Quoting Osamu Aoki (2020-07-05 16:25:40) > Control: tags -1 pending > > (Patch commuted to salsa.) > > Yes your updated licensecheck is as good in functionality with > > --deb-machine > > option! This is incorrect. > > I admit my script has some shortcomings. But I also realize replacing > it with your licensecheck doesn't solve this. So I will keep it as is > while urging people to use licensecheck in generated template file.
You mean that you will keep the package description as-is? Please consider _reprhasing_ (not removing), to avoid users misreading it as debmake being a superset of licensecheck which is not true. Concretely, I propose to replace the word "more" with the word "different". - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
signature.asc
Description: signature
