Your message dated Sun, 13 Nov 2005 13:54:50 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line tinycdb doesn't provide cdbmake
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Sep 2004 16:14:30 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Sep 17 09:14:30 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from trofast.sesse.net [129.241.93.32]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1C8LNW-0002EM-00; Fri, 17 Sep 2004 09:14:30 -0700
Received: from sesse by trofast.sesse.net with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1C8LNT-0001uG-00; Fri, 17 Sep 2004 18:14:27 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: "Steinar H. Gunderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: freecdb: does not provide a shared library
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.64
Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2004 18:14:27 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Package: freecdb
Version: 0.62
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 8
freecdb does not provide a shared library, even though policy requires
it to do so. This leads to bugs like #243007 (making vpopmail RC-buggy)
and possibly others.
If there is some good reason for freecdb not to be a shared library
(Policy 8.3), at the very least there should be a freecdb_pic version,
but I can't see any such reason.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.6
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=en_US.ISO8859-1
Versions of packages freecdb depends on:
ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-16 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 338038-done) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Nov 2005 12:54:57 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Nov 13 04:54:57 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.irb.hr ([161.53.22.8] ident=UNKNOWN)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1EbHNo-0007Zj-RH; Sun, 13 Nov 2005 04:54:57 -0800
Received: from diziet.irb.hr (diziet.irb.hr [161.53.22.31])
by mail.irb.hr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3) with ESMTP id jADCsUCA001388;
Sun, 13 Nov 2005 13:54:30 +0100
Received: from diziet.irb.hr (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.5/8.13.5/Debian-3) with ESMTP id jADCsoVc016713;
Sun, 13 Nov 2005 13:54:50 +0100
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.5/8.13.5/Submit) id jADCsoN4016711;
Sun, 13 Nov 2005 13:54:50 +0100
From: Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Charles Fry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: tinycdb doesn't provide cdbmake
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2005 13:54:50 +0100
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Charles Fry's
message of "Mon, 7 Nov 2005 17:12:09 -0500")
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on 161.53.22.8
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2
Charles Fry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> tinycdb is not currently a fit replacement for freecdb in skkdic, which
> depends on the cdbmake command, which is not currenlty included in
> tinycdb. It seems that cdbmake should either be released as a seperate
> package, or moved into tinycdb (although if that were to happen, it
> should arguably be upstream).
tinycdb provides a cdb utility with a `-c' option that is equivalent
to cdbmake. (A fixed skkdic is in incoming.)
Thanks,
Matej
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
