Bug#295804: libjack0.80.0-dev has no Dependencies

Package: libjack0.80.0-dev Version: 0.99.0-5 Severity: grave For 0.99.0-4: $ dpkg -s libjack0.80.0-dev | grep Depends Depends: libjack0.80.0-0 (= 0.99.0-4), libasound2-dev, libglib1.2-dev, pkg-config For 0.99.0-5: $ dpkg -f libjack0.80.0-dev_0.99.0-5_i386.deb |grep Depends $ This caused the als

Processed: [Micah Anderson ] Bug#295751: Err, sorry wrong bug

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 295751 normal Bug#295751: webmin-ldap-useradmin cannot create new user Severity set to `normal'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bug

Bug#295751: Err, sorry wrong bug

I accidentally changed the severity on this bug due to a mistype of the bug number. However, it does appear as if this package is orphaned, and it doesn't seem to be working... so perhaps this was a good thing. micah -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe".

Bug#286940: marked as done (php4 updates (4.3.10-2 tested) break turck-mmcache)

Your message dated Thu, 17 Feb 2005 23:32:24 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#286940: fixed in turck-mmcache 2.4.6-9 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#294004: marked as done (turck-mmcache: phpapi revision requires a new upload in sid)

Your message dated Thu, 17 Feb 2005 23:32:24 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#294004: fixed in turck-mmcache 2.4.6-9 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#295511: [tore@debian.org: Bug#295511: Fork bomb in default make completion]

I can reproduce this. http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi/Makefile?bug=295511&msg=3&att=1 I'm attaching the trace (up 'til I killed it) gzipped. - Forwarded message from Tore Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - When trying to tab complete anything after make in a directory with th

Bug#293815: marked as done (libimlib2 version 1.2.0 breaks libimage-imlib2-perl)

Your message dated Thu, 17 Feb 2005 20:42:32 -0600 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line libimlib2 version 1.2.0 breaks libimage-imlib2-perl has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the ca

Bug#295511: marked as forwarded (Fork bomb in default make completion)

Your message dated Thu, 17 Feb 2005 21:41:24 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> has caused the Debian Bug report #295511, regarding Fork bomb in default make completion to be marked as having been forwarded to the upstream software author(s) [EMAIL PROTECTED] (NB: If you are a system admini

Bug#289182: [Kino-dev] [schmitz@zirkon.biophys.uni-duesseldorf.de: Bug#289182: kino endianness issues on powerpc]

Hi, Has there been any movement regarding endian issues in Kino? Are there any patches I can try to clean some up, or perhaps test? Daniel Kobras wrote: Moi! I've received a bug report (quoted below) by a Debian user about multiple endianness issues when trying to use kino on a powerpc system. A

Processed: fixed package has reached testing

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 291251 -sarge Bug#291251: CAN-2005-0064: Arbitrary code execution in kpdf Tags were: sarge security patch Bug#291270: kpdf: vulnerable to CAN-2005-0064, buffer overflow in xpdf Tags removed: sarge > close 291251 Bug#291251: CAN-2005-0064: Arbitrar

Bug#295012: marked as done (aspell-ca: Support for pending Aspell 0.60)

Your message dated Thu, 17 Feb 2005 20:17:20 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#295012: fixed in ispellcat 0.4-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#295638: rdiff-backup: appears to have disappeared

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, in the source tree, do a "echo 4 > debian/compat". Then rebuild the package. Regards, Bastian - -- ,''`. Bastian Kleineidam : :' :GnuPG SchlÃssel `. `'gpg --keyserver wwwkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys 32E

Bug#295778: hicolor-icon-theme: Generic icons on desktop

Package: hicolor-icon-theme Version: 0.7-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Problem with this package : there are missing icons in the package which result in generic icons everywhere -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'uns

Bug#295777: hicolor-icon-theme: (ppc) Package is almost empty : there are only generic icons on my desktop after update.

Package: hicolor-icon-theme Version: 0.7-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: powerpc (ppc) Kernel: Linux 2.6.9 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charm

Bug#295315: marked as done (pppoeconf: sed command fails when user contains a / character)

Your message dated Thu, 17 Feb 2005 19:17:31 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#295315: fixed in pppoeconf 1.1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Processed: unreproducible bug, probably user error?

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 294247 important Bug#294247: libapache-mod-auth-pam: PAM authentification doesn't work after upgrading Severity set to `important'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system admi

Processed: tagging 295638

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10 > tags 295638 + patch Bug#295638: rdiff-backup: appears to have disappeared Tags were: sid Tags added: patch > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need

Bug#288464: marked as done (python2.3-tables: depends on libucl0 available only in stable)

Your message dated Thu, 17 Feb 2005 18:56:55 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#288464: fixed in pytables 0.9.1-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#289856: mdnsresponder: Wrong license

clone 289856 -1 -2 -3 reassign -1 daapd retitle -1 Build-depends on libhowl-dev, which will become non-free or removed reassign -2 gnome-vfs2 retitle -2 Build-depends on libhowl-dev, which will become non-free or removed reassign -3 supercollider retitle -3 Build-depends on libhowl-dev, which will

Bug#291784: marked as done (zopeinterface_3.0.0-2(hppa/unstable): FTBFS: missing build-depends?)

Your message dated Thu, 17 Feb 2005 18:57:06 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#291784: fixed in zopeinterface 3.0.0-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Processed: Re: mdnsresponder: Wrong license

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > clone 289856 -1 -2 -3 Bug#289856: mdnsresponder: Wrong license Bug 289856 cloned as bugs 295774-295776. > reassign -1 daapd Bug#295774: mdnsresponder: Wrong license Bug reassigned from package `mdnsresponder' to `daapd'. > retitle -1 Build-depends on

Processed: severity of 295751 is grave

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10 > severity 295751 grave Bug#295751: webmin-ldap-useradmin cannot create new user Severity set to `grave'. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need ass

Bug#294895: Patch for a2ps

Hi, I am sending patch for its package. I wait that this decides the BUG and that this package is in sarge. The archive control was modified by understanding that in this case pre-depends cannot be applied. I made the installation and removal of the package and got success. Regards, -- Rodrigo

Bug#295149: kernel-package: it fails to build my kernel

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, the latest kernel-package version builds fine on my system. I see that you used the := initialization for the kernel version variables. This also fixed the performance problems, thanks! Regards, Bastian - -- ,''`. Bastian Kl

Processed: tagging 295315

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10 > tags 295315 patch Bug#295315: pppoeconf: sed command fails when user contains a / character There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > End of message, stopping processing here. Ple

Bug#295315: pppoeconf: sed command fails when user contains a / character

Eduard Bloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > #include > * Leopold BAILLY [Tue, Feb 15 2005, 12:38:28AM]: > >> The use of "grep -v" should be more appropriate. > > Could you test the attached version? I did and it works : the previous content of pap-secrets and chap-secrets is no more lost. But, f

Bug#295761: aspell-pt-br: uninstallable in sid

Package: aspell-pt-br Version: 2.4.really.3.0.beta4-7 Severity: grave Tags: sid Justification: renders package unusable This package needs to be updated to the new aspell versions. It is currently uninstalable. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (990,

Bug#294946: marked as done (therion in sarge lacks a dependency on tetex-extra)

Your message dated Thu, 17 Feb 2005 12:51:43 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line tagged for removal, and bug does not exist in unstable has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the

Bug#295425: aspell-tl: Rebuild required for aspell 0.60

Hi, Thanks for the notice. I'm working on it. tl_affix.dat just takes a bit of time since I have to coordinate with the maintainer. Cheers, -- Jan Alonzo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> pgp7aV2egqkE1.pgp Description: PGP signature

Processed: Re: openoffice.org-thesaurus-it: should be Arch all

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 289622 patch Bug#289622: openoffice.org-thesaurus-it: should be Arch all There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrat

Bug#289622: openoffice.org-thesaurus-it: should be Arch all

tags 289622 patch thanks Hi again, I'm uploading a 0-day NMU for this issue. Patch is attached. Cheers, -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer diff -Nru /var/tmp/WIHV4tLOZX/openoffice.org-thesaurus-it-0+20041114.2/debian/changelog /var/tmp/alpRwtWDuJ/openoffice.org-thesaurus-it-0+20041114.2

Bug#289622: better patch

revised patch: fixes a lintian warning about Build-Depends used for an arch: all package. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Processed: Fixed in NMU of openoffice.org-thesaurus-it 0+20041114.2-0.1

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 289622 + fixed Bug#289622: openoffice.org-thesaurus-it: should be Arch all Tags were: patch Tags added: fixed > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debi

Bug#295736: stella: Stella does not work. I get only "Abgebrochen" on Konsole.

Package: stella Version: 1.4.1-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Stella on 64-Bit does not work on my computer. With the same command, the 32-Bit stella works fine when I boot 32-Bit Sarge. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 64-Bit Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Ke

Bug#295713: Exim 3 is obsolete and should be removed from future releases

severity 295713 normal thanks Nigel Metheringham wrote: Future debian releases should either:- * Not provide an exim 3 package and obsolete it so that existing installations are upgraded to exim4. * Very clearly mark the package as deprecated so that users do not continuing

Processed: "sarge" tags behave counterintuitively here

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 294719 -sarge Bug#294719: wdm: can't fulfill the build dependencies in sarge Tags were: sarge Tags removed: sarge > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrato

Bug#295415: amavis-ng: Fails to start with perl errors

Stefan Hornburg wrote: How does the Courier section of your amavis-ng configuration file looks like ? [Courier] ;; Location and arguments of the binary sendmail = /usr/sbin/sendmail args = -- Best regards, Black Dew. == ~ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ ICQ:206 ~ 2:400/567 ~ -

Bug#295687: marked as done (base-config: late_command run with TMPDIR not world-writable)

Your message dated Thu, 17 Feb 2005 12:17:04 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#295687: fixed in base-config 2.62 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#295718: gnupg: sha1 is broken

severity 295718 important thanks Markus Schaber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Package: gnupg > Version: 1.2.5-3 > Severity: grave > Justification: user security hole > > Hi, > > As Bruce Schneier reports at http://www.schneier.com/blog/ the SHA-! > algorithm seems broken. >From that webpage: "At

Processed: Re: Bug#295718: gnupg: sha1 is broken

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 295718 important Bug#295718: gnupg: sha1 is broken Severity set to `important'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) --

Bug#295718: gnupg: sha1 is broken

Package: gnupg Version: 1.2.5-3 Severity: grave Justification: user security hole Hi, As Bruce Schneier reports at http://www.schneier.com/blog/ the SHA-! algorithm seems broken. GnuPG should be changed to give strong warings whenever SHA-1 is used, and maybe disable the usage of SHA-1 for new s

Processed: Re: Bug#295687: base-config: late_command run with TMPDIR not world-writable

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 295687 serious Bug#295687: base-config: late_command run with TMPDIR not world-writable Severity set to `serious'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (adminis

Bug#295714: gftp: DSA 686-1: directory traversal vulnerability

Package: gftp Version: 2.0.17+cvs20050102-3 Severity: critical Tags: security, sarge DSA 686-1: -- Albert Puigsech Galicia discovered a directory traversal vulnerability in a proprietary FTP client (CAN-2004-1376) which is also present in gftp, a GTK+ FTP client. A malicious server could

Bug#295713: Exim 3 is obsolete and should be removed from future releases

Package: exim Version: 3.36-13 Severity: grave Exim version 3.x has been obsolete for 3 years now. Support is not available for it other than within the debian community. The exim developers no longer provide any support at all for it *including* security updates other than the recommendation to

Processed: your mail

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 190662 patch Bug#190662: pydb: cont not working, run after C-c not working There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > tags 285902 patch Bug#285902: CAN-2004-1294: Arbitrary file overwrite vulnerability Tags were: fixed-upstream security upstream

Bug#295415: amavis-ng: Fails to start with perl errors

On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 15:20:54 +0200 "Black Dew" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > After applying the patch, i get: > > AMAVIS: Couldn't init AMAVIS::MTA::Courier: at > /usr/share/perl5/AMAVIS.pm line 235, line 520. How does the Courier section of your amavis-ng configuration file looks like ? Bye

Processed: a missing dependency is RC

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 281392 grave Bug#281392: eieio: should depend upon cedet-common Severity set to `grave'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs databa

Bug#295614: Fails to purge correctly

Thanks Andrew. That did the trick. If you have an opportunity, please use my home address <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> if I happen to be referenced. Cheers, Jason On Feb 16, 2005, at 5:17 PM, Andrew Pollock wrote: Package: argus-server Severity: grave On Wed, Feb 16, 2005 at 01:14:31PM -0600, Jason Wohlfo

Bug#292137: half-patch for gramofile's bplay.c

On Tue, Feb 01, 2005 at 05:33:41PM +, Paul Brossier wrote: > nice. attached is the patch corrected for fmtheaders (could benefit > fiddling a bit with the line numbers to avoid the warnings). your patch > seems to produce cleaner files than mine (aplay like them), altough i > still get Prematur

Bug#295415: amavis-ng: Fails to start with perl errors

After applying the patch, i get: AMAVIS: Couldn't init AMAVIS::MTA::Courier: at /usr/share/perl5/AMAVIS.pm line 235, line 520. -- Best regards, Black Dew. == ~ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ ICQ:206 ~ 2:400/567 ~ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject

Bug#295263: marked as done (ipsec-tools_0.4999pre0.5rc2-2(ia64/unstable): FTBFS: missing build-depends)

Your message dated Thu, 17 Feb 2005 07:32:15 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#295263: fixed in ipsec-tools 0.4999pre0.5rc2-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the cas

Processed: BTS corrections after security upload of awstats

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reopen 291064,294488, 293668 Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. > tags 291064 - sid Bug#291064: Arbitrary command execution Tags were: fixed sid patch sarge security Bug#291306: awstats: possible remote command execution vulnerability (

Bug#295548: Merging bugs

Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: > > These bugs are the same, and it seems that indeed there was a mistake when > > making the package. I hope it can be fixed soon. > > Security team, Joey, > > It seems the most recent evolution security update had a regression > w.r.t. SSL support, not unlikely cau

Bug#294247: libapache-mod-auth-pam: PAM authentification doesn't work after upgrading

tags 294247 + unreproducible stop Am Dienstag, 8. Februar 2005 19:46 schrieb Guillaume Morin: > After upgrading libapache-mod-auth-pam, my pam authentification through > apache doesn't work anymore. I tried the configuration you showed but the authentication worked. On this host, PAM goes throu

Processed: Re: Bug#294247: libapache-mod-auth-pam: PAM authentification doesn't work after upgrading

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 294247 + unreproducible Bug#294247: libapache-mod-auth-pam: PAM authentification doesn't work after upgrading There were no tags set. Tags added: unreproducible > stop Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian b

Processed: Re: Merging bugs

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 295548 woody Bug#295548: Security update version of Evolution on 10/02/05 removed SSL support There were no tags set. Tags added: woody > severity 295548 serious Bug#295548: Security update version of Evolution on 10/02/05 removed SSL support Seve

Processed: Fixed in NMU of ipython 0.6.5-1.1

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 294500 + fixed Bug#294500: ipython breaks because profile.py is removed in the latest dsfg-free python 2.3. Tags were: patch Tags added: fixed > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system

Bug#295657: EXT3 on RAID problems in all 2.6-smp

Package: kernel-image-2.6.10-1-686-smp Version: 2.6.10-4 Severity: critical 2 months ago I bought 4 new hard drives, which I configured as follows: - | Linux | Swap | RAIDSET-1 disk 1 | -

Bug#294500: NMU of ipython

I NMUed IPython (0.6.5-1.1) to fix this bug. Thanks for the patch. -Steven -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: only in sid

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 295638 sid Bug#295638: rdiff-backup: appears to have disappeared There were no tags set. Tags added: sid > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian

Processed: who, me, critical?

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 295221 serious Bug#295221: twiki: Twiki should depend on libtext-diff-perl and not provide these files Severity set to `serious'. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking syst

Bug#295633: expect_5.42.1-1.2(i386/unstable): FTBFS: really build-depends autoconf2.13

tags 295633 unreproducible severity 295633 important thanks Hi LaMont, I'm not sure where this bug is coming from, but version 5.42.1-1.2 has successfully build from source on all architectures, continues to build correctly in i386 pbuilder for me, and is the explicit result of an NMU that *updat

Processed: Re: Processed: Merging bugs

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 295248 wishlist Bug#295248: tex4ht: interested in providing a patch for the upgrade Severity set to `wishlist'. > merge 295248 268126 Bug#268126: ITA: tex4ht -- LaTeX and TeX for Hypertext (HTML) Bug#295248: tex4ht: interested in providing a

Processed: Re: expect_5.42.1-1.2(i386/unstable): FTBFS: really build-depends autoconf2.13

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 295633 unreproducible Bug#295633: expect_5.42.1-1.2(i386/unstable): FTBFS: really build-depends autoconf2.13 Tags were: patch Tags added: unreproducible > severity 295633 important Bug#295633: expect_5.42.1-1.2(i386/unstable): FTBFS: really build

Bug#294867: base: de4x5.ko generates endless loop of errors with phobos p430tx

> Now I see that de4x5 used to be blacklisted by default by hotplug, but I > removed last year when somebody told me that the driver was obsolete. > Please let me know if you will finally kill it or I have to add it again > to the default blacklist. As of 2.4.27-2, de4x5 appears to still be the mo

Processed: severity of 294647 is grave, tagging 294647

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.6 > severity 294647 grave Bug#294647: mailman: postinst error on security update Severity set to `grave'. > tags 294647 woody Bug#294647: mailman: postinst error on security update There

Processed: whoops, NMU

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reopen 292237 Bug#292237: manpage looks not distributeable, as license not adhered Bug reopened, originator not changed. > tags 292237 +fixed Bug#292237: manpage looks not distributeable, as license not adhered Tags were: patch Tags added: fixed > tha

Processed: frozen package approved for sarge

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 292237 -sarge Bug#292237: manpage looks not distributeable, as license not adhered Tags were: sarge patch Tags removed: sarge > close 292237 Bug#292237: manpage looks not distributeable, as license not adhered 'close' is deprecated; see http://www

Processed: packages reaching sarge tomorrow

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 273590 -sarge Bug#273590: init.d script is noisy if LANG is set in /etc/environment twice Tags were: sarge patch Bug#292112: en_US.UTF-8: command not found Tags removed: sarge > close 273590 Bug#273590: init.d script is noisy if LANG is set in /et

Bug#294817: marked as done (mailman: Can not go to private archives)

Your message dated Thu, 17 Feb 2005 09:10:16 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Fixed in -7 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reop

Bug#295187: marked as done (mailman: Web archive don't work)

Your message dated Thu, 17 Feb 2005 09:10:16 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Fixed in -7 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reop

Processed: woody bug

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 295575 woody Bug#295575: evolution: woody2 disables SSL There were no tags set. Tags added: woody > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs d