Hi,
On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 04:56:04PM +0300, Dmitry Shachnev wrote:
>
> Because mathjax 3.x is not compatible with 2.x [1], and given the number
> of packages that currently depend on libjs-mathjax, I think 3.x should be
> a separate package.
>
> So maybe retitle this bug to ITP?
>
> I will co
Hi all,
On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 03:00:38PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Xavier,
>
> I've noticed you prepared mathjax 3.0 in Git. Is there any reason not
> to upload it? I'd be really interested to have not only 3.0 but rather
> the latest 3.1.2.
Because mathjax 3.x is not compatible with 2
Hi Xavier,
I've noticed you prepared mathjax 3.0 in Git. Is there any reason not
to upload it? I'd be really interested to have not only 3.0 but rather
the latest 3.1.2.
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
Hi Norbert!
On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 05:38:23PM +0900, Norbert Preining wrote:
> Dear maintainer,
>
> mathjax3 has been released quite some time ago, and for reverse deps we
> (in calibre) need mathjax3. Also, functionality and performanc wise it
> is recommendable.
FWIW, I am looking for a new ma
Package: libjs-mathjax
Version: 2.7.8+dfsg-1
Severity: normal
Dear maintainer,
mathjax3 has been released quite some time ago, and for reverse deps we
(in calibre) need mathjax3. Also, functionality and performanc wise it
is recommendable.
Thanks
Norbert
-- System Information:
Debian Release:
5 matches
Mail list logo
