Bug#304182: marked as done (apt-proxy-v1tov2 generates empty timeout value)

2005-05-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 16 May 2005 00:32:15 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#304182: fixed in apt-proxy 1.9.29 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#309252: ifupdown must conflict with ifscheme (<< 1.3-3)

2005-05-15 Thread Steve Langasek
severity 309252 important thanks ifscheme has never been in a stable release, and ifscheme 1.3-3 has been approved for sarge (and will go in tomorrow), so this is not an RC bug; it only affects partial upgrades within testing. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Descr

Processed: Re: ifupdown must conflict with ifscheme (<< 1.3-3)

2005-05-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 309252 important Bug#309252: ifupdown must conflict with ifscheme (<< 1.3-3) Severity set to `important'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, D

Processed: closing 302629, tagging 302629

2005-05-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 > close 302629 Bug#302629: Fails parsing LDIF during upgrade 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug closed, send any further explanations to Richar

Processed: closing 304916, tagging 304916

2005-05-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 > close 304916 Bug#304916: [FTBFS] schedutils need to be updated with the recent glibc change 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug closed, send a

Processed: closing 306108, tagging 306108

2005-05-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 > close 306108 Bug#306108: lattice: FTBFS: error on examples check 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug closed, send any further explanations to

Processed: Fixed in NMU of libgnomemm2.6 2.8.0-1sarge0.1

2005-05-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 305414 + fixed Bug#305414: libgnomemm-2.6-dev: libgnomemm-2.6.la still references libhowl.la Tags were: sarge patch Tags added: fixed > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administra

Bug#308399: marked as done (openafs-client: openafs wont shutdown in kernel 2.6.12-rc3)

2005-05-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 15 May 2005 22:47:09 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#308399: fixed in openafs 1.3.82-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#308844: marked as done (libpam-openafs-kaserver pam_afs.so gives undefined symbol errors when used)

2005-05-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 15 May 2005 22:47:09 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#308844: fixed in openafs 1.3.82-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#305414: Processed: still present in sarge

2005-05-15 Thread Steve Langasek
Hi Bradley, On Sun, May 15, 2005 at 05:04:05PM -0700, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > > tags 305414 -fixed > Bug#305414: libgnomemm-2.6-dev: libgnomemm-2.6.la still references libhowl.la > Tags were: fixed patch > Tags removed: fixed > > tags 305414 +sarge > Bug#305414: libgnomemm-2.6-dev: li

Processed: tagging 308401

2005-05-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 > tags 308401 sarge Bug#308401: Missing dependency Tags were: patch Tags added: sarge > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug

Bug#264174: xslideshow (unstable/non-free) needs build on m68k

2005-05-15 Thread Kenshi Muto
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, At Sun, 15 May 2005 18:26:54 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > It looks like an m68k build of xslideshow 3.1-7 is needed to fix RC bug > #264174 in sarge. Would anyone here care to do the honors? I just built and uploaded by myself using Mutsumi Is

Bug#309245: Found the problem

2005-05-15 Thread John Goerzen
thanks for the follow-up, Arjan. I actually already noticed this and have uploaded 0.11.1 with the appropriate fix in MissingH.cabal. Thanks again. -- John On Mon, May 16, 2005 at 01:48:07AM +0200, Arjan Oosting wrote: > Hi, > > I think i found the problem. MissingH uses Control.Monad.Error (an

Bug#264174: xslideshow (unstable/non-free) needs build on m68k

2005-05-15 Thread Steve Langasek
On Mon, May 16, 2005 at 11:07:17AM +0900, Kenshi Muto wrote: > At Sun, 15 May 2005 18:26:54 -0700, > Steve Langasek wrote: > > It looks like an m68k build of xslideshow 3.1-7 is needed to fix RC bug > > #264174 in sarge. Would anyone here care to do the honors? > I just built and uploaded by myse

Bug#308401: uw-imapd: Missing dependency

2005-05-15 Thread Steve Langasek
On Mon, May 16, 2005 at 03:20:43AM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > >>Alternatively I can recompile with the translations included as well, > >>but that will probably not be today, unfortunately. > > If you have the time, it would be nice to still have the translations in as > > well, since those

Bug#84981: Processed: Patch included

2005-05-15 Thread Steve Langasek
On Mon, May 16, 2005 at 09:16:17AM +1000, Craig Small wrote: > On Sat, May 14, 2005 at 04:12:56AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > > > Please note that it still won't work at all in Debian if #222307 is not > > > fixed either, because the current version of mnogosearch-php in > > > Sarge/Sid does not

Bug#308401: uw-imapd: Missing dependency

2005-05-15 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 15-05-2005 20:13, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Sun, May 15, 2005 at 07:43:23PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > >>On 15-05-2005 16:24, Steve Langasek wrote: >>it seems anonymous uploads to ftp-master is no longer allowed, > Uh, that's not true. Wh

Bug#264174: xslideshow (unstable/non-free) needs build on m68k

2005-05-15 Thread Steve Langasek
Hi folks, It looks like an m68k build of xslideshow 3.1-7 is needed to fix RC bug #264174 in sarge. Would anyone here care to do the honors? Thanks, -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Processed: tagging 309249

2005-05-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 > tags 309249 sarge-ignore Bug#309249: opencv: #270345 is still present in sarge Tags were: sarge Tags added: sarge-ignore > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact m

Processed: tagging 309247

2005-05-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 > tags 309247 sid Bug#309247: roxen4-doc fails to install on its own, extremely bad packaging There were no tags set. Tags added: sid > End of message, stopping processing here. Pleas

Bug#309259: GmailFS problems

2005-05-15 Thread Sebastien Delafond
Here is what gmailfs upstream author, Richard Jones, has to say about fixes in 0.4: On Mon, May 16, 2005 at 05:43:52AM +1000, Richard Jones wrote: > For me, GmailFS appeared to work with just the MI_* fix, but then > when you unmounted and remounted it had trouble retrieving the files > previously

Bug#309245: marked as done (libghc6-missingh-dev: ghc -package MissingH fails with unknown symbol)

2005-05-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 15 May 2005 20:18:00 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#309245: fixed in missingh 0.11.1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#309259: Cannot create new files on gmailfs partition

2005-05-15 Thread Sebastien Delafond
Package: gmailfs Version: 0.3-9 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable As of May 2005, no new files can be created on gmailfs mounts. Any attempt to save a file results in the following error: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/share/gmailfs/gmailfs.py", line 31

Bug#289690: smbfs fails on some files on kernel-image-2.6.8-2-686-smp version 2.6.8-13

2005-05-15 Thread Jo Shields
Package: kernel-image-2.6.8-2-686 Followup-For: Bug #289690 Further to the above report, I have a somewhat lazier smbfs mount set on boot (some simple entries in fstab, with a credentials file). Some of my music, stored on a Windows Server 2003 machine, is not properly accessible via these smb

Bug#263612: marked as done (mozilla-browser: [CAN-2004-0597] libpng vulnerability also affects mozilla)

2005-05-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 16 May 2005 00:06:21 GMT with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line mozilla-browser: [CAN-2004-0597] libpng vulnerability also affects mozilla has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.

Bug#276172: logrotate: Pre/post rotate scripts don't get the log filenames as argument

2005-05-15 Thread Lars Wirzenius
su, 2005-05-15 kello 23:59 +0100, Paul Martin kirjoitti: > On Mon, May 16, 2005 at 12:51:48AM +0300, Lars Wirzenius wrote: > > I've verified that Brice Figureau's bug is valid, and that his patch > > fixes it. Attached is a patch complete with an updated debian/changelog > > as well. I will NMU it

Bug#263755: marked as done (png security issues in mozilla)

2005-05-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 16 May 2005 00:06:21 GMT with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line mozilla-browser: [CAN-2004-0597] libpng vulnerability also affects mozilla has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.

Bug#307183: marked as done (linda: can't build as root)

2005-05-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 15 May 2005 19:32:18 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#307183: fixed in linda 0.3.13.sarge.1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is n

Bug#309257: libpano12: patent problems

2005-05-15 Thread Robert Jordens
Package: libpano12 Version: 2.7.0.9-1 Severity: serious As has been pointed out multiple times in the ITP (obviously noone read it...) for panotools (http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=251617), the original author of panotools/libpano, Helmut Dersch has been forced by patent lawsuits

Bug#309245: Found the problem

2005-05-15 Thread Arjan Oosting
Hi, I think i found the problem. MissingH uses Control.Monad.Error (and other modules) which are in the package mtl (Monad Transformer Library) which is not mentioned as a dependency in the pkg-config file. After I added it and did a ghc-pkg update MissingH-pkg-config everything worked as expected

Processed: still present in sarge

2005-05-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reopen 304916 Bug#304916: [FTBFS] schedutils need to be updated with the recent glibc change Bug reopened, originator not changed. > tags 304916 -sid Bug#304916: [FTBFS] schedutils need to be updated with the recent glibc change Tags were: patch sarge

Processed: still present in sarge

2005-05-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reopen 302629 Bug#302629: Fails parsing LDIF during upgrade Bug reopened, originator not changed. > tags 302629 +sarge Bug#302629: Fails parsing LDIF during upgrade Tags were: confirmed Tags added: sarge > thanks Stopping processing here. Please cont

Processed: still present in sarge

2005-05-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 305414 -fixed Bug#305414: libgnomemm-2.6-dev: libgnomemm-2.6.la still references libhowl.la Tags were: fixed patch Tags removed: fixed > tags 305414 +sarge Bug#305414: libgnomemm-2.6-dev: libgnomemm-2.6.la still references libhowl.la Tags were: pa

Processed: (no subject)

2005-05-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 304373 normal Bug#304373: docker: icons only 1x1 Severity set to `normal'. > retitle 304373 docker doesn't show any icons while running metacity Bug#304373: docker: icons only 1x1 Changed Bug title. > End of message, stopping processing here.

Processed: still present in sarge

2005-05-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reopen 264174 Bug#264174: xslideshow: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'libxaw6-dev' Bug reopened, originator not changed. > tags 264174 +sarge Bug#264174: xslideshow: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'libxaw6-dev' Tags were: patch Tags added: sarge > t

Bug#309249: opencv: #270345 is still present in sarge

2005-05-15 Thread Adrian Bunk
Package: opencv Version: 0.9.5-10 Severity: serious Tags: sarge This is a reminder that archived bug #270345 ("Incorrect build on systems with libavcodec installed") is still present in sarge. I've set the severity that high because this bug might e.g. lead to a miscompiled binary package on one

Bug#308819: openmotif: affected by vulnerabilities in libxpm

2005-05-15 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 05:12:46PM +0200, Matej Vela wrote: > OpenMotif includes an outdated copy of the Xpm library with a number of > vulnerabilities: CAN-2004-0687, CAN-2004-0688, CAN-2004-0914, and > CAN-2005-0605. I investigated this a bit and it seems that upstream only has made fixes availa

Processed: still present in sarge - and the package is seriously broken

2005-05-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reopen 304418 Bug#304418: ifscheme: since ifupdown 0.6.5, /etc/network/ifstate moved to /etc/network/run/ifstate Bug reopened, originator not changed. > severity 304418 serious Bug#304418: ifscheme: since ifupdown 0.6.5, /etc/network/ifstate moved to

Bug#84981: Processed: Patch included

2005-05-15 Thread Craig Small
On Sat, May 14, 2005 at 04:12:56AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > > Please note that it still won't work at all in Debian if #222307 is not > > fixed either, because the current version of mnogosearch-php in > > Sarge/Sid does not work with the current version of mnogosearch. > > Hmm, then I think

Processed: Remove pending status

2005-05-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 307948 - pending Bug#307948: scite_1.63-2 (unstable): fails to build from source Tags were: fixed confirmed patch pending sid Tags removed: pending > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking

Processed: missing dependencies are RC

2005-05-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 307497 serious Bug#307497: lme4 requires latticeextra Severity set to `serious'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) --

Bug#83894: marked as done (installs manpages that conflict with manpages-fr)

2005-05-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 16 May 2005 00:54:39 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line fixed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the

Bug#309109: marked as done (xfm: double click to change directory does not work)

2005-05-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 15 May 2005 18:32:32 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#309109: fixed in xfm 1.4.3-8 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your r

Bug#276172: logrotate: Pre/post rotate scripts don't get the log filenames as argument

2005-05-15 Thread Paul Martin
On Mon, May 16, 2005 at 12:51:48AM +0300, Lars Wirzenius wrote: > I've verified that Brice Figureau's bug is valid, and that his patch > fixes it. Attached is a patch complete with an updated debian/changelog > as well. I will NMU it shortly (since we're in a 0-day NMU period) and > release manager

Bug#309247: roxen4-doc fails to install on its own, extremely bad packaging

2005-05-15 Thread Jakob Bohm
Package: roxen4-doc Version: 4.0.325-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable (fails to install) roxen4-doc failed to install, complaining that it did not know what database to contact. That sounded like obvious nonsense (I was installing the *documentation*, not a database clien

Processed: Fixed in NMU of scite 1.63-2.1

2005-05-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 307948 + fixed Bug#307948: scite_1.63-2 (unstable): fails to build from source Tags were: confirmed patch pending sid Tags added: fixed > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administ

Bug#309245: libghc6-missingh-dev: ghc -package MissingH fails with unknown symbol

2005-05-15 Thread Arjan Oosting
Package: libghc6-missingh-dev Version: 0.10.10 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I just tried to use your package with ghc 6.4 but it fails. Both ghc -package MissingH and ghci -package MissingH fail with: Loading package

Bug#309243: gnome-gv: queries DNS-servers about local filenames

2005-05-15 Thread Christian Hammers
severity 309243 normal tags 309243 + moreinfo unreproducible thanks Hello Mads On 2005-05-15 Mads Chr. Olesen wrote: > When ggv is started, a lot of network traffic can be seen. When viewed > with ethereal, it can be seen that many DNS-queries are made, to domains > that resemble document-names f

Bug#307948: scite_1.63-2 (unstable): fails to build from source

2005-05-15 Thread Roger Leigh
Given that this bug was RC, I was advised not to upload using the DELAYED queue, and so I have uploaded it to incoming with the urgency set to high. The amended diff follows: diff -urN scite-1.63.old/debian/changelog scite-1.63/debian/changelog --- scite-1.63.old/debian/changelog 2005-05-15 2

Bug#307516: marked as done (cycle: can't install: Depends: libwxgtk2.5.3-python but it is not installable)

2005-05-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 15 May 2005 18:17:19 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#307516: fixed in cycle 0.3.0-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Processed: Fixed in NMU of logrotate 3.7-2.1

2005-05-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 276172 + fixed Bug#276172: logrotate: Pre/post rotate scripts don't get the log filenames as argument Tags were: patch Tags added: fixed > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system admini

Processed: Re: Bug#309243: gnome-gv: queries DNS-servers about local filenames

2005-05-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 309243 normal Bug#309243: gnome-gv: queries DNS-servers about local filenames Severity set to `normal'. > tags 309243 + moreinfo unreproducible Bug#309243: gnome-gv: queries DNS-servers about local filenames Tags were: security Tags added: mor

Processed: grave

2005-05-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 309109 grave Bug#309109: xfm: double click to change directory does not work Severity set to `grave'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debia

Processed: Mark pending

2005-05-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 307948 + pending patch confirmed Bug#307948: scite_1.63-2 (unstable): fails to build from source Tags were: sid Tags added: pending, patch, confirmed > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug trackin

Bug#307948: scite_1.63-2 (unstable): fails to build from source

2005-05-15 Thread Roger Leigh
Hello, I have uploaded an NMU to fix this problem to DELAYED/2-day. If you do not agree with this change, please remove it from gluck:~tfheen/DELAYED/ within the next two days. The changes in this NMU are detailed in the following diff: diff -urN scite-1.63.old/debian/changelog scite-1.63/debia

Bug#276172: logrotate: Pre/post rotate scripts don't get the log filenames as argument

2005-05-15 Thread Lars Wirzenius
I've verified that Brice Figureau's bug is valid, and that his patch fixes it. Attached is a patch complete with an updated debian/changelog as well. I will NMU it shortly (since we're in a 0-day NMU period) and release managers to accept the change for sarge. diff -ruN old/debian/changelog logrot

Bug#309119: marked as done (rhythmbox: fails to check return value when writing playlists to disk)

2005-05-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 15 May 2005 17:47:14 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#309119: fixed in rhythmbox 0.8.8-13 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Processed: Fixed in upload of libgdiplus 1.1.7-1 to experimental

2005-05-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 301113 + fixed-in-experimental Bug#301113: libgdiplus: FTBFS: Compile error There were no tags set. Tags added: fixed-in-experimental > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administra

Bug#309243: gnome-gv: queries DNS-servers about local filenames

2005-05-15 Thread Mads Chr. Olesen
Package: gnome-gv Version: 1:2.8.2-3 Severity: grave Tags: security Justification: user security hole When ggv is started, a lot of network traffic can be seen. When viewed with ethereal, it can be seen that many DNS-queries are made, to domains that resemble document-names from the local system,

Bug#309242: gcjwebplugin: makes firefox throw "undefined symbol: g_thread_init"

2005-05-15 Thread Timo Juhani Lindfors
Package: gcjwebplugin Version: 0.3.1-3 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable I recently installed firefox and gcjwebplugin from unstable inside a chroot. Unfortunately it seems that gcjwebplugin prevents firefox from starting at all. Here's what I see when I try to start firefox

Bug#308031: mailutils: woody is affected too

2005-05-15 Thread Primoz
Hello, > I don't think this will need a DSA. Please double-check! Default compile option is without mysql and you didn't change that (so your binaries are not vulnerable, even if source is) Primoz signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Bug#309152: tipa: upgrade problems related to tetex-bin

2005-05-15 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sun, May 15, 2005 at 05:07:39PM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote: > On Sun, May 15, 2005 at 04:59:54PM +0200, Rafael Laboissiere wrote: > > * Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-05-15 00:24]: > > > If tipa and tetex-bin from woody are installed and I upgrade to > > > sarge the upgrade fails,

Bug#306108: Processed: I was able to reproduce this in sarge

2005-05-15 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
On Sun, May 15, 2005 at 08:05:56PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Sun, May 15, 2005 at 12:51:35PM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > > On Sun, May 15, 2005 at 10:04:22AM -0700, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > > > Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > > > > > > > reopen 306108 > > > Bug#3

Processed: tagging 309093

2005-05-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 > tags 309093 - sarge Bug#309093: depend on libsomaplayer Tags were: sarge Tags removed: sarge > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. D

Processed: severity of 309093 is grave

2005-05-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 > severity 309093 grave Bug#309093: depend on libsomaplayer Severity set to `grave'. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug

Bug#309111: gnutls DoS bug - Already filed

2005-05-15 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
merge 309111 307641 thanks I've already filed this as 307641 11 days ago. The second part fixes an issue in the RSA key export that looks worthy to be included in Sarge as well. My original report includes two patches; for the DoS issue and a patch which includes the RSA fix as well. Cheers,

Processed: tagging 309093

2005-05-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 309093 sarge Bug#309093: depend on libsomaplayer There were no tags set. Tags added: sarge > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs

Processed: severity of 309093 is critical

2005-05-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 309093 critical Bug#309093: depend on libsomaplayer Severity set to `critical'. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs databa

Processed: reassign 309146 to upgrade-reports

2005-05-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 > reassign 309146 upgrade-reports Bug#309146: install: upgrading from stable to unstable loose pcmcia pakage - problem with network on pcmcia Bug reassigned from package `install' to `

Bug#308401: uw-imapd: Missing dependency

2005-05-15 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sun, May 15, 2005 at 07:43:23PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > On 15-05-2005 16:24, Steve Langasek wrote: > > You submitted a patch to this bug with the subject "NMU patch ...", but no > > NMU has been received in the archive. Are you planning to NMU uw-imap yet > > for this bug (and the tra

Bug#306108: Processed: I was able to reproduce this in sarge

2005-05-15 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Sun, May 15, 2005 at 12:51:35PM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > On Sun, May 15, 2005 at 10:04:22AM -0700, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > > Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > > > > > reopen 306108 > > Bug#306108: lattice: FTBFS: error on examples check > > Bug reopened, originat

Bug#306108: Processed: I was able to reproduce this in sarge

2005-05-15 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
On Sun, May 15, 2005 at 10:04:22AM -0700, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > > > reopen 306108 > Bug#306108: lattice: FTBFS: error on examples check > Bug reopened, originator not changed. > > > tags 306108 -sid > Bug#306108: lattice: FTBFS: error on

Bug#308401: uw-imapd: Missing dependency

2005-05-15 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 15-05-2005 16:24, Steve Langasek wrote: > You submitted a patch to this bug with the subject "NMU patch ...", but no > NMU has been received in the archive. Are you planning to NMU uw-imap yet > for this bug (and the translation bugs)? I have mad

Bug#308031: marked as done (mailutils: sql injection vulnerability in sql authentication module)

2005-05-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 15 May 2005 13:17:04 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#308031: fixed in mailutils 1:0.6.1-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is no

Bug#309208: marked as done (Recent Gmail changes render python-libgmail unusable)

2005-05-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 15 May 2005 13:17:19 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#309208: fixed in python-libgmail 0.0.8+cvs20050208-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not t

Bug#308031: mailutils: woody is affected too

2005-05-15 Thread Jordi Mallach
tags 308031 - woody thanks Hey Primoz, On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 04:17:21AM +0200, Primoz Bratanic wrote: > Woody is affected too. Just check MySql/MySql.c (just that there is no > escaping ... ) I just logged into merkel and checked some of the binaries and the source package for the woody versio

Processed: I was able to reproduce this in sarge

2005-05-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reopen 306108 Bug#306108: lattice: FTBFS: error on examples check Bug reopened, originator not changed. > tags 306108 -sid Bug#306108: lattice: FTBFS: error on examples check Tags were: sid Tags removed: sid > tags 306108 +sarge Bug#306108: lattice: F

Processed: tagging 308031

2005-05-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 > tags 308031 - woody Bug#308031: mailutils: sql injection vulnerability in sql authentication module Tags were: patch sid sarge woody security Tags removed: woody > End of message, st

Bug#304735: slapd: data corruption with LDBM backend

2005-05-15 Thread juan
Package: slapd Version: 2.2.23-1 Followup-For: Bug #304735 We have been running slapd 2.1 for over 2 years without any problems, when upgrading to 2.2 we had serious / random data loss : entries were missing but visible with a slapcat. After migrating to BDB (it's slower), no data loss was noti

Bug#305230: Fwd: Bug#305230: [sparc64] [rc3] [netinstall] RC3 does not work on Ultra5 with both kernels 2.4 and 2.6

2005-05-15 Thread Frederic Lehobey
Hi, On Thu, Apr 21, 2005 at 11:23:37PM -0700, Blars Blarson wrote: > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > >> > We tried to install RC3 on an Ultra5 machine. It failed with both > >> > kernels. > > >> > VFS: Cannot open root device "hda2" or 03:02 > > I've seen this on one

Processed: Re: Bugs #276172 and #270246

2005-05-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 276172 critical Bug#276172: logrotate: Pre/post rotate scripts don't get the log filenames as argument Severity set to `critical'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system admin

Bug#309208: Recent Gmail changes render python-libgmail unusable

2005-05-15 Thread martin f krafft
Please prepare a fixed upload for immediate pushing through to sarge. This is RC after all... -- .''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : :' :proud Debian developer, admin, user, and author `. `'` `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system Invalid/expire

Bug#308401: uw-imapd: Missing dependency

2005-05-15 Thread Luk Claes
Steve Langasek wrote: Hi Luk, Hi Steve You submitted a patch to this bug with the subject "NMU patch ...", but no NMU has been received in the archive. Are you planning to NMU uw-imap yet for this bug (and the translation bugs)? Well, I had to go before I had the time to upload it correctly.

Bug#309209: automatically edited files must not be conffiles

2005-05-15 Thread martin f krafft
Package: fai Version: 2.8.2 Severity: serious FAI's postinst script changes /etc/fai/fai.conf and /etc/fai/sources.list, which are part of the package and marked as dpkg conffiles. Section 10.7.3 of the policy says: "The other way to do it is via the maintainer scripts. In this case, the con

Bug#309152: tipa: upgrade problems related to tetex-bin

2005-05-15 Thread Julian Gilbey
On Sun, May 15, 2005 at 04:59:54PM +0200, Rafael Laboissiere wrote: > * Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-05-15 00:24]: > > > If tipa and tetex-bin from woody are installed and I upgrade to > > sarge the upgrade fails, if the new tetex-bin is configured after > > the new tipa: > > > > S

Processed: still present in sarge

2005-05-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 295265 -fixed Bug#295265: kopete: Crashes with new ICQ-version Tags were: sarge fixed patch security Bug#297861: Kopete crashes on incoming icq message from icq5 user Tags removed: fixed > reopen 305942 Bug#305942: kdenetwork: FTBFS, missing build

Processed: (no subject)

2005-05-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 304373 serious Bug#304373: docker: icons only 1x1 Severity set to `serious'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To

Bug#309152: tipa: upgrade problems related to tetex-bin

2005-05-15 Thread Julian Gilbey
On Sun, May 15, 2005 at 04:59:54PM +0200, Rafael Laboissiere wrote: > * Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-05-15 00:24]: > > > If tipa and tetex-bin from woody are installed and I upgrade to > > sarge the upgrade fails, if the new tetex-bin is configured after > > the new tipa: > > > > S

Bug#309208: Recent Gmail changes render python-libgmail unusable

2005-05-15 Thread Sebastien Delafond
Package: python-libgmail Version: 0.0.8+cvs20050208-1 Severity: grave Tags: upstream patch Justification: renders package unusable The following patch is needed as of May 2005 (increment the constants from MI_AUTHOREMAIL to MI_PHISHWARNING incremented by 1. So MI_SUBJECT should become 15 and MI_A

Bug#309152: marked as done (tipa: upgrade problems related to tetex-bin)

2005-05-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 15 May 2005 11:32:25 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#309152: fixed in tipa 2:1.2-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#309152: tipa: upgrade problems related to tetex-bin

2005-05-15 Thread Rafael Laboissiere
* Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-05-15 00:24]: > If tipa and tetex-bin from woody are installed and I upgrade to > sarge the upgrade fails, if the new tetex-bin is configured after > the new tipa: > > Setting up tipa (1.2-1) ... > texhash: Updating /usr/local/share/texmf/ls-R... > te

Bug#294501: php4-pgsql: php4-pgsql causes apache to segfault upon startup

2005-05-15 Thread Steve Langasek
severity 294501 important thanks With the upload of php4-pgsql 3:4.3.10-4, php4-pgsql now takes steps at install time to ensure that pgsql and imap are loaded in the correct order (i.e., the order that doesn't trigger this hideously obscure bug). Since all the reporters of this current round of s

Bug#309014: Unprivileged users may crash atd

2005-05-15 Thread Steve Langasek
severity 309014 important thanks On Sun, May 15, 2005 at 03:50:27PM +0200, Matthijs Mohlmann wrote: > I have a Dual AMD Athlon 1800+ (MP) and running the commands above > wouldn't crash atd. > I also vote to downgrade the severity to important, the bug causes not a > unusable package. Running th

Bug#307231: RageIRCd build failure on s390

2005-05-15 Thread Marc Haber
Thiemo Seufer suggests replacing the entire VA_COPY detection code with: #if defined(__GNUC__) || (defined(__powerpc__) && defined(__FreeBSD__)) #define VA_COPY __va_copy #elif defined(__powerpc__) && defined(__NetBSD__) #define VA_COPY va_copy #else #define VA_COPY(x, y) x = y #endif With that p

Bug#309201: osgcal - uses ccache but does not clean up the cache

2005-05-15 Thread Bastian Blank
Package: osgcal Version: 0.1.28-1 Severity: serious osgcal uses ccache but never cleans up the cache in the clean target. This violates policy Â4.8: | clean | This must undo any effects that the build and binary targets may | have had, except that it should leave alone any output files cre

Bug#308401: uw-imapd: Missing dependency

2005-05-15 Thread Steve Langasek
Hi Luk, You submitted a patch to this bug with the subject "NMU patch ...", but no NMU has been received in the archive. Are you planning to NMU uw-imap yet for this bug (and the translation bugs)? Thanks, -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Processed: Re: Bug#309014: Unprivileged users may crash atd

2005-05-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 309014 important Bug#309014: Unprivileged users may crash atd Severity set to `important'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs data

Bug#308489: marked as done (geda: segfault in malloc())

2005-05-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 15 May 2005 09:47:03 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#308489: fixed in geda 20050313-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#309014: Unprivileged users may crash atd

2005-05-15 Thread Matthijs Mohlmann
Hi, I have a Dual AMD Athlon 1800+ (MP) and running the commands above wouldn't crash atd. I also vote to downgrade the severity to important, the bug causes not a unusable package. Regards, Matthijs Mohlmann signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#84981: Processed: Patch included

2005-05-15 Thread Jerome Warnier
[..] > I've done that, but it does not work either because PHP (in Debian) > lacks the mnogosearch extension. And that is related to #117110, which has been reported by Craig, 3 years and 202 days ago. > So, for me, it could/should be removed from Sarge. > > Thanks for your help. > > > > Cheers,

  1   2   >