Your message dated Sun, 15 May 2005 19:32:18 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#307183: fixed in linda 0.3.13.sarge.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 1 May 2005 12:41:12 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun May 01 05:41:12 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from c203005.adsl.hansenet.de (localhost.localdomain) [213.39.203.5] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1DSDl1-0002lW-00; Sun, 01 May 2005 05:41:12 -0700
Received: from aj by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.50)
        id 1DSDlL-0001NG-MU; Sun, 01 May 2005 14:41:31 +0200
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Andreas Jochens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: linda: FTBFS: test.test_support.TestFailed: errors occurred 
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 01 May 2005 14:41:31 +0200
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: linda
Version: 0.3.13
Severity: serious

When building 'linda' in a clean chroot on i386/testing,
I get the following error:

    self.assertEqual(expected.intersection(output), expected)
  File "/usr/lib/python2.3/unittest.py", line 302, in failUnlessEqual
    raise self.failureException, \
AssertionError: Set([]) != Set([' removed within the clean target.', 'E: 
testunpacked; Package contains debian/files.', ' This package contains 
debian/files, which should not be installed, and'])

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ran 187 tests in 4.879s

FAILED (failures=4, errors=2)
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "tests/run_tests.py", line 84, in ?
    UnpackerBaseTest, EndToEndTest, KeysTest)
  File "/usr/lib/python2.3/test/test_support.py", line 262, in run_unittest
    run_suite(suite, testclass)
  File "/usr/lib/python2.3/test/test_support.py", line 246, in run_suite
    raise TestFailed(msg)
test.test_support.TestFailed: errors occurred; run in verbose mode for details
make[1]: *** [test] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/linda-0.3.13'
make: *** [test-stamp] Error 2


Regards
Andreas Jochens

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 307183-close) by bugs.debian.org; 15 May 2005 23:49:16 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun May 15 16:49:15 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1DXSrD-0003RC-00; Sun, 15 May 2005 16:49:15 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1DXSao-0000u4-00; Sun, 15 May 2005 19:32:18 -0400
From: Steve Kowalik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $
Subject: Bug#307183: fixed in linda 0.3.13.sarge.1
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 15 May 2005 19:32:18 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Source: linda
Source-Version: 0.3.13.sarge.1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
linda, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

linda_0.3.13.sarge.1.dsc
  to pool/main/l/linda/linda_0.3.13.sarge.1.dsc
linda_0.3.13.sarge.1.tar.gz
  to pool/main/l/linda/linda_0.3.13.sarge.1.tar.gz
linda_0.3.13.sarge.1_all.deb
  to pool/main/l/linda/linda_0.3.13.sarge.1_all.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Steve Kowalik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated linda package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 15 May 2005 23:05:54 +1000
Source: linda
Binary: linda
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.3.13.sarge.1
Distribution: testing-proposed-updates
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Steve Kowalik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Steve Kowalik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 linda      - Debian package checker, not unlike lintian
Closes: 307183
Changes: 
 linda (0.3.13.sarge.1) testing-proposed-updates; urgency=medium
 .
   * Command-line arguments:
     - Add -S, which doesn't drop root privledges when running as root.
   * Testsuite:
     - Call linda with -S in the endtoend tests. (Closes: #307183)
Files: 
 25a487cff89a6c0f75a0a1e8d187b5bb 538 devel optional linda_0.3.13.sarge.1.dsc
 b78de1ef09ba2ad042823edc7a1f64c7 672028 devel optional 
linda_0.3.13.sarge.1.tar.gz
 b72516640a2f0f4b3ac1480994770195 129952 devel optional 
linda_0.3.13.sarge.1_all.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFCh0uWCfB0CMh//C8RAqgsAKDJ5oyGjoSxItD1195IISN2wax97QCfQmqc
ewPc2xa2CwjEeslouJEKVcs=
=WfXs
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to