.5 > Build started at 20051115-0054

Processed: let's try again

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 339105 zlib Bug#339105: needs to Replace: ia32-libs Warning: Unknown package 'lib32z1' Bug reassigned from package `lib32z1' to `zlib'. > -- Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system admin

Bug#338046: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: Removal of initex?]

Hi, Initex command symlink is removed from tetex-3.0, since it was apparently a cause of lot of confusion. Especially since tetex-3.0 switched (again) to pdfetex for generating latex formats. Thanks Julian for the info regards, junichi At Mon, 14 Nov 2005 19:11:14 +, Julian Gil

Bug#339099: marked as done (pygmy: Fails to run: No module named gobject)

Your message dated Mon, 14 Nov 2005 14:47:10 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#339099: fixed in pygmy 0.45+svn77-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#338311: marked as done (pdsh - FTBFS: not available build dependency)

Your message dated Mon, 14 Nov 2005 16:56:45 -0600 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#338311: pdsh - FTBFS: not available build dependency has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not t

Bug#339095: Can't reproduce this bug as described

Hi, I'm writing to you about the bug you reported to Debian about Mailman. (http://bugs.debian.org/339095) I can't reproduce the bug as you describe it, at least the DOS part. In my testing, messages with attachments with an invalid filename: - _do_ get distributed - do _not_ get archived - g

Bug#339105: needs to Replace: ia32-libs

Package: lib32z1 Version: 1:1.2.3-6 Severity: serious dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/lib32z1_1%3a1.2.3-6_amd64.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite `/emul/ia32-linux/usr/lib/libz.so.1', which is also in package ia32-libs lib32z1 should Replace: ia32-libs. -- System Information:

Bug#339103: rcalc: FTBFS: error: XML::Parser perl module is required for intltool

Package: rcalc Version: 0.5.0-1 Severity: serious Justification: Fails to build from source >From my build log: > Automatic build of rcalc_0.5.0-1 on hertz by sbuild/kfreebsd-i386 1.170.5 > Build started at 2005

Processed: Re: Bug#338942: FTBFS: missing libz dependency

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 338942 libssl-dev Bug#338942: FTBFS: missing libz dependency Bug reassigned from package `hula' to `libssl-dev'. > merge 337873 338313 Bug#337873: hula - FTBFS: missing build dependency Bug#338313: zlib wanted when building against openssl Mer

Bug#338942: FTBFS: missing libz dependency

reassign 338942 libssl-dev merge 337873 338313 thanks Falk Hueffner wrote: Package: hula Severity: serious Justification: no longer builds from source hula 0.1.0+svn379-2.1 fails to build on all autobuilders: This is not a Hula bug and should be resolved when a new openssl hits the archiv

Bug#339099: pygmy: Fails to run: No module named gobject

Package: pygmy Version: 0.45+svn77-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable I get this when trying to run pygmy: [ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ][ ~ ]$ pygmy Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/pygmy", line 31, in ? from pygmylib import pygmy File "/usr/lib/python2.3/

Bug#326305: marked as done (please rebuild with libreadline5-dev as build dependency)

Your message dated Mon, 14 Nov 2005 14:02:53 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#326305: fixed in rcalc 0.5.0-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#326294: marked as done (please rebuild with libreadline5-dev as build dependency)

Your message dated Mon, 14 Nov 2005 14:03:07 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#326294: fixed in tclreadline 1.2.0-7 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is no

Processed: Can't reproduce this bug as described

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 327732 normal Bug#327732: Messages with invalid filenames don't get archived Severity set to `normal'. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administra

Processed: Can't reproduce this bug as described

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 327732 -security Bug#327732: Dos attack to a list in mailman using sarge due to impropper handling of exception of utf8 Tags were: security pending Tags removed: security > clone 327732 -1 Bug#327732: Dos attack to a list in mailman using sarge d

Bug#336775: marked as done (read-edid does not provide any binary)

On Mon, Nov 14, 2005 at 12:33:25PM -0800, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > You got the wrong option. It's -L, not -S : > # dpkg -L read-edid > /. > /usr > /usr/bin > /usr/bin/get-edid > /usr/bin/parse-edid > /usr/share > [...] Aha. I overlooked that. Thanks for catching it, Stefan! -- G. Br

Bug#276993: [patch] user-mode-linux support for 2.4.27-1um and bug fixes

Package: kernel-patch-uml Version: 2.4.26-3um Severity: wishlist Tags: patch Hi Matt, I have worked to include support for 2.4.27 kernel version in user-mode-linux and kernel-patch-uml in order to fix the bug [0]. I made the package available in the following repository (or throught the attached p

Bug#339079: CVE-2005-334[78]: Two vulnerabilities in phpsysinfo

Hello, thanbks for the info. A new package is in preparation and will be uploaded ASAP. Best regards Frederik Schüler -- Lust, ein paar Euro nebenbei zu verdienen? Ohne Kosten, ohne Risiko! Satte Provisionen für GMX Partner: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/partner -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAI

Bug#339085: coreutils: tail and sort does not recognize the option +n

Package: coreutils Version: 5.93-2 Severity: critical Justification: breaks the whole system -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: L

Bug#339082: kernel-patch-openswan: ISAKMP implementation problems / DoS

/niscc/docs/br-20051114-01013.html for more information from NISCC and http://www.openswan.org/niscc2/ for the openswan specific information. The problems have been addressed in 2.4.2. Cheers, Moritz -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy

Bug#336775: read-edid does not provide any binary

You got the wrong option. It's -L, not -S : # dpkg -L read-edid /. /usr /usr/bin /usr/bin/get-edid /usr/bin/parse-edid /usr/share [...] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#339079: CVE-2005-334[78]: Two vulnerabilities in phpsysinfo

Package: phpsysinfo Severity: grave Tags: security Justification: user security hole Two security problems have been found in phpsysinfo. Please see http://www.hardened-php.net/advisory_212005.81.html for more information. 2.4.1 fixes these issues. MITRE has assigned the identifiers CVE-2005-3347

Bug#323027: IMPORTANT: fetchmail regression in 6.2.5-12sarge1

Hi, * Loic Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-11-14 20:56]: > While preparing a fix for CVE-2005-3088 (#336096), the Debian bugs > #323027 and #327893 were brought to my attention. It seems to me other > quality fixes were included in the 6.2.5-12sarge1 version, basically > including parts of th

Bug#336775: marked as done (read-edid does not provide any binary)

Your message dated Mon, 14 Nov 2005 21:09:36 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line read-edid does not provide any binary has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#339077: rar: Two security problems fixed in 3.51

Package: rar Severity: grave Tags: security Justification: user security hole RAR 3.51 fixes two unspecified security problems: | fixed two vulnerabilities, which could be exploited with | specially crafted ACE and UUE/XXE archives; Due to the non-free nature of rar I'm not sure whether rar 3.30

Bug#339074: linux-ftpd-ssl: Remotely exploitable buffer overflow

Package: linux-ftpd-ssl Severity: grave Tags: security Justification: user security hole A remotely exploitable buffer overflow has been found in linux-ftpd-ssl. Please see http://seclists.org/lists/fulldisclosure/2005/Nov/0140.html for a PoC exploit. A proposed patch is available at http://secli

Bug#326319: marked as done (please rebuild with libreadline5-dev as build dependency)

Your message dated Mon, 14 Nov 2005 11:47:10 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#326319: fixed in mutella 0.4.5-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#339061: FTBFS (alpha): test suite fails: ERROR CODE 0x8b for test/drt1

Package: felix Severity: serious Justification: no longer builds from source felix fails to build on Alpha and IA64. This is the Alpha log: [...] RUNNING TESTS TRANSLATING FELIX TEST CODE TO C++ .. REGRESSION TESTS and TUTORIAL EXAMPLES PATH=bin:"$PATH" LD_LIBRARY_PATH=rtl:"$LD_LIBRARY_PATH" bi

Bug#339060: abntex: FTBFS: \pdfinfo used while \pdfoutput

Package: abntex Version: 0.8.2-2 Severity: serious Hi, building the package abntex in a clean sid build environment (with pbuilder) on i386 results in: = [...] (/usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/graphics/keyval.sty) (/usr/share/tex

Bug#322172: marked as done (Fails to install )

Your message dated Mon, 14 Nov 2005 20:21:01 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line bug cleaning has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reo

Bug#339056: tktable-dev: Library package fails to include shlibs file

Package: tktable-dev Version: 2.9-1 Severity: grave Justification: 8.6: when a package is built which contains any shared libraries, it must provide a `shlibs' file for other packages to use The package doesn't include a .shlibs file. There is some disagreement about whether this shared library

Bug#338046: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: Removal of initex?]

This is what Thomas said about initex as a symlink. So this just about does it. Julian - Forwarded message from Thomas Esser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2005 19:44:57 +0100 From: Thomas Esser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: Removal of initex? To: Julian Gilbey <[EMAIL PR

Bug#329358: [bug #14619] find -perm +... broken in 4.2.25

Follow-up Comment #14, bug #14619 (project findutils): Jay wrote in comment#13 > Andreas, did you intend both patch files to be applied, or > just one of them? Just the newer one (find.diff), it is a superset of the first one (perm.diff). cu andreas _

Bug#339048: tkdesk: directory listing is incorrect

Package: tkdesk Version: 2.0-4 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable When upgrading from 2.0-2 to 2.0-4, the directory/files list becomes unusable. For example: 2.0-2 partial directory listing is correct and shows: lost+found media mnt old opt ... 2.0-4 partial directory listin

Processed: bug cleaning

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 322172 cm-super Bug#322172: Fails to install Bug reassigned from package `pts-tetex-cm-super' to `cm-super'. > reassign 326934 cm-super Bug#326934: Error message during install Bug reassigned from package `pts-tetex-cm-super' to `cm-super'. >

Processed: Fixed in NMU of pal 0.3.5-1pre1.1

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 326311 + fixed Bug#326311: please rebuild with libreadline5-dev as build dependency There were no tags set. Tags added: fixed > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (adm

Processed: Fixed in NMU of blender 2.37a-1.1

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 333958 + fixed Bug#333958: blender - build puts files outside of the build directory Tags were: patch Tags added: fixed > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administr

Bug#334038: marked as done (qdbm_1.8.33-1(hppa/unstable): FTBFS: gcc-4.0 workaround needed)

Your message dated Mon, 14 Nov 2005 09:02:20 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#334038: fixed in qdbm 1.8.33-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Processed: Re: Bug#339034: tcsh: Unknown colorls variable `su'

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 339034 normal Bug#339034: tcsh: Unknown colorls variable `su' Severity set to `normal'. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bug

Bug#338932: marked as done (postgresql-ocaml - FTBFS: Fatal error: the file install is not a bytecode executable file)

Your message dated Mon, 14 Nov 2005 08:32:09 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#338935: fixed in findlib 1.1-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#338935: marked as done (ocamlfind shouldn't be stripped on non-native archs)

Your message dated Mon, 14 Nov 2005 08:32:09 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#338935: fixed in findlib 1.1-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#338935: marked as done (ocamlfind shouldn't be stripped on non-native archs)

Your message dated Mon, 14 Nov 2005 08:32:09 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#338932: fixed in findlib 1.1-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#338932: marked as done (postgresql-ocaml - FTBFS: Fatal error: the file install is not a bytecode executable file)

Your message dated Mon, 14 Nov 2005 08:32:09 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#338932: fixed in findlib 1.1-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#339034: tcsh: Unknown colorls variable `su'

Package: tcsh Version: 6.14.00-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable I'm using slickedit that uses tcsh, but after a debian update I can't compile using slickedit. Slickedit uses tcsh and tcsh gives me this error: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ tcsh Unknown colorls variable `su'. --

Processed: Re: Bug#338932: postgresql-ocaml - FTBFS: Fatal error: the file install is not a bytecode executable file

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 338932 ocaml-findlib Bug#338932: postgresql-ocaml - FTBFS: Fatal error: the file install is not a bytecode executable file Bug reassigned from package `postgresql-ocaml' to `ocaml-findlib'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact m

Processed: merging 338932 338935

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.8 > merge 338932 338935 Bug#338932: postgresql-ocaml - FTBFS: Fatal error: the file install is not a bytecode executable file Bug#338935: ocamlfind shouldn't be stripped on non-native arc

Bug#338932: postgresql-ocaml - FTBFS: Fatal error: the file install is not a bytecode executable file

reassign 338932 ocaml-findlib thanks The bug is related to ocaml-findlib and will be fixed with its forthcoming upload. -- Stefano Zacchiroli -*- Computer Science PhD student @ Uny Bologna, Italy [EMAIL PROTECTED],debian.org,bononia.it} -%- http://www.bononia.it/zack/ If there's any real truth i

Bug#326364: marked as done (please rebuild with libreadline5-dev as build dependency)

Your message dated Mon, 14 Nov 2005 07:47:05 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#326364: fixed in netkit-ftp 0.17-14 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#338935: ocaml-ssl - FTBFS: Fatal error: the file install is not a bytecode executable file

On Mon, Nov 14, 2005 at 04:23:56PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > this problem was introduced when findlib switched to using cdbs, and the > "if [ -x /usr/bin/ocamlopt ]; then dh_strip; else true; fi" line was > removed. I think the following patch should fix this issue: Gotcha!, many thanks for y

Bug#339028: chicken-setup tries to load "libchicken.so" (dependency problem)

Package: chicken Version: 1.63-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable chicken-setup tries to load "libchicken.so" (as opposed to "libchicken.so.0". This file is only available if "chicken-dev" is installed. Either "chicken-setup" is moved into "chicken-dev", or the incorrect lo

Processed: Re: Bug#338935: ocaml-ssl - FTBFS: Fatal error: the file install is not a bytecode executable file

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 338935 + patch Bug#338935: ocaml-ssl - FTBFS: Fatal error: the file install is not a bytecode executable file There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > found 338935 1.1-3 Bug#338935: ocaml-ssl - FTBFS: Fatal error: the file install is not a byt

Bug#338935: Processed: Re: Bug#338935: ocaml-ssl - FTBFS: Fatal error: the file install is not a bytecode executable file

On Mon, Nov 14, 2005 at 07:03:42AM -0800, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > Bug#338935: ocaml-ssl - FTBFS: Fatal error: the file install is not a > bytecode executable file I'm aware of the problem, I'm waiting for an s390 admin to install findlib build dependencies to examine the problem ...

Bug#338935: ocaml-ssl - FTBFS: Fatal error: the file install is not a bytecode executable file

tags 338935 + patch found 338935 1.1-3 retitle 338935 ocamlfind shouldn't be stripped on non-native archs kthxbye On Mon, Nov 14, 2005 at 16:04:01 +0100, Samuel Mimram wrote: > Right. Apparently the problem is that ocamlfind is stripped on > non-native archs also (and thus there's no bytecode...)

Processed: Re: Bug#338935: ocaml-ssl - FTBFS: Fatal error: the file install is not a bytecode executable file

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 338935 ocaml-findlib Bug#338935: ocaml-ssl - FTBFS: Fatal error: the file install is not a bytecode executable file Bug reassigned from package `ocaml-ssl' to `ocaml-findlib'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need

Bug#338935: ocaml-ssl - FTBFS: Fatal error: the file install is not a bytecode executable file

reassign 338935 ocaml-findlib thanks Bastian Blank wrote: > Package: ocaml-ssl > Version: 0.3.1-2 > Severity: serious > > There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: > > >>Automatic build of ocaml-ssl_0.3.1-2 on debian01 by sbuild/s390 69 > > [...] > >>make[2]: Entering directo

Bug#338046: Debian Bug#338046: whizzytex: einitex unavailable from tetex and no longer functions.

On 13.11.05 Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Hilmar Preusse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, > > I guess a much better idea is to use the interface provide by > > fmtutil if you need additional formats. In the "Debian TeX > > policy" (from tex-common) we mention that. In the Version as of

Bug#338888: marked as done (cl-screen-sbcl: FTBFS: texi2pdf not found)

Your message dated Mon, 14 Nov 2005 06:02:12 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#33: fixed in cl-screen-sbcl 1.0-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is n

Processed: removing libreadline4-dev from the archive, raising severity of bug reports

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 326275 serious Bug#326275: please rebuild with libreadline5-dev as build dependency Severity set to `serious'. > severity 326280 serious Bug#326280: please rebuild with libreadline5-dev as build dependency Severity set to `serious'. > severit

Bug#339007: php4-mapscript: php_mapscript.so is into incorrect directory

Package: php4-mapscript Version: 4.6.1-4 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable I get this error because php_mapscript.so is into /usr/lib/php4/20020429: Warning: dl(): Unable to load dynamic library '/usr/lib/php4/20050606/php_mapscript.so' - /usr/lib/php4/20050606/php_mapscript

Bug#338711: marked as done (Not installable in sid)

Your message dated Mon, 14 Nov 2005 04:47:14 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#338711: fixed in pxlib 0.5.1-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Processed: Re: Bug#337881: udev: Still seeing post-inst errors with 0.074-2 on ppc

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 337881 linux-2.6 Bug#337881: udev post-inst fails Bug reassigned from package `udev' to `linux-2.6'. > severity 337881 grave Bug#337881: udev post-inst fails Severity set to `grave'. > retitle 337881 CONFIG_KOBJECT_UEVENT must always be defin

Bug#337881: udev: Still seeing post-inst errors with 0.074-2 on ppc

On Nov 14, Nathan Robertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Unpacking replacement udev ... > Setting up udev (0.074-2) ... > dpkg: error processing udev (--install): > subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 3 > Errors were encountered while processing: > udev This is totall

Bug#337881: udev: Still seeing post-inst errors with 0.074-2 on ppc

reassign 337881 linux-2.6 severity 337881 grave retitle 337881 CONFIG_KOBJECT_UEVENT must always be defined thanks On Nov 14, Nathan Robertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Unpacking replacement udev ... > Setting up udev (0.074-2) ... > dpkg: error processing udev (--install): > subprocess post-

Bug#338455: marked as done (python2.3-kde3: uninstallable : dependency problem)

Your message dated Mon, 14 Nov 2005 13:27:41 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line python2.3-kde3: uninstallable : dependency problem has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the cas

Bug#327949: marked as done (python-kde3: uninstallable; needs rebuild for the Qt/KDE transition)

Your message dated Mon, 14 Nov 2005 13:25:44 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line python-kde3: uninstallable; needs rebuild for the Qt/KDE transition has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If t

Bug#327314: marked as done (FTBFS: Unsatisfiable build-dependency on sip4 (<< 4.3))

Your message dated Mon, 14 Nov 2005 13:30:16 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line FTBFS: Unsatisfiable build-dependency on sip4 (<< 4.3) has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the

Bug#304407: marked as done (python-kde3: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): invalid cast of an rvalue expression of type 'QValueList

Your message dated Mon, 14 Nov 2005 13:29:01 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line python-kde3: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): invalid cast of an rvalue has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is

Processed: Bump severity, as lots of installations are affected

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 338900 grave Bug#338900: reportbug: smtp connection direct to master.debian.org is fails Severity set to `grave'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administ

Bug#337881: udev: Still seeing post-inst errors with 0.074-2 on ppc

Package: udev Version: 0.074-2 Followup-For: Bug #337881 On installing (updating from 0.071-1), I get the following - my workaround currently is to downgrade to the old package: Preparing to replace udev 0.074-2 (using .../udev_0.074-2_powerpc.deb) ... Unpacking replacement udev ... Setting up

Bug#339000: bashism in /usr/bin/nicec

Package: nice Version: 0.9.10-1 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 10.4 POSIX specifies that trap uses signal names without the SIG prefix. bash accepts both SIGHUP and HUP but nicec claims to be a /bin/sh script so it should use trap "" HUP -- System Information: Shell: /bin/sh linked to /

Bug#338046: Debian Bug#338046: whizzytex: einitex unavailable from tetex and no longer functions.

Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Junichi Uekawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> BTW, how would I find out that /var/lib/texmf/web2c/latex.fmt >> is in fact not generated from tex, but pdfetex? > > You can do that by parsing /var/lib/texmf/web2c/fmtutil.cnf (or rather > `kpsewhich --format

Bug#338993: ia32-libs: conflicts with libg2c0-dev

Package: ia32-libs Version: 1.4 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Hi, Installation of the packages fails due a conflics with libg2c0-dev: (Reading database ... 261195 files and directories currently installed.) Unpacking lib32z1 (from .../lib32z1_1%3a1.2.3-6_amd64.deb) ...

Processed: Re: Bug#338983: horde2: New upstream version with security fix

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 338983 important Bug#338983: horde2: New upstream version with security fix Severity set to `important'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, De

Bug#338587: marked as done (tex-common fails to install)

Your message dated Mon, 14 Nov 2005 10:40:52 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#338587: tex-common fails to install has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#338983: horde2: New upstream version with security fix

severity 338983 important thanks Hello I assume that this applies to the sarge version as well. I'm not sure this should be considered grave as this only can occur when a fatal error occur. This is the actual fix: @@ -234,7 +234,7 @@ $errortext = _("A fatal error has occurred:") . "\

Bug#318850: marked as done ([squishdot] Not working with zope2.7?)

Your message dated Mon, 14 Nov 2005 01:32:11 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#318850: fixed in squishdot 1.5.0-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#338931: marked as done (tess - FTBFS)

Your message dated Mon, 14 Nov 2005 03:02:11 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#338931: fixed in tess 0.1.2.r3-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#338148: ocaml still FTBFS with binutils 2.16.1cvs20051109-1

Hi, I just tried rebuilding ocaml on alpha with the latest binutils package (2.16.1cvs20051109-1), and it still fails with a segmentation fault. Cheers, Julien Cristau -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

  1   2   >