Bug#338978: python2.3-pylint: Depends on unavailable package python2.3-logilab-astng

2005-11-13 Thread Jamie Norrish
Package: python2.3-pylint Version: 0.8.1-1 Severity: grave The new release of python2.3-pylint in unstable added a dependency on python2.3-logilab-astng, but there is no such package in the archive. The same appears true of the 2.2 and 2.4 versions of pylint. Jamie -- Artefact Publishing: http:/

Bug#298709: chrony: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): array type has incomplete element type

2005-11-13 Thread John Hasler
> If there is no progress on this, may it would be better to compile with > gcc-3.4 right now. I'm working on it right now. -- John Hasler [EMAIL PROTECTED] Elmwood, WI USA -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Re: Bug#338868: fuser doesn't work anymore.

2005-11-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 338868 normal Bug#338868: fuser doesn't work anymore. Severity set to `normal'. > tags 338868 moreinfo Bug#338868: fuser doesn't work anymore. There were no tags set. Tags added: moreinfo > thankyou Stopping processing here. Please contact m

Bug#338868: fuser doesn't work anymore.

2005-11-13 Thread Craig Small
severity 338868 normal tags 338868 moreinfo thankyou On Sun, Nov 13, 2005 at 02:22:16PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > It seems that fuser doesn't work anymore. While 21.6-1 returned > all the processes, 21.8-1 doesn't return anything anymore. Could you give me more information about what makes it

Bug#328534: Adaptec 2005S Hangs with current experiemental 2.6.13-686-smp kernel

2005-11-13 Thread wolftales
Jonas Smedegaard wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sun, 13 Nov 2005 12:38:35 -0800 Wolftales <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I had no luck running this with yaird as I showed below. Do I understand correctly that your running kernel is 2.4.27? If so, then you can't i

Bug#335941: marked as done (gconf2-common: fails to purge because of nonexistant directory /etc/gconf/2)

2005-11-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 14 Nov 2005 00:33:10 -0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Fixed in upload of gconf2 2.12.1-1 to experimental has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the cas

Bug#337009: marked as done (quodlibet raises the UnboundLocalError exception on start up)

2005-11-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 13 Nov 2005 17:47:08 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#337009: fixed in quodlibet 0.15-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#328534: Adaptec 2005S Hangs with current experiemental 2.6.13-686-smp kernel

2005-11-13 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sun, 13 Nov 2005 12:38:35 -0800 Wolftales <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I had no luck running this with yaird as I showed below. Do I understand correctly that your running kernel is 2.4.27? If so, then you can't install yaird as it requires sysfs

Bug#338700: marked as done (libcpre3: grep fails on boot when /usr/lib on different partition from /lib)

2005-11-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 14 Nov 2005 11:33:43 +1100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#338700: libcpre3: grep fails on boot when /usr/lib on different partition from /lib has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has b

Processed: severity of 338886 is important

2005-11-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.8 > # DoS bugs are normally sev: important > severity 338886 important Bug#338886: leafnode security bug SA-2005:02 (CVE-2005-1911) Severity set to `important'. > End of message, stoppin

Bug#326252: marked as done (rekall: FTBFS (amd64): cast from 'ELShared*' to 'int' loses precision)

2005-11-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 13 Nov 2005 16:02:11 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#326252: fixed in rekall 2.2.6-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

Bug#338929: marked as done (amule: relocation error)

2005-11-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 14 Nov 2005 00:41:01 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#338929: amule: relocation error has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

Processed: Fixed in upload of gconf2 2.12.1-1 to experimental

2005-11-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 329340 + fixed-in-experimental Bug#329340: gconf2: Local configuration sources do not work anymore There were no tags set. Tags added: fixed-in-experimental > tag 335941 + fixed-in-experimental Bug#335941: gconf2-common: fails to purge because of n

Bug#338932: postgresql-ocaml - FTBFS: Fatal error: the file install is not a bytecode executable file

2005-11-13 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Sun, Nov 13, 2005 at 11:25:18PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote: > > Automatic build of postgresql-ocaml_1.4.6-3 on debian-31 by sbuild/s390 69 > [...] > > Installing library with ocamlfind > > ocamlfind install -ldconf /dev/null -destdir > > /build/buildd/postgresql-ocaml-1.4.6/debian/libpostgresql

Bug#338929: amule: relocation error

2005-11-13 Thread Piotr Zielinski
Adeodato Simó: > > as I suspected, you have a local instalation of wxWidgets, plus it is > incompatible with the wxWidgets in Debian. To be able to use Debian's > prepackaged amule, you'll have to get rid of it; if you installed it > for some other hand-installed program, you probably can

Bug#338929: amule: relocation error

2005-11-13 Thread Adeodato Simó
* Piotr Zielinski [Mon, 14 Nov 2005 00:00:58 +0100]: Hi again, > Wow, *really* fast response. :-) > And yes, of course. Here it is: > [23:48 ~]%ldd /usr/bin/amule > libwx_gtk2u_xrc-2.6.so.0 => > > /usr/local/lib/libwx_gtk2u_xrc-2.6.so.0 (0xb7e98000) > libwx_gtk2u_qa-2.6.so.0 =

Bug#338942: FTBFS: missing libz dependency

2005-11-13 Thread Falk Hueffner
Package: hula Severity: serious Justification: no longer builds from source hula 0.1.0+svn379-2.1 fails to build on all autobuilders: [...] gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../../.. -I../../../include -Wall -g -O2 -Wchar-subscripts -Wmissing-declarations -Wmissing-prototypes -Wnested-externs -Wpo

Bug#338929: amule: relocation error

2005-11-13 Thread Piotr Zielinski
Adeodato Simó: >>Package: amule >>Version: 2.0.3-3 >>Severity: grave >>Justification: renders package unusable > > >>[23:18 ~]%amule > > > I can't reproduce this. Can you send the output of the following > commands?: > > % ldd /usr/bin/amule > % ldd /usr/bin/amule | awk '{print $3}

Bug#338929: amule: relocation error

2005-11-13 Thread Adeodato Simó
* Piotr Zielinski [Sun, 13 Nov 2005 23:20:51 +0100]: > Package: amule > Version: 2.0.3-3 > Severity: grave > Justification: renders package unusable > [23:18 ~]%amule I can't reproduce this. Can you send the output of the following commands?: % ldd /usr/bin/amule % ldd /usr/bin/amul

Bug#338587: tex-common fails to install

2005-11-13 Thread Eric Valette
Frank Küster wrote: > which means that all lines with calls to db_* end with || true except > for db_version and db_go. This seems to indicate to me that *if* we > made an error with debconf, it wouldn't reveal itself as a failing > maintainer script. The full error message is included in the f

Bug#338935: ocaml-ssl - FTBFS: Fatal error: the file install is not a bytecode executable file

2005-11-13 Thread Bastian Blank
ving directory `/build/buildd/ocaml-ssl-0.3.1/src' > make[1]: *** [install] Error 2 > make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/ocaml-ssl-0.3.1' > make: *** [install] Error 2 > ** > Build finished at 20

Bug#338934: parrot - FTBFS: Segmentation fault

2005-11-13 Thread Bastian Blank
rrot-0.3.1' > make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2 > ** > Build finished at 20051113-1928 > FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died] Bastian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#338932: postgresql-ocaml - FTBFS: Fatal error: the file install is not a bytecode executable file

2005-11-13 Thread Bastian Blank
*** [libinstall] Error 2 > make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/postgresql-ocaml-1.4.6/lib' > make: *** [common-install-impl] Error 2 > ** > Build finished at 20051113-0949 > FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage d

Bug#338931: tess - FTBFS

2005-11-13 Thread Bastian Blank
/build/buildd/tess-0.1.2.r2' > make: *** [common-post-build-impl] Error 2 > ** > Build finished at 20051113-1153 > FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died] Bastian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#338929: amule: relocation error

2005-11-13 Thread Piotr Zielinski
Package: amule Version: 2.0.3-3 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable [23:18 ~]%amule amule: Symbol `_ZTV11wxSpinEvent' has different size in shared object, consider re-linking amule: Symbol `_ZTV14wxTextCtrlBase' has different size in shared object, consider re-linking amule

Bug#338930: gambas - FTBFS: creating symbolic link: Permission denied

2005-11-13 Thread Bastian Blank
; > make[2]: *** [install-am] Error 2 > make[2]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/gambas-1.0.12' > make[1]: *** [install-recursive] Error 1 > make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/gambas-1.0.12' > make: *** [install] Error 2 >

Bug#337445: marked as done (pointless: FTBFS with tetex 3.0: \pdfinfo used while \pdfoutput is not set)

2005-11-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 13 Nov 2005 14:02:41 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#337445: fixed in pointless 0.5-8 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#322452: marked as done (python-cherrypy: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'python-dev')

2005-11-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 13 Nov 2005 14:02:43 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#322452: fixed in python-cherrypy 2.0.0f-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Processed: Fixed in NMU of boo 0.7.0.1921-0.1

2005-11-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 329454 + fixed Bug#329454: broken symlinks "/usr/bin/boo*" There were no tags set. Tags added: fixed > tag 331086 + fixed Bug#331086: FTBFS: Syntax errors There were no tags set. Tags added: fixed > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact m

Bug#328534: Adaptec 2005S Hangs with current experiemental 2.6.13-686-smp kernel

2005-11-13 Thread Wolftales
Jurij Smakov wrote: On Sat, 12 Nov 2005, wolftales wrote: End of screen ouput: Begin: Running /scripts/local-top ... Done. ALERT! /dev/sda1 does not exist. Dropping to a shell! Oh, that might be not your controller's bug, but initramfs-tools bug. You can either use yaird to generate your

Bug#338739: RFC: allow usage of mknod in postinst

2005-11-13 Thread Brian M. Carlson
On Sunday 13 November 2005 09:17, Eduard Bloch wrote: > * Marco d'Itri [Sat, Nov 12 2005, 12:42:07PM]: > > Package: sl-modem-source > > Version: 2.9.9d-7 > > Severity: serious > > > > See policy 10.6: packages must use MAKEDEV instead of calling mknod. I must agree with Mr. d'Itri in this case. >

Bug#338920: migrationtools: Insecure handling of temporary files

2005-11-13 Thread Jason Hoover
Package: migrationtools Version: 46-1 Severity: critical Tags: security Justification: root security hole Migrationtools leaves insecure temporary files containing information from /etc/shadow. When it fails to add information, it creates files like nis..ldif which are world readable. This ca

Bug#338420: marked as done (dcgui_0.80-3_m68k: FTBFS: undefined reference to `db_env_create_4002')

2005-11-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 13 Nov 2005 11:47:07 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#338420: fixed in dcgui 0.80-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Processed: your mail

2005-11-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 338886 - confirmed Bug#338886: leafnode security bug SA-2005:02 (CVE-2005-1911) Tags were: confirmed fixed-upstream security upstream Tags removed: confirmed > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. D

Processed: Re: Bug#338911: udev 0.074-2 fails to start with linux 2.6.14

2005-11-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 338911 important Bug#338911: udev 0.074-2 fails to start with linux 2.6.14 Severity set to `important'. > tag 338911 unreproducible moreinfo Bug#338911: udev 0.074-2 fails to start with linux 2.6.14 There were no tags set. Tags added: unreprod

Bug#338911: udev 0.074-2 fails to start with linux 2.6.14

2005-11-13 Thread Marco d'Itri
severity 338911 important tag 338911 unreproducible moreinfo thanks On Nov 13, Uwe Schindler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Since today I have a linux-2.6.12 (with mkinitrd) and linux-2.6.14 > (with yaird) running in parallel on an alpha machine (Alphastation 500/500). Did you build your own kerne

Bug#338911: udev 0.074-2 fails to start with linux 2.6.14

2005-11-13 Thread Uwe Schindler
Package: udev Version: 0.074-2 Severity: grave Since today I have a linux-2.6.12 (with mkinitrd) and linux-2.6.14 (with yaird) running in parallel on an alpha machine (Alphastation 500/500). With udev-0.071-1 the system starts without any problems with both kernels. When then switching to udev-0

Bug#338906: bidwatcher: Bidwatcher doens neither show my current bids, nor am i abble to enter a item number, cause it will tell me, that item number is not correct

2005-11-13 Thread Jens Suelwald
Package: bidwatcher Version: 1.3.17-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (700, 'unstable'), (600, 'testing'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin

Bug#333142: marked as done (libcamel1.2-0: soversion bump with no package name change)

2005-11-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 13 Nov 2005 18:33:52 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Fixed in upload of evolution-data-server 1.4.1.1-1 to experimental has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If th

Processed: Mailman bugs tags galore

2005-11-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 327732 +pending security Bug#327732: Dos attack to a list in mailman using sarge due to impropper handling of exception of utf8 There were no tags set. Tags added: pending, security > tags 326024 +pending Bug#326024: mailman: Unhandled exception

Bug#327732: Mailman bugs tags galore

2005-11-13 Thread Lionel Elie Mamane
tags 327732 +pending security tags 326024 +pending tags 310451 +pending thanks A patch hopefully fixing this bug has been committed to the SVN repository of the package. If it survives some yet-to-be-made testing, it will be part of the next upload. Yours truly, -- Lionel Mamane -- To UNSUBS

Bug#337873: marked as done (hula - FTBFS: missing build dependency)

2005-11-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 13 Nov 2005 09:17:13 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#338313: fixed in openssl 0.9.8a-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#338313: marked as done (zlib wanted when building against openssl)

2005-11-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 13 Nov 2005 09:17:13 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#338313: fixed in openssl 0.9.8a-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#298414: marked as done (smtpfeed: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): invalid storage class for function 'newmx')

2005-11-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 13 Nov 2005 09:17:14 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#298414: fixed in smtpfeed 1.19-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Processed: Fixed in upload of evolution-data-server 1.4.1.1-1 to experimental

2005-11-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 291469 + fixed-in-experimental Bug#291469: libedataserver3: Typo in synopsis: s/Utily/Utility Tags were: fixed Tags added: fixed-in-experimental > tag 305611 + fixed-in-experimental Bug#305611: Subsection is wrong There were no tags set. Tags added

Processed: Fixed in upload of eventlog 0.2.3+20051105 to experimental

2005-11-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 333202 + fixed-in-experimental Bug#333202: binary packages are empty Tags were: patch experimental Tags added: fixed-in-experimental > tag 337654 + fixed-in-experimental Bug#337654: ITP: libevt0 -- Syslog event logger library There were no tags set

Bug#338901: kdenetwork: FTBFS: ambiguous overload for operator+

2005-11-13 Thread Roland Stigge
Package: kdenetwork Version: 4:3.4.2-3 Severity: serious Hi, building the package kdenetwork in a clean sid build environment (with pbuilder) on i386 results in: = [...] /usr/share/qt3/include/private/qucom_p.h:287: warning:

Bug#332563: marked as done (FTBFS: Missing build-dependency on texinfo)

2005-11-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 13 Nov 2005 08:53:51 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#332563: fixed in libtasn1-2 0.2.17-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is no

Bug#337008: marked as done (gtklookat: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'libgcj-dev')

2005-11-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 13 Nov 2005 08:32:05 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#337008: fixed in gtklookat 0.13.0-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#338715: xserver-xorg: file conflict with nvidia-glx

2005-11-13 Thread David Nusinow
On Sat, Nov 12, 2005 at 08:07:12PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Sun, Nov 13, 2005 at 11:03:13AM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote: > > libglx is an xorg module. It is originally provided by the XFree86 DDX. > > Some drivers feel the need to provide an alternate version, and that's > > great. But nvi

Bug#335150: marked as done (xdebconfigurator: incompatible debconf values for xserver-xorg)

2005-11-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 13 Nov 2005 08:17:06 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#335150: fixed in xdebconfigurator 1.19 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#338886: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Bug#338886: leafnode security bug SA-2005:02 (CVE-2005-1911)]

2005-11-13 Thread Mark Brown
The enclosed bug was filed by Leafnode upstream. I believe this patch contains the relevant fix: diff -urN leafnode-1.11.2.rel/artutil.c leafnode-1.11.3.rel/artutil.c --- leafnode-1.11.2.rel/artutil.c 2004-03-16 02:54:43.0 + +++ leafnode-1.11.3.rel/artutil.c 2005-06-08 1

Bug#338899: ghemical: ppc ghemical 1.90-2 segmentaion fault

2005-11-13 Thread Giovanni Ridolfi
Package: ghemical Version: 1.90-2 Severity: grave Ghemical 1.90-2 When I run ghemical from a gnometerm and try to draw a molecule the program seg-faults. This is the output I pasted from the gnometerm: $ ghemical OpenGL extension version - 1.2 WARNING : SetCurrent() called before widget was r

Bug#327315: marked as done (FTBFS: Unable to find scim-make-table)

2005-11-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 13 Nov 2005 08:10:26 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#327315: fixed in scim-tables 0.5.4-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is no

Bug#337369: marked as done (Please update scim-tables-zh for scim 1.41)

2005-11-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 13 Nov 2005 08:10:26 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#323831: fixed in scim-tables 0.5.4-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is no

Bug#337062: marked as done (IM provided by scim-tables-zh no longer available in scim 1.4.1)

2005-11-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 13 Nov 2005 08:10:26 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#323831: fixed in scim-tables 0.5.4-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is no

Bug#323831: marked as done (scim-tables-additional: cannot be installed with scim in unstable)

2005-11-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 13 Nov 2005 08:10:26 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#323831: fixed in scim-tables 0.5.4-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is no

Bug#338823: guile-1.6-slib: catch 22 on installation? circular dependency conflict

2005-11-13 Thread Kenward Vaughan
On Sat, Nov 12, 2005 at 11:56:10PM -0800, Rob Browning wrote: > Kenward Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Package: guile-1.6-slib > > Severity: grave > > Justification: renders package unusable > > > > > > Below is a script of my attempt to install this package. This follows > > my attem

Bug#338046: Debian Bug#338046: whizzytex: einitex unavailable from tetex and no longer functions.

2005-11-13 Thread Frank Küster
Junichi Uekawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > BTW, how would I find out that /var/lib/texmf/web2c/latex.fmt > is in fact not generated from tex, but pdfetex? You can do that by parsing /var/lib/texmf/web2c/fmtutil.cnf (or rather `kpsewhich --format='web2c files' fmtutil.cnf`) if you need to. > I h

Bug#334613: tetex-bin: same problem still exists

2005-11-13 Thread Kenward Vaughan
On Sun, Nov 13, 2005 at 01:20:28PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote: > Kenward Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Fri, Nov 11, 2005 at 03:51:35PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote: > >> Kenward Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >> > On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 09:30:44AM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:

Processed: your mail

2005-11-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > close 338886 1.11.3-1 Bug#338886: leafnode security bug SA-2005:02 (CVE-2005-1911) 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug marked as fixed in version 1.11.3-1, send any further explanations to Matthias Andree <[EMAI

Bug#282815: marked as done (cscope: Vulnerable to CAN-2004-0996)

2005-11-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 13 Nov 2005 07:02:03 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#282815: fixed in cscope 15.5+cvs20050816-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#338587: tex-common fails to install

2005-11-13 Thread Frank Küster
Eric Valette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I (of course!) took the postinst of the failing packages aka tex-common. > (Do not assume I'm stupid please). Sorry, I didn't want to offend; I just had a problem understanding your sentence, and that might well be due to my english being not good enough

Bug#338659: pngcrush: fails to start with relocation error

2005-11-13 Thread Roland Stigge
libpng12 doesn't provide the respective symbol anymore. For the same reason, pngcrush doesn't even build anymore. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#337259: debian-reference: FTBFS with new tetex-bin: Error trying to create pdflatex.fmt

2005-11-13 Thread Jens Seidel
Hi, first of all sorry for this late reply. On Sun, Nov 13, 2005 at 11:49:24AM +0100, Frank Küster wrote: > Daniel Schepler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Package: debian-reference > > Severity: serious > > Version: 1.08-4 > > > >>From my pbuilder build log: > > > > ... > > ln -sf fix.txt.ent

Bug#338891: pnet-assemblies: FTBFS: relocation error: /usr/bin/csant: symbol __libc_stack_end

2005-11-13 Thread Roland Stigge
Package: pnet-assemblies Version: 0.6.12-2 Severity: serious Hi, building the package pnet-assemblies in a clean sid build environment (with pbuilder) on i386 results in: = [...] if test -e build-tree/pnetlib-0.6.12/

Bug#338888: cl-screen-sbcl: FTBFS: texi2pdf not found

2005-11-13 Thread Roland Stigge
Package: cl-screen-sbcl Version: 1.0-3 Severity: serious Tags: patch Hi, building the package cl-screen-sbcl in a clean sid build environment (with pbuilder) on i386 results in: = [...] make[1]: Nothing to be done for `rever

Bug#338886: leafnode security bug SA-2005:02 (CVE-2005-1911)

2005-11-13 Thread Matthias Andree
Package: leafnode Version: 1.11.2.rel-1 Severity: grave Tags: security upstream confirmed fixed-upstream Leafnode 1.11.2 contains a denial of service bug, fixed in subsequent versions. Find below the full security announcement. Please fix. Thank you, -- Matthias -

Processed: change severity

2005-11-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 329231 important Bug#329231: X errors in kst due to qt change in 3.3.5 Severity set to `important'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian

Processed: Re: Bug#329231: [Kst] debian unstable X errors (WAS: kst-1.1.0 and svn HEAD X Errors)

2005-11-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 329231 libqt3-mt Bug#329231: kst: KST can't show any plots Bug reassigned from package `kst' to `libqt3-mt'. > found 329231 3.3.5-1 Bug#329231: kst: KST can't show any plots Bug marked as found in version 3.3.5-1. > tags 329231 + patch Bug#32

Bug#329231: [Kst] debian unstable X errors (WAS: kst-1.1.0 and svn HEAD X Errors)

2005-11-13 Thread Mark Hymers
reassign 329231 libqt3-mt found 329231 3.3.5-1 tags 329231 + patch retitle 329231 X errors in kst due to qt change in 3.3.5 thanks CC'd to interested parties and also the KST mailing list for the record. OK, I've finally tracked down exactly where this bug comes from. There was a change between

Bug#338879: cdbs: FTBFS: DVI file can't be opened

2005-11-13 Thread Roland Stigge
Package: cdbs Version: 0.4.32 Severity: serious Hi, building the package cdbs in a clean sid build environment (with pbuilder) on i386 results in: = [...] proc (from libxslt \OML/cmm/m/it/10 <[][]$\OT1/pcr/m/n/10 http : / /

Bug#338587: tex-common fails to install

2005-11-13 Thread Eric Valette
Frank Küster wrote: > Eric Valette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>Eric Valette wrote: >> >>>Joey Hess wrote: >>> >>> >>On Fre, 11 Nov 2005, Hilmar Preusse wrote: >> >> >> Setting up tex-common (0.10) ... debconf: Unable to load Debconf::Element::Dialog.

Bug#338046: Debian Bug#338046: whizzytex: einitex unavailable from tetex and no longer functions.

2005-11-13 Thread Junichi Uekawa
Hi, > > anyway, the following changes will be applied to Debian whizzytex default > > configuration to work around the problem. > > ... and cause a new one sooner or later. > > > -FMT=efmt > > +FMT=fmt > > As I said previously, and as it is documented in the Debian TeX Policy > Draft, the forma

Bug#338868: fuser doesn't work anymore.

2005-11-13 Thread Kurt Roeckx
Package: psmisc Version: 21.8-1 Severity: serious Hi, It seems that fuser doesn't work anymore. While 21.6-1 returned all the processes, 21.8-1 doesn't return anything anymore. Downgrading fixes it. Note that this is tested in a chroot, I can't testing it outside the chroot since that is runnin

Bug#325271: marked as done (freecdb is dead, please migrate to tinycdb)

2005-11-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 13 Nov 2005 05:02:12 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#325271: fixed in skkdic 20040323-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#308125: marked as done (bash dependence)

2005-11-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 13 Nov 2005 05:02:12 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#308125: fixed in skkdic 20040323-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#338038: marked as done (skkdic requires cdbmake to complete migration from freecdb)

2005-11-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 13 Nov 2005 13:54:50 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line tinycdb doesn't provide cdbmake has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your re

Bug#336047: marked as done (Tries to use non-essential package on purge)

2005-11-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 13 Nov 2005 04:47:06 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#336047: fixed in epos 1:2.5.36-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#325271: tinycdb doesn't provide cdbmake

2005-11-13 Thread Matej Vela
Charles Fry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > tinycdb is not currently a fit replacement for freecdb in skkdic, which > depends on the cdbmake command, which is not currenlty included in > tinycdb. It seems that cdbmake should either be released as a seperate > package, or moved into tinycdb (although

Bug#274705: marked as done (mv: --reply doesn't work)

2005-11-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 13 Nov 2005 07:29:02 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line mv --reply doesn't work has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibi

Bug#338739: RFC: allow usage of mknod in postinst

2005-11-13 Thread Marco d'Itri
On Nov 13, Eduard Bloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I suggest changing the policy to reflect the reality. Using a wrapper > like MAKEDEV to maintain device nodes which use arbitrary choosen > major/minor numbers is just not very useful. Sure, just close the bug if appropriate. > > (Please rememb

Bug#338739: RFC: allow usage of mknod in postinst

2005-11-13 Thread Eduard Bloch
#include * Eduard Bloch [Sun, Nov 13 2005, 10:17:55AM]: > Further, I expect from you as a carefull maintainer to write at least a > simple HOWTO for your fellows about how (exactly) to deal with > changes/transition to udev. You simply throw people into cold water. > Feel free to tell me that I a

Bug#338046: Bug#338608: Debian Bug#338046: whizzytex: einitex unavailable from tetex and no longer functions.

2005-11-13 Thread Frank Küster
Atsuhito Kohda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Where is that texk mailing list and texlive list archives >> that keeps on popping up? >> URL? > > I'm not so familiar with texlive but perhaps > http://tug.org/pipermail/tex-live/ > (or you can start from http://www.tug.org/texlive/) I tried to find i

Bug#334613: tetex-bin: same problem still exists

2005-11-13 Thread Frank Küster
Kenward Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Nov 11, 2005 at 03:51:35PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote: >> Kenward Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> > On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 09:30:44AM +0100, Frank Küster wrote: >> >> Now in the future, *never* edit texmf.cnf again, but instead just ed

Bug#336278: marked as done (FTBFS: No match for operator<<)

2005-11-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 13 Nov 2005 04:02:25 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#336278: fixed in maxdb-7.5.00 7.5.00.31-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#334823: marked as done (php4-maxdb: broken php4 dependency)

2005-11-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 13 Nov 2005 04:02:28 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#334823: fixed in php4-maxdb 7.5.00.30-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#338739: RFC: allow usage of mknod in postinst

2005-11-13 Thread Eduard Bloch
#include * Marco d'Itri [Sat, Nov 12 2005, 12:42:07PM]: > Package: sl-modem-source > Version: 2.9.9d-7 > Severity: serious > > See policy 10.6: packages must use MAKEDEV instead of calling mknod. I suggest changing the policy to reflect the reality. Using a wrapper like MAKEDEV to maintain devic

Bug#332683: marked as done ([PR 23711] [4.1 regression] [s390] bootstrap error in libjava (ICE in fixup_eh_region_note))

2005-11-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 13 Nov 2005 12:54:26 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line fixed in gcc-snapshot-20051112 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your res

Bug#338046: Bug#338608: Debian Bug#338046: whizzytex: einitex unavailable from tetex and no longer functions.

2005-11-13 Thread Atsuhito Kohda
From: Junichi Uekawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Bug#338608: Debian Bug#338046: whizzytex: einitex unavailable from tetex and no longer functions. Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2005 09:30:43 +0900 > Well, it was a news, which could have been included in > 3.0-2 NEWS.Debian. To be more precise, removeal of

Bug#338855: fails to bootstrap

2005-11-13 Thread Robert Millan
Package: crosshurd Version: 1.7.22 Severity: grave Tags: patch For some reason, this didn't happen before, but the problem appears clear now: when makehurddir.sh attempts to extract packages, it fails when changing cwd to $TARGET. This is because the TARGET variable contains a relative path, but

Processed: [Help] How to fix a buggy prerm script in sarge? (was: Bug#338638: tetex-base: dies when /usr/local/ read-only)

2005-11-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 338638 help Bug#338638: tetex-base: dies when /usr/local/ read-only There were no tags set. Tags added: help > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, De

Bug#338638: [Help] How to fix a buggy prerm script in sarge? (was: Bug#338638: tetex-base: dies when /usr/local/ read-only)

2005-11-13 Thread Frank Küster
tags 338638 help thanks Hi all, we just received a bug report that is caused by a buggy prerm script in the package in sarge (it fails because it doesn't handle read-only /usr/local properly). Is there any way to fix this, except documenting it in the release notes? And on a related thought,

Bug#338638: [Help] How to fix a buggy prerm script in sarge? (was: Bug#338638: tetex-base: dies when /usr/local/ read-only)

2005-11-13 Thread sean finney
hi frank, On Sun, Nov 13, 2005 at 12:25:01PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote: > we just received a bug report that is caused by a buggy prerm script > in the package in sarge (it fails because it doesn't handle read-only > /usr/local properly). Is there any way to fix this, except documenting > it in t

Processed: Fixed in NMU of bison 1:2.1-0.2

2005-11-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 338833 + fixed Bug#338833: bison - contains no binaries There were no tags set. Tags added: fixed > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs data

Bug#337259: debian-reference: FTBFS with new tetex-bin: Error trying to create pdflatex.fmt

2005-11-13 Thread Frank Küster
Daniel Schepler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Package: debian-reference > Severity: serious > Version: 1.08-4 > >>From my pbuilder build log: > > ... > ln -sf fix.txt.ent fix.ent > debiandoc2text -l $(echo ja | bin/getlocale) quick-reference.ja.sgml > bin/fixtxt ja quick-reference.ja.txt > TEX

Bug#338046: Debian Bug#338046: whizzytex: einitex unavailable from tetex and no longer functions.

2005-11-13 Thread Frank Küster
Hilmar Preusse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > I guess a much better idea is to use the interface provide by fmtutil > if you need additional formats. In the "Debian TeX policy" (from > tex-common) we mention that. In the Version as of 18th of July it is > not written clearly how to use it. This

Bug#338046: Debian Bug#338046: whizzytex: einitex unavailable from tetex and no longer functions.

2005-11-13 Thread Frank Küster
Junichi Uekawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > anyway, the following changes will be applied to Debian whizzytex default > configuration to work around the problem. ... and cause a new one sooner or later. > -FMT=efmt > +FMT=fmt As I said previously, and as it is documented in the Debian T

Processed: Re: Bug#188448 acknowledged by developer (Bug#188448: fixed in abuse-sdl 1:0.7.0-2)

2005-11-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > found 188448 1:0.7.0-2 Bug#188448: abuse-sdl: Nothing happens Bug marked as found in version 1:0.7.0-2. > severity 188448 minor Bug#188448: abuse-sdl: Nothing happens Severity set to `minor'. > thanks bts control programm Stopping processing here. Pl

Bug#338587: tex-common fails to install

2005-11-13 Thread Frank Küster
Eric Valette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Eric Valette wrote: >> Joey Hess wrote: >> >On Fre, 11 Nov 2005, Hilmar Preusse wrote: > > >>>Setting up tex-common (0.10) ... >>>debconf: Unable to load Debconf::Element::Dialog. >>> >>> >>>I imagine that a strace -f of a run of dpkg-

  1   2   >