clone 289856 -1 -2 -3 reassign -1 daapd retitle -1 Build-depends on libhowl-dev, which will become non-free or removed reassign -2 gnome-vfs2 retitle -2 Build-depends on libhowl-dev, which will become non-free or removed reassign -3 supercollider retitle -3 Build-depends on libhowl-dev, which will become non-free or removed thanks
On Thu, Jan 20, 2005 at 01:30:53AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > Above and beyond the issue of distributing code without proper license > notices, the APSL 2.0 is not, in the opinion of many (and AFAICT, according > to the consensus of the debian-legal mailing list), a free license under the > DFSG. Although there's been extensive discussion about *which* points of > the license are actually DFSG problems, the questionable clauses are > multiple. So, the 'howl' source package, building the libhowl-dev package amongst others, will either need to be removed, or moved to non-free. In either of those two cases, the main packages build-depending on it should stop doing so. --Jeroen -- Jeroen van Wolffelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
