Your message dated Wed, 8 Jun 2005 22:48:11 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line (no subject)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Apr 2005 08:23:25 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Apr 26 01:23:25 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from apate.telenet-ops.be [195.130.132.57] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1DQLLp-000663-00; Tue, 26 Apr 2005 01:23:25 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
        by apate.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with SMTP id 7E986380AD
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 26 Apr 2005 10:23:24 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from western.grep.be (dD5E0678D.access.telenet.be [213.224.103.141])
        by apate.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66DC438143
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 26 Apr 2005 10:23:24 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [2001:838:37f:20:20d:93ff:fec0:b54a] (helo=country.grep.be)
        by western.grep.be with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
        id 1DQLLo-0006HV-2c
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]
        message size 2096; Tue, 26 Apr 2005 10:23:24 +0200
Received: from wouter by country.grep.be with local (Exim 4.50)
        id 1DQLKo-0002J9-UI
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 26 Apr 2005 10:22:22 +0200
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2005 10:22:22 +0200
From: Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: synaptic/experimental/m68k: FTBFS: undeclared variable
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Speed: Gates'' Law: Every 18 months, the speed of software halves.
Organization: none
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Sender: "Wouter Verhelst,,," <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: synaptic
Version: 0.55+cvs20050325-1.1
Severity: serious

Hi,

There was an error trying to autobuild your package. From the build log:

Automatic build of synaptic_0.55+cvs20050325-1.1 on quickstep by sbuild/m68k 
1.170.5
Build started at 20050426-0421
******************************************************************************
[...]
if g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I/usr/include/apt-pkg   -DXTHREADS 
-I/usr/include/gtk-2.0 -I/usr/lib/gtk-2.0/include -I/usr/X11R6/include 
-I/usr/include/atk-1.0 -I/usr/include/pango-1.0 -I/usr/include/freetype2 
-I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include -I/usr/include/libglade-2.0 
-I/usr/include/libxml2  -DSYNAPTICLOCALEDIR=\""/usr/share/locale"\" 
-DSYNAPTICSTATEDIR=\""/var/lib/synaptic"\"    -g -O2 -MT rpackage.o -MD -MP -MF 
".deps/rpackage.Tpo" \
  -c -o rpackage.o `test -f 'rpackage.cc' || echo './'`rpackage.cc; \
then mv -f ".deps/rpackage.Tpo" ".deps/rpackage.Po"; \
else rm -f ".deps/rpackage.Tpo"; exit 1; \
fi
rpackage.cc: In member function `bool RPackage::isTrusted()':
rpackage.cc:697: error: `IsTrusted' undeclared (first use this function)
rpackage.cc:697: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once for 
   each function it appears in.)
make[3]: *** [rpackage.o] Error 1
[...]

For your convenience, a full build log can be found through
http://experimental.ftbfs.de/

-- 
The amount of time between slipping on the peel and landing on the
pavement is precisely one bananosecond

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 302643-done) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Jun 2005 20:49:38 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 08 13:49:38 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from pop.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net) [213.165.64.20] 
        by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1Dg7UY-0001lW-00; Wed, 08 Jun 2005 13:49:38 -0700
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 08 Jun 2005 20:49:06 -0000
Received: from ip181.135.1511I-CUD12K-01.ish.de (EHLO top.ping.de) 
[62.143.135.181]
  by mail.gmx.net (mp028) with SMTP; 08 Jun 2005 22:49:06 +0200
X-Authenticated: #18895133
Received: by top.ping.de (Postfix, from userid 1000)
        id 454946F2D1; Wed,  8 Jun 2005 22:48:11 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2005 22:48:11 +0200
From: Michael Vogt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01,NOSUBJECT 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

this is fixed in experimental, I close the bug therefore
-- 
Linux is not The Answer. Yes is the answer. Linux is The Question. - Neo


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to