Your message dated Mon, 07 Mar 2005 01:47:15 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#286905: fixed in perl 5.8.4-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Mon, 07 Mar 2005 01:47:15 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#286905: fixed in perl 5.8.4-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
> make[3]: *** No rule to make target `xeplugin_dcop_skel.h', needed by
> `all-am'. Stop.
Debian (including kxdocker package) doesn't seem to contain a file named
like that. Removing the reference to it in src/Makefile.am and
src/Makefile.in allows the package to be built.
--
To UNSUBSCRIB
> I attach a bzipped tarball of /etc/udev.
Better if I really attach it. :-/
Successfully,
Nowhere man
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OpenPGP 0xD9D50D8A
BZh91AY&SY:E »ÿ°<@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@Qª6ØÊM
[EMAIL PROTECTED]@¢ ©
[EMAIL PROTECTED]@ Ji
§±&ÒQê<[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]&§©úÔ
With regard to bug #295877: gauche-gtk is missing versioned build
dependencies on gauche-dev (>= 0.8.3-1) and possibly on gauche (>=
0.8.3-1). gauche has been split into several packages and is waiting for
NEW package processing (see http://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html). I've
verified that those
> Please report the content of /etc/udev/udev.rules of the /etc/udev/
> directory.
I attach a bzipped tarball of /etc/udev.
Quickly,
Nowhere man
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OpenPGP 0xD9D50D8A
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Your message dated Sun, 06 Mar 2005 21:02:35 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#298233: fixed in kernel-patch-adamantix 1.7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case i
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 294163 = moreinfo
Bug#294163: libdb4.3: build failed on hppa
Tags were: patch
Tags set to: moreinfo
> --
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs data
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10
> retitle 241497 need upgrade directories for hppa64, sparc sun4m and 80386
Bug#241497: sarge needs upgrade-i386 directory which gives us upgrade-path for
real i386 architecture
Change
Your message dated Sun, 06 Mar 2005 19:47:44 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#222664: fixed in signing-party 0.3.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 297992 + fixed
Bug#297992: dcraw: No longer installable.
Tags were: sid
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
On Mar 07, Pierre THIERRY <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Please don't close bugs without even waiting to know if the solution you
> give is helpful!
It was a very good bet.
Please report the content of /etc/udev/udev.rules of the /etc/udev/
directory.
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: Di
reopen 298351
thanks
Please don't close bugs without even waiting to know if the solution you
give is helpful!
> mv /etc/udev/udev.rules.dpkg-dist /etc/udev/udev.rules
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ls /etc/udev/udev.rules.dpkg-dist
ls: /etc/udev/udev.rules.dpkg-dist: No such file or directory
Quickly,
N
Your message dated Mon, 7 Mar 2005 01:16:00 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#298351: udev: Bad permissions for all devices render
system unusable or mostly so
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
jaldhar: I'm cc'ing you since you've made the last couple of
versions/uploads and might have a clue about finding the missing
is13194-bn.cset file.
Not knowing any Bengali whatsoever, I don't know if this is helpful, but
ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/aspell/dict/bn/ has a tarball that contains
u-beng.cmap
On Mon, 7 Mar 2005, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> jaldhar: I'm cc'ing you since you've made the last couple of
> versions/uploads and might have a clue about finding the missing
> is13194-bn.cset file.
>
> Not knowing any Bengali whatsoever, I don't know if this is helpful, but
> ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/a
Your message dated Sun, 06 Mar 2005 18:47:03 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#298114: fixed in nvi 1.79-22
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10
> reassign 241497 module-init-tools,modutils,initrd-tools
Bug#241497: sarge needs upgrade-i386 directory which gives us upgrade-path for
real i386 architecture
Bug reassigned from pack
Package: udev
Version: 0.053-1
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
After boot, udev creates all device nodes with owner and group root, and
permissions rw-rw, so noone can read nor write in any device. Thus
it is impossible to login to KDE (screen disappears and then KDM
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 241497 kernel
Bug#241497: sarge needs upgrade-i386 directory which gives us upgrade-path for
real i386 architecture
Bug reassigned from package `ftp.debian.org' to `kernel'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if yo
Your message dated Sun, 06 Mar 2005 17:17:17 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#298339: fixed in rake 0.4.15-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
For what it's worth, with 0.3.3.cvs.20031022-3, on i386 with current
sid, I see the problem with pbuilder (i.e., the build fails), but not
when building directly outside pbuilder or any chroot.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAI
Kenshi Muto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> Package: tetex-bin
> Version: 2.99.12.20050203-beta-1
> Severity: serious
> Tags: experimental
>
> I put tetex-bin 2.99.12.20050203-beta-1 to my arm buildd queue.
Thank you for trying!
> As you mentioned ago, I installed tetex-base 2.99.9.20050111-beta-
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10
> severity 269523 normal
Bug#269523: RM: mono:mono-common [!i386 !powerpc !s390] -- RoM; NBS (ANAIS);
unsupported upstream
Severity set to `normal'.
>
End of message, stopping process
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10
> severity 271313 normal
Bug#271313: On ftp.debian.org ia64 has to be removed for all packages depending
on xview
Severity set to `normal'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Your message dated Sun, 06 Mar 2005 16:02:21 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#297661: fixed in iso-codes 0.45-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Package: request-tracker3.2
Version: 3.2.2-3
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
Apache2 MPM prefork begins to leek memory at an alarming rate - forks reach
around
35MB each at start up expanding to around 50MB in some cases in a few
minutes even when request-tracker is not
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10
> tags 298339 sid
Bug#298339: rake: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'rdoc'
Tags were: patch
Tags added: sid
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need a
Your message dated Sun, 06 Mar 2005 15:32:13 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#293079: fixed in aolserver4 4.0.10-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Package: rake
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
When building 'rake' in a clean chroot,
I get the following error:
ruby -I ./lib bin/rake rdoc
rm -r debian/rake/usr/share/doc/rake/html
rdoc -o debian/rake/usr/share/doc/rake/html --line-numbers --inline-source
--main README --title 'Rake -- Ruby Make
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 297985 important
Bug#297985: xserver-xfree86: X server crashes when compiling a program from
gnat-gps
Severity set to `important'.
> tag 297985 = upstream moreinfo
Bug#297985: xserver-xfree86: X server crashes when compiling a program from
g
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10
> tags 291500 sarge sid
Bug#291500: cryptsetup_20050111-2(arm): FTBS
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sarge, sid
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if yo
Hello
On Sun, Mar 06, 2005 at 01:20:06AM +0100, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 05, 2005 at 09:56:43PM +0100, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> > Hello
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 03, 2005 at 02:23:52AM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > > Package: util-vserver
> > > Version: 0.30.203-1
> > > Severity: serious
> >
Package: cryptsetup
Version: 20050111-2.1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Cryptsetup fails to build (tested on mipsel), caused by a follow-on
error to:
configure.in: 5: required file ./config.h.in]' not found
Makefile.am:1: AM_GNU_GETTEXT in configure.in' but intl' not in SUBDIRS
automake:
Hello
On Thu, Mar 03, 2005 at 02:23:52AM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
> Package: util-vserver
> Version: 0.30.203-1
> Severity: serious
> Tags: experimental
>
> Hi,
> please see http://experimental.ftbfs.de/build.php?arch=&pkg=util-vserver
> for the full build log
I actually think this is a bug i
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10
> severity 291500 serious
Bug#291500: cryptsetup_20050111-2(arm): FTBS
Severity set to `serious'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10
> tags 291500 - unreproducible sarge sid
Bug#291500: cryptsetup_20050111-2(arm): FTBS
Tags were: unreproducible sid
Tags removed: unreproducible, sarge, sid
>
End of message, stopping
gksu "gnome-cups-manager -p D1_HPColor"
-> authenticates "gnome-cups-manager -p D1_HPColor", then
-> /usr/bin/env -u XAUTHORITY=/tmp/libgksu1.2-zWXKDc/.Xauthority
gnome-cups-manager -p D1_HPColor
-> this is the right one !
Are you sure that this doesn't break special printer names like "$TERMtt"?
c
Your message dated Sun, 06 Mar 2005 17:50:15 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line FTBFS: Unsatisfiable Build-Depends
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Sun, 06 Mar 2005 17:45:18 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line gorm: GNUstep Mass Bug Breaks Policy Section 9.1.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the cas
Your message dated Sun, 06 Mar 2005 11:32:06 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#191982: fixed in flwm 1.00-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
Your message dated Sun, 06 Mar 2005 11:32:06 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#196400: fixed in flwm 1.00-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
Your message dated Sun, 06 Mar 2005 10:47:50 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#249234: fixed in libxtm-perl 0.36-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Sun, 06 Mar 2005 16:12:45 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
has caused the Debian Bug report #298294,
regarding non-free icons
to be marked as having been forwarded to the upstream software
author(s) [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(NB: If you are a system administr
Your message dated Sun, 06 Mar 2005 10:02:03 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#298298: fixed in libparse-recdescent-perl 1.94-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the c
Package: libparse-recdescent-perl
Version: 1.94-1
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 3.5
The package currently depends on perl >= 5.6something, but doesn't
include the Text::Balanced module anymore. The package is thus unusable
on woody systems. If this is intentional, please depend on perl
Hi,
On Sun, Mar 06, 2005 at 01:30:29PM +0100, Thibauld Manson wrote:
> Package: gcjwebplugin
> Severity: critical
> Justification: breaks unrelated software
>
> When using gcjwebplugin, I can't run Mozilla-firefox, as I get an
> GLib-error** : The thread system is not yet initialized
>
> However
Package: sysfsutils
Version: 1.2.0-5
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
my /etc/sysfs.conf is like :
#
# /etc/sysfs.conf - Configuration file for setting sysfs attributes.
#
# The sysfs mount directory is automatically prepended to th
Package: baghira
Version: 0.6a-1
Severity: serious
The license of the icons are not clearly dfsg-compliant. Please clear
the situation with upstream and get a proper license statement.
Otherwise, the package must go to non-free.
Regards,
Daniel
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse
On Sun, 06 Mar 2005 11:09:30 +0900
Hideki Yamane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Sat, 05 Mar 2005 17:35:02 +0100", "Ricardo Mones"
> "Re: Bug#298173: sylpheed: [security] buffer overflow (=< 1.0.2), now
> 1.0.3 is released"
> > Thanks for reminding but I've already done it, just waiting for my
Package: gcjwebplugin
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks unrelated software
When using gcjwebplugin, I can't run Mozilla-firefox, as I get an
GLib-error** : The thread system is not yet initialized
However, the same problem goes with Mozilla-1.7.5
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
Your message dated Sun, 6 Mar 2005 11:53:43 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Package: capi4hylafax
Version: 1:01.02.03-7
Followup-For: Bug #291559
The same problem occurs with version 1:01.02.03-9.
For now I'll stick with 1:01.02.03-7 and use my wrapper script
as workaround for bug #293808.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (9
Your message dated Sun, 6 Mar 2005 11:54:42 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Your message dated Sun, 06 Mar 2005 05:32:14 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#298267: fixed in foomatic-gui 0.7.4.7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Your message dated Sun, 06 Mar 2005 05:02:07 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#298178: fixed in rxvt-unicode 5.2-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Hi Esteban,
>Is this bug being investigated?
Yes. It's already pending. I just haven't put the tag for the upload is
ready and we're just holding the userland until all buildds have
openh323.
>So, why don't you upload it to unstable and close this bug? Any reason?
It will be later today
Package: foomatic-gui
Severity: serious
Version: 0.7.4.6
>From my build log, using pbuilder in an i386 chroot:
...
fakeroot debian/rules clean
dh_testdir
dh_testroot
rm -f build-stamp configure-stamp
#rm -rf build
# Add here commands to clean up after the build process.
rm -f `find -name '*.py[c
58 matches
Mail list logo
