So the current Array::IntSpan maintainer managed to track down the
original author, which has agreed to relicense to Artistic-2.0, which
resolves this issue.
Quoting Sandro Mani (2020-02-24 15:16:16)
>
> On 24.02.20 15:14, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > Quoting Sandro Mani (2020-02-24 14:29:41)
> >> On 24.02.20 13:16, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> >>> I'll go with applying the patch, and make a note in the rpm
> >>> specfile
> that it is a temporary hac
Quoting Sandro Mani (2020-02-24 14:29:41)
>
> On 24.02.20 13:16, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > I'll go with applying the patch, and make a note in the rpm specfile
> >> that it is a temporary hack and causes the deficiencies you
> >> describe.
> > Your call :-)
>
> Could you confirm whether the te
On 24.02.20 15:14, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Quoting Sandro Mani (2020-02-24 14:29:41)
On 24.02.20 13:16, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
I'll go with applying the patch, and make a note in the rpm specfile
that it is a temporary hack and causes the deficiencies you
describe.
Your call :-)
Could you
On 24.02.20 13:16, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
I'll go with applying the patch, and make a note in the rpm specfile
that it is a temporary hack and causes the deficiencies you describe.
Your call :-)
Could you confirm whether the temporary hack would result in the same
level of accuracy licens
Quoting Sandro Mani (2020-02-24 12:26:34)
>
> On 24.02.20 12:21, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> >
> >>> If you do choose to carry this patch, then I kindly request that you
> >>> document clearly that you are effectively distributing a fork of the
> >>> code, so that your users do not get the false imp
On 24.02.20 12:21, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
If you do choose to carry this patch, then I kindly request that you
document clearly that you are effectively distributing a fork of the
code, so that your users do not get the false impression that the
quality of your licensecheck is on par with th
Quoting Sandro Mani (2020-02-24 12:04:34)
> On 24.02.20 11:58, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > Quoting Sandro Mani (2020-02-24 10:12:50)
> >> Since I need to update the package in Fedora (it is currently broken),
> >> I've prepared the patch below to remove the dependency. Can you
> >> perhaps confirm
Hi Jonas
On 24.02.20 11:58, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Hi Sandro,
Quoting Sandro Mani (2020-02-24 10:12:50)
Since I need to update the package in Fedora (it is currently broken),
I've prepared the patch below to remove the dependency. Can you
perhaps confirm that it does not fundamentally break l
Hi Sandro,
Quoting Sandro Mani (2020-02-24 10:12:50)
> Since I need to update the package in Fedora (it is currently broken),
> I've prepared the patch below to remove the dependency. Can you
> perhaps confirm that it does not fundamentally break licensecheck in
> some way?
> From my tests, it
Hi Jonas
Since I need to update the package in Fedora (it is currently broken),
I've prepared the patch below to remove the dependency. Can you perhaps
confirm that it does not fundamentally break licensecheck in some way?
From my tests, it appears to work.
Thanks
Sandro
diff -rupN A
Hi Sandro,
Quoting Sandro Mani (2020-02-12 00:24:50)
> The perl Array-IntSpan module is licensed Artistic v1 [1], but this
> license is considered a non-free license [2] and not allowed in Fedora
> [3].
>
> As such, Fedora won't be able to ship newer versions of licensecheck
> as long as there
Package: licensecheck
Version: 3.0.41
The perl Array-IntSpan module is licensed Artistic v1 [1], but this
license is considered a non-free license [2] and not allowed in Fedora [3].
As such, Fedora won't be able to ship newer versions of licensecheck as
long as there is a dependency on this m
13 matches
Mail list logo
