Bug#297492: mozilla-thunderbird-enigmail: Enigmail apparently not doing anything of value

2005-02-28 Thread Alexander Sack
Brian Bennett wrote: Package: mozilla-thunderbird-enigmail Version: 2:0.90.0-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Enigmail menu and toolbar buttons are present but encrypted/signed mail is not decrypted/verified. Additionally, mail that is specified to be encrypted/signed is ne

Bug#297284: Only wishlist

2005-02-28 Thread Helge Kreutzmann
retitle 297284 Please check/reset critical environment variables severity 297284 wishlist thanks -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann, Dipl.-Phys. [EMAIL PROTECTED] gpg signed mail preferred 64bit GNU powered http://www.itp.uni-hannover.de/~kreutzm

Bug#284952: marked as done (kernel-image-2.6.9-powerpc: freeze when unplugging USB storage)

2005-02-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 1 Mar 2005 15:34:25 +0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line fixed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the

Processed: Only wishlist

2005-02-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 297284 Please check/reset critical environment variables Bug#297284: base: tetex after sarge install not setup correctly Changed Bug title. > severity 297284 wishlist Bug#297284: Please check/reset critical environment variables Severity set to

Processed: tagging 296506

2005-02-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10 > tags 296506 + patch Bug#296506: libhid: FTBFS: cast from pointer to integer of different size There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > End of message, stopping processing here. P

Bug#297282: marked as done (exim4: option "local_scan_path" unknown)

2005-02-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 01 Mar 2005 02:17:16 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#297282: fixed in exim4 4.50-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#297470: cacti: rrd location in /var/cache not compliant with fhs

2005-02-28 Thread sean finney
On Tue, Mar 01, 2005 at 07:08:54AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > The usual location for such data would be /var/lib/cacti (as > postgres and mysql does). > Though a closer check from the fhs may be safer ... meant to say /var/lib/cacti/rra, not cacti/lib... sean -- signature.asc

Bug#297470: cacti: rrd location in /var/cache not compliant with fhs

2005-02-28 Thread sean finney
On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 07:39:53PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > > the next version of cacti i upload will fix this, and also support > > moving the rrd's from the old location into the new one, which will > > be /var/cacti/lib/rra. > > Er, I hope not, as this would be even further from FHS compl

Bug#297282: Re: exim4: option "local_scan_path" unknown

2005-02-28 Thread Marc Haber
tags #297282 sid confirmed pending thanks On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 02:30:31PM +0100, Marc Haber wrote: > Ouch. The dlopen functionality was patched in, and somehow that patch > must have gotten lost in the process. 4.50-3 will have the dlopen patch enabled in both -daemon-light and -daemon-heavy.

Processed: Re: Re: exim4: option "local_scan_path" unknown

2005-02-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags #297282 sid confirmed pending Bug#297282: exim4: option "local_scan_path" unknown Tags were: sid Tags added: sid, confirmed, pending > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administ

Bug#297470: cacti: rrd location in /var/cache not compliant with fhs

2005-02-28 Thread browaeys . alban
The usual location for such data would be /var/lib/cacti (as postgres and mysql does). Though a closer check from the fhs may be safer ... Regards Alban -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#297479: marked as done (gvimdiff: relocation error: /usr/lib/libXft.so.2: undefined symbol: XRenderFindStandardFormat)

2005-02-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 28 Feb 2005 20:57:02 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line gvimdiff: relocation error: /usr/lib/libXft.so.2: undefined symbol: XRenderFindStandardFormat has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Bug#297460: mmx-emu: installs library into /lib

2005-02-28 Thread Steve Langasek
severity 297460 important thanks To the extent that anything depends on this library at all, there's no reason that it couldn't be something in /bin or /sbin except that it's unlikely for such core tools to be able to take advantage of MMX instructions. It's likely that this library is better sui

Processed: Re: mmx-emu: installs library into /lib

2005-02-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 297460 important Bug#297460: mmx-emu: installs library into /lib Severity set to `important'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs d

Bug#297504: avr-libc: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends

2005-02-28 Thread Daniel Schepler
Package: avr-libc Severity: serious Version: 1:1.2.3-1 >From my build log (reproduced with pbuilder in an i386 chroot): ... fig2dev -L eps demo.fig demo.eps fig2dev -L png demo.fig demo.png sh: gs: command not found fig2dev: broken pipe (GhostScript aborted?) command was: gs -q -dSAFER -sDEVICE=p

Bug#297503: aspell-sl: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends

2005-02-28 Thread Daniel Schepler
Package: aspell-sl Severity: serious Version: 0.60-1 >From my build log: ... fakeroot debian/rules clean debian/rules:3: /usr/share/cdbs/1/rules/debhelper.mk: No such file or directory debian/rules:4: /usr/share/cdbs/1/class/makefile.mk: No such file or directory make: *** No rule to make target

Bug#296897: CAN-2005-0532: Buffer overflow in reiserfs_copy_from_user... on 64bit arches

2005-02-28 Thread Horms
On Tue, Mar 01, 2005 at 12:38:49PM +0900, Horms wrote: > On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 03:05:58PM +0100, Stefan Fritsch wrote: > > Package: kernel-source-2.6.8 > > Version: 2.6.8-13 > > Severity: critical > > Tags: security > > Justification: root security hole > > > > Cite: > > "The reiserfs_copy_from_

Bug#283002: marked as done (This package shouldn't enter sarge)

2005-02-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 1 Mar 2005 11:32:05 +0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen th

Bug#279881: marked as done (kernel-patch-powerpc-2.6.9: should not enter sarge)

2005-02-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 1 Mar 2005 11:32:05 +0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen th

Bug#277024: marked as done (kernel-patch-2.4.25-apus: should not be included in sarge)

2005-02-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 1 Mar 2005 11:32:05 +0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen th

Bug#277015: marked as done (kernel-image-2.4.26-mac: should not be included in sarge)

2005-02-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 1 Mar 2005 11:32:05 +0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen th

Bug#277013: marked as done (kernel-image-2.4.26-hppa: should not be included in sarge)

2005-02-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 1 Mar 2005 11:32:05 +0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen th

Bug#277008: marked as done (kernel-image-2.4.26-s390: should not be included in sarge)

2005-02-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 1 Mar 2005 11:32:05 +0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen th

Bug#277010: marked as done (kernel-image-2.4.26-arm: should not be included in sarge)

2005-02-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 1 Mar 2005 11:32:05 +0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen th

Bug#277001: marked as done (kernel-image-2.4.25-arm: should not be included in sarge)

2005-02-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 1 Mar 2005 11:32:05 +0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen th

Bug#277004: marked as done (kernel-image-2.4.25-hppa: should not be included in sarge)

2005-02-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 1 Mar 2005 11:32:05 +0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen th

Bug#297470: cacti: rrd location in /var/cache not compliant with fhs

2005-02-28 Thread Steve Langasek
> the next version of cacti i upload will fix this, and also support > moving the rrd's from the old location into the new one, which will > be /var/cacti/lib/rra. Er, I hope not, as this would be even further from FHS compliance than the current layout? -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer

Bug#296897: CAN-2005-0532: Buffer overflow in reiserfs_copy_from_user... on 64bit arches

2005-02-28 Thread Horms
On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 03:05:58PM +0100, Stefan Fritsch wrote: > Package: kernel-source-2.6.8 > Version: 2.6.8-13 > Severity: critical > Tags: security > Justification: root security hole > > Cite: > "The reiserfs_copy_from_user_to_file_region function in reiserfs/file.c for > Linux kernel > 2.6

Bug#277005: marked as done (kernel-image-2.4.26-alpha: should not be included in sarge)

2005-02-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 1 Mar 2005 11:32:05 +0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen th

Bug#277011: marked as done (kernel-image-2.4.25-mac: should not be included in sarge)

2005-02-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 1 Mar 2005 11:32:05 +0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen th

Bug#277014: marked as done (kernel-image-2.4.26-ia64: should not be included in sarge)

2005-02-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 1 Mar 2005 11:32:05 +0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen th

Bug#279594: marked as done (kernel-source-2.6.9: should not enter sarge)

2005-02-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 1 Mar 2005 11:32:05 +0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen th

Processed: 2.6.9 -> 2.6.10

2005-02-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 279648 kernel-source-2.6.10 Bug#279648: kernel-source-2.6.9: Boot : console vga mode problem Warning: Unknown package 'kernel-source-2.6.9' Bug reassigned from package `kernel-source-2.6.9' to `kernel-source-2.6.10'. > reassign 280091 kernel-s

Processed: 2.4.26 -> 2.4.27

2005-02-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 233297 kernel-image-2.4.27-ia64 Bug#233297: sym53c8xx MCA / debian 2.4.24 Warning: Unknown package 'kernel-image-2.4.26-ia64' Bug#236699: sym53c8xx_2 linked statically Warning: Unknown package 'kernel-image-2.4.26-ia64' Bug reassigned from pack

Bug#297492: mozilla-thunderbird-enigmail: Enigmail apparently not doing anything of value

2005-02-28 Thread Brian Bennett
Package: mozilla-thunderbird-enigmail Version: 2:0.90.0-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Enigmail menu and toolbar buttons are present but encrypted/signed mail is not decrypted/verified. Additionally, mail that is specified to be encrypted/signed is neither encrypted nor

Bug#255121: marked as done (wordpress: Many filenames violate Debian policy; many are also not marked confflies)

2005-02-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 1 Mar 2005 16:24:22 +0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Fixed in previous uploads has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsib

Bug#297323: blitz++: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends

2005-02-28 Thread Steve Langasek
> run > apt-get build-dep blitz++ > before you try to build the package. This installed g77 here. This was being pulled in by blas-dev. The latest version of blas-dev (1.1-14) no longer depends on g77; if blitz++ needs it to build, it should build-depend on it directly. Cheers, -- Steve La

Bug#297284: base: tetex after sarge install not setup correctly

2005-02-28 Thread Jeffrey B. Green
Sent this bug in this morning, however during the day at work I thought that the environment variables that were working from woody might be the problem. So I commented all pertinent to tetex out except for TEXINPUTS and voila, it worked. Before you close out this bug report, you might put in s

Processed: only in sid

2005-02-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 297305 sid Bug#297305: aspell-pt-br: pt_BR-only.rws placed in a wrong directory There were no tags set. Tags added: sid > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (admini

Bug#296835: openafs-modules-source: Fails to build with kernel-source-2.6.10

2005-02-28 Thread Dmitriy Ivanov
Ok thanks. Will check it out when I get a chance. -- Dmitriy Ivanov -- Center for Mind and Brain pgpwGlBnjEhOt.pgp Description: PGP signature

Bug#297323: run apt-get build-dep blitz++

2005-02-28 Thread Martin Lohmeier
Package: blitz++ Version: 1:0.8-3 Followup-For: Bug #297323 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, run apt-get build-dep blitz++ before you try to build the package. This installed g77 here. by, Martin - -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT pol

Bug#296976: marked as done (sgml2x: FTBFS: Permission denied in ELinks)

2005-02-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 28 Feb 2005 17:32:16 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#296976: fixed in sgml2x 1.0.0-9 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

Bug#297479: gvimdiff: relocation error: /usr/lib/libXft.so.2: undefined symbol: XRenderFindStandardFormat

2005-02-28 Thread Arne Romo
Package: libxft2 Version: 2.1.2-6 Severity: critical Justification: breaks unrelated software when using gvimdiff -rv /etc/passwd /etc/group an unresolved symbol is reported (gvimdiff: relocation error: /usr/lib/libXft.so.2: undefined symbol: XRenderFindStandardFormat) gvimdiff is provided by vi

Bug#297470: cacti: rrd location in /var/cache not compliant with fhs

2005-02-28 Thread Sean Finney
Package: cacti Version: 0.6.8a-13.1 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 9.1.1 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 this is really just a note to myself. the fhs mandates that everything in /var/cache should be able to be regenerated if removed, but these rrd files carry historical i

Bug#297200: libpam-mount doesn't work after the last update

2005-02-28 Thread Bastian Kleineidam
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 06:59:41PM +0100, Thomas Kosch wrote: > On Day 59 of Chaos 3171, Bastian Kleineidam wrote: > > nfsmount /bin/mount %(SERVER):%(VOLUME) %(MNTPT) "%(before=\"-o \" OPTIONS)" > That should be ... "%(MNTPT) %(before=\"-o \ ...

Bug#276800: do you want to fix erlang?

2005-02-28 Thread Torsten Werner
Frank Lichtenheld wrote: On Sat, Feb 26, 2005 at 04:04:03PM +0100, Torsten Werner wrote: reassign 294992 erlang merge 294992 276800 Hmm, why did you do that merge? From the bug reports I can't see any connection between them. Apart from the fact that 294992 was tagged "sarge" and 276800 "si

Bug#276800: do you want to fix erlang?

2005-02-28 Thread Torsten Werner
unmerge 294992 276800 reassign 294992 ejabberd thanks Frank Lichtenheld wrote: Hmm, why did you do that merge? Sorry that was wrong. Thanks, Torsten -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#297460: mmx-emu: installs library into /lib

2005-02-28 Thread Philipp Kern
Package: mmx-emu Version: 0.6-3 Severity: serious Justification: violates FHS, thus [9.1.1] mmx-emu installs its library into /lib. The package's priority is ``optional''. As /lib is reserved for any essential shared libraries and kernel modules it should install itself into /usr/lib instead. No b

Processed: Re: Bug#276800: do you want to fix erlang?

2005-02-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > unmerge 294992 276800 Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. > reassign 294992 ejabberd Bug#294992: ejabberd: #282836 is still present in sarge Bug#276800: erlang: Segmentation fault trying to run "erl" Bug#282247: ejabberd: Segmentation fa

Bug#297458: configlet-frontends: libglade-convert: command not found

2005-02-28 Thread Carsten Hey
Package: configlet-frontends Version: 2.4 Severity: grave Hi, # configlets-druid start_configlet: configlet in path /usr/share/configlets/localeconf is bad sh: line 1: libglade-convert: command not found ... libglade-convert is in libglade2/stable and in libglade2-dev/{testing,unstable} config

Processed: Re: gnome-icon-theme: no more icons in nautilus

2005-02-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > forwarded 297207 http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=167942 Bug#297207: gnome-icon-theme: no more icons in nautilus Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=167942. > severity 297207 grave Bug

Processed: severity of 297211 is important

2005-02-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10 > severity 297211 important Bug#297211: analog: hard link error on install Severity set to `important'. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assis

Bug#297162: python-mysql is brocken

2005-02-28 Thread Jonas Meurer
severity 297162 normal tags 297162 unreproducible thanks --- end of instructions for [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- On 27/02/2005 Robert Penz wrote: > Package: python-mysql > Version: 1.1.6-1 > Severity: grave > > In sarge I get following: > > $ python > Python 2.3.5 (#2, Feb 9 2005, 00:38:15) > [GCC 3.

Bug#296536: marked as done (aspell-sl: Needs to be rebuilt for Aspell 0.60)

2005-02-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 28 Feb 2005 13:47:14 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#296536: fixed in aspell-sl 0.60-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#296537: marked as done (aspell-sl: Package is Arch: all but must be changed to Arch: any)

2005-02-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 28 Feb 2005 13:47:14 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#296537: fixed in aspell-sl 0.60-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Processed: Re: Bug#297162: python-mysql is brocken

2005-02-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 297162 normal Bug#297162: python-mysql is brocken Severity set to `normal'. > tags 297162 unreproducible Bug#297162: python-mysql is brocken There were no tags set. Tags added: unreproducible > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact

Bug#297315: libX11-6: missing links

2005-02-28 Thread Julien Cristau
michael, you should copy your replies to the bug report, so that other peoples can read them. (I did this for this one) On 28/02/2005-17:57, michael bane wrote: > On Mon, 2005-02-28 at 17:13 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > > On 28/02/2005-17:06, michael wrote: > > > > > Package: libX11-6 > > > V

Bug#295425: marked as done (aspell-tl: Rebuild required for aspell 0.60)

2005-02-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 28 Feb 2005 13:02:18 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#295425: fixed in ispell-tl 0.02-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#297200: libpam-mount doesn't work after the last update

2005-02-28 Thread Thomas Kosch
On Day 59 of Chaos 3171, Bastian Kleineidam wrote: > Hi Thomas, > > I think the problem is the missing space after the %(MNTPT) in the > nfsmount config. Please try out this new nfs mount configuration: > > nfsmount /bin/mount %(SERVER):%(VOLUME) %(MNTPT) "%(before=\"-o \" OPTIONS)" That should be

Bug#297284: base: tetex after sarge install not setup correctly

2005-02-28 Thread Frank Küster
"Jeffrey B. Green" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Package: base > Severity: grave > > Installed sarge this last weekend That is, you installed from scratch, it wasn't an upgrade from woody, right? > and now trying to latex a document, but > having a cascade of problems in getting it to work. Un

Bug#297328: marked as done (bluez-utils: FTBFS: Link error)

2005-02-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 28 Feb 2005 16:59:47 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#297328: bluez-utils: FTBFS: Link error has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#297328: bluez-utils: FTBFS: Link error

2005-02-28 Thread Daniel Schepler
Package: bluez-utils Severity: serious Version: 2.15-1 >From my build log, using pbuilder in an i386 chroot: ... cc -I/usr/include -DDBUS_API_SUBJECT_TO_CHANGE -I/usr/include/dbus-1.0 -I/usr/lib/dbus-1.0/include -DENABLE_DBUS -DDBUS_API_SUBJECT_TO_CHANGE -g -Wall -O2 -o hcid main.o security.

Bug#297323: blitz++: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends

2005-02-28 Thread Daniel Schepler
Package: blitz++ Severity: serious Version: 1:0.8-3 >From my build log, using pbuilder in an i386 chroot: ... -> Installing g++ blas-dev debhelper tetex-bin texi2html ... checking for xlf... no checking for ifort... no checking for ifc... no checking for f77... no checking for g77... no checkin

Bug#297284: Reassigning from base to tetex-base

2005-02-28 Thread Helge Kreutzmann
reassign 297284 tetex-base thanks Can you please provide the "r" script you use? Greetings Helge -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann, Dipl.-Phys. [EMAIL PROTECTED] gpg signed mail preferred 64bit GNU powered http://www.itp.uni-hannover.de/~kr

Bug#297309: libieee1284-3: udev (0.054-1) device naming brakes this library

2005-02-28 Thread Julien BLACHE
retitle 297309 udev (0.054-1) breaks device naming scheme severity 297309 important tags 297309 - patch thanks Hi, > udev (0.054-1) alters the naming scheme /dev/parport[0..9] to > /dev/parports/[0..9] and breaks libieee1284 by that. > A patch to adapt libieee1284 to use the new names is attached

Processed: Reassigning from base to tetex-base

2005-02-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 297284 tetex-base Bug#297284: base: tetex after sarge install not setup correctly Bug reassigned from package `base' to `tetex-base'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system adm

Processed: Re: Bug#297309: libieee1284-3: udev (0.054-1) device naming brakes this library

2005-02-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 297309 udev (0.054-1) breaks device naming scheme Bug#297309: libieee1284-3: udev (0.054-1) device naming breaks this library Changed Bug title. > severity 297309 important Bug#297309: udev (0.054-1) breaks device naming scheme Severity set to

Bug#297315: marked as done (libX11-6: missing links)

2005-02-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 28 Feb 2005 17:13:16 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#297315: libX11-6: missing links has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

Bug#295832: Solution to this bug

2005-02-28 Thread Alexander E. Patrakov
This bug is also present in previous versions of slirp if one compiles them with gcc-3.3 or gcc-3.4. The manifestation is that all TCP packets are discarded as having wrong checksum. There was already a discussion of a similar issue on qemu-devel list. Solution: add -fno-strict-aliasing to all

Bug#295775: marked as done (Build-depends on libhowl-dev, which will become non-free or removed)

2005-02-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 28 Feb 2005 10:02:44 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#295775: fixed in gnome-vfs2 2.8.4-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#297315: libX11-6: missing links

2005-02-28 Thread michael
Package: libX11-6 Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 Severity: grave Tags: patch Justification: renders package unusable On my system I had to put these symbolic links lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 11 Feb 28 14:47 libXpm.so -> libXpm.so.4 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 12 Feb 28 13:48 libXext.so -> libXext.so.

Bug#297020: marked as done (dbus-1-dev: Version 0.23.2 breaks API)

2005-02-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 28 Feb 2005 10:02:27 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#297020: fixed in dbus 0.23.2-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#297198: Me Too

2005-02-28 Thread Olaf van der Spek
Just wanted to add a me too. # apt-get dist-upgrade Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... Done Calculating Upgrade... Done The following NEW packages will be installed: gawk The following packages will be upgraded: mysql-server-4.1 1 upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove

Processed: retitle 297309 to libieee1284-3: udev (0.054-1) device naming breaks this library

2005-02-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10 > retitle 297309 libieee1284-3: udev (0.054-1) device naming breaks this library Bug#297309: libieee1284-3: udev (0.054-1) device naming brakes this library Changed Bug title. > End of

Bug#294271: marked as done (IDN support allows domain name spoofing)

2005-02-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 28 Feb 2005 09:50:59 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#294271: fixed in kdelibs 4:3.3.2-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#297309: libieee1284-3: udev (0.054-1) device naming brakes this library

2005-02-28 Thread Philipp Sadleder
Package: libieee1284-3 Version: 0.2.8-2 Severity: grave Tags: patch Justification: renders package unusable udev (0.054-1) alters the naming scheme /dev/parport[0..9] to /dev/parports/[0..9] and breaks libieee1284 by that. A patch to adapt libieee1284 to use the new names is attached. Best regard

Bug#297305: aspell-pt-br: pt_BR-only.rws placed in a wrong directory

2005-02-28 Thread Rafael Ãvila de EspÃndola
Package: aspell-pt-br Version: 2.4.really.3.0.beta4-8 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable pt_BR-only.rws is installed in /usr/lib/aspell. Running aspell -c -l pt_BR produces the error: Error: The file "/usr/lib/aspell-0.60/pt_BR-only.rws" can not be opened for reading. movi

Bug#297123: openldap2.2: FTBFS in experimental

2005-02-28 Thread Torsten Landschoff
Hi Kenshi, On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 10:30:02PM +0900, Kenshi Muto wrote: > openldap2.2.23-0.pre3 still cause same build failure because missing > perl library. *blush* I really wonder how that happened. The build dependency is still missing but I am 100% sure I added it and test built using pdebu

Bug#297200: libpam-mount doesn't work after the last update

2005-02-28 Thread Bastian Kleineidam
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Thomas, I think the problem is the missing space after the %(MNTPT) in the nfsmount config. Please try out this new nfs mount configuration: nfsmount /bin/mount %(SERVER):%(VOLUME) %(MNTPT) "%(before=\"-o \" OPTIONS)" If it works I will release a

Bug#297200: libpam-mount doesn't work after the last update

2005-02-28 Thread Thomas Kosch
On Day 59 of Chaos 3171, Bastian Kleineidam wrote: > Hi Thomas, > > On Sun, Feb 27, 2005 at 10:46:26PM +0100, Thomas Kosch wrote: >> pam_mount: mount: mount point /home/thomas.kosch/video -o >> nosuid,nodev,noexec,hard,intr does not exist >> >> pam_mount: waiting for mount >> pam_mount: mount of

Processed: Re: exim4: option "local_scan_path" unknown

2005-02-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity #297282 serious Bug#297282: exim4: option "local_scan_path" unknown Severity set to `serious'. > tags #297282 sid Bug#297282: exim4: option "local_scan_path" unknown There were no tags set. Tags added: sid > thanks Stopping processing here.

Bug#297123: openldap2.2: FTBFS in experimental

2005-02-28 Thread Kenshi Muto
reopen 297123 thanks openldap2.2.23-0.pre3 still cause same build failure because missing perl library. Get:1 http://ftp2.de.debian.org ../project/experimental/main openldap2.2 2.2.23-0.pre3 (dsc) [982B] Get:2 http://ftp2.de.debian.org ../project/experimental/main openldap2.2 2.2.23-0.pre3 (tar

Bug#297284: base: tetex after sarge install not setup correctly

2005-02-28 Thread Jeffrey B. Green
Package: base Severity: grave Installed sarge this last weekend and now trying to latex a document, but having a cascade of problems in getting it to work. First problem is: /home/jeff/unk/250/exams/1[429] r lat latex wrapper This is e-TeX, Version 3.14159-2.1 (Web2C 7.4.5) kpathsea: Running mk

Bug#282342: (no subject)

2005-02-28 Thread Daniel Baumann
With 0.4.2-1, the ole2 plugin skipped on hppa (and powerpc). Read README.Debian for more information. -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, em

Processed: your mail

2005-02-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 282342 ole2-plugin fails on HPPA/PowerPC Bug#282342: libextractor: FTBFS: Linking to static version of gobject-2.0 when making shared object. Changed Bug title. > severity 282342 normal Bug#282342: ole2-plugin fails on HPPA/PowerPC Severity se

Processed: reopening 295775

2005-02-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10 > reopen 295775 Bug#295775: Build-depends on libhowl-dev, which will become non-free or removed Bug reopened, originator not changed. > End of message, stopping processing here. Pleas

Processed: tagging 294499

2005-02-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 294499 - patch Bug#294499: php4 wrappers broken for thread-safe php Tags were: confirmed upstream patch Tags removed: patch > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administ

Bug#296266: greylistd: fails to install

2005-02-28 Thread Laurent Fousse
* Steve Langasek [2005-02-26]: > > IIRC, it failed in greylistd.postinst right after: > > > . /usr/share/debconf/confmodule > > > so it's likely not a bug in greylistd, but somewhere between debconf > > and/or ash. It looks a lot like #242011. > > No, this is completely unrelated to #242011. Th

Bug#297181: auctex dont't install

2005-02-28 Thread Frank Küster
Jean-Jacques Rétorré <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb: > Package: auctex > Version: 11.55-1 > Severity: grave > Justification: renders package unusable > > `aptitude install auctex` report: > Unpacking auctex (from .../auctex_11.55-1_all.deb) ... > Setting up auctex (11.55-1) ... > install/auctex: Set

Bug#279313: marked as done (synaptic: pseudo bug to keep the latest upload from entering test)

2005-02-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 28 Feb 2005 11:33:49 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line closing has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t

Bug#297200: libpam-mount doesn't work after the last update

2005-02-28 Thread Bastian Kleineidam
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Thomas, On Sun, Feb 27, 2005 at 10:46:26PM +0100, Thomas Kosch wrote: > pam_mount: mount: mount point /home/thomas.kosch/video -o > nosuid,nodev,noexec,hard,intr does not exist > > pam_mount: waiting for mount > pam_mount: mount of /home/thomas.k

Bug#244276: marked as done (tex4ht: source code is obfuscated)

2005-02-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 28 Feb 2005 05:17:21 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#244276: fixed in tex4ht 20050216.2023-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#276964: phpbb2-conf-mysql: I reported same problem

2005-02-28 Thread Herbert Xu
On Sun, Feb 27, 2005 at 08:18:09PM +, Gerrit Pape wrote: > > Hi Herbert, this does fine with the subshell. Unfortunately I stumbled > across another problem with these patches as well as with the previous > single one. After the EXEVAL exception is raised in the or list, dash > stops process

Bug#294175: unable to remove package

2005-02-28 Thread Cesar Martinez Izquierdo
El Lunes 28 Febrero 2005 08:46, Steve Langasek escribió: > $ wget > http://users.evtek.fi/~k0400388/debian/mozilla-firefox-locale-all/1.0lang20 >041216/mozilla-firefox-locale-all_1.0lang20041216-3.diff.gz --22:45:21-- > http://users.evtek.fi/%7Ek0400388/debian/mozilla-firefox-locale-all/1.0lang >20

Bug#296628: Only force-reload is mandatory

2005-02-28 Thread jdthood
Only the force-reload method is mandatory. The reload method is not. (Policy 9.3.2.) -- Thomas Hood -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: new version in sid

2005-02-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 295902 sid Bug#295902: FTBFS: socketapi_1.3.1-5_arm: needs libtool update for arm There were no tags set. Tags added: sid > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (admi