Bug#953724: package description

2020-07-08 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Quoting Osamu Aoki (2020-07-06 03:26:50) > Jonas > > Rest assured I "removed lines" > > What I did: > > * Knock-out incorrect package description lines. > * Keep copyright parsing python code as is > * Keep encouraging statement in template file to use licensecheck > > Sorry for my confusin

Bug#953724: package description

2020-07-05 Thread Osamu Aoki
Jonas Rest assured I "removed lines" What I did: * Knock-out incorrect package description lines. * Keep copyright parsing python code as is * Keep encouraging statement in template file to use licensecheck Sorry for my confusing message :-) I didn't go for "different" thinking that I may

Bug#953724: package description

2020-07-05 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Quoting Osamu Aoki (2020-07-05 16:25:40) > Control: tags -1 pending > > (Patch commuted to salsa.) > > Yes your updated licensecheck is as good in functionality with > > --deb-machine > > option! This is incorrect. > > I admit my script has some shortcomings. But I also realize replacing >

Bug#953724: package description

2020-07-05 Thread Osamu Aoki
Control: tags -1 pending (Patch commuted to salsa.) Yes your updated licensecheck is as good in functionality with --deb-machine option! This is incorrect. I admit my script has some shortcomings. But I also realize replacing it with your licensecheck doesn't solve this. So I will keep it