Your message dated Thu, 9 Jun 2005 07:40:17 +1000 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line cgiemail + sendmail has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -------------------------------------- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Jun 2005 14:03:11 +0000 >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 08 07:03:11 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from pu.schlittermann.de [212.80.235.130] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Dg19D-0002vH-00; Wed, 08 Jun 2005 07:03:11 -0700 Received: from eth1.tigger.schlittermann.de ([212.80.235.129] helo=localhost) by Exim 4.50 on pu.schlittermann.de with esmtp id 1Dg18s-0003Jd-07 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 08 Jun 2005 16:02:50 +0200 Received: from pu.schlittermann.de ([212.80.235.130]) by localhost (tigger [212.80.235.129]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 07392-06 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 8 Jun 2005 16:02:46 +0200 (CEST) Received: from tigger.schlittermann.de ([212.80.225.206] helo=jumper.schlittermann.de) (verified: C=DE,ST=Saxony,O=schlittermann -- internet & unix support,CN=jumper.schlittermann.de) by Exim 4.50 on pu.schlittermann.de with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) id 1Dg18o-0003JR-EY for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 08 Jun 2005 16:02:46 +0200 Received: from heiko by jumper.schlittermann.de with local (Exim 4.50) id 1Dg17e-0002os-Re for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 08 Jun 2005 16:01:34 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Heiko Schlittermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: cgiemail: sendmail not found X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8 Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2005 16:01:34 +0200 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: "Heiko Schlittermann,,," <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at schlittermann.de Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: cgiemail Version: 1.6-26 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Hello, sh: line 1: sendmail not found (the above line is from my memory) If I use `strings /usr/lib/cgi-bin/cgiemail` I cannot find any location for sendmail compiled in. Probably you rely on a proper set PATH? I built cgiemail on my laptop and it seems as if now '/usr/sbin/sendmail' is included in the binary as sendmail path and the package works. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.11.11.jumper Locale: LANG=C, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages cgiemail depends on: ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-22 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an --------------------------------------- Received: (at 312512-done) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Jun 2005 21:40:29 +0000 >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 08 14:40:29 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from cpe-138-217-160-143.vic.bigpond.net.au (nukak.apana.org.au) [138.217.160.143] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Dg8Hl-0006KY-00; Wed, 08 Jun 2005 14:40:29 -0700 Received: by nukak.apana.org.au (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 0E8A268497C; Thu, 9 Jun 2005 07:40:18 +1000 (EST) Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2005 07:40:17 +1000 From: Anibal Monsalve Salazar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Heiko Schlittermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: cgiemail + sendmail Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="AaVReJtVIhtsyOXr" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: --AaVReJtVIhtsyOXr Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline On Wed, Jun 08, 2005 at 04:01:34PM +0200, Heiko Schlittermann wrote: > >sh: line 1: sendmail not found >(the above line is from my memory) > >If I use `strings /usr/lib/cgi-bin/cgiemail` I cannot find any >location for sendmail compiled in. Probably you rely on a proper set >PATH? > >I built cgiemail on my laptop and it seems as if now >'/usr/sbin/sendmail' is included in the binary as sendmail path >and the package works. cgiemail doesn't set the PATH variable. It has been almost the same for a long time. On Wed, Jun 08, 2005 at 11:04:17PM +0200, Heiko Schlittermann wrote: > >today I filed a bug report for cgiemail 1.6-26. Your package doesn't >include the proper sendmail path or for some other reason you package >it with some error. > >I just rebuilt the package w/o changing anything: It works. >So I do not know, what you forgot... I'm closing this bug as it is not a cgiemail problem. Regards, Anibal Monsalve Salazar -- .''`. Debian GNU/Linux : :' : Free Operating System `. `' http://debian.org/ `- http://v7w.com/anibal --AaVReJtVIhtsyOXr Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCp2XBgY5NIXPNpFURAiA4AJ49lnPTURFUyKz8FutCoO4ObswtUQCffoQD S8H5U6HsqgviUgyume1FNJg= =yXKk -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --AaVReJtVIhtsyOXr-- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]