Your message dated Mon, 14 Nov 2005 10:40:52 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#338587: tex-common fails to install
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Nov 2005 09:20:20 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Nov 11 01:20:20 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from smtp6-g19.free.fr ([212.27.42.36])
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1EaV52-0003ru-Dn
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 11 Nov 2005 01:20:20 -0800
Received: from localhost (unknown [81.56.219.194])
by smtp6-g19.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39C83968D;
Fri, 11 Nov 2005 10:20:19 +0100 (CET)
Received: from valette by localhost with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1EaV50-0004Ia-00; Fri, 11 Nov 2005 10:20:18 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Eric Valette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: tex-common fails to install
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2005 10:20:17 +0100
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Eric Valette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: tex-common
Version: 0.10
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Setting up tex-common (0.10) ...
debconf: Unable to load Debconf::Element::Dialog. Failed because: Can't locate
Debconf/Element/Dialog.pm in @INC (@INC contains: /etc/perl
/usr/local/lib/perl/5.8.7 /usr/local/share/perl/5.8.7 /usr/lib/perl5
/usr/share/perl5 /usr/lib/perl/5.8 /usr/share/perl/5.8 /usr/local/lib/site_perl
.) at (eval 24) line 2, <GEN6> line 6.
BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at (eval 24) line 2, <GEN6> line 6.
Can't locate object method "new" via package "Debconf::Element::Dialog"
(perhaps you forgot to load "Debconf::Element::Dialog"?) at
/usr/share/perl5/Debconf/FrontEnd.pm line 53, <GEN6> line 6.
dpkg: error processing tex-common (--install):
subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 2
Errors were encountered while processing:
tex-common
tri-yann:/home/valette/local/local-src/unicorn/unicorn_pci# dpkg --purge
tex-common
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers testing-proposed-updates
APT policy: (500, 'testing-proposed-updates'), (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.13.4
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) (ignored:
LC_ALL set to [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Versions of packages tex-common depends on:
ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.4.59 Debian configuration management sy
ii ucf 2.003 Update Configuration File: preserv
tex-common recommends no packages.
-- debconf information:
* tex-common/groupname: devsoft
* tex-common/cnf_name:
* tex-common/managedlsr: cache
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 338587-done) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Nov 2005 09:40:46 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Nov 14 01:40:46 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from idmailgate1.unizh.ch ([130.60.127.100])
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1EbapS-0001OV-Ea
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 14 Nov 2005 01:40:46 -0800
Received: from localhost ([130.60.169.210])
by idmailgate1.unizh.ch (8.13.1/8.13.1/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id
jAE9eiGI029515;
Mon, 14 Nov 2005 10:40:44 +0100
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=localhost.localdomain)
by localhost with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1EbapZ-0002AY-B9; Mon, 14 Nov 2005 10:40:53 +0100
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Norbert Preining <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
teTeX maintainers <debian-tetex-maint@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: Bug#338587: tex-common fails to install
X-Attribution: fant
X-Ehrenamt: http://www.langau.de
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Eric Valette's message of "Sun, 13
Nov 2005 23:31:45 +0100")
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: =?iso-8859-1?q?Frank_K=FCster?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2005 10:40:52 +0100
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Eric Valette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Frank K=FCster wrote:
>> - it was a problem with your local debconf installation, and it was in
>> fact fixed by reinstalling it, although you first said it wasn't (how
>> did you check?).=20=20
>
>
> When you do "apt-get install --reinstall dialog debconf" and then
> apt-get -f install, whitout fixing the problem, I think I can say it did
> not change. I also tried to reconfigure debconf with "dpkg-reconfigure
> debconf" to put readline instead of dialog but this did not help either.
Okay, that's clear.
> OK. Do not waste your time any further, I have now a fully functionnal
> system and as you cannot reproduce this bug, I propose to close it. Use
> it as an hint if someone else comes with a similar problem.
I hope we'll remember it when we need it...
Closing,
Frank
--=20
Frank K=FCster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Z=FCrich
Debian Developer
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
