Your message dated Mon, 14 Nov 2005 14:02:53 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#326305: fixed in rcalc 0.5.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Sep 2005 20:40:05 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Sep 02 13:40:05 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13] (root)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EBIKS-0005vZ-00; Fri, 02 Sep 2005 13:40:05 -0700
Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.17.13])
by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA09985
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 2 Sep 2005 22:40:03 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id D91AEFD4A
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 2 Sep 2005 22:40:02 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (bueno [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10224) with ESMTP
id 16449-22 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Fri, 2 Sep 2005 22:40:02 +0200 (MEST) 13910
Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.19.1])
by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 2 Sep 2005 22:40:02 +0200 (MEST)
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.8/Submit) id j82Ke2V7003589
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 2 Sep 2005 22:40:02 +0200 (MEST)
Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2005 22:40:02 +0200 (MEST)
From: Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: please rebuild with libreadline5-dev as build dependency
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at cs.tu-berlin.de
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: rcalc
The package depends/recommends libreadline4. This version
will be removed from the archive in the near future.
Please change your build dependencies to
libreadline5-dev | libreadline-dev
Please raise the severity of this bug report to serious,
if the package cannot be built with libreadline5-dev.
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 326305-close) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Nov 2005 22:12:49 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Nov 14 14:12:49 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1EbmPd-0004ay-0O; Mon, 14 Nov 2005 14:02:53 -0800
From: Sam Hocevar (Debian packages) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#326305: fixed in rcalc 0.5.0-1
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2005 14:02:53 -0800
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Source: rcalc
Source-Version: 0.5.0-1
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
rcalc, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
rcalc_0.5.0-1.diff.gz
to pool/main/r/rcalc/rcalc_0.5.0-1.diff.gz
rcalc_0.5.0-1.dsc
to pool/main/r/rcalc/rcalc_0.5.0-1.dsc
rcalc_0.5.0-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/r/rcalc/rcalc_0.5.0-1_i386.deb
rcalc_0.5.0.orig.tar.gz
to pool/main/r/rcalc/rcalc_0.5.0.orig.tar.gz
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Sam Hocevar (Debian packages) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated rcalc
package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2005 18:58:04 +0100
Source: rcalc
Binary: rcalc
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.5.0-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Sam Hocevar (Debian packages) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Sam Hocevar (Debian packages) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description:
rcalc - graphical symbolic calculator
Closes: 306961 326305
Changes:
rcalc (0.5.0-1) unstable; urgency=low
.
* New upstream release (Closes: #306961).
* debian/control:
+ Set policy to 3.6.2.1.
+ Build-depend on libreadline5-dev (Closes: #326305).
+ Build-depend on libpanel-applet2-dev.
+ Build-depend on pkg-config.
* debian/rules:
+ Use debian/compat instead of DH_COMPAT.
+ Enable the GNOME applet.
Files:
91f3ba9ab4b903ddd1b2c67762ec2c47 694 gnome optional rcalc_0.5.0-1.dsc
24dd38f303259bd92ed452909ad2bfba 352371 gnome optional rcalc_0.5.0.orig.tar.gz
6322e7d5ceb7cbd385c9005a4f9c42a1 3191 gnome optional rcalc_0.5.0-1.diff.gz
93afcfd037cb9189c9b532cde07dcb8e 204546 gnome optional rcalc_0.5.0-1_i386.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDePV8fPP1rylJn2ERAmMXAKCMZr1gzsVMKoDvNODGqm7Kd8+ErwCfUVnW
GuOqvJbHOXcXIQ+hYLOnRtA=
=Ve2x
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
