Bug#329320: nvidia-glx: Should not provide xserver

2005-09-20 Thread Alexey Feldgendler
Package: nvidia-glx Version: 1.0.7174-4 Severity: serious This package should not provide the xserver virtual package, because the package does not contain a complete X server. Installing just this package along with its dependencies is not enough; the user must install a package like xorg-common

Bug#329304: fail2ban: fails to ban because iptables not in path

2005-09-20 Thread Jeroen Vermeulen
On Wed, Sep 21, 2005 at 01:38:03AM -0400, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote: > nope -- I do use original script, thus I have -b as well (although it is > not necessary, fail2ban detaches anyway (background config parameter in > fail2ban.conf) If it's not needed, don't use it! The background option suppr

Bug#323655: marked as done (vegastrike: FTBFS: cast from 'Unit*' to 'int' loses precision)

2005-09-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 20 Sep 2005 22:32:15 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#323655: fixed in vegastrike 0.4.3-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#321619: marked as done (php4-idn: phpapi revision requires a new upload in unstable)

2005-09-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 20 Sep 2005 22:17:03 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#321619: fixed in php4-idn 1.1-7 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

Bug#329316: nvidia-kernel-source: Fails to build from nvidia-kernel-source

2005-09-20 Thread Alexey Feldgendler
Package: nvidia-kernel-source Version: 1.0.7174-4 Severity: grave I was trying to build the kernel module from nvidia-kernel-source according to the directions in /usr/share/doc/nvidia-kernel-source/README.Debian (method #1). I have the linux-headers-2.6.12-1-686 package from etch installed, and m

Bug#329304: fail2ban: fails to ban because iptables not in path

2005-09-20 Thread Yaroslav Halchenko
I got it I got it... just follow my "research": > I'm running the unmodified init script. Hey, I hadn't noticed that: it > does add /sbin to the path. So maybe the problem is that this gets lost > somewhere in start-stop-daemon. Perhaps it's the -b option that does > this? nope -- I do use orig

Bug#321189: marked as done (libgettext-ruby-util: rgettext does not work)

2005-09-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 20 Sep 2005 21:47:14 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#321189: fixed in ruby1.8 1.8.3-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#329304: fail2ban: fails to ban because iptables not in path

2005-09-20 Thread Jeroen Vermeulen
On Wed, Sep 21, 2005 at 12:11:14AM -0400, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote: > Are you starting fail2ban manually or using /etc/init.d/fail2ban script > (shipped with the package) which DOES define the PATH to include > sbin in any case? I'm running the unmodified init script. Hey, I hadn't noticed that

Bug#329304: fail2ban: fails to ban because iptables not in path

2005-09-20 Thread Yaroslav Halchenko
Hi Jeroen, I'm just trying to figure out where is the source of the problem because you seems to be your case is quite unique -- as you will see, I am running the same kind of Debian system and fail2ban without any such weird side effect Are you starting fail2ban manually or using /etc/init.d/fai

Bug#329307: masqmail: CAN-2005-2662 and CAN-2005-2663

2005-09-20 Thread Florian Weimer
Package: masqmail Severity: grave Tags: security sarge Justification: user security hole Mandriva has disclosed two security problems in masqmail: Jens Steube discovered two vulnerabilities in masqmail: When sending failed mail messages, the address was not properly sanitized which could all

Bug#329304: fail2ban: fails to ban because iptables not in path

2005-09-20 Thread Jeroen Vermeulen
On Tue, Sep 20, 2005 at 11:11:59PM -0400, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote: > Although I don't mind additing full path for the config file shipped > with the package, I ask you first to verify either you have > proper path setup in /etc/profile and in whatever environment you've > started fail2ban f

Bug#329304: fail2ban: fails to ban because iptables not in path

2005-09-20 Thread Yaroslav Halchenko
Hi Jeroen, Indeed, such problem wasn't reported before ,-) Although I don't mind additing full path for the config file shipped with the package, I ask you first to verify either you have proper path setup in /etc/profile and in whatever environment you've started fail2ban from, and then d

Bug#327446: marked as done (Perl modules changes causes postinst failure in other packages)

2005-09-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 20 Sep 2005 21:48:33 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#327446: r-cran-lattice: postinst failure (R/Rdconv.pm not found) has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If

Bug#329304: fail2ban: fails to ban because iptables not in path

2005-09-20 Thread Jeroen Vermeulen
Package: fail2ban Version: 0.5.2-1 Severity: grave Tags: patch Justification: renders package unusable Hope this isn't a duplicate--reportbug isn't showing me any known issues for some reason. The iptables blocking in fail2ban consistently fails to work because the iptables command is not in the

Bug#314653: marked as done (mh-e: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'emacs21')

2005-09-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 20 Sep 2005 19:32:06 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#314653: fixed in mh-e 7.84-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your r

Bug#329249: marked as done (kdeprint: fails to print anything)

2005-09-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 21 Sep 2005 04:30:19 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#329249: Acknowledgement (kdeprint: fails to print anything) has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this i

Bug#328200: Problems with ntp

2005-09-20 Thread Nathanael Nerode
Marco D'Itri wrote: I do, and I stand by my opinion: the package license is intended to be applied to everything, and pretending otherwise is useless pedantry. Modern copyright law, unfortunately, demands pedantry. If you think it's useless, that's your opinion, but as far as I can tell that'

Processed: Fixed in upload of libxrender 1:0.9.0+CVS20050919-1 to experimental

2005-09-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 327527 + fixed-in-experimental Bug#327527: libxrender: Missing X build dependency Tags were: experimental Tags added: fixed-in-experimental > tag 327744 + fixed-in-experimental Bug#327744: [FTBFS] libxrender missing libxt-dev build-dep Tags were: e

Bug#328018: zsafe: Same problem here...

2005-09-20 Thread John Goerzen
On Wed, Sep 21, 2005 at 12:35:06AM +0200, Nicolas wrote: > Package: zsafe > Version: 2.1.3-2 > Followup-For: Bug #328018 > > > Les paquets suivants contiennent des dépendances non satisfaites : > zsafe: Dépend: libqt3c102-mt (>= 3:3.3.3) mais il n'est pas > installable > > I ned zsafe! I

Bug#329039: marked as done (mkisofs segfaults when creating isos)

2005-09-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 20 Sep 2005 18:47:05 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#329039: fixed in cdrtools 4:2.01+01a03-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it i

Bug#312140: marked as done (xwatch: segmentation fault)

2005-09-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 20 Sep 2005 18:32:08 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#312140: fixed in xwatch 2.11-11 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

Bug#309146: marked as done (install: upgrading from stable to unstable loose pcmcia pakage - problem with network on pcmcia)

2005-09-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 20 Sep 2005 21:36:04 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Closing old bugs has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to

Bug#295213: marked as done (general: Upgrade removed /usr/local (symlink))

2005-09-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 20 Sep 2005 21:36:04 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Closing old bugs has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to

Processed: your mail

2005-09-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 327732 grave Bug#327732: Dos attack to a list in mailman using sarge due to impropper handling of exception of utf8 Severity set to `grave'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking sy

Bug#327956: marked as done (creox: uninstallable; needs rebuild for the Qt/KDE transition)

2005-09-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 20 Sep 2005 16:02:09 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#327956: fixed in creox 0.2.2rc2-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#317198: marked as done (libjack0.80.0-0 removed from unstable; rebuild required)

2005-09-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 20 Sep 2005 16:02:11 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#317198: fixed in horgand 1.07-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

Bug#285100: marked as done (amsynth: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): cast from 'void*' to 'int' loses precision)

2005-09-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 20 Sep 2005 16:02:06 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#285100: fixed in amsynth 1.0.0+1.0.1cvs-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#317189: marked as done (libjack0.80.0-0 removed from unstable; rebuild required)

2005-09-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 20 Sep 2005 16:02:09 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#317189: fixed in creox 0.2.2rc2-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#317183: marked as done (libjack0.80.0-0 removed from unstable; rebuild required)

2005-09-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 20 Sep 2005 16:02:07 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#317183: fixed in amsynth 1.0.0+1.0.1cvs-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#274703: marked as done (amsynth: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-3.4): `pthread_kill' undeclared)

2005-09-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 20 Sep 2005 16:02:06 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#274703: fixed in amsynth 1.0.0+1.0.1cvs-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#274809: marked as done (creox: FTBFS with gcc-3.4: `EBUSY' undeclared)

2005-09-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 20 Sep 2005 16:02:09 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#274809: fixed in creox 0.2.2rc2-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#273826: marked as done (Horgand freeze the system when run)

2005-09-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 20 Sep 2005 16:02:11 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#273826: fixed in horgand 1.07-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

Processed: #329286: wterm_6.2.9-6.3: FTBFS: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

2005-09-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 329286 wterm_6.2.9-6.3: FTBFS: internal compiler error: Segmentation > fault Bug#329286: : FTBFS: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault Changed Bug title. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Deb

Bug#328018: zsafe: Same problem here...

2005-09-20 Thread Nicolas
Package: zsafe Version: 2.1.3-2 Followup-For: Bug #328018 Les paquets suivants contiennent des dépendances non satisfaites : zsafe: Dépend: libqt3c102-mt (>= 3:3.3.3) mais il n'est pas installable I ned zsafe! It contains all of my passwords! I'm stuck!!! :-/ Please, please, please,

Bug#318681: marked as done (gcl: depends on binutils-dev <<= 2.1.5-999), so uninstallable in unstable)

2005-09-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 20 Sep 2005 15:17:32 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#318681: fixed in gcl 2.6.7-6 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your r

Processed: Re: Bug#329280: ClamAV Vulnerabilities

2005-09-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 329280 serious Bug#329280: ClamAV Vulnerabilities Severity set to `serious'. > tags 329280 +security Bug#329280: ClamAV Vulnerabilities There were no tags set. Tags added: security > close 329280 0.87-1 Bug#329280: ClamAV Vulnerabilities 'clo

Bug#329286: : FTBFS: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

2005-09-20 Thread Anibal Monsalve Salazar
Package: wterm Severity: serious Version: 6.2.9-6.3 Tags: sid Justification: fails to build from source There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: Automatic build of wterm_6.2.9-6.3 on kiivi by sbuild/m68k 42 Build started at 20050920-1357 [...] ** Using build dependencies

Bug#324089: marked as done (destar: not installable: quixote 2.0 is now in unstable (destar depends on quixote 1.0))

2005-09-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 20 Sep 2005 14:47:08 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#324089: fixed in destar 0.0.184-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Processed: Re: Bug#328840: very old package, should this be removed?

2005-09-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 328840 RM: pc532down -- RoM; old, few users Bug#328840: very old package, should this be removed? Changed Bug title. > severity 328840 normal Bug#328840: RM: pc532down -- RoM; old, few users Severity set to `normal'. > reassign 328840 ftp.debi

Processed: tagging 328163

2005-09-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.7 > tags 328163 + pending Bug#328163: soya: Unsatisfiable build-dependency on libcal3d10-dev There were no tags set. Tags added: pending > End of message, stopping processing here. Pleas

Bug#329231: kst: KST can't show any plots

2005-09-20 Thread Mark Hymers
On Tue, 20, Sep, 2005 at 06:08:39PM +0100, N. Riesco spoke thus.. > I'm using KST in unstable. After updating on Sept the 19th, > KST stopped displaying any plots. Apart from this, KST works > as usual, I can open file, I can't see its plot, but I can > export it to PNG and the exported plot is fin

Bug#328794: very old package, should this be removed?

2005-09-20 Thread Julian Gilbey
On Sat, Sep 17, 2005 at 03:03:26PM +0200, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote: > Package: cwebx > Version: 3.04-7 > Severity: serious > > Hi, > > During the Debian QA meeting hold during Sept. 09th till 11th, we > decided that looking at packages that haven't been uploaded for a very > long time could c

Processed: reassign 329223 to libfreetype6

2005-09-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 > reassign 329223 libfreetype6 Bug#329223: rssreader.app: Fails to start, giving a symbol lookup error Bug reassigned from package `rssreader.app' to `libfreetype6'. > End of message,

Processed: merging 320958 329223

2005-09-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 > merge 320958 329223 Bug#320958: rssreader.app: cant start Bug#329223: rssreader.app: Fails to start, giving a symbol lookup error Bug#314385: gworkspace.app: Loader error when launchi

Bug#329277: whitespace: Uninstallable, depends on libgmp3

2005-09-20 Thread Kurt Roeckx
Package: whitespace Version: 0.3-1 Severity: grave Hi, Your package is currently uninstallable because it still depends on libgmp3 which has been renamed to libgmp3c3 because of the C++ ABI change. Since ghc6 is available on all arches again, a simple rebuild should fix this. Kurt -- To UN

Bug#329276: lhs2tex: Uninstallable, depends on libgmp3

2005-09-20 Thread Kurt Roeckx
Package: lhs2tex Version: 1.9-1 Severity: grave Hi, Your package is currently uninstallable because it still depends on libgmp3 which has been renamed to libgmp3c3 because of the C++ ABI change. Since ghc6 is available on all arches again, a simple rebuild should fiix this. Kurt -- To UNSU

Bug#329275: haskelldb-bin: Uninstallable, libgmp3 not available in sid anymore.

2005-09-20 Thread Kurt Roeckx
Package: haskelldb-bin Version: 0.9.cvs.601-6 Severity: grave Hi, This package is currently uninstallable in sid because it still depends on libgmp3 which has been replaced by libgmp3c2 because of the C++ ABI transition. Since ghc6 is installable again, I think a simple rebuid should take care o

Bug#328794: marked as done (very old package, should this be removed?)

2005-09-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 20 Sep 2005 14:02:08 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#328794: fixed in cwebx 3.04-8 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#329274: dhis-tools-genkeys: Uninstallable, libgmp3 not available in sid anymore.

2005-09-20 Thread Kurt Roeckx
Package: dhis-tools-genkeys Version: 5.0-3 Severity: grave Hi, Your package has a dependency on libgmp3, but that is no longer available because it was renamed to libgmp3c2 due to the C++ ABI transition. Rebuilding against the current version of gmp in sid should fix this. Kurt -- To UNSUB

Processed: Fixed in NMU of lowmem 1.11

2005-09-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 329175 + fixed Bug#329175: lowmem: Low memory mode stills goes through the language selection screen Tags were: patch d-i Tags added: fixed > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system adm

Bug#329272: dhis-server: Uninstallable, libgmp3 not available anymore.

2005-09-20 Thread Kurt Roeckx
Package: dhis-server Version: 5.1-4 Severity: serious Hi, Your package has a dependency on libgmp3, but that is no longer available because it was renamed to libgmp3c2 due to the C++ ABI transition. Rebuilding against the current version of gmp in sid should fix this. Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIB

Processed: your mail

2005-09-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 328793 wishlist Bug#328793: very old package, should this be removed? Severity set to `wishlist'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bu

Bug#328793: very old package, should this be removed?

2005-09-20 Thread Bdale Garbee
severity 328793 wishlist thanks On Sat, 2005-09-17 at 15:39 +0200, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote: > Package: gcpegg > Version: 5.1-7 > Severity: serious This package works fine, and is in constant use on one of my own servers. I'll arrange to close all relevant bugs before etch release. Removing

Bug#328840: very old package, should this be removed?

2005-09-20 Thread Bdale Garbee
reassign 328840 thanks On Sat, 2005-09-17 at 18:30 +0200, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote: > Package: pc532down > Version: 1.1-9 > Severity: serious > During the Debian QA meeting hold during Sept. 09th till 11th, we > decided that looking at packages that haven't been uploaded for a very > long tim

Bug#321619: Patch for the problem

2005-09-20 Thread Turbo Fredriksson
Quoting Volker Janzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hi, > > needing this package working I think I've probably found a bugfix for > this. I read in bug #321324 (php4-dev) that build-scripts need to be > changed: "As of php4-dev 4:4.4.0-1, this is a bug in the build script, > and you should be using the v

Processed: Re: Bug#328798: very old package, should this be removed?

2005-09-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 328798 RM: xlispstat -- RoM; old, superseded by R Bug#328798: very old package, should this be removed? Changed Bug title. > severity 328798 normal Bug#328798: RM: xlispstat -- RoM; old, superseded by R Severity set to `normal'. > reassign 328

Bug#328798: very old package, should this be removed?

2005-09-20 Thread Douglas Bates
It is fine with me to remove the package from the distribution. As you point out the upstream development is stalled and is unlikely to be restarted. Most of the people who would have used xlispstat are now using R, which is available in the actively maintained r-base package and associated packa

Bug#329249: Acknowledgement (kdeprint: fails to print anything)

2005-09-20 Thread Rick Friedman
Actually, I found that, somehow, a filter named, "True" had been activated. How the filter was created, I don't know since I didn't create it. I'm the only one who uses this machine, so I'm a bit puzzled as to where the filter came from. Once I deleted the filter and save the the KPrinter options,

Bug#329249: kdeprint: fails to print anything

2005-09-20 Thread Rick Friedman
Package: kdeprint Version: 4:3.4.2-3 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Attempting to print from ANY KDE app produces the following error dialog: Window title: Catastrophe! - KNotify Window text: A print error occurred. Error message received from system: Error

Processed: Re: Bug#329239: mutt-ng segfaults when attempting to open mailbox

2005-09-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > merge 329238 329239 Bug#329238: mutt-ng segfaults when attempting to open mailbox from sidebar Bug#329239: mutt-ng segfaults when attempting to open mailbox Merged 329238 329239. > Hi, Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. > * Arias <[EMA

Bug#329239: mutt-ng segfaults when attempting to open mailbox

2005-09-20 Thread Nico Golde
merge 329238 329239 Hi, * Arias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-09-20 20:26]: > Justification: renders package unusable can you please provide a backtrace? And please don't report bugs twice, it seems that both are the same bug. Regards Nico -- Nico Golde - JAB: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GPG: 0x73647CFF ht

Bug#328866: very old package, should this be removed?

2005-09-20 Thread Kevin Lindsay
Hi, yes I am find with this package being removed. Thanks, Kevin- On Sat, Sep 17, 2005 at 08:37:30PM +0200, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote: > Package: opennap > Version: 0.44-2 > Severity: serious > > Hi, > > During the Debian QA meeting hold during Sept. 09th till 11th, we > decided that looki

Processed: your mail

2005-09-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > package destar Ignoring bugs not assigned to: destar > tags 324089 + pending Bug#324089: destar: not installable: quixote 2.0 is now in unstable (destar depends on quixote 1.0) There were no tags set. Tags added: pending > tags 325167 + pending Bug#3

Bug#329239: mutt-ng segfaults when attempting to open mailbox

2005-09-20 Thread Arias
Package: mutt-ng Version: 0.0+20050916-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 - -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (500, 'hoary-updates'), (500, 'hoary-

Bug#329238: mutt-ng segfaults when attempting to open mailbox from sidebar

2005-09-20 Thread Arias
Package: mutt-ng Version: 0.0+20050831-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 - -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (500, 'hoary-updates'), (500, 'hoary-

Processed: Re: Bug#329141: azureus: Azureus window remains blank and it reports a message about a missed plugin.

2005-09-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > package azureus Ignoring bugs not assigned to: azureus > tag 329141 +confirmed Bug#329141: azureus: Azureus window remains blank and it reports a message about a missed plugin. There were no tags set. Tags added: confirmed > severity 329141 normal Bu

Bug#329141: azureus: Azureus window remains blank and it reports a message about a missed plugin.

2005-09-20 Thread Shaun Jackman
package azureus tag 329141 +confirmed severity 329141 normal thanks Thanks for the bug report. There is a workaround for this bug (see also #308393). This workaround requires at least azureus 2.3.0.4 from Debian unstable. After the blank Azureus and "Error loading plugin 'azupdate'" windows open,

Bug#329231: kst: KST can't show any plots

2005-09-20 Thread N. Riesco
Package: kst Version: 1.1.0-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable I'm using KST in unstable. After updating on Sept the 19th, KST stopped displaying any plots. Apart from this, KST works as usual, I can open file, I can't see its plot, but I can export it to PNG and the exporte

Processed: tagging 329201

2005-09-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.7 > tags 329201 patch Bug#329201: ion3-mod-ionflux: The listening UNIX socket is inherited by processes spawned by ion Tags were: upstream confirmed pending Tags added: patch > End of me

Bug#328561: marked as done (buildd m86k: libdbi-perl failed due to clock screw on host q650)

2005-09-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 20 Sep 2005 18:35:56 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line fixed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the

Bug#329201: ion3-mod-ionflux: close-on-exec for socket

2005-09-20 Thread Rene van Bevern
Package: ion3-mod-ionflux Version: 20050428-7 Followup-For: Bug #329201 Hi, a patch is attached and about to be uploaded. René Tue Sep 20 15:02:06 CEST 2005 René van Bevern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * set close-on-exec flag on the file descriptors. diff -rN -u old-mod_ionflux-3/mod_ionflux/

Processed: subversion

2005-09-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Is this the right syntax? > block 329184 with 227741 Bug#329184: subversion_1.2.3a-1 (arm/unstable): FTBFS: unsatisfiable kaffe build-dependency Was not blocked by any bugs. Blocking bugs added: 227741 > -- Stopping processing here. Please contact

Bug#329184: subversion_1.2.3a-1 (arm/unstable): FTBFS: unsatisfiable kaffe build-dependency

2005-09-20 Thread Dalibor Topic
I hope to have that fixed with the next uploads. There is a bug in jikes that prevents the class library from being built on arm (and recently, mipsel. jikes seems to be a little unmaintained these days). I've tested building kaffe with ecj on x86, so if ecj is available on arm, it could be built

Processed: Re: Bug#328696: gallery2: Dependencies mistakes..

2005-09-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 328696 important Bug#328696: gallery2: Dependencies mistakes.. Severity set to `important'. > title 328696 gallery2: Improve Depends and Recommends Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please

Bug#328696: gallery2: Dependencies mistakes..

2005-09-20 Thread Michael Schultheiss
severity 328696 important title 328696 gallery2: Improve Depends and Recommends thanks Romain Beauxis wrote: > Package: gallery2 > Severity: grave > Justification: renders package unusable > > > From the last package from sid, I get: > Version: 2.0-1 > Depends: apache | apache-ssl | apache-perl

Bug#328483: Debian binutils dependency policy

2005-09-20 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
On Tue, Sep 20, 2005 at 11:42:06AM -0400, Camm Maguire wrote: > OK, but this is a pity. I still don't understand why this need be the > case. Because the interface between BFD and binutils is subject to change and does on a regular basis, and there are not enough users to bother doing anything m

Bug#328483: Debian binutils dependency policy

2005-09-20 Thread Camm Maguire
Greetings, and thanks so much for your helpful reply! Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I have no idea why you've copied this to the binutils upstream list, > debian-devel, et cetera... > Well, upstream for some idea of their release and versioning number plans, debian-devel as th

Bug#329223: rssreader.app: Fails to start, giving a symbol lookup error

2005-09-20 Thread Gunnar Wolf
Subject: rssreader.app: Fails to start, giving a symbol lookup error Package: rssreader.app Version: 0.2.2-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Just installed rssreader.app, and starting it from the command line gives me: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ RSSReader /usr/lib/GNUstep/Syste

Processed: tagging 329201

2005-09-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.7 > tags 329201 pending confirmed upstream Bug#329201: ion3-mod-ionflux: The listening UNIX socket is inherited by processes spawned by ion There were no tags set. Tags added: pending, co

Bug#293787: marked as done (linux-wlan-ng: -pre21 includes firmware files with no license)

2005-09-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 20 Sep 2005 16:22:55 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line linux-wlan-ng has no firmware files has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

Bug#328483: Debian binutils dependency policy

2005-09-20 Thread Camm Maguire
Greetings! Do we have a plan or policy regarding packages which need to depend on binutils-dev? Is there now or will there ever be in the future a stable binary api, by which I mean one that might be good for a year or more of development on average? In such a case, would binary api compatibilit

Bug#328483: Debian binutils dependency policy

2005-09-20 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
I have no idea why you've copied this to the binutils upstream list, debian-devel, et cetera... On Tue, Sep 20, 2005 at 10:09:03AM -0400, Camm Maguire wrote: > Greetings! > > Do we have a plan or policy regarding packages which need to depend on > binutils-dev? Is there now or will there ever be

Processed: linux-wlan-ng bugs updates

2005-09-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 230855 + pending Bug#230855: linux-wlan-ng: shared scripts loops forever because of shared.dpkg-old There were no tags set. Tags added: pending > tags 327695 + pending Bug#327695: linux-wlan-ng: FTBFS: Endless loop There were no tags set. Tags ad

Bug#329212: fisg: Fisg segfault

2005-09-20 Thread Sythos
Package: fisg Version: 0.3.8-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable fisg segfault while parsing file, strace output attached -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.4.31-GRSEC Locale: LANG=it_IT, LC_CTYPE=it_IT (charmap=ISO-8859-1)

Bug#327334: conflicts

2005-09-20 Thread Ricardo Javier Cardenes Medina
On Tue, Sep 20, 2005 at 01:26:46PM +0200, Torsten Marek wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi, > > it should not be possible to have both libqscintilla5 and 6 installed, since > libqscintilla5 depends on libqt3c102-mt. In order to install libqscintilla6, > you > need to

Processed: ion3-mod-ionflux shall not enter testing with bug 329201

2005-09-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 329201 serious Bug#329201: ion3-mod-ionflux: The listening UNIX socket is inherited by processes spawned by ion Severity set to `serious'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking syst

Bug#321619: Patch for the problem

2005-09-20 Thread Volker Janzen
Hi, needing this package working I think I've probably found a bugfix for this. I read in bug #321324 (php4-dev) that build-scripts need to be changed: "As of php4-dev 4:4.4.0-1, this is a bug in the build script, and you should be using the value of 'php-config4 --phpapi' instead." So the phpapi

Bug#329197: postgresql-7.4: Fails to start with a Bus Error

2005-09-20 Thread Martin Pitt
Hi Simon! Simon Farnsworth [2005-09-20 12:06 +0100]: > waiting for postmaster to start/usr/lib/postgresql/7.4/bin/pg_ctl: line > 417: 31939 Bus error "$po_path" ${1+"$@"} > ${PGDATAOPTS+$PGDATAOPTS} >$logfile 2>&1 > . > > This suggests that the postmaster process i

Processed: Re: Bug#328814: very old package, should this be removed?

2005-09-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 328814 RM: debian-history-ko -- RoM; content put into other package Bug#328814: very old package, should this be removed? Changed Bug title. > severity 328814 normal Bug#328814: RM: debian-history-ko -- RoM; content put into other package Sever

Processed: reopen 321619

2005-09-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reopen 321619 Bug#321619: php4-idn: phpapi revision requires a new upload in unstable Bug reopened, originator not changed. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator

Bug#321619: Bug is still there in 1.1-6

2005-09-20 Thread Volker Janzen
Hello, I don't know why my bug was closed, but it is not solved in Debian unstable: dpkg -i php4-idn_1.1-6_i386.deb Selecting previously deselected package php4-idn. (Reading database ... 102444 files and directories currently installed.) Unpacking php4-idn (from php4-idn_1.1-6_i386.deb) ... dpkg

Processed: Re: Bug#328863: very old package, should this be removed?

2005-09-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 328863 RM: ultrapoint -- RoM; old, unused, upstream-dead Bug#328863: very old package, should this be removed? Changed Bug title. > severity 328863 normal Bug#328863: RM: ultrapoint -- RoM; old, unused, upstream-dead Severity set to `normal'.

Bug#327334: conflicts

2005-09-20 Thread Torsten Marek
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, it should not be possible to have both libqscintilla5 and 6 installed, since libqscintilla5 depends on libqt3c102-mt. In order to install libqscintilla6, you need to install libqt3-mt, which itself conflicts with libqt3c102-mt, leading to the remo

Bug#329197: postgresql-7.4: Fails to start with a Bus Error

2005-09-20 Thread Simon Farnsworth
Package: postgresql-7.4 Version: 1:7.4.8-17 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable The init script cannot start postgresql-7.4 (/etc/init.d/postgresql-7.4 start). If I attempt to start it by hand with: sudo -u postgres /usr/lib/postgresql/7.4/bin/pg_ctl start -w -D /var/lib/pos

Processed: Fixed in NMU of wterm 6.2.9-6.3

2005-09-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 229517 + fixed Bug#229517: Error in file /usr/lib/menu/wterm-ml Tags were: patch Tags added: fixed > tag 288648 + fixed Bug#288648: wterm: FTBFS (gcc-4.0): static declaration of 'kstate_add_xlat' follows non-static declaration Tags were: patch Tag

Processed: aspell-sv: Needs repackaging for latest aspell

2005-09-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 319667 patch Bug#319667: aspell-sv: Needs repackaging for latest aspell Tags were: sid Tags added: patch > thank you Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Deb

Bug#319667: aspell-sv: Needs repackaging for latest aspell

2005-09-20 Thread Magnus Holmgren
tags 319667 patch thank you Vill du ha hjälp med detta? Jag har implementerat de ändringar som behövs genom att kika på aspell-en och byggt ett eget paket (se http://fryken.frryd.se/~magnus/aspell-sv_0.50-2-5_all.deb). Källkodsdiff och DSC i http://fryken.frryd.se/~magnus/aspell-sv_0.50-2-5.(diff.

Bug#329095: openswan_1:2.2.0-11(m68k/unstable/thing2): FTBFS on m68k

2005-09-20 Thread Rene Mayrhofer
Am Dienstag 20 September 2005 10:31 schrieb Steve Langasek: > You seem to be agreeing with something I didn't say. :) I only pointed out > that progress is being made on fixing the toolchain; when this was not the > case, I certainly encouraged maintainers to lower the optimization level > they we

Bug#329137: Use version in testing

2005-09-20 Thread Philipp Frauenfelder
The version 0.9.12 of valgrind-callgrind is for valgrind up to 2.4.1. You can find valgrind 2.4 in testing. Regards -- Philipp Frauenfelder -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#329095: openswan_1:2.2.0-11(m68k/unstable/thing2): FTBFS on m68k

2005-09-20 Thread Steve Langasek
On Tue, Sep 20, 2005 at 10:22:41AM +0100, Rene Mayrhofer wrote: > Am Montag 19 September 2005 22:40 schrieb Steve Langasek: > > FWIW, Wouter Verhelst has made progress on identifying the gcc bug causing > > these problems, so I'm not sure how much good it does to file per-package > > bugs about thi

  1   2   >