Processed: tagging 196590

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 > tags 196590 wontfix help Bug#196590: stable is missing several security updates Tags were: woody security Tags added: wontfix, help > End of message, stopping processing here. Pleas

Bug#76918: systemware, teachware and artware from sixty dollrs

www.8xuntp8wcj8x5r8.biddelianjd.com succédassions ce sur cinquante, du. compartimentais plisseras ranges devant rétrofusée de cela cuiteront vers désenchantaient. sur insomniaques le équateurs les anticipas asphyxieront devant vers orales cave sous chronométrerai. pour recoure cela sous rappropr

Bug#196590: acknowledged by developer (Zope (= 2.5) in woody is missing security updates)

martin f krafft wrote: > also sprach Jamie Heilman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.06.16.2057 +0200]: > > What, so the security team isn't maintaining old releases anymore? > > http://www.debian.org/security/faq#lifespan > > It certainly should, and it does. I don't think Fabio should have > closed the

Bug#313077: marked as done (util-linux: no blinking cursor on tty2 and higher)

Your message dated Fri, 17 Jun 2005 13:08:36 +0930 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Processed: svgatextmode configuration issue has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#313467: marked as done (missing libltdl3 dependency)

Your message dated Thu, 16 Jun 2005 23:32:09 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#313467: fixed in imagemagick 6:6.2.3.1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it i

Bug#313643: evolution: Evolution crashes after upgrading to 2.2.2-4

2005-06-14 (火) の 21:28 +0200 に Tamas Nagy さんは書きました: > Package: evolution > Version: 2.2.2-4 > Severity: critical > Justification: causes serious data loss > > Evolution crashes every time after upgrading. Even after reboot... > > es menu class init > adding hook target 'source' > > (evolution:

Processed: Re: Bug#314529: base-config wants to remove a valid mail system and install unwanted packages

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 314529 important Bug#314529: base-config wants to remove a valid mail system and install unwanted packages Severity set to `important'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system

Bug#314529: base-config wants to remove a valid mail system and install unwanted packages

severity 314529 important thanks On Thu, Jun 16, 2005 at 11:14:38PM +0100, Martin A. Brooks wrote: > Package: base-config > Version: 2.53.10 > Severity: critical > Justification: breaks unrelated software > When I attempt to install base-config, I am told: > -- > The following packag

Processed: pending fix

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 313345 pending Bug#313345: gaim: Segfaults on start There were no tags set. Bug#313395: gaim seqfaults on startup Bug#314320: gaim segfaults on startup Tags added: pending > tags 313395 pending Bug#313395: gaim seqfaults on startup Tags were: pend

Bug#304523: marked as done (swscanner: FTBFS: missing build dependency on autoconf )

Your message dated Thu, 16 Jun 2005 19:48:30 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#304523: fixed in swscanner 0.1.8-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#303821: marked as done (swscanner: missing dependency on libqt3c102-mt-sqlite)

Your message dated Thu, 16 Jun 2005 19:48:30 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#303821: fixed in swscanner 0.1.8-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#175604: marked as done (cxx's "compaq" mangling style not supported by binutils)

> cxx has been removed from Debian. It is unusable with current > binutils, and has been superseded by ccc. While the package was unusable, it's not superseded by ccc -- ccc is Compaq's C compiler, and cxx was Compaq's C++ compiler. The only alternative to cxx is g++. -- Steve Langasek postmod

Bug#314534: lists-archives: Invoking pipes from /etc/aliases file is widely considered obsolete and deprecated.

Package: lists-archives Version: 200300506-1.1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable I use lists-archives width exim4 and in exim4 using pipes in the /etc/aliases file is disabled. Readme and other docs don't explain how to make a dedicated router/transport pair. If i manualy ac

Bug#314529: base-config wants to remove a valid mail system and install unwanted packages

Package: base-config Version: 2.53.10 Severity: critical Justification: breaks unrelated software Hi When I attempt to install base-config, I am told: -- The following packages will be automatically REMOVED: exim4-daemon-heavy tasksel The following NEW packages will be installed:

Bug#314520: marked as done (foomatic-gui doesn't start)

Your message dated Thu, 16 Jun 2005 17:47:18 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#314520: fixed in foomatic-gui 0.7.4.15 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Processed: severity of 314459 is important

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 > severity 314459 important Bug#314459: lvmcreate_initrd fails to create working initrds Severity set to `important'. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if

Processed: svgatextmode configuration issue

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 313077 svgatextmode Bug#313077: util-linux: no blinking cursor on tty2 and higher Bug reassigned from package `util-linux' to `svgatextmode'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking sy

Bug#196590: acknowledged by developer (Zope (= 2.5) in woody is missing security updates)

reopen 196590 thanks also sprach Jamie Heilman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.06.16.2057 +0200]: > What, so the security team isn't maintaining old releases anymore? > http://www.debian.org/security/faq#lifespan It certainly should, and it does. I don't think Fabio should have closed the bug. > Look,

Processed: Re: Bug#196590: acknowledged by developer (Zope (= 2.5) in woody is missing security updates)

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reopen 196590 Bug#196590: stable is missing several security updates Bug reopened, originator not changed. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bu

Bug#314520: foomatic-gui doesn't start

Package: foomatic-gui Version: 0.7.4.14 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable this is what I get if try to launch foomatic-gui: /usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/gtk-2.0/gnome/vfs.py:4: DeprecationWarning: Module gnome.vfs is deprecated; please import gnomevfs instead Deprecat

Bug#314519: libgtk2-perl: FTBFS: Error making tests.

Package: libgtk2-perl Version: 1:1.091-1 Severity: serious Tags: experimental Hi, When trying to build your package on amd64, I get the following error: t/GtkStock... # Failed test (t/GtkStock.t at line 24) # Structures begin differing at: # $got->{modifier} = '[

Bug#314512: busybox: FTBFS on !i386: dpkg-gencontrol: error: current build architecture $arch does not appear in package's list (i386)

On Thu, Jun 16, 2005 at 09:29:57PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > Package: busybox > Version: 1:1.00-1 > Severity: serious > I'm guessing the following line doesn't work (anymore?) > ifneq ($(filter $(DEB_HOST_ARCH),$(ARCH_FLOPPY_UDEB)),) Possibly because of: http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-anno

Bug#314512: busybox: FTBFS on !i386: dpkg-gencontrol: error: current build architecture $arch does not appear in package's list (i386)

Package: busybox Version: 1:1.00-1 Severity: serious Hi, Your package is failing bo build on all arches other than i386 with the following error: dpkg-gencontrol: error: current build architecture $arch does not appear in package's list (i386) This looks like it's about busybox-floppy-udeb (the

Processed: unmerging 314484, reassign 314484 to libgnomevfs2-0 ...

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 > unmerge 314484 Bug#314484: Error on login: 'The Application "gnome-panel" has quit unexpectedly' Bug#312406: gnome-core: Does not install in SID Bug#313219: gnome-vfs2 crashes in rea

Bug#175604: marked as done (cxx's "compaq" mangling style not supported by binutils)

Your message dated Thu, 16 Jun 2005 20:14:55 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t

Bug#196590: acknowledged by developer (Zope (= 2.5) in woody is missing security updates)

> > Now that sarge has been released, woody version of zope is not a problem=20 > anymore, so this bug report can be closed. > What, so the security team isn't maintaining old releases anymore? http://www.debian.org/security/faq#lifespan Look, its obvious nobody cares enough to actually fix thes

Bug#314448: ncurses: ftbfs [sparc] nc_panel.h: No such file or directory

On Thu, Jun 16, 2005 at 11:38:38AM -0700, Blars Blarson wrote: > On Thu, Jun 16, 2005 at 01:23:51PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > > Is the entire log available? Your bug only showed me that the 64-bit > > packages were not built. > > Attached. dpkg-architecture -qDEB_HOST_GNU_TYPE changed in

Bug#314448: ncurses: ftbfs [sparc] nc_panel.h: No such file or directory

On Thu, Jun 16, 2005 at 10:01:55AM -0700, Blars Blarson wrote: > > > A different problem occurs on my sparc pbuilder: > > > This works on the buildd; maybe there are missing packages? Or an > > unstated dependency on a 64-bit kernel, have you got a 32-bit system? > > > > Ben Collins wrote the li

Processed: Bumping severity of this bug

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 313467 serious Bug#313467: missing libltdl3 dependency Severity set to `serious'. > kthxbye Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Processed: Drop pending tag

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 298960 - pending Bug#298960: freewrl: contains non-free fonts Tags were: pending Tags removed: pending > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator,

Bug#314408: libc6: the patch seems to work

Package: libc6 Version: 2.3.2.ds1-22 Followup-For: Bug #314408 Just following up ... I built glibc with the patch above, and installed it on a production server: so far, so good. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel:

Bug#314448: ncurses: ftbfs [sparc] nc_panel.h: No such file or directory

On Thu, Jun 16, 2005 at 09:33:06AM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > On Thu, Jun 16, 2005 at 03:44:06AM -0700, Blars Blarson wrote: > > ncurses fails to build from source a sparc buildd: > Are you sure that the build directory was not removed during this build? > I can't imagine how that error co

Bug#284835: marked as done (electricsheep: Version in woody is so old it doesn't work at all)

Your message dated Thu, 16 Jun 2005 18:12:17 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line [electricsheep #284835] Woody bugs are closed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#284835: [electricsheep #284835] Woody bugs are closed

This bug is closed now, woody is dropped. -- Alexis Sukrieh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.sukria.net « Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur. » Whatever is said in Latin sounds profound.

Bug#152857: those are real amateurs Rod

These are real amateurs who have webcams on their computers in their dorm rooms! This is not one of those porn sites with professional girls who get paid to do this in front of the camera, these are the average girls next door, at college, trying to make money and meet guys! It wont take you more

Bug#314480: (no subject)

The problem come with nis : Without nis : no problem with dbus-1 With nis : segmentation fault in dbus-1 thanks Christian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#314373: [debootstrap-udeb] Breaks new installations - Additional info

I've tried to trace the last remaining error. As far as I can tell, this problem is not in debootstrap, so it would have to be in d-i's run-debootstrap. I have done an install with extra debugging statements around the last statements in debootstrap (see deboot.debug), but even with an explicit

Bug#314480: dbus-1 does not start because of segmentation fault

Package: dbus-1 Version: 0.23.4-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable I ve just installed the system from the sarge s cd .( clean disk , no upgrade ) After the boot, first start : Starting system message bus: /etc/rc2.d/S20dbus-1: line 84: 3627 Segmentation fault start-st

Bug#314448: ncurses: ftbfs [sparc] nc_panel.h: No such file or directory

On Thu, Jun 16, 2005 at 03:44:06AM -0700, Blars Blarson wrote: > Package: ncurses > Version: 5.4-6 > Severity: serious > Tags: sid > Justification: fails to build from source > > ncurses fails to build from source a sparc buildd: > > gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I../ncurses -I/build/buildd/ncurses-5.4/nc

Bug#314465: CA.pl and openssl.cnf default to insecure MD5 digest

Package: openssl Version: 0.9.7e-3 Severity: grave Tags: security Justification: user security hole openssl.cnf defaults to usage of MD5 as digest algorithm for generation of certificates and CAs. MD5 must be considered broken beyond hope, we're not just talking about theoretical attacks, but at

Bug#314373: [debootstrap-udeb] Breaks new installations - Correction

Oops. Colin just noticed my first "patch" is reversed. Should be: - local leftoverdebs="$@" + local leftoverdebs="$*" (but you already knew that :-) pgpHOOFmulvOX.pgp Description: PGP signature

Processed: tagging 314433

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 > tags 314433 fixed-upstream Bug#314433: crafted emails get razor to segfault Tags were: patch Tags added: fixed-upstream > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me

Processed: gtodo

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > package gtodo Ignoring bugs not assigned to: gtodo > tag 313218 unreproducible Bug#313218: gtodo: Program refuses to load if a single todo item exists There were no tags set. Tags added: unreproducible > tag 313218 moreinfo Bug#313218: gtodo: Program

Bug#314459: lvmcreate_initrd fails to create working initrds

Package: lvm10 Version: 1.0.8-8 Severity: critical Problem description: lvm10 is the logical volume manager userspace utility package for the official 2.4 kernel series. When setting up a system which has its root partition on LVM, the kernel has to be loaded from a non-LVM boot partition (wh

Bug#196590: marked as done (stable is missing several security updates)

Your message dated Thu, 16 Jun 2005 13:34:34 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Zope (= 2.5) in woody is missing security updates has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case

Bug#300416: marked as done (nant: FTBFS: stops idling after src/NAnt.DotNet/NAnt.DotNet.build)

Your message dated Thu, 16 Jun 2005 07:17:21 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#300416: fixed in nant 0.84+0.85-rc3-6 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is n

Bug#314448: ncurses: ftbfs [sparc] nc_panel.h: No such file or directory

Package: ncurses Version: 5.4-6 Severity: serious Tags: sid Justification: fails to build from source ncurses fails to build from source a sparc buildd: gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I../ncurses -I/build/buildd/ncurses-5.4/ncurses -I/build/buildd/ncurses-5.4/ncurses/../include -I. -I../include -D_GNU_SO

Bug#314236: marked as done (apt-proxy: breaks with twisted > v2)

Your message dated Thu, 16 Jun 2005 11:22:38 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#314236: apt-proxy: breaks with twisted > v2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case i

Processed: reassign 312406 to glibc, merging 312406 313219

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 > reassign 312406 glibc Bug#312406: gnome-core: Does not install in SID Bug reassigned from package `libc6' to `glibc'. > merge 312406 313219 Bug#312406: gnome-core: Does not install i

Bug#314236: apt-proxy: breaks with twisted > v2

On Wednesday 15 Jun 2005 11:25, Mark De Souza wrote: > Current version does not enforce python2.3-twisted < v2 yet when > python2.3-twisted >= v2 is installed apt-proxy breaks In what way? > "/etc/init.d/apt-proxy start" breaks silently Is there any output in the logfile? > running /usr/sbin/ap

Bug#312406: Think this is related

reassign 312406 libc6 severity 312406 grave merge 312406 313219 thanks, On Wed, Jun 15, 2005 at 09:32:22PM -0400, Jim Wiggs wrote: >Hmmm. HAL is not running on my system at all. I'm running the > original 2.4.18 that installed with my system, or a vanilla 2.4.26 that > I built from source.

Bug#314433: crafted emails get razor to segfault

Hi, if you get time, I'd appreciate it if you could check if this still affects razor 2.71 (packaged at http://go.org.nz/razor/) which I intend to upload to the main debian repository once I've finished QA. If not, I'll check over the weekend. Corrin signature.asc Description: Digital signatu

Processed: Re: Bug#312406: Think this is related

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 312406 libc6 Bug#312406: gnome-core: Does not install in SID Bug reassigned from package `gnome-core' to `libc6'. > severity 312406 grave Bug#312406: gnome-core: Does not install in SID Severity set to `grave'. > merge 312406 313219 Bug#31240

Bug#314335: marked as done (libsphinx2-dev: The file ad_conf.h is not in the /usr/include/sphinx2/ subdirectory.)

Your message dated Thu, 16 Jun 2005 04:47:20 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#314335: fixed in sphinx2 0.5-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#314408: Debian NPTL seems broken

On 6/16/05, David Welton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Both of these bugs seem like reasonably serious issues. I'm not sure > exactly which one 'mine' is, but it looks a bit more like 276312: Ah, I see that 314408 is an amd64 thing, so mine is either 276312, or some other NPTL. In any case, the v

Bug#314268: marked as done (nano_1.3.7-1_hurd-i386.deb: after installation /bin/nano is a symbolic link to /bin/nano (itself))

Your message dated Thu, 16 Jun 2005 04:32:04 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#314268: fixed in nano 1.3.7-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#314433: crafted emails get razor to segfault

Package: razor Version: 2.670-1 Severity: grave Tags: patch Justification: causes non-serious data loss Hi Razor Maintainer Special crafted emails can be used to DOS razor. Some examples of such emails can be found on: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_id=7244345&forum_id=101

Bug#314335: libsphinx2-dev: The file ad_conf.h is not in the /usr/include/sphinx2/ subdirectory.

On Wednesday, 15 June 2005 21:17, Victor Vergara wrote: > Package: libsphinx2-dev > Version: 0.5-1 > Severity: grave > Justification: renders package unusable > > I've tried to compile an application using sphinx but it repports a missing > called ad_conf.h file when including . What application ar

Bug#314408: Debian NPTL seems broken

Both of these bugs seem like reasonably serious issues. I'm not sure exactly which one 'mine' is, but it looks a bit more like 276312: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1220692&group_id=12997&atid=112997 Like the bug Stefan reports, this has caused problems on machines tha

Bug#314407: [Pkg-shadow-devel] Bug#314407: FTBFS: incompatible with dpkg-dev 1.13

tags 314407 pending thanks Quoting Matt Kraai ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > Package: shadow > Severity: serious > Tags: patch > Justification: no longer builds from source > > shadow does not build with dpkg-dev 1.13 because the output of > dpkg-architecture has changed. > > http://lists.debian.org/de

Processed: Re: [Pkg-shadow-devel] Bug#314407: FTBFS: incompatible with dpkg-dev 1.13

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 314407 pending Bug#314407: FTBFS: incompatible with dpkg-dev 1.13 Tags were: patch Tags added: pending > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian B