Package: dasher
Version: 3.2.13-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Maybe a conflict with the ion3 window manager ? After trying a few times
to start it, from an xterm or run (F3), I reinstalled it, purging
everything. After a second reinstall, I was able to launch dasher fr
Your message dated Thu, 09 Jun 2005 06:22:53 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed in 1.13.5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 308777 pending
Bug#308777: python2.3-subversion: leaves byte-compiled files after removal in
/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/{lib,}svn/
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need
Package: xserver-xfree86
Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-14
Followup-For: Bug #309143
-- Package-specific info:
Contents of /var/lib/xfree86/X.roster:
xserver-xfree86
/etc/X11/X target unchanged from checksum in /var/lib/xfree86/X.md5sum.
X server symlink status:
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 20 2005-06-08 19
On Wed, Jun 08, 2005 at 05:56:43PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> tags 312292 -fixed
> thanks
> Surely, this last tag was wrong; "fixed" refers to NMUs, which there hasn't
> been for this package, and sarge doesn't have version 1.0.28 anyway.
Sorry my mistake.
I thought "fixed" referred to if the
tags 312292 -fixed
thanks
On Wed, Jun 08, 2005 at 05:48:07PM -0700, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> > tags 312292 + sarge
> Bug#312292: maradns: Maradns 1.0.28 works around a serious Linux kernel 2.6
> bug that causes MaraDNS to hang
> Tags were: security
> Tags added: sarge
> > tags 312292
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 312292 -fixed
Bug#312292: maradns: Maradns 1.0.28 works around a serious Linux kernel 2.6 bug
that causes MaraDNS to hang
Tags were: fixed sarge security
Tags removed: fixed
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assist
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 257619 serious
Bug#257619: pvpgn: Cannot remove package when /etc/init.d/bnetd fails
Severity set to `serious'.
> retitle 257619 pvpgn: daemon still runs after removing the package
Bug#257619: pvpgn: Cannot remove package when /etc/init.d/bnet
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 312292 + security
Bug#312292: maradns: Maradns 1.0.28 works around a serious Linux kernel 2.6 bug
that causes MaraDNS to hang
There were no tags set.
Tags added: security
> tags 312292 + sarge
Bug#312292: maradns: Maradns 1.0.28 works around a se
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> tags 312584 sid
Bug#312584: librsvg2-bin: current version of package depends on packages
outside unstable
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sid
>
End of message, stopping processi
Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I think etch should really no longer ship this dummy package that's
> obsolete this long. Please upon next upload of lilypond, stop building
> this dummy package to get it removed.
I agree.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
Package: librsvg2-bin
Version: 2.8.1-3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Latest unstable librsvg2-bin (2.9.5-3) depends on:
- libgnomeprint2.2-0 (>= 2.10.2)
- libgnomeprintui2.2-0 (>= 2.10.0)
but latest version of those packages in unstable are: 2.8.2-1 and 2.8.2-2.
-- Sys
Your message dated Thu, 9 Jun 2005 01:38:08 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Please move ebook-dev-ggad and ebook-dev-alp in non-free (OPL
1.0)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If thi
Financial Update:
Client ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Daily Earned Income: 200$ - 2000$
Since you are apart of our growing Financial Community
we have information on how to make 200$ - 2000$ daily.
About 80% of our clients succeed with this opportunity.
Give me a call anytime to find out how.
1-800-4
Your message dated Thu, 9 Jun 2005 01:17:03 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: Severity of trademark problems]
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Your message dated Thu, 9 Jun 2005 01:03:04 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line gtoaster is not installable in Debian 3.0r1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Package: raidtools2
Severity: serious
As this is a dummy transitional package for Sarge, and upgrades skipping
a stable release are not supported, I think this package should be
removed from unstable and that way from etch, in order to reduce package
bloat.
Please do reassign this bug to ftp.debi
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 308702 serious
Bug#308702: mdctl: Dummy package still needed?
Severity set to `serious'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs databa
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 308705 serious
Bug#308705: ipfwadm: Shouldn't this package be removed?
Severity set to `serious'.
> --
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs d
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 308703 serious
Bug#308703: rplay: Dummy package still needed?
Severity set to `serious'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs databa
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 308708 serious
Bug#308708: freetype2: Dummy package still needed?
Severity set to `serious'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs da
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 308709 serious
Bug#308709: lilypond1.3: Dummy package still needed?
Severity set to `serious'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 308715 serious
Bug#308715: alsaplayer: Dummy package still needed?
Severity set to `serious'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs d
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 308718 serious
Bug#308718: amd: Dummy package still needed?
Severity set to `serious'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database
Your message dated Thu, 9 Jun 2005 07:40:17 +1000
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line cgiemail + sendmail
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility
Your message dated Wed, 8 Jun 2005 22:48:11 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line (no subject)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reop
Your message dated Wed, 8 Jun 2005 22:48:11 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line (no subject)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reop
Package: electricsheep
Version: 2.5-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi,
When launching electricsheep from xscreensaver, Xlib will refuse any connection
to the X server until xscreensaver is killed.
Removing electricsheep resolve the problem.
I'm not sure wether this b
Photos, drawings, graphics...learn to create them...then share them all...
http://dwci.6valr5oh3yovlp6.tapetiec.com
There is a fullness of all things, even of sleep and love.
When you're through changing, you're through.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subjec
Package: debian-installer
Severity: grave
This concerns a bug in the partition portion of the debian-installer
for Debian GNU/Linux 3.1r0. At the bottom of this report are also two
feature requests.
1) I start with a single 80 GB hard disk.
2) Clear the partition table.
3) Create a couple 20 GB p
Package: unrar-free
Version: 1:0.0.1-2
Severity: serious
Hi
This package should be removed from debian. It is unusable.
This unrar use unrarlib from http://www.unrarlib.org
Unrar-free is very simple port to use these library.
If you see on download http://www.unrarlib.org/download.html
then y
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> package ntpdate
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: ntpdate
> tags 312454 sarge
Bug#312454: ntpdate: Bug #294636 needs fixing in sarge
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sarge
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
De
On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 07:24:56PM +0200, Isaac Clerencia wrote:
> On Tuesday, 7 June 2005 18:53, Itai Seggev wrote:
> > Package: kdm
> > Version: 4:3.3.2-1
> > Severity: grave
> > Tags: experimental
> > Justification: renders package unusable
> >
> > I think the title says it all. :) I've upgraded
Quoting Martin Kos ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> [2005/06/08 15:24:31, 1] smbd/sesssetup.c:reply_spnego_kerberos(265)
> make_server_info_from_pw failed!
>
> when a user from a windows-client (that is member of the domain, btw samba is
> configured as member of the domain too -> net ads join).
>
> i
On Wed, Jun 08, 2005 at 05:55:43PM +0200, Bastian Kleineidam wrote:
> this bug seems to be already fixed:
> $ apt-cache show abuse-lib
> Package: abuse-lib
> [...]
> Version: 2.00-16
> [...]
> Depends: abuse (>= 1:0.7.0-1)
> I think this bug can be closed.
The claim that it's obsolete still seems
Your message dated Wed, 08 Jun 2005 12:18:01 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#279243: fixed in samba 3.0.14a-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
do you have CONFIG_PREEMPT enabled in your kernel config?
If yes, try to disable it. The preemption stuff is not stable on
certain platforms (eg. AMD64).
Regards,
Bastian
- --
,''`. Bastian Kleineidam
: :' :
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
this bug seems to be already fixed:
$ apt-cache show abuse-lib
Package: abuse-lib
[...]
Version: 2.00-16
[...]
Depends: abuse (>= 1:0.7.0-1)
I think this bug can be closed.
Greetings,
Bastian
- --
,''`. Bastian Kleineidam
On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 03:19:57PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 11:44:18PM +0200, Artur R. Czechowski wrote:
> > The t1lib 1.3.x is na old and upstream unsupported version of library.
> > This package will be - sooner or later - scheduled for remove from
> > Debian.
> Is t
Package: xmms-jack
Version: 0.14-1
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 3.5
Hi !
I just noticed that there is a missing dependency for xmms-jack, or
worse.
In fact, I do not know where the problem really is, but as this is with
this package I found it, I report here.
If xmms-dev is not insta
This code snippet taken from tinyca 0.7.0 fixes it, too.
Cheers,
T.O.
--- tinyca-0.6.8/lib/OpenSSL.pm 2005-02-20 22:03:03.0 +0100
+++ tinyca-0.6.8/lib/OpenSSL.pm 2005-06-08 15:47:30.0 +0200
@@ -497,7 +497,10 @@
# get revoked certs
$tmp->{'LIST'} = [];
- for($i = 0; $li
Package: cgiemail
Version: 1.6-26
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hello,
sh: line 1: sendmail not found
(the above line is from my memory)
If I use `strings /usr/lib/cgi-bin/cgiemail` I cannot find any
location for sendmail compiled in. Probably you rely on a proper set
Package: winbind
Version: 3.0.10-1
Severity: grave
After upgrading the server to sarge the access from windows clients to the samba
server stopped working. all the samba packages have been upgraded from 3.0.10-1
to 3.0.14-a. in the logfile i get
[2005/06/08 15:24:31, 1] smbd/sesssetup.c:reply_s
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 308391 -etch
Bug#308391: crosshurd: Tries to copy a file from sysvinit package even on
hurd-i386
Tags were: etch sarge patch
Tags removed: etch
> tags 299623 -etch
Bug#299623: mdadm: Fails to upgrade while udev installed
Tags were: etch sarge pat
Quoting Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> severity 296609 serious
> tags 296609 +sarge
> thanks
>
>
> This bug ("fam: can not unmount floppy") seems to be a duplicate of the
> archived bug #234787.
>
> David, can you confirm that the fam package in unstable fixes this
> issue?
No. I don't have D
Your message dated Wed, 08 Jun 2005 13:39:16 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line can enter testing now
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibili
Hi,
It has been a long time since this bug has been reported. As I am unable
to reproduce the problem (and to be honest, I doubt the bug is in pdftk,
it works well on all machines I have seen), could you please try again
after an upgrade to see if the problem has disappeared? Maybe a library
has b
Your message dated Wed, 08 Jun 2005 13:39:16 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line can enter testing now
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibili
Your message dated Wed, 08 Jun 2005 13:39:16 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line can enter testing now
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibili
Your message dated Wed, 08 Jun 2005 13:39:16 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line can enter testing now
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibili
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> package mirrors
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: mirrors
> severity 312472 important
Bug#312472: Moroccan Debian mirror should be remoived from list of mirrors
Severity set to `important'.
> retitle 312472 callbright.com mirror out-of-date/stale
Bug#312
Package: mirrors
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)
The Moroccan mirror (something like casa.callbright.com) reports most
pack
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 303324 arla
Bug#303324: file conflicts in freebsd-sendpr arla
Bug reassigned from package `freebsd-sendpr,arla' to `arla'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
I found this copyright notice (non free because it forbids commercial usage).
Though with previous permission given by the second copyright owner it may
become
at least distriutable .
Hope it helps decipher the issue if one is interested in gettyps (it looks like
an interesting getty for dialup)
Package: ntpdate
Version: 1:4.2.0a+stable-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
The clocks on my sarge boxes are drifting because the fix for bug #294636
*still*
hasn't found its way into sarge. Any other box without an IPv6 route to the ntp
server may have the same problem.
Your message dated Wed, 8 Jun 2005 10:33:51 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Only affected Woody
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility
Your message dated Wed, 08 Jun 2005 03:04:52 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#306193: fixed in openoffice.org 1.1.4-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 08:50:37AM -0700, Alan W. Irwin wrote:
> On 2005-06-07 17:48+0900 Horms wrote:
>
> >On Sun, Jun 05, 2005 at 01:11:54PM +0200, Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
> >>severity 311357 grave
> >>thanks
> >>
> >>* Alan W. Irwin wrote:
> >>>This is a confirmation of the bad problem with t
58 matches
Mail list logo
