Your message dated Sun, 6 Mar 2005 11:53:43 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Jan 2005 22:29:08 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jan 03 14:29:08 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from emailhub.stusta.mhn.de (mailout.stusta.mhn.de) [141.84.69.5] 
        by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1ClahH-0005Ht-00; Mon, 03 Jan 2005 14:29:07 -0800
Received: (qmail 12585 invoked from network); 3 Jan 2005 22:28:36 -0000
Received: from r063144.stusta.swh.mhn.de (10.150.63.144)
  by mailout.stusta.mhn.de with SMTP; 3 Jan 2005 22:28:36 -0000
Received: by r063144.stusta.swh.mhn.de (Postfix, from userid 1000)
        id A1007BBA7E; Mon,  3 Jan 2005 23:28:35 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: magma lacks dependencies
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.2
Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2005 23:28:35 +0100
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: magma
Version: 0.trunk20040913-1
Severity: grave


magma lacks dependencies although at least a shlibs dependency on
libc6 is required.



BTW: lintian gives a warning for this bug.

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 288466-done) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Mar 2005 10:53:47 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Mar 06 02:53:47 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from wavehammer.waldi.eu.org [82.139.196.55] (postfix)
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1D7tOM-0000ZX-00; Sun, 06 Mar 2005 02:53:47 -0800
Received: by wavehammer.waldi.eu.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
        id 9FC6D3C010; Sun,  6 Mar 2005 11:53:43 +0100 (CET)
Date: Sun, 6 Mar 2005 11:53:43 +0100
From: Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: fixed
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
        protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="qlTNgmc+xy1dBmNv"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,ONEWORD autolearn=no 
        version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 


--qlTNgmc+xy1dBmNv
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

This bug is fixed in 0.trunk20050206-1.
--=20
You're dead, Jim.
                -- McCoy, "The Tholian Web", stardate unknown

--qlTNgmc+xy1dBmNv
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkIq4TcACgkQnw66O/MvCNFYBgCff7Z0of1Jr9IJtDHqgMmfd8Ec
5UkAnRMgQg+E+A0FUYtgF4bqauBCZZT5
=OKQt
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--qlTNgmc+xy1dBmNv--


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to